[Bug 496779] New: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol Alias: perl-RT-Client-REST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Summary: Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/RT-Client-REST OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-RT-Client-REST.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-RT-Client-REST-0.37-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: *RT::Client::REST* is */usr/bin/rt* converted to a Perl module. I needed to implement some RT interactions from my application, but did not feel that invoking a shell command is appropriate. Thus, I took *rt* tool, written by Abhijit Menon-Sen, and converted it to an object-oriented Perl module. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310693 *rt-0.06 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-MooseX-MethodAttribute |perl-MooseX-MethodAttribute |s - no summary found|s - Introspect your code ||attributes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-21 02:20:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06-2.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 03:06:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310693 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 383bf572afdb8040641d4d413ef96476 RT-Client-REST-0.37.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=15, Tests=325, 24 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr 0.03 sys + 5.09 cusr 0.31 csys = 5.59 CPU) + Package perl-RT-Client-REST-0.37-1.fc11.noarch = Provides: perl(RT::Client::REST) = 0.37 perl(RT::Client::REST::Attachment) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) = 0.19 perl(RT::Client::REST::Forms) perl(RT::Client::REST::HTTPClient) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object) = 0.09 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.05 perl(RT::Client::REST::Queue) = 0.02 perl(RT::Client::REST::SearchResult) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Ticket) = 0.09 perl(RT::Client::REST::Transaction) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::User) = 0.02 Requires: perl(Error) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exporter) perl(HTTP::Cookies) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(Params::Validate) perl(RT::Client::REST) = 0.14 perl(RT::Client::REST) = 0.18 perl(RT::Client::REST) = 0.20 perl(RT::Client::REST::Attachment) perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) perl(RT::Client::REST::Exception) = 0.18 perl(RT::Client::REST::Forms) perl(RT::Client::REST::HTTPClient) perl(RT::Client::REST::Object) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.04 perl(RT::Client::REST::SearchResult) = 0.02 perl(RT::Client::REST::Ticket) perl(RT::Client::REST::Transaction) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) Also, Strange to see requires perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.04 Do we really need to care to filter 2 of them? APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 03:15:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310695 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9db312b0fe2b5311aac1f7c68b3133df MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=12, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.86 cusr 0.06 csys = 1.98 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes-0.06-2.fc11.noarch = Provides: perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Inheritable) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::AttrContainer) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::AttrContainer::Inheritable) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Class) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::MaybeWrapped) = 0.06 perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::Wrapped) = 0.06 Requires: perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Exporter) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util) perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole) perl(MooseX::MethodAttributes::Role::Meta::Method::Wrapped) perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) perl(namespace::clean) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #7 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 03:22:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) * Timestamps * Directory ownership issue I think that I resolved these issues. Please, take a look at: Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/photoprint-borders.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch builds are green: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310717 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310715 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #16 from Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl 2009-04-21 03:43:59 EDT --- Thanks for the clarification. I'll throw out the epoch related things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Nicoleau Fabien nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Nicoleau Fabien nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 03:48:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: abby Short Description: Front-end for cclive and clive Owners: eponyme Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien nicoleau.fab...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 03:47:18 EDT --- If cclive is present, abby won't warn. It requires one, or the other, but not both. If none of them are found, abby will display a messagebox. I'll add cclive as an explicit requires. If users thinks that clive is needed too, I'll add it in further releases. I'll also fix URL. Thank you for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||liangsuil...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 04:21:18 EDT --- new SRPM http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec I do not omit the perltetris.pl, because I think that it is OK on Fedora 10. And no netizen tell me that it can not run on their Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(liangsuil...@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 04:26:59 EDT --- SRPM http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck-0.16-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Gnome2-Wnck.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #56 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 04:37:08 EDT --- NSS SSL_new segfault already reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496643 and was recently fixed (and submitted for updates). Several others possible segfaults were fixed as well... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #3 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 04:47:50 EDT --- Please, wait with this until I'll resolve GCC4.4 issue and other spec cleaning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 04:45:13 EDT --- * Summary * License * BR * %description * Build failure * scriplets All resolved: SPEC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/camcardsync.spec SRPM: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310790 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310779 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310738 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zarko.pin...