[Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||477750 Bug 496433 depends on bug 492690, which changed state. Bug 492690 Summary: Review Request: kvirc - Free portable IRC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492690 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #24 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-04-22 02:17:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) There is a file conflict between globus-common-progs and grid-packaging-tools. The file /usr/share/globus/config.guess exists in both packages. This must be sorted out. Is this file really needed in any of these packages? The issue with the duplicate files has been reported as a separate bug #496921. For further comments on this issue please add them to that bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #17 from Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl 2009-04-22 02:13:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: EekBoek is a bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses. Unlike other accounting software, EekBoek has both a command-line interface (CLI) and a graphical user-interface (GUI, currently under development). Furthermore, it has a complete Perl API to create your own custom applications. EekBoek is designed for the Dutch/European market and currently available in Dutch only. An English translation is in the works (help appreciated). The spec file is non-trivial but well commented. The spec file and rpms are rpmlint free with the exception of two files that are not utf8. This is intentional, these files need to be latin1. Same as 1.04.03-2, with Epoch: removed. Results of last koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412
--- Comment #7 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 02:22:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
sorry I really don't understand
if I make a rpm --showrc , these macros are there (f10)
and if not %{_iconsdir}, %{_liconsdir}, %{_miconsdir}, then what else ?
Have you a suggestion ?
I currently have three Fedora installations on my PC Two of F10 and one of F11
branches
Only at one of my Fedora branches I have these macros defined, so I suggest to
you that change these macros with:
%{_iconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons
%{_liconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons/large
%{_miconsdir} change to: %{_datadir}/icons/mini
Or, why you do not put these icons to standard dirs, like:
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/%{name}.png
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/%{name}.png
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png
and reformat install and convert commands at %install section to use these
dirs, and after that simply refresh icons cache?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #60 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 02:32:16 EDT --- sorry I forget this one ok http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec upgraded http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-3.fc10.src.rpm available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495237] Review Request: python-hash_ring - Python implementation of consistent hashing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495237 Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2009-04-22 02:49:32 EDT --- Built. Thanks Jussi and Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225769] Merge Review: freeradius
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225769 Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|twoer...@redhat.com |jden...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 03:46:20 EDT --- jdennis is the maintainer, now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:01:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313843 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-gothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-gothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA == ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 5ae6783ec8c1e0c6579eb2033bfc78f9 ipag00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:01:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313839 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pgothic-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pgothic-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA == ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url ab5e7e962b358a5579d08f09a9d07ebf ipagp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:05:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1313898 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 5d48b713f0252c0697edd3bd2e6fb289 dict-kk.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496825] Review Request: ipa-pgothic-fonts - Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496825 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:16:23 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-pgothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496824] Review Request: ipa-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496824 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:15:15 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-gothic-fonts Short Description: Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:16:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Spec URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek.spec SRPM URL: http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11.src.rpm Looks fine to me now, approved! Johan, can you please apply for packager group member ship in the account system (if you haven't done that already), and tell me your FAS username, then I'll sponsor you. Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:17:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314104 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-pmincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-pmincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA == ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url be6bd5e5f09da8773d0361128340a0f1 ipamp00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:18:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314105 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. ipa-mincho-fonts.src: W: invalid-license IPA ipa-mincho-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license IPA == ignored as its present in wiki list. rpmlint need to be updated. + source files match upstream url 583645bf37f787b2edec30e7d763e8b3 ipam00301.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts packaging guidelines used. