[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 03:10:53
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
fedora-devshell.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Fedora Devshell is a
developers toolbox for creating packages and developing software for Fedora. It
aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora
repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora components.
fedora-devshell.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/devshell/devshell.py 0644
fedora-devshell.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/devshell/ports.py 0644
fedora-devshell.src: E: description-line-too-long Fedora Devshell is a
developers toolbox for creating packages and developing software for Fedora. It
aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora
repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora components.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings.
- You need to break the description lines to match the 80 character width
restricition.
- Either add executable bits to devshell.py and ports.py or remove their
shebangs to fix the non-executable-script problem. Python library files should
not have shebangs; please contact upstream to remove them.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- License is GPLv2, not GPLv2+.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX
- No source URL provided. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. ~OK
- Instead of using
%{python_sitelib}/*
please use
%{python_sitelib}/devshell/
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}-*.egg-info
instead, as this is more likely to pick up errors.
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSFIX
- Add PKG-INFO to %doc.
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 03:26:26
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- There is nothing mentioned about a license in the tarball => the tarball has
no license.
- Since the GPLv2+ license is in upstream svn, use a svn revision for now,
until upstream releases a stable tarball with a license. (Of course, you can
ask upstream to make a new stable release with the license info ASAP.)
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX
- Use "cp -a" instead of plain "cp" in setup phase.
- Also, use
install -D -p -m 755 smem $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/smem
to preserve the time stamp of the python file itself. -D creates the directory
if necessary, so you can drop the dir creation line:
install -p -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX
- Use the svn revision until upstream releases a new tarball with license
information included.
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-01 04:22:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Source1:websvn-httpd.conf > Patch1: websvn-2.2.0-use_system_libs.patch > > What is source for patch1? > Where do you get websvn-httpd.conf? > I wrote both of them. The patch allows to use external php-geshi and php-feedcreator. The source is the conf needed for httpd. > in spec file you have 2.2.0-1 but srpm is for 2.1.0-3 > could you please give a link to 2.2.0 srpm? Sorry, I updated the package but forgot to update the ticket... Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/websvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/websvn-2.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 2.2.0 needs a bit of work because an option to move the config file is now provided and the symlink to /etc trick is not needed anymore. I'll fix that asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #74 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-01 05:42:13 EDT --- I reworked my patch to preserve the name of all the current rpms (src and noarch): Please test: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/publican/publican-0.45-0.4+naming.fc11.noarch.rpm This package should have brew-* and web-* targets continuing to work unchanged as before (only changes to the .spec and tarball names), and provide new make targets fedora-* and koji-* for creating fedora rpms and pushing builds to koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324
--- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 05:56:34
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Alright, here is the review. Nothing serious:
Thank you very much for the review!
> ! Please make the description span 80 columns evenly (as much as possible)
Done.
> ! The file Changes can be packaged as %doc
Done.
> ! There is no information about the license except at the end of the
> lib/JSON/RPC/Common.pm file. Could you advise upstream for putting a COPYING
> file into the tarball and adding headers that contain license information to
> the source files?
Yes, I've mailed upstream. The author replied that he'll have a look at this.
> ! It looks like these BR's can be removed:
>BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
>BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean)
> The package builds fine without them. The other packages pull them in so they
> don't cause any harm. I'll leave this up to you.
Done, I've removed them.
> * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
> I
> don't think this package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ . It should own
> %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/RPC instead. Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ will
> be satisfied by rpm's automatic dependency generation.