@gmail.com --- Comment #50 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 06:20:46 EDT --- Hello, I'm working on Flamerobin's review, and I checked Firebird for F11 branch, but builds Fails! Please, look at my Koji tasks: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310953 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1310951 some troubles with libtoolize, see buildlogs.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fab...@bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-21 06:29:14 EDT --- Version 2.0.4 was released 2.0.4 (2009-04-20) * Version 2.0.3 broke support for relative paths to the socket (-s option and socket-name parameter), now relative paths work again as in version 2.0.2. * Fixed change log format, made table of contents nicer. * Fixed author's email address. * Removed zpkg stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #51 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 06:49:40 EDT --- Philippe, are you 100% sure, that this move from lib to lib64 doesn't hurt anyone (see line 237 of your spec)? Here is a full list of rpmlint messages: [pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ~/Desktop/firebird-* firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird firebird.ppc64: E: no-binary firebird.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded firebird-classic.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so firebird-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbclient.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbembed.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/data firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/backup firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird firebird firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr ./usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr.bin firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/firebird firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 33 warnings. [pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496825] New: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Summary: Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pgothic-fonts/ipa-pgothic-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Gothic (sans-serif) style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496827] New: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Summary: Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-pmincho-fonts/ipa-pmincho-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Proportional Mincho style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496824] New: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Summary: Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-gothic-fonts/ipa-gothic-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Gothic (sans-serif) style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #52 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 07:07:56 EDT --- All messages regarding non-standart-[gu]id may be ignored, so here is a final rpmling messages list: [pe...@sulaco Desktop]$ rpmlint firebird-*|grep -v non-standard firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird firebird.ppc64: E: no-binary firebird.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded firebird-classic.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-classic.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so firebird-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbclient.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-libfbembed.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh 0755 firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec firebird-server-common.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: no-documentation firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr ./usr/lib64/firebird/bin/fbmgr.bin firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 33 warnings. [pe...@sulaco Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 07:30:20 EDT --- OK, let's try once more. There is fixed upstream tarball with new release of the package ftp://ftp.linux.cz/pub/linux/people/jan_kasprzak/vlna/vlna-1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm with fixed license: Program distribution: - The program may be freely used. If somebody makes useful changes in the CWEB source code, I want to be informed about it. The modified version must not be distributed under the same name without author's consent. The author gives no warranty that the program will not damage your file that you have been editing for many hours. Although the program creates backup files, these files are deleted after subsequent use of the program. --- I will try to make it through fedora-legal and let's see, where it ends. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #53 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 07:34:42 EDT --- * We may omit messages, regarding relative symlinks (just add a note somewhere in %doc that there may be some issues with chrooting) * we may ignore messages about no-documentation and about no-binary. * These messages needs fixing: firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: sourced-script-with-shebang firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: executable-sourced-script Note, that files in /etc/profile.d should be 0644 and shouldn't have #!/bin/whatever * This message firebird-superserver.ppc64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firebird warns you that your init-script ddidn't used /var/lock/subsys - this may be omitted, but more better idea is to fix init-script. All you need is to touch /var/lock/subsys/firebird at start and remove it at stop. See /etc/init.d/rsyslog for example. * regarding messages about dangerous-command-in- - Im afraid we cannot do much here, so we should omit them too. At least for now. If some issues will occur, then you should solve them as they will go. * Regarding firebird.ppc64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Firebird - easyfix. * Regarding firebird-classic.ppc64: W: obsolete-not-provided firebird-client-embedded - please add Provides: firebird-client-embedded also. * firebird-superserver.ppc64: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird - should be ignored. * firebird-devel.ppc64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/firebird/lib/libib_util.so libib_util.so - should be ignored * firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log - should be ignored. Ok, please comment this remaining rpmlint message: * firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 And we'll move further. