[Bug 497720] Review Request: hunspell-ln - Lingala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497720 Caolan McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-29 03:24:07 EDT --- Hm, testsuite was failing since %a seems to be ignored with most recent glibcs even when the source is not an ISO C source, contrary to what was documented. The package was updated to 1.1, imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-29 03:35:13 EDT --- Argh! my bad. I forgot to remove them from SPEC while testing and installing this package locally. Please add Requires: back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gssapi-error - Globus |globus-gssapi-error - |Toolkit - GSSAPI Error |Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI |Library |Error Library --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 03:35:29 EDT --- The upstream name of this package (gssapi-error) fails the "to common name" rule. Therefore I have changed it to have the globus- prefix like all the other globus packages. Patch for this is submitted upstream. New version: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-04-29 03:39:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-App-Nopaste Short Description: Easy access to any pastebin Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-29 04:03:27 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-04-29 04:06:44 EDT --- Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-MIME-Charset Short Description: Charset Informations for MIME Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494820] Review Request: python-pytools - A collection of tools for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494820 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet 2009-04-29 04:09:33 EDT --- Response from Brian Thanks for the heads up. I'll look into adding a configure switch to disable it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497991] Review Request: hunspell-as - Assamese hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497991 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-04-29 04:14:45 EDT --- Built for F-11 and devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494819] Review Request: python-bitarray - Efficient Array of Booleans --C Extensions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494819 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495021] Review Request: python-posix_ipc - POSIX IPC primitives for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495021 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494853] Review Request: python-achoo - A fluent interface for testing Python objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494853 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 04:47:41 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 04:47:33 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 05:27:38 EDT --- Do you still need BuildRequires: doxygen? Anyway, that you can check post-review. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Reischig 2009-04-29 06:05:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) I try compile and install the package and it's working good. Thank you very much. I hope that the package will be included in the next Fedora version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453857 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 453857 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:02:24 EDT --- Sources match upstream: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/ is silent. Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328247 $ rpmlint globus-gsi-sysconfig*.rpm globus-gsi-sysconfig-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Reischig 2009-04-29 06:10:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) Please, do you know how can I insert to the KDE new CA key or site selfsigned key which will be acepted in this kio-ftps? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-29 06:11:52 EDT --- thank you for your review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: tucan Short Description: Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:08:12 EDT --- Fedora review globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output See above; the "no documentation" warning can be ignored. + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm the source repacking makes it impossible to compare md5sum's, thus: $ diff -urN globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2/ globus_gsi_sysconfig-2.2-dl/ reports no differences + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' indirectly, via R: globus-core + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:15:37 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-plotmm Short Description: MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:16:19 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libsqlite3x Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226108] Merge Review: lsof
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226108 Karel Zak changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(k...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Karel Zak 2009-04-29 06:21:19 EDT --- Michal, thanks for your review. I'll fix all in the next rawhide update (probably together with some others issues). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt 2009-04-29 06:21:57 EDT --- > soci-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm APPROVED So you can squash remaining issues in pkg cvs, which will be more convenient than going through the upload-bugzilla-review cycle. [...] With a caveat, though, as the conditional build options don't seem to work [yet]: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-backend-empty, --disable-backend-sqlite3 And although it recognises the other --disable-backend options, it ignores them and still builds various backends if the needed -devel pkgs are installed. E.g. --without mysql ends with RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/soci/backends/mysql/soci-mysql.h /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3 /usr/lib/libsoci_mysql.so.3.0.0 Unless you can disable the backends at "configure"-time, you could add "BuildConflicts: mysql-devel" to enforce uninstalling unwanted -devel pkgs. ;o) [...] > %define mydocs __tmp_docdir Not used anywhere. * The many %{?with_foo:...