[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(extras...@fedorap ||roject.org) --- Comment #26 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-03-27 03:04:44 EDT --- Any additional comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #1 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-03-27 03:06:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase-1.1.0.20090327-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-extraphrase.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 --- Comment #7 from Caius "kaio" Chance 2009-03-27 03:08:06 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi-1.1.0.20090327-1.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-wubi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491875] Review Request: unzoo - ZOO archive extractor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491875 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(jussi.leht...@iki | |.fi)| --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 03:13:53 EDT --- No need to tag NEEDINFO every time you update the spec :) OK, now the package looks better. btw, you can see the file list simply by using rpm -qpl, no need for rpm2cpio... The package adheres to the guidelines and is thus APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #17 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-03-27 03:22:31 EDT --- If I remove the quote is not validated by desktop-file-validate anymore... For me it's look better with the quotes. Are you sure it is not valid to use quote when there is a redirection? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644
--- Comment #18 from Edouard Bourguignon 2009-03-27
03:25:12 EDT ---
http://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/latest/ar01s06.html
"Arguments may be quoted in whole. If an argument contains a reserved character
the argument must be quoted. [...] Reserved characters are space (" "), tab,
newline, double quote, single quote ("'"), backslash character ("\"),
greater-than sign (">"), less-than sign ("<"), tilde ("~"), vertical bar ("|"),
ampersand ("&"), semicolon (";"), dollar sign ("$"), asterisk ("*"), question
mark ("?"), hash mark ("#"), parenthesis ("(") and (")") and backtick character
("`"). "
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 03:27:08
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
netstat-nat-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/netstat-nat-1.4.9/netstat-nat.c
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
- You need to remove the executable perms in %setup.
- Time stamps are not preserved. Use
make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225708] Merge Review: dovecot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225708 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 03:30:19 EDT --- Ping, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot is a virtual machine.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #23 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-03-27 03:40:04 EDT --- The URL of the spec file with the workaround is: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/fedora/specs/parrot.spec.6 The URL of the ticket is: https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995
Simon Wesp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
--- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2009-03-27
04:52:01 EDT ---
I didn't find your surname in fas. You need a sponsor, right?
I will add the need sponsor blocker, if i am wrong, then please remove it.
some issues:
--
%global snap 20090209
why global instead of define?
--
%{__make}
please use commands like they are, not as a macro.
make instead of %{__make}
--
BuildRoot Tag
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
your buildroot tag is not valid!
--
%defattr(644,root,root,755)
please use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
--
makro couples
please use:
$RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
or
%{buildroot} and %{optflags}
please use one of this couples, but do not mix this.
--
BuildRequires: pidgin-devel
Requires: pidgin
if you have as BR pidgin-devel, then will rpm requires pidgin automaticly.
you don't need Requires: pidgin
--
this is a tlen plugin, so it will be need
Requires: libtlen
or?! I didn't test it, yet.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383
--- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-03-27 05:06:34 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> - You need to remove the executable perms in %setup.
>
> - Time stamps are not preserved. Use
> make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install
- Fixed file permissions and time stamps
Spec URL:
http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/netstat-nat/netstat-nat.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/netstat-nat/netstat-nat-1.4.9-2.fc10.src.rpm
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260694
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 05:14:53 EDT --- Okay, looks good. The package adheres to the guidelines and is thus APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #7 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-03-27 05:23:36 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution||RAWHIDE
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 05:38:07
EDT ---
rpmlint output: clean.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved.
- Optflags OK, but
SHOULD: time stamps are not preserved. You need to patch the makefile to use
'cp -p' instead of 'cp'.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
No blockers; the package is
APPROVED.