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496827] Review Request: ipa-pmincho-fonts - Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496827 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:24:13 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing so quick :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-pmincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Proportional Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496651] Review Request: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries - hunspell-kk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496651 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:24:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-kk Short Description: Kazakh hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #61 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:34:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #58) To benefit upstream the following bugs may be submitted: * Bugs in configure. First, ppc64 case should be added to target switch in configure.in (as powerpc64-*-linux* or so). And proper libdir set there. noted, seems that I need to propose a patch for this to Firebird Project * Bug in autogen.sh. It relies on libtool message to get location of aclocal.m4. But in this case, in new libtool message that message somehow changed and pattern didn't handle that. Consider using of aclocal for this task (like autoreconf does). this one is done in the upstream according to Alex from Firebird admin team : in Head autogen.sh have: echo Running autoreconf ... $AUTORECONF --install --force --verbose || exit 1 And some hacks to work around known bugs in old versions. This is in head. I do not backport it to release versions cause there are still troubles with some autoconf/libtoolize/automake combinations, but hope to solve and backport before 2.1.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 04:37:18 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 04:40:35 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 04:40:40 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493531] Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 04:36:53 EDT --- After freeze of F-11 it will be build as perl-Test-Most-0.21-3.fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Bug 493530 depends on bug 493531, which changed state. Bug 493531 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Most - Test::Most Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493531 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #62 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 04:49:02 EDT --- Before final review, I need to clarify one bureaucratic thing - who will be maintainer of this package - you, Philippe, or initial reporter, Jonathan? There is an technical issue (another one nail into the bugzilla's coffin) - AFAIK only Jonathan can raise/clear flags in this ticket (because he is an reporter), not you, Philippe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #44 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 05:11:59 EDT --- This package transferred to RPM Fusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527 Can you close it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zarko.pin...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 05:13:23 EDT --- This package transferred to RPM Fusion: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528 Can you close it here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #63 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 05:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) Before final review, I need to clarify one bureaucratic thing - who will be maintainer of this package - you, Philippe, or initial reporter, Jonathan? There is an technical issue (another one nail into the bugzilla's coffin) - AFAIK only Jonathan can raise/clear flags in this ticket (because he is an reporter), not you, Philippe. As Jonathan wanted, I let him choose I have no problem to become the maintainer if need. but in that case, it seems that I needed to be sponsored for what I understand ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 05:45:13 EDT --- Version 1.0.6 released, which includes Java bindings, hence more subpackages. There is some bug with qemu on PPC. It builds OK but does not run on PPC, so I have to disable PPC for the time being. This is unfortunate, but as usual because I don't have a PPC machine to run this on, there's not a lot I can do to look into the bug at this time. Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #25 from Zarko zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 05:45:17 EDT --- Question: Once, when update of package will come up from upstream (example: photoprint 0.4.1 or 0.5.0...) what happened? - I must open a new bug for this new release, - or I make update by myself, put it onto Koji and Bodhi as new release and that is it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-22 05:56:23 EDT --- No problem. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496826] Review Request: ipa-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496826 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 05:59:35 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ipa-mincho-fonts Short Description: Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 05:34:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Reviewing version 3.2.5-19.a found in koji. - Other missing Requires: Common uses update-desktop-database = Requires(post): desktop-file-utils Fixed in CVS MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX I cannot fix this, all I can do is replace this with a link the _orig tarbal on one of Debian mirrors. I've asked upstream to make this release available on the official webpage but he hasn't gotten around to this yet. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Include in package: CHANGES, README, LATEX.AND.XFIG*, FIGAPPS Fixed in CVS Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491084] Review Request: medusa - parallel brute forcing pasword cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491084 Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Bug 492266 depends on bug 491128, which changed state. Bug 491128 Summary: Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22 07:41:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) Question: Once, when update of package will come up from upstream (example: photoprint 0.4.1 or 0.5.0...) what happened? - I must open a new bug for this new release, - or I make update by myself, put it onto Koji and Bodhi as new release and that is it? You can just update the package by yourself, submit builds to koji, then submit new update requests on bodhi if needed. No new review request is needed. Closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl 2009-04-22 07:44:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: EekBoek Short Description: Bookkeeping package for small and medium-size businesses Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl 2009-04-22 07:46:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Text-CSV Short Description: Handling data with comma-separated values Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Johan Vromans jvrom...@squirrel.nl 2009-04-22 07:47:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Report Short Description: A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework Owners: sciurius Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #64 from Pavel Lisý pavel.l...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 08:05:31 EDT --- Do you think about making packages for epel-4, epel-5 too? I've tried rebuilt your latest src.rpm in my mock environment (epel-4, epel-5 for i386 and x86_64) and it was successful. Can I help with it, I will use it definitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-22 08:24:40 EDT --- It is, but from times when it be rawhide if you understand me. Now, after sucessful build, I try make update and got error: php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc11 not tagged as an update candidate Where I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #65 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 08:28:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) Do you think about making packages for epel-4, epel-5 too? yes of course Can I help with it, I will use it definitely. any help appreciate, I don't know all the details and procedure to make it append -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100