} switches throughout the spec file could be grouped together and could be replaced with a much more readable %if/%endif block that covers everything for each conditional subpkg except the %build/%install sections. In other words, for e.g. MySQL you would end up with: %if %{with mysql} %package mysql ... %description mysql ... %files mysql ... %post mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun mysql -p /sbin/ldconfig ... %package mysql-devel ... %description mysql-devel ... %files mysql-devel ... %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch Bug 453856 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 453856 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:19:36 EDT --- Sources match upstream: 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz $ rpmlint globus-gsi-cert-utils*.rpm globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec globus-gsi-cert-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gsi-cert-utils-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-04-29 06:25:10 EDT --- Fedora review globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output See above; the "no documentation" warning can be ignored. Source Tarball does not contain a license file + Package is named according to Fedora Package Naming Guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora ASL 2.0 + License matches the actual package license n/a The package contains the license file none shipped by upstream tarball + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 ORIG/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz 48987f39031ac79949a9b0913aa42c67 SOURCES/globus_gsi_cert_utils-5.5.tar.gz + Package scratch-builds n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content + Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage n/a Files marked %doc should not affect package + Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' indirectly, via R: globus-core + libfoo.so must go in -devel + -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Thomas Sailer changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 06:43:00 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gsi-cert-utils Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 06:43:03 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gsi-sysconfig Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497807] Review Request: perl-Capture-Tiny - Capture stdin or stdout from Perl, XS or external programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497807 Marcela Maslanova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498186] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is mostly a Perl-rewrite of http://github.com/einars/js- beautify/tree/master/beautify.js http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328326 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 07:43:05 EDT --- A few notes: - .la files need to be removed, add find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \; to the end of the install phase - if possible, static library build should be disable (usually %configure --disable-static) - devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig - you're running autoreconf, but not BRing the packages => the package will not build in mock. Autoreconf'ing is frowned upon, and should not be done unless it is specifically necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498188] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-1.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module removes unnecessary whitespace from JavaScript code. The primary requirement developing this module is to not break working code: if working JavaScript is in input then working JavaScript is output. It is ok if the input has missing semi-colons, snips like '++ +' or '12 .toString()', for example. Internet Explorer conditional comments are copied to the output but the code inside these comments will not be minified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Marcela Maslanova changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Mattias Ellert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-29 07:57:15 EDT --- Fedora review jorbis-0.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-04-29 rpmlint output: [ell...@ellert jorbis]$ rpmlint 1256512409979681881233819/result/jorbis/*.rpm jorbis.spec jorbis.src:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jorbis.src:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* jorbis.src:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.* jorbis.src:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.* jorbis.spec:156: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %dir %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} jorbis.spec:157: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.jar.* jorbis.spec:170: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package player %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-player*.jar.* jorbis.spec:178: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package comment %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/%{name}-comment*.jar.* 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint warnings are bogus - rpmlint does not understand the conditional BuildArch. * Package is named according to the guidelines * The specfile is named after the package * The package follows the guidelines for a native Java package * Package license is Fedora approved (LGPLv2+) * The README file says that the license is LGPL with no version, but that is equivalent to LGPLv2+ according to the Fedora License list * The license file (COPYING.LIB) in the sources is installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream: 6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f jorbis-0.0.17.zip 6141edfb16d34412a86c95a97fd4b10f SRPM/jorbis-0.0.17.zip * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires are sane * No shared libraries * Package owns the directories it creates ! The jars in -comment and -player are also in main (duplicate files) * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Consistent use of macros * Documentation in -javadoc package * %doc is not runtime essential * subpackages require main with fully versioned dependencies * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498189] New: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 498188 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JavaScript::Minifier::XS is a JavaScript "minifier"; its designed to remove un-necessary whitespace and comments from JavaScript files, which also not breaking the JavaScript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498191] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR-0.