Fix the time stamp problem in CVS.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] New: Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Summary: Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tejasdin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/choqok/choqok.spec SRPM URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/choqok/choqok-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260723 Description: A Free/Open Source micro-blogging client for K Desktop Environment. The name comes from an ancient Persian word, which means Sparrow! Choqok currently supports Twitter.com and Identi.ca services. Tests Done: No errors/warnings when running rpmlint on * SPEC file * SRPM file * RPM file when build on i386 * Posted at least one tweet to my twitter account without borking: http://twitter.com/tdinkar/status/1399986748 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 nucleo changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #4 from nucleo 2009-03-27 05:42:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: netstat-nat Short Description: A tool that displays NAT connections Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(lemen...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-03-27 05:43:04 EDT --- I'll try to investigate issue with python modules anon. There is one more issue - incorrectly installed dsm modules - I'll try to fix it too. It takes me a couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Tejas Dinkar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tejasdin...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tejasdin...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com Depends on||454410(mingw32-gcc) Alias||mingw32-libtiff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 06:34:34 EDT --- Aren't you going to branch for EPEL (EL-4, EL-5)? This would be very useful there too, and due to its simplicity very easy to maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #9 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-03-27 06:43:01 EDT --- > SHOULD: time stamps are not preserved. You need to patch the makefile > ... > Fix the time stamp problem in CVS. done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995
--- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
2009-03-27 05:29:33 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I didn't find your surname in fas. You need a sponsor, right?
> I will add the need sponsor blocker, if i am wrong, then please remove it.
As you've already found out, I don't need a sponsor.
> some issues:
> --
> %global snap 20090209
> why global instead of define?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
And it's been ratified by FESCo already.
Although in this particular case it doesn't make a difference.
> --
> %{__make}
> please use commands like they are, not as a macro.
> make instead of %{__make}
OK, but what's wrong with using macros?
> --
> BuildRoot Tag
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
> your buildroot tag is not valid!
OK.
> --
> %defattr(644,root,root,755)
> please use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Why?
> --
> makro couples
> please use:
> $RPM_OPT_FLAGS and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> or
> %{buildroot} and %{optflags}
> please use one of this couples, but do not mix this.
You're picky, but OK.
> --
> BuildRequires: pidgin-devel
> Requires: pidgin
> if you have as BR pidgin-devel, then will rpm requires pidgin automaticly.
> you don't need Requires: pidgin
IIRC it won't, because plugins are dlopen()'d, but I'll re-check.
> --
> this is a tlen plugin, so it will be need
> Requires: libtlen
> or?! I didn't test it, yet.
No, it has its own implementation. I'm not sure if it makes sense to ask
upstream to use libtlen because libtlen hasn't been updated in quite a while.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492501(mingw32-libtiff) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492520] New: Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492520 Summary: Review Request: swami - MIDI instrument and sound editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fed...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/swami.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/swami-0.9.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Swami Project - Sampled Waveforms And Musical Instruments - is a collection of free software for editing and sharing MIDI instruments and sounds. Swami aims to provide an instrument editing and sharing software for instrument formats such as SoundFont, DLS and GigaSampler. rpmlint is silent. We don't have any soundfont editors in Fedora and it looks like this one is the only "stable" one available out there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #6 from nucleo 2009-03-27 07:06:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Aren't you going to branch for EPEL (EL-4, EL-5)? This would be very useful > there too, and due to its simplicity very easy to maintain. Can you give me more information? I already setup plague-client as this described in FAQ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UsingPlagueClientFaq What next should I do to add netstat-nat to EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #11 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-03-27 07:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > > SHOULD: time stamps are not preserved. You need to patch the makefile > > > ... > > > Fix the time stamp problem in CVS. > > > > done > > Hmm, what did you do, exactly? cp + chmod Encodings/* replaced by install -p -m 644 Encodings/* mpage and mpage.1 are product of the build process and thus there is no time stamp to preserve > Oh, and you have CopyRight listed in %doc two times, now. Fix this. will fix if no other objections - I don't want to DoS cvs & koji :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Dinkar 2009-03-27 07:08:54
EDT ---
This is my first review, and I'm using this guide:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review
Points to Check on:
* package did NOT build on PPC. Please see
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1260790&name=build.log for
more details