--- Comment #66 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 08:44:18
EDT ---
REVIEW:
- rpmlint is not silent:
[pe...@host-12-116 Desktop]$ rpmlint firebird-*
firebird.i386: E: no-binary
firebird.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-classic.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-classic.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
firebird-classic.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
firebird-devel.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/firebird/lib/libib_util.so
libib_util.so
firebird-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-libfbclient.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-libfbembed.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-server-common.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/gsec ../tools/gsec
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /etc/firebird/security2.fdb
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: E: non-readable /etc/firebird/security2.fdb 0660
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/gpre ../tools/gpre
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/changeDBAPassword.sh ../tools/changeDBAPassword.sh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/firebird/firebird.log
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: E: zero-length /var/log/firebird/firebird.log
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/gdef ../tools/gdef
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/changeRunUser.sh ../tools/changeRunUser.sh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/data
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/data
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird/backup
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird/backup
firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/lib/firebird/bin/restoreRootRunUser.sh ../tools/restoreRootRunUser.sh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/firebird firebird
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/firebird firebird
firebird-superserver.i386: W: no-documentation
firebird-superserver.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/firebird firebird
firebird-superserver.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/firebird firebird
firebird-superserver.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln
firebird-superserver.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm
firebird-superserver.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name firebird
9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 32 warnings.
[pe...@host-12-116 Desktop]$
I commented almost all of these messages, except two if them, named as
non-conffile-in-etc:
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.csh
firebird-server-common.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/firebird.sh
In order to suppress this messages, you should mark these two files as %config:
- %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.csh
- %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.sh
+ %config %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.csh
+ %config %{_sysconfdir}/profile.d/firebird.sh
Easy to fix.
+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except %doc issues (see below).
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
- The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package MUST be
included in %doc. Also there are other issues with doc-subpackage (see below).
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2*
063b3825a06d328f726b733fd74614b1 Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2
063b3825a06d328f726b733fd74614b1 Firebird-2.1.2.18118-0.tar.bz2.1
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314169
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
+ Every sub-package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in
any of the dynamic linker's default paths, is calling ldconfig in %post
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-22 08:54:09 EDT --- Orcan, why package use self compiller flags? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags Quoting the guidelines: | Adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these | flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so; | the rationale for doing so should be reviewed and | documented in the specfile especially in the override | and filter cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: globus-rsl |Review Request: globus-rsl |-Globus Toolkit - Resource |- Globus Toolkit - Resource |Specification Language |Specification Language |Library |Library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||her...@gmail.com --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22 09:04:43 EDT --- *** Bug 496941 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #67 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 09:08:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) There is an issue with %doc. Firstly, you must include in every sub-package (except *-devel) doc/license/IDPL.txt and doc/license/README.license.usage.txt. Just add %doc doc/license/IDPL.txt %doc doc/license/README.license.usage.txt Hum, interesting it means that one file can be listed more than once ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496941] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Apache module for Ruby on Rails support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496941 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22 09:04:43 EDT --- Once closing as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 470696 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 09:17:29 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314592 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-XXX-0.12-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100
--- Comment #68 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 09:27:46
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #67)
(In reply to comment #66)
%doc doc/license/IDPL.txt
%doc doc/license/README.license.usage.txt
Hum, interesting
it means that one file can be listed more than once ?
Nope. Files listed as %doc are handled slightly different that other files.
For example, if you add the following line
%doc doc/license/IDPL.txt
into %files section of subpackages bar1 and bar2 of package foo then
rpmbuild will search for ~/rpmbuild/BUILD/%{pkgname}/doc/license/IDPL.txt and
will place it as
/usr/share/doc/foo-bar1-%{version}/IDPL.txt
in the subpackage foo-bar1
and as
/usr/share/doc/foo-bar2-%{version}/IDPL.txt
in the subpackage foo-bar2.