Done.
new package:
Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common.spec
SRPM URL:
http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-2.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-01 06:21:57 EDT --- *** Bug 478463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-01 07:11:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fix the time stamp issue before importing to cvs. Will do, thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: lxshortcut Short Description: Small utility to edit application shortcuts Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 07:33:28 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||466737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Alexey Torkhov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #10 from Fabien Georget 2009-05-01 08:27:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Please follow the procedure written on: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > from "Get a Fedora Account". > > After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor > > members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies > > that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on > > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and > > your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. > > I apply to the packager group. > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498604] New: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 Summary: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amd...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/apron/apron.spec SRPM URL: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/apron/apron-0.9.10_pr-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: APRON is a library of functions that allows the definition and analysis of abstract numerical domains. APRON allows for different types of numerical coefficients, both arbitrary precision floating-point and rational, and different types of domain structures like intervals and polyhedra. It allows for variable assignments and constraints involving domains, and operations on these variables like comparisons, existential quantification, substitution, meet and join. I have done the following with respect to checking the packaging guidelines: rpmlint produces: apron.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libap_pkgrid.a (... many more like this about static libs...) ocaml-apron.i386: W: no-documentation ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/aprontop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/aprontop ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/ppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/apronppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/apronppltop 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 49 warnings. The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel. Furthermore, these libraries are all static. Ideally, this would not be the case, and I have mentioned to upstream aspects of their build procedure that complicate packaging, and intend to continue to move them toward better practices for packaging compatibility (eg: shared libraries, using standard "configure, make, make install" process). Packaging already requires an extensive set of changes to their makefiles to allow for configuration at locations as specified by RPM parameters (which was included in the form of a patch). If there are more things I should be doing in the short term for the static libraries (eg: moving them all into -devel, creating a -static or a virtual package -static via "provides") or if this static library creation is a problem for packaging this overall, let me know. The second set of warnings are a standard set of warnings for OCaml bytecode binaries - I will tell upstream to try not to "-custom" for future releases (which goes hand-in-hand with switching to shared libraries). Note that the version name is due to the fact that this is a "pre-release" of version 0.9.10 in the sense that 0.9.10 will soon be released and this was taken from the SVN repository as "most of the way there". (It incorporates the changes that are necessary for me to next package Frama-C.) I also verified that the package builds in koji for dist-(f9 to f12) (eg: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331353). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-05-01 09:05:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Some notes: > > * About shebang or so related rpmlint warning Thanks for the feedback. I'll incorporate them into the first build for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||489564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Alexey Torkhov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-01 09:33:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. Well, the email used in your account on FAS differs from what is used on this bugzilla, which must coincide. Please change either of them, then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #42 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-05-01 10:21:50 EDT --- Ok, I built it: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-2.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-01 10:32:04 EDT --- Thanks Arthur. Just curious how you ran your build; this is what I did and it worked. 1. [si...@silas SRPM]$ wget http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 2. [si...@silas SRPMS]$ mock -r fedora-10-i386 funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm NFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-10-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-10-i386) 1 minutes 1 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result 3. [si...@silas SRPMS]$ rpmls /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/funcshell drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell-0.0.1-py2.5.egg-info -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.pyo drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/funcshell-0.0.1 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/funcshell-0.0.1/LICENSE 4. [si...@silas SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. P.S. If the syntax of the egg file name is different, let me know the name and I will make the glob more general. Thanks again, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 10:42:35 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 10:42:29 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-01 11:25:49 EDT --- Thanks. But now we have the rpmlints: perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src: E: description-line-too-long objects to convert the model objects into JSON text and HTTP requests/responses. perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src:54: W: macro-in-%changelog doc perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src:56: W: macro-in-%changelog perl_vendorlib Please fix these. Also, running rpmlint on the SPEC and SRPM files after you're done editing is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 11:36:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 11:36:02 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-01 12:33:28 EDT --- Here's a mostly-complete review with a few questions: - naming and licensing are fine - versioning is fine - where does Source3 (the build.xml) come from? what about Patch1 (-jar-up)? - I didn't know you could use the %setup macro more than once but I don't see anything in the guidelines about not doing this - a comment other than "apply patches" would be useful before the %patch macros. I personally like to say what each patch is doing - lines 16, 99, 101, 108, 109, 110 are all > 80 characters - the Makefile(s) they provide do something weird with debuginfo ... or /usr/bin/lpg isn't executable so strip-debuginfo isn't run on it? I have to go over the non-Java packaging guidelines for the C++ stuff. That'll take me a while but I'll get back to you when I'm done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-01 13:10:44 EDT --- OK, bumped to -2.aw_fc11 with that change made: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-2.aw_fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682
Terje Røsten changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|terje...@phys.ntnu.no
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Terje Røsten 2009-05-01 13:16:12
EDT ---
Thanks Remi, patch seems to work.