* Is it possible to use %_qt4_plugindir rather than '%define qtplugindir
%(qmake-qt4 -query QT_INSTALL_PLUGINS)'
Mandatory Tests:
* rpmlint passes with no errors or warnings:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
RPMS/i386/kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm
RPMS/i386/kde-style-skulpture-debuginfo-0.2.2-1.fc10.i386.rpm
SPECS/kde-style-skulpture.spec
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* package is named as per Package Naming Guidelines
* spec filename matched name
* Package meets Packaging Guidelines
* Package is GPLv3 licensed
* License verified in COPYING file
* %doc includes Copying
* spec in american english
* specfile is legible
* sources match the upstream
* package compiles on (at least i386)
* no ExcludeArch
* all dependencies listed
* no locales (not needed as this is a theme)
* package is not relocatable
* package does creates one directory. It uses directories from kde-filesystem
(which it depends on implicitly)
* no file is listed more than once
* permissions correctly set
* clean section is correct
* package consistently uses macros
* package contains only code
* no doc subpackage required
* %doc files are optional
* no header files present, so no -devel package
* no static subpackage needed
* no pkgconfig files
* no library files with a suffix
* no -devel package
* no .la libtool archives present
* package is not a gui application, so need not run desktop-file-install
* package does not own files owned by other packages
* %install runs rm -rf %{buildroot}
* package is UTF-8 valid
Optional Items:
* Source package contains a COPYING file
* No translations in spec file
* Package does NOT build on all architecture:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260789
Package fails to build on PPC architecture
* Package runs as advertises, and stlye resembles the screenshot upstream
* no scriptlets used
* no subpackages
* no pkgconfig files
* package has no file dependencies
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 06:57:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > SHOULD: time stamps are not preserved. You need to patch the makefile > > ... > > Fix the time stamp problem in CVS. > > done Hmm, what did you do, exactly? According to the build log, the install phase still doesn't preserve time stamps on the man page: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/mpage/2.5.6/6.fc11/data/logs/i586/build.log cp mpage /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mpage-2.5.6-6.fc11.i386//usr/bin cp mpage.1 /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mpage-2.5.6-6.fc11.i386//usr/share/man/man1 install -p -m 644 Encodings/* /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/mpage-2.5.6-6.fc11.i386//usr/share/mpage Oh, and you have CopyRight listed in %doc two times, now. Fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995
Simon Wesp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-03-27
07:39:24 EDT ---
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
> And it's been ratified by FESCo already.
> Although in this particular case it doesn't make a difference.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:GuidelinesTodo
should be okay.
>> please use commands like they are, not as a macro.
>> make instead of %{__make}
> OK, but what's wrong with using macros?
Nothing, it's just a sugestion. I would prefer make, so I tried to convince
you. If you don't like it, you can use macros of course, if you want.
>> %defattr(644,root,root,755)
>> please use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> Why?
This is the part you should answer why you are not using
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions
If you have a good reason to differ from default, I will have no problem with
this.
> You're picky, but OK.
I'm definitly not picky. :-)
> IIRC it won't, because plugins are dlopen()'d, but I'll re-check.
yeah i was wrong, sorry! my fault!!!
> No, it has its own implementation. I'm not sure if it makes sense to ask
> upstream to use libtlen because libtlen hasn't been updated in quite a while.
That puts another complexion on the matter.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
If you decide to patch it out, please comment your patch(es)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 --- Comment #2 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-03-27 07:43:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpmlint gave > django-sct.noarch: E: zero-length > /usr/share/doc/django-sct-0.5/communitydraft/community/sitetemplates/_head.html WONTFIX Empty templates are not a problem in Django. > django-sct.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sphene/contrib/libs/markdown/mdx_wikilink.py > 0644 > > django-sct.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sphene/contrib/libs/codecoverage/coverage.py > 0644 > > django-sct.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sphene/contrib/libs/markdown/markdown.py 0644 WONTFIX Waste of time and energy to fix. > django-sct.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang > /usr/share/doc/django-sct-0.5/communitydraft/community/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo > > django-sct.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang > /usr/share/doc/django-sct-0.5/communitydraft/community/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo > > django-sct.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang > /usr/share/doc/django-sct-0.5/communitydraft/community/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/django.mo > WONTFIX These are documentation files. Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-sct/django-sct.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-sct/django-sct-0.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 --- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-03-27 07:17:34 EDT --- Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog-0.3.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533
--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-03-27 07:55:50
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: builds in Koji
[x] Rpmlint output: clean
[-] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv3
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji.
- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260867
[x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
- f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1260867
- f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1261010
[?] Package functions as described.
- I've checked reviewer Twitter post, don't have Twitter account
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
=== SUMMARY ===
- AUTHORS, changelog and TODO should be part of %doc section
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #11 from Jon Stanley 2009-03-27 08:19:21 EDT --- And I'm very sorry for it being buried in a mess of bugzilla mail on my side, let me know if you need any help getting this into shape, I'm available for wahtever help you might need. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-03-27 08:37:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture.spec SRPM URL: http://rezza.hofyland.cz/fedora/packages/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture-0.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm - uses _qt4_plugindir - ExcludeArch ppc for Fedora <= 10 (doesn't work for --scratch build because it's fc10 package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 09:18:19 EDT --- You need to make CVS requests also for the EL-4 and EL-5 branches to get them :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 09:20:04 EDT --- Oh, is the man page generated, too..? Very interesting. In that case, no problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #8 from nucleo 2009-03-27 09:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) OK But as I understood there are different build systems. For EPEL I should do the same as for Fedora(cvs-import.sh, make build, make update)? New Package CVS Request === Package Name: netstat-nat Short Description: A tool that displays NAT connections Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 09:31:14 EDT --- Taking on review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 --- Comment #13 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-03-27 09:34:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Oh, is the man page generated, too..? Very interesting. > > In that case, no problem. yes, usually man pages are generated: something.X from something.X.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 09:42:38
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
hfsutils.src:202: W: macro-in-%changelog defattr
hfsutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tools for reading and writing Macintosh
HFS volumes.
hfsutils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Tools for reading and writing
Macintosh HFS volumes.
hfsutils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
hfsutils-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A C library for reading and
writing Macintosh HFS volumes.
hfsutils-x11.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A Tk-based front end for
browsing and copying files.
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
- Fix the above.
- Drop empty %config line in %files.
- Change buildroot to
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
- Drop INSTALL from %doc since it really isn't necessary. Also README can be
dropped, since it is too about compilation.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
SHOULD: Use INSTALL="install -p" as additional argument to make install to
preserve time stamps.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NEEDSFIX
- Devel package needs to provide %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. ?
- Any comment on this? In this case base package only contains binaries, so
there's no need to require the base package. Consider including the %doc also
in -devel, though.
