[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017
--- Comment #19 from Sandro Mathys 2009-04-29 02:56:51
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common.spec
SRPM URL:
http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/l2fprod-common-7.3-4.20090428cvs.fc11.src.rpm
* License
- Removing file in %prep
- Notified upstream
* CVS directory
- Removing in %prep
* Comments
- Removed (no copy-paste but sort of backup during the last edit...simply
forgot to remove them before uploading)
* Multilue jar files (including symlink)
- Done.
! Using xargs
- Done.
! About creating many symlinks manually
- Great input, thanks. Done.
! use "%{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar" in %files
- Done.
FYI: Right now, there's still some stuff from 7.3-3 in 7.3-4 but commented, in
case there's a problem with the new changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:46:13 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:47:11 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 02:39:44 EDT --- @tom : thanks for this. I will work on a build whithout hsieh_hash.c (I don't understand what you mean about %pre, should be deleted in %prep and Makefile patched to not try to use it) Rehards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 02:39:52 EDT --- ???!!?!?! Without those explicit requires in the spec, I get an rpm that doesn't require any of those packages and results in a broken installation - MooseX-Getopt is absolutely required - the nopaste command definitely doesn't work without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 02:41:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-App-Daemon Short Description: Start an Application as a Daemon Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 02:36:59 EDT --- Hi Arthur, I will take a look at your latest package during today/tommorow. For informal package review, you should follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Just pickup any review request which is not yet assigned and perform review (for example, you could do review on this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759, please be aware that there are specific checks for perl/python/php packages http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Application_Specific_Guidelines ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-29 02:30:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327590 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM tucan.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency librsvg2 ==> looks false message + source files match upstream url 21cc03fe952da8a0ae44ba66956a0766 tucan-0.3.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + tucan desktop file installed correctly. + GUI App. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:16 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:24:11 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-04-29 02:16:54 EDT --- 1). Updated Source0 to match tar.gz found in the source rpm. [si...@silas ~]$ curl --silent http://cloud.github.com/downloads/silas/funcshell/funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz | md5sum 1c4ffd7be2aee86743b5aa5f64cc7971 - 2). I maintain other packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/silas Just a quick clarification, when I say "I am the creator of this package" I mean I wrote funcshell (my original wording was somewhat ambiguous). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:10:33 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:11:18 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 02:11:41 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226483] Merge Review: tcsh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226483
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 02:04:43
EDT ---
- Time stamps are not conserved.
for i in Fixes WishList; do
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 < "$i" > "${i}_"
mv "${i}_" "$i"
done
should be
for i in Fixes WishList; do
iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \
touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \
mv "${i}_" "$i"
done
- Defattr should be
(-,root,root,-)
not
(-,root,root)
Fix these before building the new release. The package has been
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Jan Klepek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jan.kle...@hp.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 02:05:16 EDT --- requires seems reasonable for me, I have compared it with modules which are used in Daemon.pm and it fits. Ok, i didn't find anything wrong (except that Log::Log4perl is required two times in source code, but this imho doesn't affect runtime) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-29 02:02:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327573 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 78d560ad4fb67cb8ceb0d84c4de40ed0 App-Nopaste-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(App::Nopaste) = 0.10 perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(App::Nopaste::Service) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Gist) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Husk) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Mathbin) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::PastebinCom) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Pastie) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Rafb) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Shadowcat) perl(App::Nopaste::Service::Snitch) Requires: /usr/bin/env perl(App::Nopaste) perl(App::Nopaste::Command) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Moose) perl(WWW::Mechanize) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) Suggestion: 1) you don't need following # autoreq doesn't catch this Requires: perl(MooseX::Getopt) # necessary for optional modules Requires: perl(Clipboard) Requires: perl(Config::INI::Reader) Requires: perl(Git) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::PastebinCom::Create) Requires: perl(WWW::Pastebin::RafbNet::Create) Remove them and then import new SRPM. I see yum auto processed all these Requires APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 Jan Klepek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kle...@hp.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-04-29 01:51:36 EDT --- 1] md5sum of tarball in source rpm 1c4ffd7be2aee86743b5aa5f64cc7971 funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz is different from tarball downloaded from Source0 20d2b36a2ec3bebfaf7eb2acd317e269 funcshell-0.0.1.tar.gz 2] is this your first package for fedora? Or are you maintainer of any other packages for fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] New: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin Alias: perl-App-Nopaste https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Summary: Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-Nopaste/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Nopaste.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Pastebins (also known as nopaste sites) let you post text, usually code, for public viewing. They're used a lot in IRC channels to show code that would normally be too long to give directly in the channel (hence the name nopaste). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327573 *rt-0.07 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #17 from Andreas Osowski 2009-04-29 01:00:36 EDT --- thanks a lot for your review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: razertool Short Description: Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 00:55:15 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 00:55:10 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Andreas Thienemann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|andr...@bawue.net Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-04-29 00:47:12 EDT --- I have tested and for me are good, now I can make the volume higher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #1 from Ant Bryan 2009-04-29 00:36:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1406989 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/mulk/mulk-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm One tiny change BuildRequires: libmetalink-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #2 from Ant Bryan 2009-04-29 00:39:18 EDT --- Hi Ruben! Cool running into you here! :) Thanks in advance for the review. This is my first library package, & I based it off another so hopefully it's a good start. I also packaged mulk (bug 497948) which depends on libmetalink here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:21:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:19:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:18:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:20:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:15:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:16:06 EDT --- cvs done (with F11 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:14:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:11:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:11:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:07:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:08:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:10:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:05:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:04:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 23:06:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:57:50 EDT --- cvs done (with F11 branch added). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #54 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:53:44 EDT --- cvs done (without F-8, as we do not allow branches for F-8 anymore). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:51:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:48:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-04-28 22:50:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #25 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-28 22:28:42 EDT --- here's the review request for gst-mixer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 I'd rather focus on that for now, after that we can decide if it's a good idea to put gnome-alsamixer in too or not. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498136] New: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Summary: Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awill...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, andr...@bawue.net, bnoc...@redhat.com, fed...@christoph-wickert.de, sunda...@redhat.com, ita...@ispbrasil.com.br, d...@danny.cz, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, leigh123li...@googlemail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer.spec SRPM URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-1.aw_fc11.src.rpm Description: A full control ALSA mixer application for GNOME. Per FESco meeting of April 24th 2009, for Fedora 11 release. I previously submitted gnome-alsamixer to satisfy this proposal - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 - but Bastien Nocera said the old gnome-volume-control code would be preferable as it is still actively maintained. This is a package of the old gnome-volume-control code from gnome-media, renamed gst-mixer (the name of the directory it lives in within the gnome-media code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 arthurguru changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(arthurg.w...@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #12 from arthurguru 2009-04-28 22:14:50 EDT --- Jan, Thanks for your feedback. The debuginfo rpm issue has now been resolved using RPM_OPT_FLAGS, thanks. In the meantime I've made another point release of xmlfy that also incorporates all the good work identified in this review process (branch merge). This also means the links to the RPMs have changed from the original post. Spec file http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy.spec Source RPM http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.src.rpm Binary RPM derived from the above source RPM http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.i386.rpm Other files http://xmlfy.sourceforge.net/submit/fedora/xmlfy-debuginfo-1.4.3-1.i386.rpm Tested ok, rpmlint is content. Lubomir, Thanks for sponsoring the xmlfy project. I have enjoyed the review process and the quality it yields, and totally agree with strengthening ones knowledge of the package review guidelines rather than it being a "one-off" process. I would be more than happy to participate in an informal package review or three. How are these informal reviews conducted? Thanks to all Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] New: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Summary: Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxinput.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxinput-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXInput is a keyboard and mouse configuration utility for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] New: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Summary: Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fed...@christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the XSettings daemon for LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. It allows XSettings aware applications (all GTK+ 2 and GNOME 2 applications) to be informed instantly of changes in LXDE configuration, such as theme name, default font and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #39 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-04-28 20:13:42 EDT --- Definitely getting there :) Right now, all the descriptions are identical. Wouldn't it be better if the different packages explained what they contained, instead of just a common description of what Mumble is? Unless you already know, it's not very clear what "mumble-overlay" does. You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less confusion :) You're currently renaming the binary from murmurd to murmur. The 'd' is kind of standard for daemons, and I suggest leaving it. Read the comment about the input-policy file above :) Unless you know it to work in current revisions of Fedora, I recommend dropping it. There needs to be a post-install for murmur/mumble-server that reloads the dbus service. You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging information for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-28 20:07:03 EDT --- Red Hat Legal says the hsieh licenses are non-free. Hopefully, you should be able to delete that hsieh_hash.c file in %pre without any difficulty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Luke Macken changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lmac...