These files have different paths, so they are different.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497140] New: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Summary: Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This converter allows you to transfer domain names between the encoded (Punycode) notation and the decoded (UTF-8) notation. rpmlint output: [ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-IDNA_Convert-0.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-IDNA_Convert.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497138] New: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module tries to markup text files according to their syntax. It can be used to produce web pages with pretty-printed colourful source code samples. It can produce output in the following formats: text-vimcolor --format html --filetype prolog foo.pl foo.html This program is a command line interface to the Perl module Text::VimColor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||495693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||497138 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|495693 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495693] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6 - Perl 6 Syntax Highlighter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495693 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|497138 | --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 09:53:37 EDT --- Hm after a few changes Cursor can't be provided because rpmlint is complaining. STD is provided. Please check new version http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6-0.040-2.fc11.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl6.spec Test in this package are blocked by perl-Text-VimColor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 --- Comment #10 from Jan Yenya Kasprzak k...@fi.muni.cz 2009-04-22 10:25:52 EDT --- I have asked upstream about the possible license change, and the author has declined with rather long explanation. So, if the current license is not acceptable, close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412
--- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22
10:25:03 EDT ---
Notes:
On my system _iconsdir or so is defined, however
---
[tasa...@localhost ~]$ grep %_iconsdir /etc/rpm/macros.*
/etc/rpm/macros.jpackage:%_iconsdir %{_datadir}/icons
[tasa...@localhost ~]$ grep -l %_iconsdir /etc/rpm/macros.* | xargs rpm -qf
jpackage-utils-1.7.5-2.7.fc11.noarch
---
i.e. only when jpackage-utils (Java related package) is installed,
these macros can be used.
So if you want to use macros such as _iconsdir,
BuildRequires: jpackage-utils is needed to make it sure that
%_sysconfdir/rpm/macros.jpackage surely exists.
However
- This package does not seem to be related to Java
- So adding BR: jpackage-utils just to define %_iconsdir or
so is not desired
- Also almost all packages on Fedora installing files under
%_datadir/icons/ use %_datadir/icons, not %_iconsdir
So replacing %_iconsdir with %_datadir/icons is much preferable.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #26 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-04-22 10:32:04 EDT --- You probably forget to cvs update to get the new branch. In devel, package should be tagged F12. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@christoph-wickert.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-04-22 10:37:48 EDT --- Fabian A., who else? ;) Stay tuned for a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496244] Review Request: vlna - add non-breakable spaces after prepositions in TeX documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496244 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-22 10:43:34 EDT --- You may want to import the package into RPM Fusion instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 10:45:15 EDT --- ogmtools-1.5-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ogmtools-1.5-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495702] Review Request: perl-XXX - See Your Data in the Nude
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495702 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 10:48:47 EDT --- + source files match upstream. a9c46c1499d0ceae91504fe5fbcaade3173ebdfe XXX-0.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314592 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-XXX.noarch: I: checking perl-XXX.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(XXX) = 0.12 perl-XXX = 0.12-2.fc12 = perl = 0:5.006001 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. t/test.t .. ok t/yyy.t ... ok All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.07 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #27 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-22 10:52:17 EDT --- No, cvs ud -d was runned few times. And oof course, I known what now devel is F-12, it is a reason why I think what F-11 should be added separately. But, when I try tag it, I get error what this tag applied on a different branch: $ make tag cvs tag -c php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11 ERROR: The tag php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11 is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc11:devel:hubbitus:1237926729 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc9:F-9:hubbitus:1237929134 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_fc10:F-10:hubbitus:1237929597 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-10_CVS20090215_el5:EL-5:hubbitus:1237933086 php-pecl-runkit-0_9-11_CVS20090215_el5:EL-5:hubbitus:1240139384 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] error 1 Can I move tags? Or what I should do now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497138] Review Request: perl-Text-VimColor - Syntax color text in HTML or XML using Vim