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-03-27 09:44:12 EDT --- Yeah, except that you don't do make update; the built package goes to the EPEL testing repository and is then pushed later on to the stable repository. This will change shortly, though, when EPEL will switch to koji instead of Plague. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492383] Review Request: netstat-nat - A tool that displays NAT connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492383 --- Comment #10 from nucleo 2009-03-27 09:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) OK. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||5.1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:48:11 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update reinteract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-3075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482884] Review Request: clc-intercal - Compiler for the INTERCAL language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:49:25 EDT --- clc-intercal-0-0.1.1._94._2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6.2-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.2-3.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482884] Review Request: clc-intercal - Compiler for the INTERCAL language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:52:21 EDT --- clc-intercal-0-0.1.1._94._2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:52:09 EDT --- metromap-0.1.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:54:22 EDT --- spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10, spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:54:05 EDT --- spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10, spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:54:16 EDT --- spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10, spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.78.2.1-9.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478769] Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.78.2.1-9.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478767] Review Request: spring - Realtime strategy game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478767 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.78.2.1-9.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 478767 depends on bug 478771, which changed state. Bug 478771 Summary: Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 478767 depends on bug 478770, which changed state. Bug 478770 Summary: Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 478767 depends on bug 478769, which changed state. Bug 478769 Summary: Review Request: spring-installer - Installer for the Spring game's maps and mods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478769 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:55:39 EDT --- rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.6.2-1.fc10|0.6.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478771] Review Request: spring-maps-default - Default maps for Spring
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478771 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.78.2.1-9.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478770] Review Request: springlobby - A lobby client for the spring RTS game engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478770 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:54:11 EDT --- spring-0.78.2.1-9.fc10, springlobby-0.0.1.10425-1.fc10, spring-installer-20090316-4.fc10, spring-maps-default-0.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] New: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for pidgin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for pidgin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0...@mkdir.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.7.1/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.7.1/pidgin-gfire-0.7.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gfire is an open source plugin for the Pidgin IM client which allows you to connect the Xfire network. Features: * Friend’s list * Add & Remove friends * View friend’s current game (games list updated weekly) * View friend’s profiles * Join friend’s server * Detects games and logs game time * Set your status as “Away from Keyboard (AFK)” * Set custom status -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:48:20 EDT --- PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:49:50 EDT --- rednotebook-0.6.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:49:12 EDT --- metromap-0.1.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482884] Review Request: clc-intercal - Compiler for the INTERCAL language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0-0.1.1._94._2.fc10 |0-0.1.1._94._2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483381] Review Request: metromap - Simple program for finding paths in subway/metro maps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483381 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.2-3.fc9 |0.1.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 --- Comment #3 from Tejas Dinkar 2009-03-27 11:15:30 EDT --- New spec looks good. Passes Review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 482884] Review Request: clc-intercal - Compiler for the INTERCAL language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482884 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0-0.1.1._94._2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486757] Review Request: divine-mc - Multi-core model checking system for proving specifications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486757 --- Comment #15 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-03-27 10:39:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > You said: "regarding Java, the BR and R should be versioned, hence please use: > BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 ... > Requires: java >= 1:1.6.0" Versioning Java makes the Fedora 10 build > fail, and doesn't seem necessary; 1.5 seems to work just fine. Sorry for the delay. Well, it probably fails because you've wrong version of java-devel installed. This is because java-devel is just a provides (try `yum provides java-devel`). But anyway, if you tested building on 1.5 and working fine with 1.6, then it is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-27 10:47:37 EDT --- reinteract-0.5.0-3 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update reinteract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-3073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491570] Review Request: sahana - Disaster Management System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491570
Marcela Maslanova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-03-27
10:35:12 EDT ---
It would be nice if you put %post part between %files and %clean section.
Rpm shouldn't have any output. This must be fixed for review:
rpm -i /home/marca/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/sahana-0.6.2.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
messy:/usr/share/sahana/conf -> ../../../etc/sahana/
changed: /usr/share/sahana/conf -> ../../../etc/sahana
OK Rpmlint must be run on every package.
OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file.
OK The spec file must be written in American English.
OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source.
OK The package MUST successfully compile.
OK Correct BuildRequires.
OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.
OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun.
OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review.
OK A package must own all directories that it creates.
OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
OK Permissions on files must be set properly.
OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
OK Each package must consistently use macros.
OK The package must contain code, or permissable content.
OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application.
OK Header files must be in a -devel package.
OK Static libraries must be in a -static package.
OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'.
OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so
(without suffix) must go in -devel.
OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package.
OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file.
OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
Suggestions:
* replace the version 0.6.2.2 with macron %{version}.
* it should be used macro %bcond_without selinux and %if %{with selinux} for
parts which need selinux. It's good habit to create packages which could be
rebuild without selinux.