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-04-28 20:00:33 EDT --- I am unable to get this package working in F10 with spython-sqlalchemy-0.4.8-1.fc10 Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/ekg-scan", line 16, in import ekg.model File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ekg/model.py", line 112, in Base = declarative_base(metadata=metadata, cls=SqlBase, metaclass=MetaSqlBase) TypeError: declarative_base() got an unexpected keyword argument 'cls' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Ant Bryan changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||497947 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ant Bryan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||497948 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #73 from Jens Petersen 2009-04-28 19:38:20 EDT --- I sort of missed these comments at the time. (In reply to comment #63) > "Another option is to look at a streamlined set of review items for > publican-created doc packages... We've never explicitly done this but in > practice, people know they don't have to check, for instance, shared > library guidelines when writing and reviewing a pure python module." > > Someone would first need to propose what the specific set of review items for > publican-created doc packages should be. The way to do this is to create a > wiki > page under: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ I agree with this idea: it would be good to have an explicit Packaging Guideline for publican documentation. Basically it all rests on publican since it can generate srpm packages directly from SCM and should be capable of submitting packages directly to koji from svn (like it does for brew inside Red Hat), so in that sense this is nothing to review once publican's templates have been approved as good for Fedora. The general view seems to be that documentation writers and translators in particular should not have to do all the cvs jigs to get books built in the buildsystem so I think yes some special provisions are needed for publican publishing to Fedora. (Other options would include a special writer packager category say in FAS/koji or even a separate repo for documentation publishing (eg dist-f12-docs?).) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:19:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341659) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341659) gcc.spec patch for libstdc++-devel doc enhancements This plus the small patches also attached will generate the doxygen html and man pages for libstdc++-devel. This is configurable via the build_libstdcxx_docs switch in gcc.spec. This seems like the way to go, all is ok except that the man pages are not installed in /user/share/man/* but instead in /user/share/docs/libstdc++-devel/. Not quite sure what is going on there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #8 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:20:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341661) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341661) patch 2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #9 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:21:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341662) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341662) gcc.spec file with libstdc++-devel doc enhancements -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-04-28 18:20:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341660) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341660) patch 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2009-04-28 18:00:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> LINE 105
> you wrote:
> /sbin/chkconfig --del httpd
> should be:
> /sbin/chkconfig --del %{name}
> or not?!
Thank you! I'm copy it form httpd and accidentally forgot change name.
Fixed.
About other errors I wrote in first message. For what you post it again? Do you
think what any of them must be fixed?
Additionally I fill bug on rpmlint for mentioned error -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498107
And one question. Should I delete user in %postun If I add it in %post? Rpmlint
fire warning about it as dangerous operation.
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/RabbIT/RabbIT-3.18-7.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #38 from Igor Jurišković 2009-04-28 17:56:56 EDT --- Done. :) SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-28 17:48:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review Parag. New version, duplicate provide is filtered : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-Charset.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-28 17:48:48 EDT --- I have just "back-ported", on one of the 3.0.0 patches and on the specification file, the work you suggested on the building switches (%bcond macros in the specification file): - Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch (same file as before) and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch (has been updated) ] - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-28 17:49:03 EDT --- In the spec file in comment 8 I disabled the %check section because it took a long time to run. This build has the %check tests reenabled, and it works, although it does take a pretty long time to complete (almost 1 hour): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1327042 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ru...@rubenkerkhof.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ru...@rubenkerkhof.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-28 17:37:35 EDT --- Hi Ant, long time no see! I'll review your package tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||c...@plauener.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c...@plauener.de Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #11 from Mat Booth 2009-04-28 17:17:28 EDT --- How about this: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.16-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498106] Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498106 MERCIER changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||val(a)ide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498106] New: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498106 Summary: Integrated Development Environment for the Vala programming language Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornat...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Created an attachment (id=341652) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341652) SPEC file I want package val(a)ide but before need apply a patch to vala lib such as (shell script) : vala_dir="$(dirname $(which valac))/../share/vala" patch -p0 -d "$vala_dir" < $(cd `dirname $0` && pwd)/gtk+-2.0.vapi.diff The .spec add an attachment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #20 from Denis Arnaud 2009-04-28 16:52:01 EDT --- To be clear, I just ask for approval for the packaging of the pristine SOCI version 3.0.0 (i.e., the lastest release). The corresponding files are still here: - Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch has been updated ] - On the other hand, the extras-soci project is, for now, rather a proof-of-concept for later releases of SOCI (if any!), and a framework for easy patching (for instance, the test programs for the ODBC and Firebird backends do not compile in the pristine CVS trunk), before those patches are incorporated upstream. Of course, no RPM package should be released for later versions (> 3.0) of SOCI, as those do not exist yet... When the upstream developer team will make new releases, the extras-soci project will be ready to package those, after the synchronisation of the source code with the pristine tar-ball. At that time, I shall of course ask again for review and approval. - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-28 16:51:25 EDT --- Looking at those files: crc.c: BSD [OK] hsieh_hash.c: New license [Checking with RH Legal] jenkins_hash.c: Copyright Only (I will interpret "Do NOT use for cryptographic purposes." as advice after the license, rather than license terms, since it conflicts with "You may use this code any way you wish". The upstream for this file should really change that line to say "We do not recommend that you use this code for cryptographic purposes.") [OK] md5.c: BSD [OK] murmur_hash.c: Public Domain [OK] (They really should have a proper declaration for PD on their website, but I'll let it slide) As soon as I hear back on the hsieh licensing, I'll comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #24 from Adam Williamson 2009-04-28 16:48:50 EDT --- just an update here: I am currently not working on this, as I'm trying to build a package of the old gnome-volume-control code instead to make Bastien happy. He would rather have the old gnome-volume-control (which is still maintained for use in non-Pulse situations like Solaris) rather than the effectively unmaintained gnome-alsamixer. I'm trying to get a fully working old gnome-volume-control, parallel installable with the new one, built by the end of today - it has to be patched to identify itself as something other than gnome-volume-control, but Ubuntu has some patches to do that which I should be able to steal. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Christian Krause 2009-04-28 16:48:09 EDT --- Thanks for the update! All open issues were addressed in the last package: -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #3 from Terje Røsten 2009-04-28 16:40:28 EDT --- I have sent a mail to spot to assist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-28 16:28:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review David, and welcome to the Fedora Packagers. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-foolscap Short Description: Next-generation RPC protocol Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441
--- Comment #37 from Igor Jurišković 2009-04-28
15:50:09 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> you did really great work but unfortunately i have a few small issues left:
>
> 1.
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} missing in subpackages (overlay and
> protocol) that dont do proper autodeptracking cause of their payload.
Yea, forgot that. :) Its fixed now.
>
> 2. one has to think about if it is really necassery to symlink the binary so
> many times or instead focus on the upstream method and fix everything else.
> but
> i will leave that up to you.
I was thinking of calling it mumble-server everywhere but got confused when
Mumble devs call it sometimes murmur sometimes mumble-server. I don't now what
is the proper name(Thorvald can tell us probably). I guess its murmur. But if I
call it murmur users will get confused because many don't now what is murmur.
They only now what is mumble. I changed it a little bit. Now there is only
/usr/sbin/murmur and /usr/bin/mumble-server.
Spec coming in one hour - if I'm lucky and everything goes well. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-28 15:26:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review Parag. I'll fix the point you outlined above before building. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-HTML-StripScripts Short Description: Strip scripting constructs out of HTML Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441
--- Comment #36 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-28 15:18:49 EDT
---
you did really great work but unfortunately i have a few small issues left:
1.
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} missing in subpackages (overlay and
protocol) that dont do proper autodeptracking cause of their payload.
2. one has to think about if it is really necassery to symlink the binary so
many times or instead focus on the upstream method and fix everything else. but
i will leave that up to you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiri.reisc...@ecn.cz --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-04-28 15:17:47 EDT --- *** Bug 498005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag|needinfo?(r...@fedoraproject |fedora-review?
|.org) |
--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-28
15:07:04 EDT ---
Well, for 7.3-3:
* License
- Sorry, I missed it however one file is still under
ASL 2.0
-
src/tests/com/l2fprod/common/demo/MainUnitTest.java
-
Can this file be removed at %prep? (Your spec file
seems to be using files only under src/java, so
I guess it is possible)
! Note that only removing this file at %prep is enough.
No need to remove this file from tarball itself.
* CVS directory
- It is recommended to clean up CVS directory at %prep like:
-
find . -type d -name CVS | sort -r | xargs rm -rf
-
* Comments
- What are the comments like
-
###rm -rf docs lib
src/com/l2fprod/common/springrcp
-
for? (I guess you just copy-and-pasted mistakenly...)
* Multilue jar files (including symlink)
- The following guideline seems to be saying that this package
should create a directory and move all jar files (including symlinks)
into the directory:
-
If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must
place them into a sub-directory.
-
And some suggestion about spec file clean up
! Using xargs
- From the line
-
javac -d target -cp `build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar` `find src/java
-name '*.java'`
-
build.log shows lots of output messages brought from
`find src/java -name '*.java'` like:
-
46 + javac -d target -cp
/usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTip.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/DefaultTipModel.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/tips/TipLoader.java
src/java/totd/com/l2fprod/common/swing/TipModel.java
.