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497138 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iarn...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:06:20 EDT --- + source files match upstream. 5073ae91074a41dd1e6d22c0cf2a6934f0bb3a39 Text-VimColor-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires are missing perl(XML::Parser) + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1314782 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Text-VimColor.noarch: I: checking perl-Text-VimColor.src: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides are sane: perl(Text::VimColor) = 0.11 perl-Text-VimColor = 0.11-1.fc12 - final requires need fixing /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Path::Class) perl(Path::Class) = 0.02 perl(Text::VimColor) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) = 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) = 3.0.3-1 - %check is present and all tests pass. t/01array.t . ok t/02file.t .. ok t/05xml.t ... skipped: XML::Parser module required for these tests. t/10cmp.t ... ok t/15let.t ... ok t/20override.t .. ok t/99pod.t ... ok All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 1.64 cusr 0.34 csys = 2.06 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. There's a BuildRequires missing for perl(XML::Parser) You don't need the explicit Requires: perl(Path::Class) since we've had 0.02 for a long time now. But I think you should add a Requires: vim-enhanced since this package is pretty useless without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #69 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:10:59 EDT --- just a note, in fact I made serious Q/A test on all that, and found on major issue a major re work is needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469613] Review Request: gnue-appserver - GNU Enterprise Application Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469613 Aaron S. Hawley aaron.s.haw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron.s.haw...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Aaron S. Hawley aaron.s.haw...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:04:56 EDT --- My email address has changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-22 11:17:06 EDT --- No, no, I now speak about using all flags hard defined in SConstruct. You are put standard Fedora %optflags into begin of its (via sed in spec file), but followed flags its override!!! I think it is bad idea at all. If you expect from SSE big advantage, you may add it to standard set, defined widely for current platform, but comment in spec for that needed why you do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #22 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:19:21 EDT --- There appears to be a problem with splitting up the gnome-do-plugins package in the proposed manner. I have a bug to ask the Ubuntu folks to do the same here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351535 Which leads us to this upstream problem. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/do/+bug/324168 to do this right we need to wait for 0.8.2 to be released it seems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:07:37 EDT --- In this case, the flags that I'm overriding for ppc/ppc64 are SSE related. Enabling SSE instruction set may provide some performance boost in those archs that support it. Unfortunately, ppc and ppc64 don't support it so we need to remove those flags when compiling minicomputer in these archs. Here is more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streaming_SIMD_Extensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:28:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) No, no, I now speak about using all flags hard defined in SConstruct. You are put standard Fedora %optflags into begin of its (via sed in spec file), but followed flags its override!!! I am not familiar with all of those flags, but as far as I know, none of '-fwhole-program', '-ftree-vectorize', '-ffast-math', '-funit-at-a-time', '-fpeel-loops', '-ftracer', '-funswitch-loops', '-fprefetch-loop-arrays' is overriding the Fedora flags. The author picked these probably because these are application specific. I think it is bad idea at all. If you expect from SSE big advantage, you may add it to standard set, defined widely for current platform, but comment in spec for that needed why you do that. Again, afaik the code should support SSE if you want to use those flags. I think that my comment is clear about this. It says that SSE is only enabled in those supported archs for obvious reasons. What do you want me to add to it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-04-22 11:46:19 EDT --- Guidelines says what *any* what a adding to and overriding or filtering parts of these flags is permitted if there's a good reason to do so... So, not only sse flags here, I speak about all others. I also not familiar with it. General question - is it needed at all?? Can be compiled application whithout those? And comment about SSE instructions is fully clear for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #70 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 11:49:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #69) just a note, in fact I made serious Q/A test on all that, and found on major issue a major re work is needed Good. It's better to find it now, than later :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767
--- Comment #23 from Nalin Dahyabhai na...@redhat.com 2009-04-22 11:58:37
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
It doesn't need to live in /%{_lib}, but by convention nsswitch modules,
following largely from what glibc does with its own modules, have been put
there anyway.
Oh, good point. I guess nss_ldap is the one that's out of sorts, placing its
libraries under /usr/lib instead.
That's as much about not being able to link with various static libraries any
longer, and the shared versions of those libraries living in /usr, as anything
else.