Thanks for reading ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||492185 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-03-27 11:18:25 EDT --- Thanks for review. Note: Package contains ExcludeArch: PPC for Fedora 10, see bug dependency. Trying to prepare workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Tejas Dinkar changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-03-27 11:20:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kde-style-skulpture Short Description: Classical three-dimensional style for KDE Owners: jreznik Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 --- Comment #2 from Tejas Dinkar 2009-03-27 11:20:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/choqok/choqok.spec SRPM URL: http://tejas.fedorapeople.org/choqok/choqok-0.5-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481428] Review Request: rednotebook - A desktop diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481428 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2009-03-27 11:24:57 EDT --- FYI: 0.6.3 which fixes the bug I mentioned was released last weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492533] Review Request: Choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-03-27 11:23:00 EDT --- Thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: pytc - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-27 11:22:58 EDT --- This one can be accepted. --- This package (pytc) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: pytc - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-03-27 11:45:00 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru, I have requested sponsorship and my FAS username is "silas". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490031] Review Request: pytyrant - A pure python client implementation of Tokyo Tyrant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490031 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-27 11:56:22 EDT --- Okay. --- This package (pytyrant) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490028] Review Request: pytc - Python bindings for Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490028 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-03-27 12:01:14 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491892] Review Request: openscap - Set of open source libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491892 --- Comment #4 from Peter Vrabec 2009-03-27 12:12:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/scap/openscap.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/pvrabec/scap/openscap-0.1.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487737] Review Request: slock - Simple X display locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487737 Pavel Shevchuk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Pavel Shevchuk 2009-03-27 12:13:19 EDT --- Packages built, kudos to Alex and Kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490031] Review Request: pytyrant - A pure python client implementation of Tokyo Tyrant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490031 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492600] New: Review Request: oxygen-icon-theme - Oxygen Icon Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: oxygen-icon-theme - Oxygen Icon Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492600 Summary: Review Request: oxygen-icon-theme - Oxygen Icon Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/oxygen-icon-theme/oxygen-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/oxygen-icon-theme/oxygen-icon-theme-4.2.1-10.fc10.src.rpm Description: Oxygen Icon Theme This was once packaged as part of kdebase-runtime, but upstream kde-artwork team has pending plans to release oxygen separately. This submission currently still uses the kdebase-runtime tarball, and serves as an intermediate step so that we're ready when proper oxygen releases happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492600] Review Request: oxygen-icon-theme - Oxygen Icon Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492600 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||oxygen-icon-theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491862] Review Request: kde-style-skulpture - Classical three-dimensional style for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491862 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|492185 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490039] Review Request: pyftpdlib - Python FTP server library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490039 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492609] New: Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492609 Summary: Review Request: hmaccalc - Tools for computing and checking HMAC values for files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: na...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=hmaccalc.git;a=blob;f=hmaccalc.spec SRPM URL: http://nalin.fedorapeople.org/hmaccalc-0.9.5-1.src.rpm Description: The hmaccalc package contains tools which can calculate HMAC (hash-based message authentication code) values for files. The names and interfaces are meant to mimic the sha*sum tools provided by the coreutils package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492612] New: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Summary: Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0...@mkdir.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/python-chardet-1.0.1/python-chardet.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/python-chardet-1.0.1/python-chardet-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Chardet is a Python library for the auto-dection of character encoding. It is a port of the auto-detection code in Mozilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492613] New: Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Summary: Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0...@mkdir.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.8/canto.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/canto-0.6.8/canto-0.6.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Canto is an Atom/RSS feed reader for the console that is meant to be quick, concise, and colorful. It's meant to allow you to crank through feeds like you've never cranked before by providing a minimal, yet information packed interface. No navigating menus. No dense blocks of unreadable white text. An interface with almost infinite customization and extensibility using the excellent Python programming language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||492613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492613] Review Request: canto - Atom/RSS feed reader based on ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492613 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on||492612 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #12 from wsny...@wsnyder.org 2009-03-27 14:55:21 EDT --- >/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/systemc-mode.el >/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/systemc-mode.elc Don't bother installing these files. Emacs 22.2 and above breaks this file and it's proven almost impossible to keep them working on both 21.* and 22.*, so the next version of SystemPerl will no longer install it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