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #54 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 07:39:36 EDT --- Thanks, Zarko! Philippe, please, investigate this issue too: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c50 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/ ||Display.html?id=45186 --- Comment #17 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-04-21 08:12:37 EDT --- This is ticket #45186 on CPAN's RT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496826] New: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Summary: Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ta...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-mincho-fonts/ipa-mincho-fonts-003.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: IPA Font is a Japanese OpenType fonts that is JIS X 0213:2004 compliant, provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan. This package contains Mincho style font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492991] Review Request: mediawiki-InputBox - An extension to enable input box tags for mediawiki pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492991 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-04-21 08:53:46 EDT --- Hi John, That indeed fixed the issue and checksums match now. You should be able to request CVS now. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #55 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 09:16:40 EDT --- Regarding build failure on F-11 - Philippe, please use autoreconf -vfi instead of your (probably buggy) handwritten NOCONFIGURE=1 ./autogen.sh See build log with autoreconf: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 09:18:37 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipag00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 09:18:30 EDT --- I think correct Source URL is http://info.openlab.ipa.go.jp/ipafont/fontdata/ipagp00301.zip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412
--- Comment #5 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 09:35:27 EDT ---
* Validation of .desktop files needs this:
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
so include this BR into spec
* Macro names:
%{_iconsdir}
%{_liconsdir}
%{_miconsdir}
do not pass in my mock build, please use standard macros from here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-21 09:57:03 EDT --- Package fails to build in mock for F10 src/XmlLoader.h:25:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory When you get mock build to work I'll review the package. PS. You have an awful lot of packages and review requests for packages, but few have done few reviews. Maybe you could do a few, since the review queue is quite clogged? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #9 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 09:58:18 EDT --- perltetris.pl definitely does not work in rawhide (x86_64): [s...@velociraptor ~]$ /usr/bin/perltetris.pl GLib-GObject-WARNING **: cannot derive `GooCanvasWidgetAccessible' from non-fundamental parent type `GooCanvasItem' at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, DATA line 35. GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, DATA line 35. GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, DATA line 35. CRITICAL **: atk_object_initialize: assertion `ATK_IS_OBJECT (accessible)' failed at /usr/bin/perltetris.pl line 761, DATA line 35. You also have not resolved the legal issue here. There are two ways you can resolve it: 1) Remove perltetris.pl (and the perltetris.pl manpage) from the package. 2) Rename perltetris.pl (and the perltetris.pl manpage) to something that does not contain the trademark Tetris, and go through both files and remove the trademark Tetris from every user visible location. This would mean that you'd need to take it out entirely from the manpage. I can't advise you on where it needs to come out of the .pl file, because, well, it doesn't work for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-21 10:24:05 EDT --- The conclusion of the thread on the fedora-packaging mailing list initiated in order to resolve the issue https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00042.html was that the license file must be part of the package. The thread also concluded that the license file must be copied into and made part of the extracted tarfile and not be a separate source file. The package has been updated accordingly (including adding the cp command to the source generation description comment): http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-xio.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-21 10:24:16 EDT --- The conclusion of the thread on the fedora-packaging mailing list initiated in order to resolve the issue https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00042.html was that the license file must be part of the package. The thread also concluded that the license file must be copied into and made part of the extracted tarfile and not be a separate source file. The package has been updated accordingly (including adding the cp command to the source generation description comment): http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rsl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515
--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 10:27:06
EDT ---
Ok, since 2.2.14. is in Rawhide - here is my review request:
- rpmlint is not silent:
http://peter.fedorapeople.org/stuff/unixodbc_rpmlint.log
We may ignore messages, regarding non-versioned so-files in %{_libdir} and
zero-length /etc/odbc.ini, however other messages needs fixing.
* You must convert ChangeLof from iso8859-1 in %prep
* You must remove executable permisson from files, mentioned my rpmlint.
+/- The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Unfortunately (perhaps, due to historical reasons) GUI module for unixODBC is
named as unixODBC-kde, although it has almost nothing to do with KDE (purely
Qt-based - the only link between them is DataManager(II) applications, used by
KDE afaik). To be honest, I'd like this package to be renamed to something like
unixODBC-gui, but the unixODBC package has very long history and even this
small change may be relatively painless.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
+ The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included
in %doc.
+ The spec file is written in American English. Although I'm not a native
english speaker and, therefore, this requirement of Fedora Review Giiudelines
always confusing me :).
+ The spec file for the package is be legible.
+ The sources used to build the package are matching the upstream source:
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz*
f47c2efb28618ecf5f33319140a7acd0 unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz
f47c2efb28618ecf5f33319140a7acd0 unixODBC-2.2.14.tar.gz_from_srpm
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311282
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, calling
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
+ A package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list any file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+/- Permissions on files must be set properly, except those, noted above
(easyfix).