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module installs PAR distributions (i.e. .par files) into any perl installation on the system. The PAR::Dist module can install into the currently running perl by default and provides the necessary parameters to override any installation directories. Figuring out how to use those overrides in order to install into an arbitrary perl installation on the system may be beyond most users, however. Hence this convenience wrapper using ExtUtils::InferConfig to automatically determine the typical site installation paths of any perl interpreter than can be executed by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-04-29 08:08:06 EDT --- PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:12:12 EDT --- Whoops, I was too fast: SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:11:30 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-29 08:18:20 EDT --- I meant %prep, not %pre. :) Sorry! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498193] New: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Summary: Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description:This module can determine the configuration and @INC of a perl interpreter given its path and that it is runnable by the current user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 08:02:26 EDT --- - Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be able to remove Fedora brandings altogether. - Is the obsoletes&provides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora? rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's compatible with GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => remove %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module is an interface to the W3C CSS Validation online service http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/, based on its SOAP 1.2 support. It helps to find errors in Cascading Style Sheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498197] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: The Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phone users unable to use the Zarafa Webaccess based on Ajax and whose mobile phone is not supported via ActiveSync yet. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via your mobile device. Zarafa Webaccess Mobile has a text interface only and allows users to create simple e-mails, appointments, contacts and tasks. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] New: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Summary: Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Outlook Sharing is a Microsoft Exchange replacement. The Open Source Collaboration provides an integration with your existing Linux mail server, native mobile phone support by ActiveSync compatiblity and a webaccess with 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook using Ajax. Including an IMAP4 and a POP3 gateway as well as an iCal/CalDAV gateway, Zarafa can combine the usability with the stability and flexibility of a Linux server. The proven Zarafa groupware solution is using MAPI objects, provides a MAPI client library as well as programming interfaces for C++, PHP and Perl. The other Zarafa related packages need to be installed to gain all the features and benefits of Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498195] New: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Summary: Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, tcall...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, kana...@kanarip.com, fedora-jas...@newnewyork.nl Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Zarafa Webaccess features the familiar Outlook 'Look & Feel' interface and you can keep using the features in Outlook that have always allowed you to work efficiently. View your e-mail, calendar and contacts via a web browser. And opening your colleagues calendar or sending a meeting request is only a piece of cake. The Zarafa Webaccess is using the ajax technology to give a more interactive feeling to the users. I'll add the spec file, once I clarified some library dependency issues with Jeroen or so. SRPM shipping is for now a legal problem as I'm testing with an non-official release candidate, nevertheless, there are still some licensing issues with Zarafa, Tom is investigating into. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498198] New: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498198 Summary: Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C - Access the W3Cs online HTML validator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-WebService-Validator-HTML-W3C-0.24-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C provides access to the W3C's online Markup validator. As well as reporting on whether a page is valid it also provides access to a detailed list of the errors and where in the validated document they occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498199] New: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Summary: Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: serein...@online.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper-0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Dynamic wallpaper is based on weather-wallpaper and generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season, time of day and others. It supports themes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #9 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-04-29 08:45:06 EDT --- Thanks! And sorry for the delay. I've been running 1.6.21 and most things work (apart from, strangely, the Log Out button). http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher.spec http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/netbook-launcher-1.6.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Should we ask the legal team about the netbook trademark? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498200] Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||michel.syl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|michel.syl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498200] New: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498200 Summary: Review Request: window-picker-applet - Window picker applet for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel.syl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/window-picker-applet-0.4.23-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A gnome-panel applet that displays open windows as icons on the panel, and has integrated window title-bar functionality. Optimised for use on netbook-size screens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||462851(FedoraMini) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462851(FedoraMini) Depends on|462851(FedoraMini) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 08:58:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxinput Short Description: Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498203] New: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.32-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kirill Siminov's "libyaml" is arguably the best YAML implementation. The C library is written precisely to the YAML 1.1 specification. It was originally bound to Python and was later bound to Ruby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498204] New: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmasl...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wx::Perl::DataWalker implements a Wx::Frame subclass that shows a relatively simple Perl data structure browser. After opening such a frame and supplying it with a reference to an essentially arbitrary data structure, you can visually browse it by double-clicking references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||498195, 498196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|498196 |498197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498196] Review Request: perl-WebService-Validator-CSS-W3C - Interface to the W3C CSS Validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498196 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|498194 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498197] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498194 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #40 from Igor Jurišković 2009-04-29 09:29:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Definitely getting there :) > > Right now, all the descriptions are identical. Wouldn't it be better if the > different packages explained what they contained, instead of just a common > description of what Mumble is? Unless you already know, it's not very clear > what "mumble-overlay" does. Changed for everything except for protocol. Dont now what to write. > > You're calling the package "murmur", which provides "mumble-murmur". If you > make it provide "mumble-server" instead (or simply make it the "server" > subpackage), you'll match the naming used in other distros, which means less > confusion :) It's called mumble-server now. > > You're currently renaming the binary from murmurd to murmur. The 'd' is kind > of > standard for daemons, and I suggest leaving it. Changed. > > Read the comment about the input-policy file above :) Unless you know it to > work in current revisions of Fedora, I recommend dropping it. To be honest with you I don't even now what it does. I'll put it as documentation so if somebody wants it, it can get it there. > > There needs to be a post-install for murmur/mumble-server that reloads the > dbus > service. dbus uses inotify to monitor conf files. They'll get updated automatically. > > You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging > information > for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes for > /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this: logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid murmur.logrotate first line is: /var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log Files coming in about one hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #4 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 09:37:30 EDT --- Ant, have you been sponsored yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #41 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-04-29 09:36:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #39) > > Definitely getting there :) > > > > You're installing a logrotate, and your murmur.ini contains logging > > information > > for /var/log/murmur, but this directory isn't created anywhere. Same goes > > for > > /var/run/murmur (where murmur will try to store it's pid file) > > Are you sure about this? I just untared mumble-1.1.8.tar.gz and opened > scripts/murmur.ini.system and it says this: > > logfile=/var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log > > pidfile=/var/run/mumble-server/mumble-server.pid > > murmur.logrotate first line is: > /var/log/mumble-server/mumble-server.log that is correct but you need to mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server and mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server and %dir them both in the files section: %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/mumble-server %dir %{_localstatedir}/run/mumble-server > > Files coming in about one hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(o...@geek.co.il) --- Comment #20 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 09:39:55 EDT --- Ping again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 09:41:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Require system-icon-theme instead of fedora-icon-theme, as one should be > able > to remove Fedora brandings altogether. The reason for choosing fedora-icon-theme over system-icon-theme is that I explicitly set Fedora in the patch. Changed. > - Is the obsoletes&provides really necessary since there AFAIK is not and > hasn't ever been a lxde-settings package in Fedora? You are correct. I made one as a subpackage of the current lxde-common, but I never built it. Removed. > - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. > - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's compatible with GPLv2+. Agreed and removed. BTW: The included COPYING is GPLv3, not v2. Upstream confirmed this was an error. You want me to replace the file in the package or leave it as is for now. > - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => > remove > %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ That was intentional. I omitted the dir from lxde-common-0.4 and made it require lxde-settings-daemon instead. Updated package: SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon.spec SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498214] New: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Summary: Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum-2.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: GaussSum is a GUI application that can analyse the output of ADF, GAMESS (US), GAMESS-UK, Gaussian, Jaguar and PC GAMESS to extract and calculate useful information. This includes the progress of the SCF cycles, geometry optimisation, UV-Vis/IR/Raman spectra, MO levels, MO contributions and more. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498216] New: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Alias: perl-Perl-Tags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Perl-Tags/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Generate (possibly exuberant) Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode. Recursively follows use and require statements, up to a maximum of max_level. The implemented tagger, Perl::Tags::Naive is a more-or-less straight ripoff, slightly updated, of the original pltags code, and is rather naive. It should be possible to subclass using something like PPI or Text::Balanced, though be aware that this is alpha software and the internals are subject to change. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328528 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] New: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Summary: Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ed...@tenbrink-bekkers.nl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/fedora/picturetile.spec SRPM URL: http://www.tenbrink-bekkers.nl/fedora/picturetile-20050314-1.fc10.src.rpm Introduction: Users need this perl script in order to use the Create Photowall option (provided by extension PictureTile 0.5.0.0 in F-Spot). The script itself is not packaged anywhere in Fedora until now. When user click Create Photowall in F-Spot, only the message "picturetile.pl not found" appears, which is not very user-friendly. Unfortunately, F-Spot has a problem with its extensions at the moment, therefore live testing of the interaction with F-Spot is at the moment impossible. I already filed a bug upstream, and add I will add a tracker bug here in Bugzilla as well. Since it is not required for F-Spot to have this package or vice versa, I deliberately left out these dependencies. This is my second package under review, but I have no sponsor up to now. My first package is under review under bug 497525. Description of the script: Takes a bunch of images and tiles them into one large image. Not so much a collage, as a "photo wall." The images are selected randomly from the given directory, and packed together as tightly as possible. Images that are very small are assumed to be thumbnails and are ignored. No image will be used more than once, and the images need not be of the same size or aspect ratio. This script can be used stand-alone from the command-line, or from the F-Spot plugin "create photowall" (PictureTile). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498220] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Alias: perl-Module-Used https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Used/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Used.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Modules are found statically based upon use and require statements. If use of the base or parent is found, both that module and the referenced ones will be returned. If Moose or Moose::Role are found, this will look for extends and with sugar will be looked for; presently, this will miss modules listed in parentheses. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1328535 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-04-29 10:01:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > - lxde-settings-daemon.c is under GPLv2+, other files are under MIT. > > - I'm not sure, however, if the MIT license needs to be mentioned since it's > compatible with GPLv2+. > > Agreed and removed. BTW: The included COPYING is GPLv3, not v2. Upstream > confirmed this was an error. You want me to replace the file in the package or > leave it as is for now. Leave it as it is. The license of the program is the one in the source code. > > - Package already Requires: lxde-common which provides /usr/share/lxde => > > remove > > %dir %{_datadir}/lxde/ > > That was intentional. I omitted the dir from lxde-common-0.4 and made it > require lxde-settings-daemon instead. Oh, okay, no problem then. ** The package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 --- Comment #3 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-04-29 10:07:02 EDT --- Updated release is available: Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/projxp-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #13 from Guido Grazioli 2009-04-29 10:02:42 EDT --- Hi, no and yes actually; i'm trying to help packaging an eclipse feature right now (wtp), which is software i use daily. If someone would take over the maintenance of this package because i'm not sponsored, its no problem for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||472819, 497640 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||476530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||476530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-04-29 10:10:17 EDT --- new version available 0.3.7 alpha @parag in new version i removed shipped mo-files and built it from source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora_requires_release_not ||e? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 10:11:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxde-settings-daemon Short Description: XSettings Daemon for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-04-29 10:15:01 EDT --- Sorry, no F-9 please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-cvs? |e? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #10 from Traxtopel 2009-04-29 10:18:33 EDT --- The logout button will not work since it prereqs an older gdm (needs socket), needs a rewrite. The patch I proposed adds functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #11 from Traxtopel 2009-04-29 10:19:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=341758) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=341758) Update logout/etc patch Workaround for logout button issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #42 from Igor Jurišković 2009-04-29 10:23:55 EDT --- Done. Everything pointed by Thorvald and Rudolf has be fixed or changed. NEW SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm DESKTOP MUMBLE: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.desktop DESKTOP OVERLAY: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-overlay.desktop NEW INIT: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/murmur.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 --- Comment #5 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-04-29 10:25:05 EDT --- Hi Peter, thanks for the review. I've fixed all the issues mentioned above, and disabled building with tcmalloc (from google-perftools-devel) for ppc64. In the meantime upstream released a new version. New version here: SPEC: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand.spec SRPM: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/gearmand-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review