In this case, though, it avoids having to deal with file conflicts or
working
something out with alternatives (which I actually tried doing, but trying to
select the right one without requiring manual intervention didn't lend
itself
to any elegant solutions).
Indeed, I can't imagine how you would do this with alternatives.
Well, the idea was to hook runlevel changes (you can do that sort of thing with
upstart, at least I thought you could) and call alternatives to select one or
the other depending on whether the daemon was enabled at all for any runlevel,
not that it worked right.
So where do we go from here? I think that from a packaging standpoint this is
good, but without support from the selinux policy it's not as useful and the
interactions with nscd are problematic (although it seems that at least some
of
the problems I'm seeing are due to nscd's negative caching).
If you can leave aside the no-policy-for-it problem while the rest of the
packaging review continues, I can take a first stab at getting a policy
together and then impose on dwalsh to work on fixing it. I'm okay with leaving
this bug open until the policy's sorted out.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 12:59:07 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:00:20 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:00:24 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 12:59:14 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 12:59:19 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-callout-0.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:02:12 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:00:14 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-2.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 13:01:55 EDT --- OK, I got your point now. I know very many packages for which their builders add some extra flags on top of %optflags and I never saw anyone documenting this (unless they are overriding the %optflags). It is an interesting point and I brought this into the attention of Fedora Packaging ML: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-April/msg00073.html Thanks for bringing this up. I will act according to the responses we will get. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:02:22 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-22 13:02:17 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-5.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-04-22 13:12:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Package fails to build in mock for F10 src/XmlLoader.h:25:19: error: expat.h: No such file or directory When you get mock build to work I'll review the package. Sorry, I uploaded the copy to fedorapeople before building the package in mock and koji and haven't synchronized them. PS. You have an awful lot of packages and review requests for packages, but few have done few reviews. Maybe you could do a few, since the review queue is quite clogged? sure Can you please download the stuff again? 'BuildRequires: expat-devel' was added. Thanks for your time to review my packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-22 13:37:08 EDT --- - Optflags are not used. - scons install recompiles targets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 --- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-04-22 13:37:51 EDT --- Ping Adam? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-04-22 13:37:33 EDT --- Ping Jeroen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22 13:43:32 EDT --- --- This package (photoprint-borders) is APPROVED by mtasaka --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497192] New: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Summary: Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/ Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/polkit-qt.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/polkit-qt/polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Polkit-qt is a library that lets developers use the PolicyKit API through a nice Qt-styled API. It is mainly a wrapper around QAction and QAbstractButton that lets you integrate those two component easily with PolicyKit. This will be needed for future incarnations of PolicyKit-kde -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-04-22 14:05:53 EDT --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] New: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Summary: Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdie...@math.unl.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Liblastfm is a collection of libraries to help you integrate Last.fm services into your rich desktop software. Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315407 Will be needed for upcoming amarok-2.1.1 (and newer) releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-04-22 14:15:05 EDT --- Well, - I still think that including I in %description is not good, like -- * For speed and efficiency, I don't want to have to view the images, even in thumbnail form, to figure out which ones need copying. -- If you want to include this sentence in %descript, at least I should be changed to you. Once %description is cleaned up, I would approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 14:49:55 EDT --- This one builds in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1315384 I'll do this next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495579] Review Request: ifstatus - Command Line real time interface graphs using ncurses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495579 Adam Miller maxamill...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Adam Miller maxamill...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 15:02:41 EDT --- Forgot to tag bodhi with the bug to close it, it has been released into updates. I will close it now, sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-04-22 15:44:33 EDT --- Everything seems good, except: * Please add some more information to the description because Usage Library is too general to use for a description. Please do that before you commit. --- This package (globus-usage) is APPROVED by oget --- I also have a stack of packages that depend on each other. The ultimate goal is to get frinika approved: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Could you help me with that whenever you have time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-22 15:44:20
EDT ---
- Does the package work with php4? Maybe a version could be added to Requires:
php =5.
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
- No PECL, PEAR or CHANNEL; package belongs to category other php, so name is
correct.
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. NEEDSFIX
- According to idna_convert.class.php license is LGPLv2+ not LGPLv2. Other php
files do not contain any license specifications.
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