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissable content.
+ The package does not contain etremely large chunks of documentation.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the
application.
+ C header files are in a -devel package.
+ No static libraries.
+ The package does not contains pkgconfig(.pc) files.
+ The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
- The sub-package containing GUI applications does include a %{name}.desktop
file. Unfortunately, it does NOT properly installed with desktop-file-install
in the %install section.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in the package must be valid UTF-8.
So, please,
* use proper installation procedure of desktop-files (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop )
* Suppress rpmlint messages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496880] New: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Summary: Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://wannier.org/ Description: Wannier90 is a program for calculating maximally-localised Wannier functions (MLWF) from a set of Bloch energy bands that may or may not be attached to or mixed with other bands. The formalism works by minimising the total spread of the MLWF in real space. This is done in the space of unitary matrices that describe rotations of the Bloch bands at each k-point. As a result, wannier90 is independent of the basis set used in the underlying calculation to obtain the Bloch states. Therefore, it may be interfaced straightforwardly to any electronic structure code. The locality of MLWF can be exploited to compute band-structure, density of states and Fermi surfaces at modest computational cost. Furthermore, wannier90 is able to output MLWF for visualisation and other post-processing purposes. Wannier functions are already used in a wide variety of applications. These include analysis of chemical bonding in real space; calculation of dielectric properties via the modern theory of polarisation; and as an accurate and minimal basis set in the construction of model Hamiltonians for large-scale systems, in linear-scaling quantum Monte Carlo calculations, and for efficient computation of material properties, such as the anomalous Hall coefficient. rpmlint output: wannier90.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libwannier.so wannier90.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libwannier.so 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I have no idea why rpm doesn't strip the library... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225974] Merge Review: krb5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225974 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-04-21 10:34:17 EDT --- krb5-workstation.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/kerberos/bin/ksu Fix if possible. The buildroot strip script misses setuid applications. I'm actually not sure if that's intentional or not. CCing Panu for this one. Great, looks like this is all we have. Panu? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #56 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 10:44:05 EDT --- thanks for all reports, I'll take care of for : * firebird-server-common.ppc64: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660 that's a security issue, only firebird may have rights on this file it is the database where are stored all users (and their passsword) that can connect to Firebird databases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||496890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 10:59:20 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 11:03:36 EDT --- What's the status of this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Depends on|182235(FE-Legal)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) Depends on|182235(FE-Legal)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 --- Comment #10 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-04-21 11:39:26 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-IO-LockedFile New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767
--- Comment #17 from Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 11:39:50
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Well, I figured out that my problems getting this to work simply go away with
'setenforce 0'. Here are the complaints I see while running in permissive
mode:
type=1400 audit(1240256724.128:55): avc: denied { write } for pid=1712
comm=nscd name=socket dev=dm-4 ino=409614
scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0
tclass=sock_file
type=1400 audit(1240256724.134:56): avc: denied { connectto } for pid=1712
comm=nscd path=/var/run/nslcd/socket scontext=system_u:system_r:nscd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket
The daemon started fine, but it seems that nothing could talk to it. I guess
some policy tweaks will be needed before this gets to the point of being
useful.
Well, it can't talk to nscd, and nscd can't talk to it. I'm having trouble
reproducing the case where this causes things to fail completely, but
temporarily stopping nscd should take these out of the picture. (Until we get
a policy for it, the daemon's running as initrc_t, which is effectively
unconfined, so it shouldn't have difficulties itself. BTW which policy version
do you have installed?)
BTW, does Simo know you're packaging this for inclusion? I thought SSSD was
supposed to do the same thing in a different way.