-
In this case I usually use xargs like:
-
find src/java -name '*.java' -print0 | xargs -0 javac -d target -cp
`build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar`
-
With this, build.log shows:
-
48 + find src/java -name '*.java' -print0
49 ++ build-classpath nachocalendar jcalendar
50 + xargs -0 javac -d target -cp
/usr/share/java/nachocalendar.jar:/usr/share/java/jcalendar.jar
51 src/java/sheet/com/l2fprod/common/beans/BeanUtils.java:41: warning:
non-varargs call of varargs method with inexact argument type for last
parameter;
52 cast to java.lang.Class for a varargs call
-
which is much easier to look at.
! About creating many symlinks manually
- I think this is error-prone. I guess the following is better:
--
install -m644 %{name}-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all-%{version}.jar
ln -s %{name}-all-%{version}.jar $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-all.jar
for dir in src/java/*/
do
subname=$(basename $dir)
for exception in \
demo springrcp
do
if [ $subname = $exception ] ; then continue 2 ; fi
done
ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}.jar
ln -sf %{name}-all-%{version}.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-${subname}-%{version}.jar
done
---
Also I would just use "%{_javadir}/%{name}-*.jar" in %files
(however also see the previous comment about
"Multilue jar files (including symlink)".
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
[Bug 498073] New: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Summary: Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroubl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: EKG is a community health scanner. Currently this targets mailing list archives, in the future, we may also pay closer attention to code contributions and other details. Note: We are in discussion what the name should be. There is a definite python library component. The big question is the scripts that come with this package, should they also be considered 'python-fedora', or would we be better off with a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #4 from Fabien Georget 2009-04-28 14:57:18 EDT --- I have updated the package : Spec URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bde.espci.fr/~george27/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm But I have a question about the files section : Are we allowed (encouraged ?) to not include all files that we don't think it is necessary ? I will take a look on review Guidelines. Thank you for this advice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-28 14:53:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Updated: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11.src.rpm Spec: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec > ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? Good you noticed that. It isn't MIT, it is under zlib. There are a few copyright notices as comments in source files, eg. sqlite3x.hpp. I changed the license tag in the above spec file, and I will also change the native package. David Woodhouse (the reviewer of the native package), has also been notified, he is ok with the change. > ! The package contains documentation already present in the native > Fedora package Removed. > ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in > the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? Reordered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 manuel wolfshant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480434] Review Request: xcall - Packet Radio Terminal Program for ham radio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480434 Randall Berry changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #6 from Randall Berry 2009-04-28 13:58:58 EDT --- Closing request for review. Project appears to be abandoned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #35 from Igor Jurišković 2009-04-28 13:47:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Just a quick comment: If you're using scripts/murmur.conf as it is, that > expects murmur to be running under the username "mumble-server". If you want > the user to be named "murmur", you'll need to change it :) > Unless it clashes with Fedora policy, I would actually recommend keeping the > username as "mumble-server", as that will allow you to use the majority of the > config-files as-is. Yeah, I was thinking to do that but it was late last night. And mumble-server fits better because most files and directories are called mumble-server. I'll change that today. > > Also the input-policy file -- please check that it does indeed work. It's a > complete hack, has only been tested on Ubuntu (and does not work on e.g. > Debian), and so it might not give the result you wish. Also, unless you happen > to run an older X server, X will lock input devices so they can't be read, > which means it won't work anyway. May be better to just remove it. > > BTW: I may be missing something obvious here, but why target F9? F10 is > released, and F11 is due in a month? Mine system is F9. Its heavily modified and doing an upgrade is not an option. I'll do a complete new installation of F11 when it comes out. Anyway I wont need to change nothing in spec file. g15 is still missing in F11. :( I would try to make package but I don't have G15 keyboard so I can't test binaries. I'll upload new spec and srpms later(few hours). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Martin Bacovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(mbaco...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Martin Bacovsky 2009-04-28 13:33:13 EDT --- I found out this bug is waiting on me. Since I'm no longer maintainer of psutils, I changed the needinfo requestee to the current one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226324] Merge Review: psutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226324 Martin Bacovsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tsmet...@redhat.c ||om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-04-28 13:25:36 EDT --- Okay, now this package itself is good - I think "BR: pkgconfig" is not needed, however anyway "pkgconfig" is included in buildroot because "rpm-build" has "Requires: pkgconfig" due to a reason. So, I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #1 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2009-04-28 13:00:31 EDT --- More information about tuna and the oscilloscope can be found in this article, that has some screenshots: http://www.osadl.org/Single-View.111+M5aa14d3660e.0.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-04-28 12:54:38 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.15-1.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1326784 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