Starting full review.
[ x=ok -=dont't apply !=please fix ?=may fix ]
MUST
[x] rpmlint must be run on every package
[x] package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
[x] spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[-] package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
[x] [BSD] package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license
[x] license field in the package spec file must match the actual license
[x] includes the text of the license(s) in its own file: include in %doc
[x] be written in American English
[x] spec file for the package be legible
[x] sources used to build the package must match the upstream source
md5sum: 3e022f51301a73ddfc3df32de5b748b19fd97c65 : ok
[x] compile and build into binary rpms on at least one architecture
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611
[-] not successfully compile an architecture: use ExcludeArch
[x] all build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[-] spec file MUST handle locales properly
[x] shared library files not in any default linker paths: ldconfig
[-] relocatable package: the packager must state this fact
[x] package must own all directories that it creates
[x] not any duplicate files in the %files listing
[x] permissions on files must be set properly
[x] package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
[x] consistently use macros
[x] must contain code, or permissable content
[-] large docs should go in a -doc subpackage
[x] %doc must not affect the runtime of the application
[x] header files must be in a -devel package
[-] static libraries must be in a -static package
[!] containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
-devel package should have this added.
[x] library files that end in .so: go in a -devel package
[x] devel pkg: require base package using a fully versioned dependency
[x] no .la libtool archives
[-] gui app include a %{name}.desktop file
[x] must not own files or directories already owned by other packages
[x] %install includes rm -rf %{buildroot}
[x] filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8
SHOULD
[x] test that the package builds in mock
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611
[x] compile and build into binary rpms on all archs
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611
[+] package functions as described
[x] those scriptlets are sane
[x] subpackages require the base packag fully versioned dep
[x] pkgconfig(.pc) in devel
[x] no explicit file dep outside /etc, /bin/, /sbin, /usr/{sbin,bin}
Add req on pkgconfig in -devel on importing and you are done.
libmemcached is APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498654] New: Review Request: uget - A download manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uget - A download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Summary: Review Request: uget - A download manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/uget/uget.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/uget/uget-1.4.7-1.fc.src.rpm Description: A download manager using GTK+ and libcurl. Koji scratch build: for dist-f11-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331576 for dist-f10-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-01 13:34:51 EDT --- 1] rpmlint is not silent on actual package 2] do you really need patch for replacing 3 lines? sed with comment in %prep will be imho better readable. 3] I think that it would be good to add webserver into requires. Because websnv wouldn't work without webserver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet 2009-05-01 13:56:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the head up on license. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libmemcached Short Description: Client library and command line tools for memcached server Owners: remi Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 13:59:52 EDT --- Thanks for taking up the review Jussi. Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm This release fixes all the above comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #12 from Fabien Georget 2009-05-01 14:28:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. > > Well, the email used in your account on FAS differs from > what is used on this bugzilla, which must coincide. > Please change either of them, then I will sponsor you. Sorry, I didn't pay attention to that point. (too many e-mails !) So : Account name : manawy Email : fabien.georget*at*gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-01 14:43:27 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 15:37:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please fix these. Also, running rpmlint on the SPEC and SRPM files after > you're > done editing is a good idea. Sure, your're right. Here are the new packages: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 15:39:54 EDT --- So it does. The package has been APPROVED. PS. You might still want to remove the hash comment about noarch packages that have been left over from the spec file template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-01 15:50:08 EDT --- Great. Thanks! --- This package (perl-JSON-RPC-Common) is APPROVED by oget --- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Christian Krause changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 15:58:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-JSON-RPC-Common Short Description: Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects Owners: chkr Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmcgr...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Mike McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmcgr...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmcgr...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmcgr...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Mike McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mike McGrath 2009-05-01 16:14:18 EDT --- rpmlint: pam_yubico.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1-1 ['2.1-1fc9', '2.1-1fc9'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. name matches approved license, matches what is in README Very simple package, all things look good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mike McGrath 2009-05-01 16:24:13 EDT --- rpmlint looks ok: ykclient.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.2-1 ['2.2-1fc9', '2.2-1fc9'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The license isn't explicitly listed as BSD but the text is BSD clause two and valid. Name matches, package builds and I can auth against the yubico server. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:33:31 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:44:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ykclient Short Description: Yubikey management library and client Owners: ausil Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: CVS Done thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:46:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pam_yubico Short Description: A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys Owners: ausil Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: CVS Done thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:51:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:50:05 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:52:05 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:49:16 EDT --- CVS Done I took the liberty to add a F-11 branch also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:52:50 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Bug 476530 depends on bug 472819, which changed state. Bug 472819 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:53:40 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:56:38 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:55:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:55:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:54:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:58:46 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:58:04 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Bug 476530 depends on bug 497640, which changed state. Bug 497640 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:02:06 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498186] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:59:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:00:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:57:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #54 from Igor Jurišković 2009-05-01 16:58:20 EDT --- Building mumble on ppc64 fails. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331819 Reason: ice-devel witch is required by mumble is not available for ppc64 arch. Should I fill this as a bug report or? NEW SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:22:15 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zfstream-20041202-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:03:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:21:12 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:00:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:54:17 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Terje Røsten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||terje...@phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #14 from Terje Røsten 2009-05-01 17:14:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > works fine in its basic usage without it. > > and fails gracefully if its not installed. Not to mention the ridiculous > depchain difference between only python and python-matplotlib. Would be nice if upstream could separate gui stuff in a module such that we could ship smem and smem-gui, with smem-gui having a dep on python-matplotlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:01:20 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:02:42 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:54:07 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:45:52 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:43:56 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:44:56 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 18:45:40 EDT --- You mean the remark on the first line? I've seen that in other packages as well, so i'm not really gonna bother. Thanks again for the speedy review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 18:48:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fedora-devshell Short Description: Fedora Developer's Toolbox Owners: ynemoy Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:58:46 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||498688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:00:22 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:59:32 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:46 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:51 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:56 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-01 23:51:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2009-05-01 23:50:35 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1332306 1332306 build (dist-f10, mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1332306 build (dist-f10, mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully RPMLint: rpmlint mathgl.spec ../SRPMS/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 e...@glibc_2.0 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. With regards to the error, quoting from http://www.opengl.org/resources/libraries/glut/spec3/node90.html "GLUT has no special routine for exiting the program. GLUT programs should use ANSI C's exit routine. If a program needs to perform special operations before quitting the program, use the ANSI Conexit routine to register exit callbacks. GLUT will exit the program unilaterally when fatal errors occur or when the window system requests the program to terminate. For this reason, avoid calling any GLUT routines within an exit callback." Thus this is entirely a glut limitation, and I don't think that we should drop GLUT support for this reason. GLUT is a convenient first foray into OpenGL programming. Changelog: * Fri May 02 2009 1.8.1-1 - Update to 1.8.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-01 23:55:21 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:06:55 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:03:21 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:03:57 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-05-02 00:06:45 EDT --- SPEC URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.spec SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm Koji : No, pending mathgl. RPMLint output: $ rpmlint udav.spec ../SRPMS/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Changelog: * Sat May 02 2009 0.5.1-1 - Update to 0.5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:07:30 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2009-05-02 00:12:12 EDT --- SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm Should beL SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