I'm pretty sure, yes. It's pretty clear that SSSD won't replace nss_ldap or
its successors for 100% of cases.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-21 11:42:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-RT-Client-REST Short Description: Talk to RT using REST protocol Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496777] Review Request: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes - Introspect your code attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496777 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-21 11:41:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MooseX-MethodAttributes Short Description: Introspect your code attributes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496779] Review Request: perl-RT-Client-REST - Talk to RT using REST protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496779 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-04-21 11:45:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Also, Strange to see requires perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.01 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.03 perl(RT::Client::REST::Object::Exception) = 0.04 Do we really need to care to filter 2 of them? Yeah, it's weird but outside of filtering them there isn't much we can do about it. The most restrictive one wins (the last one in this case), and nothing bad will happen due to this, so I don't think it's really worth filtering the redundant ones out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #18 from Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 12:01:04 EDT --- Hmm, actually, nslcd can use nscd, but not the other way around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-04-21 12:36:28 EDT --- I'm running whatever's in rawhide currently: selinux-policy-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch Well, at least I've found that the caching works across reboots. After logging in with setenforce 0, I can reboot the machine (which resets selinux to enforcing) and still log in. But I can't resolve any other users. And indeed, stopping nscd does get things working, but of course nscd caches more than uid/gid lookups. BTW, do you know if this will cache autofs lookups as well? Finally, to packaging issues: You fixed the minor issues I had; personally I dont' care one way or the other about the /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so dependency. However, one issue concerns me: /lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap-264.so /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so /usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2 This brings up a couple of issues: Does the library really need to live in the root directory? Generally we try not to install things there unless they're absolutely required that early in the boot process (or for recovery). I know it conveniently avoids a conflict in this case, but I'm wondering if it's just done that way because of the conflict or if there's another reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-21 12:42:02 EDT --- Thank you for going through that process! APPROVED by sailer. I would like to encourage you to add the pkgconfig dependency to globus-xio-devel, or to add a comment to the globus-core spec file that this dependency is indirectly needed, to prevent this dependency to be accidentally removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-21 12:51:13 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 13:18:19 EDT --- As far as I'm concerned it can be closed, all comments made have been addressed, but I'm the xfig maintainer so it is not up to me to close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 13:26:02 EDT --- Ok, I'm closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-04-21 13:24:23 EDT --- Unfortunately now I'm seeing other strange behavior. I found that, even though I'm currently logged in, a second login fails unless I start nscd. But that causes things like sudo to complain that I'm not in the passwd file. Only running setenforce 0 gets things working properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483250] Review Request: chordii - Print songbooks (lyrics + chords)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483250 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 13:32:47 EDT --- As Hans says, all of those additional restrictions on top of the GPL are horribly non-free. If the old upstream (the original copyright holders) will waive all of those additional restrictions, you should be okay, but if not, this is not acceptable in Fedora as-is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-21 13:36:52 EDT --- Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. And maybe also explicitly libXt, since it owns /usr/share/X11/app-defaults/ (the lib dependency is however already picked up automatically). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-21 13:40:48 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-xio Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-21 13:41:37 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-rsl Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 13:38:44 EDT --- Ugh. I just _LOVE_ crappy licenses. This license has no explicit right to copy, modify, or redistribute. There is an implicit grant for modification, but I would prefer that it was explicit. As is, I'm going to have to say no. Please ask upstream if they can use an established license, like MIT (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style) or LPPL (http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3a.txt). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #15 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 13:48:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. Good catch, fixed in CVS, will get picked up the next build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #57 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 13:49:23 EDT --- All builds are ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311836 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-2.fc10.src.rpm upgraded Seems that now rpmlint results are better I shouldn't trust as much the previous work that was made ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492231] Review Request: trac-watchlist-plugin - plugin for watching trac wiki pages and tickets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492231
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|opensou...@till.name
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-04-21 13:51:59 EDT
---
[OK] rpmlint output:
trac-watchlist-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
[OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format
[OK] license allowed: BSD
[OK] license matches shortname in License: tag
[OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: not in upstream tarball/SCM
[OK] package is code or permissive content:
{OK} patches sent to upstream and commented: no patches
[GOOD ENOUGH] Source0 is a working URL
Tarball generation instructions work
{N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
OK SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}
[OK] Source0 matches Upstream:
indidual files in tarball match locally generated tarball
[OK] Package builds on all primary architectures: noarch
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311889
[N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented:
[OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds)
(OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin
[N/A] %find_lang used for locales
[N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
[N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage
[N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig
(N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel
[N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included
[N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop
[N/A] Follows desktop entry spec
[N/A] Valid .desktop Name
[N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName
[N/A] Valid .desktop Categories
[N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
[N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install
[OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable)
[OK] Owns all created directories
[OK] no duplicates in %files
[OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section
[OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages
[OK] included filenames are in UTF-8
[OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] Consistent macro usage
[OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage
[OK] %doc does not affect runtime
{OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
{OK} well known BuildRoot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
{OK} PreReq not used
{N/A} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured
{N/A} Useful debuginfo generated
{OK} no duplication of system libraries
{OK} no rpath
{GOOD ENOUGH} Timestamps preserved with cp and install
{N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
{OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used
{OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and
%{buildroot} on %install and %clean)
{OK} no Conflicts
{OK} nothing installed in /srv
{OK} Changelog in allowed format
{OK} does not use Scriptlets
OK Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
OK Sane Provides: and Requires:
{OK} Follows Naming Guidelines
{OK} Has BuildRequires: python
{NOT OK} Defines and uses %{python_sitelib}:
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
you should use %global instead of %define
[OK] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from
upstream into the proper directory.
[OK] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[OK] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be
included in the package.
[N/A] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so
it won't conflict with the main package.
[N/A] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the
packages must contain a default version that is usable via import MODULE with
no prior setup.
(OK) A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
{OK} Egg install:
%install
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please change the two occurences of %define to %global before importing the
package into Fedora. Except for this minor issue the package looks good and is
therefore APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
[Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808
--- Comment #2 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-04-21 14:00:48 EDT
---
You do not use rpm macros here:
/usr/games/robotfindskitten
/usr/share/info/robotfindskitten.info.gz
/usr/share/man/man6/robotfindskitten.6.gz
%{_datadir} is iirc /usr/share, and %{_prefix} /usr.
Also it is best practices to use a * instead of the .gz suffix for manpages and
maybe also info pages, because they may not be gzipped depending on the rpm
configuration.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #16 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 14:02:32 EDT --- I've made a modified tarball that removes the ilbc bits, and committed it for F-11 and rawhide. If you push any updates for F-9 or F-10, you need to do the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496941] New: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496941 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: her...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-passenger.spec SRPM URL: http://herlo.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-passenger-2.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Passenger is an Apache module for Ruby on Rails support. I would like to mention that this review is dependent upon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496937 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767
--- Comment #21 from Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com 2009-04-21 14:20:18
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
I'm running whatever's in rawhide currently:
selinux-policy-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch
selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.12-4.fc11.noarch
Well, at least I've found that the caching works across reboots. After
logging
in with setenforce 0, I can reboot the machine (which resets selinux to
enforcing) and still log in. But I can't resolve any other users.
Yeah, we're going to have to get that sorted before it gets into any
repositories.
And indeed, stopping nscd does get things working, but of course nscd caches
more than uid/gid lookups.
BTW, do you know if this will cache autofs lookups as well?
It does not; autofs doesn't use libc's nsswitch subsystem to look up automount
information (there's no interface for one, and for such an interface to be
useful right away you'd have to add frontend the functions to libc, and then a
backend for it to the various nsswitch modules, and by doing so duplicate a lot
of code that you need to keep in the automounter until the older versions of
libc that don't provide it go away, so in the end you haven't gained much).
Finally, to packaging issues: You fixed the minor issues I had; personally I
don't care one way or the other about the /lib64/security/pam_ldap.so
dependency. However, one issue concerns me:
/lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2
/usr/lib64/libnss_ldap-264.so
/usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so
/usr/lib64/libnss_ldap.so.2
This brings up a couple of issues:
Does the library really need to live in the root directory? Generally we try
not to install things there unless they're absolutely required that early in
the boot process (or for recovery). I know it conveniently avoids a conflict
in this case, but I'm wondering if it's just done that way because of the
conflict or if there's another reason.
It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules,
following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put
there anyway. In practice, any location in the shared library path will do.
The main reason to move one elsewhere is admitting that it has dependencies
that will never be satisfiable without a working /usr.
In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or working
something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to
select the right one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend itself
to any elegant solutions).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-21 14:29:26 EDT --- Branched the library into its own package. Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|opensou...@till.name
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-04-21 14:27:51 EDT
---
[OK] rpmlint output: silent
[OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format
[OK] license allowed: EPL
[OK] license matches shortname in License: tag
[NOT OK] license in tarball and included in %doc:
COPYING should be %doc, because it specifies the license terms
a local copy of the actual license would be nice there btw.
[OK] package is code or permissive content:
{N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented
[OK] Source0 is a working URL
{OK} Sourceforge URL is Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
OK SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}
[OK] Source0 matches Upstream:
34571617ff63b28b6d28fd6d92030b04 arm4module-1.1.tar.gz
[OK] Package builds on all primary architectures:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1311916
[N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented:
[OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds)
(OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin
[N/A] %find_lang used for locales
[N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
[N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage
[N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig
(N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel
[N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included
[N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop
[N/A] Follows desktop entry spec
[N/A] Valid .desktop Name
[N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName
[N/A] Valid .desktop Categories
[N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
[N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install
[OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable)
[OK] Owns all created directories
[OK] no duplicates in %files
[OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section
[OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages
[OK] included filenames are in UTF-8
[OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] Consistent macro usage
[OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage
[OK] %doc does not affect runtime
{OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
{OK} well known BuildRoot
nearly this one:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
{OK} PreReq not used
{OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured
{OK} Useful debuginfo generated
{OK} no duplication of system libraries
{OK} no rpath
{OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install
{N/A} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
{OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used
{OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and
%{buildroot} on %install and %clean)
{OK} no Conflicts
{OK} nothing installed in /srv
{OK} Changelog in allowed format
{OK} does not use Scriptlets
N/A Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
OK Sane Provides: and Requires:
{OK} Follows Naming Guidelines
{NOT OK} Has BuildRequires: python
BR: is python2-devel, this should probably be python-devel
{N/A} Defines and uses %{python_sitelib}:
{OK} Defines and uses %{python_sitearch}:
%{!?python_sitearch: %global python_sitearch %(%{__python} -c from
%distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1))}
{UNCLEAR} Has BuildRequires: python-setuptools
I am not sure, whether this is required or not, but certainly it is not in the
spec.
[OK] Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from
upstream into the proper directory.
[OK] Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[OK] If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be
included in the package.
[N/A] When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so
it won't conflict with the main package.
[N/A] When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the
packages must contain a default version that is usable via import MODULE with
no prior setup.
(OK) A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
{OK} Egg install:
%install
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Other issues:
Mixed whitespace:
There are tabs uses after BR: arm4-devel and Requires: arm4, please use spaces
here or use everywhere tabs.
Please add COPYING to
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #58 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-04-21 14:38:39 EDT --- To benefit upstream the following bugs may be submitted: * Bugs in configure. First, ppc64 case should be added to target switch in configure.in (as powerpc64-*-linux* or so). And proper libdir set there. * Bug in autogen.sh. It relies on libtool message to get location of aclocal.m4. But in this case, in new libtool message that message somehow changed and pattern didn't handle that. Consider using of aclocal for this task (like autoreconf does). Fixing this bugs upstream will benefit them. But this won't have influnce on review as workarounds were made in spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-21 15:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Actually, there are still some things to fix, at least directory ownership: the package should Requires: hicolor-icon-theme. Good catch, fixed in CVS, will get picked up the next build. Maybe I'd better do a full review still, just in case. Reopening; don't do a release until I reclose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767
--- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-04-21 15:07:42
EDT ---
It does not; autofs doesn't use libc's nsswitch subsystem to look up automount
information
I guess the automount: line in nsswitch.conf is confusing. Lack of caching
of autofs lookups is the other half of the problem (or at least my problem).
Completely off topic here, though.
It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules,
following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put
there anyway.
Oh, good point. I guess nss_ldap is the one that's out of sorts, placing its
libraries under /usr/lib instead.
In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or working
something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to
select the right one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend
itself
to any elegant solutions).
Indeed, I can't imagine how you would do this with alternatives.
So where do we go from here? I think that from a packaging standpoint this is
good, but without support from the selinux policy it's not as useful and the
interactions with nscd are problematic (although it seems that at least some of
the problems I'm seeing are due to nscd's negative caching).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492834] Review Request: spawn-fcgi - Simple program for spawning FastCGI processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492834
Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|opensou...@till.name
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-04-21 15:23:27 EDT
---
[OK] rpmlint output: silent
[OK] Spec in %{name}.spec format
[OK] license allowed: BSD
[OK] license matches shortname in License: tag
[OK] license in tarball and included in %doc: COPYING
[OK] package is code or permissive content:
{N/A} patches sent to upstream and commented
[OK] Source0 is a working URL
{N/A} Sourceforge URL is Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
OK SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}
[OK] Source0 matches Upstream:
ae893d12943fd4cd38a0a38835263c80 spawn-fcgi-1.6.1.tar.bz2
[OK] Package builds on all primary architectures:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1312054
[N/A] ExcludeArch bugs are filed and commented:
[OK] BuildRequires are complete (mock builds)
(OK) No file dependencies outside of /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin
[N/A] %find_lang used for locales
[N/A] Every (sub)package containing libraries runs ldconfig
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
[N/A] .h (header) files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] .a (static libraries) are in -static subpackage
[N/A] contains .pc (pkgconfig) files and has Requires: pkgconfig
(N/A) .pc files are in -devel subpackage
[N/A] contains .so.X(.Y) files and .so is in -devel
[N/A] -devel subpackage has Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
[N/A] .la files (libtool) are not included
[N/A] Has GUI and includes %{name}.desktop
[N/A] Follows desktop entry spec
[N/A] Valid .desktop Name
[N/A] Valid .desktop GenericName
[N/A] Valid .desktop Categories
[N/A] Valid .desktop StartupNotify
[N/A] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install
[OK] Prefix: /usr not used (not relocatable)
[OK] Owns all created directories
[OK] no duplicates in %files
[OK] %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section
[OK] Does not own files or dirs from other packages
[OK] included filenames are in UTF-8
[OK] %clean is rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[OK] Consistent macro usage
[OK] large documentation is -doc subpackage
{OK} no pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries
find -print0 -type f | xargs -0 file | cut -d -f 2- | sed 's/^ *//' | sort
-u
{OK} well known BuildRoot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
{OK} PreReq not used
{OK} RPM_OPT_FLAGS honoured
{OK} Useful debuginfo generated
{OK} no duplication of system libraries
{OK} no rpath
{OK} Timestamps preserved with cp and install
{OK} Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags})
{OK} Requires(pre,post) style notation not used
{OK} only writes to tmp /var/tmp $TMPDIR %{_tmppath} %{_builddir} (and
%{buildroot} on %install and %clean)
{OK} no Conflicts
{OK} nothing installed in /srv
{OK} Changelog in allowed format
{OK} does not use Scriptlets
N/A Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch
OK Sane Provides: and Requires:
{OK} Follows Naming Guidelines
minor issue:
%files contains a -n spawn-fcgi, this should be removed before CVS import.
This package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557
--- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-21 15:35:47
EDT ---
Reviewing version 3.2.5-19.a found in koji.
- Other missing Requires:
Common uses update-desktop-database =
Requires(post): desktop-file-utils
rpmlint output:
xfig.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xfig-plain.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. ~OK
- Quite a few undocumented patches. A reason SHOULD be documented for having
each patch.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX
- Source not available upstream for this release.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK [fixed in CVS]
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Include in package: CHANGES, README, LATEX.AND.XFIG*, FIGAPPS
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX
- README contains license, which should be added in %doc as mentioned above.
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241095] Review Request: perl-IO-LockedFile - Flock based locking, extendable to other mechanisms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241095 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:40:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:42:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:42:01 EDT --- There already is a F-11 branch. Note that you may have to do a 'cvs update -d' to see it locally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:46:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl -Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:44:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:45:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 David Carter dcar...@davidcarter.ca changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from David Carter dcar...@davidcarter.ca 2009-04-21 15:49:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-arm4 Short Description: Python language bindings for Application Response Measurement V4.0 Owners: grandcross Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:50:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:52:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:57:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 15:54:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:01:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458279] Review Request: python-arm4 - Python language bindings for Applicatioon Response Measurement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458279 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:05:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:11:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:08:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:10:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496424] Review Request: perl-Test-Aggregate - Aggregate C*.t tests to make them run faster
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496424 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:21:04 EDT --- I assume you want a F-11 branch here as well. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496425] Review Request: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check - Wrap OP check callbacks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-04-21 16:23:45 EDT --- I assume you wanted a F-11 branch as well. cvs done with F-11 added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
