[Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-12 02:27:18 EDT --- I wouldn't add INSTALL to %doc since it doesn't contain anything useful for the user of the rpm package. (You do know that you can list multiple files in a %doc line?) The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 07:14:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I guess the no-documentation ones can be ignored. You should also use the python_sitelib macro, as the module should live in /usr/lib64/python2.5/... Plan on doing that but it somewhere slightly non default (looking at my system its not the only one that does it) but I have reported it upstream and will correct. You'd just need to move the directory in your install section. With that fix done, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 07:53:20 EDT --- Excellent, thanks will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 08:03:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libplist Short Description: Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #15 from Mauricio Henriquez buhochil...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 09:26:58 EDT --- What is the final status of this packages?, is going to be included in fed11?, as an update in the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #15 from Mauricio Henriquez buhochil...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 09:26:36 EDT --- What is the final status of this packages?, is going to be included in fed11?, as an update in the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 David Nalley da...@gnsa.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-12 09:35:40 EDT --- I'll strip out INSTALL before it hits CVS. Yes I know that I can list multiple files, but as long as there isn't a plethora, one per line makes it a bit more legible to me at least. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: postal Short Description: mail server benchmark Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #7 from James Bowes jbo...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 09:40:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jussi! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 09:56:21 EDT --- Sorry, I've been busy this past week. I'm waiting on you to merge the changes from Ryan that you think are appropriate and then post new versions of the spec file and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 James Bowes jbo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from James Bowes jbo...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 09:53:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gitg Short Description: GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system Owners: jbowes Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:16:34 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:15:58 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:15:27 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Bug 467237 depends on bug 453861, which changed state. Bug 453861 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-12 10:57:19 EDT --- I have created a new version where the license tag is ASL 2.0 and OpenSSL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec I now think this makes the most sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 11:17:19 EDT --- Yes, I agree that that's the best thing to do with what we have, but the biggest doubt here is whether upstream globus is legally allowed to add a new license an top of the existing one or not. FE-Legal usually responds in a couple days. You can send an email to their mailing list if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org 2009-05-12 11:33:01 EDT --- Michal Schmidt -- do you want to be co-owner of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 12:06:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-Email Short Description: Send Email from Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #19 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 12:19:22 EDT --- Matthew, yes please. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-12 12:32:59 EDT --- Yes I missing the CVS-Admin request to, so what is the state of this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #33 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-12 12:30:36 EDT --- Can you update to 0.1.0.305 as an official release? Second, it seem, that there are to source tar ball Yarafay and Yarafay-blender. It may be nice, if you can get a look on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] New: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Summary: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ke...@tummy.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cnetworkmanager is a command-line client for NetworkManager, intended to supplement or replace the GUI applets. rpmlint says: cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf Which I think can both be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-12 13:22:23 EDT --- Well, this package was setup, but never imported or built. ;( It was also recently orphaned because of an inactive maintainer. ;( So, perhaps we should close this one, and you can re-open your submission? (You might look at the package here to see if there is any way to improve your submission). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-12 13:27:12 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag(In reply to comment #1)
Potential for {?dist} being mixed with an {?alphatag} suffix, I’ve seen a
format being used similar to this
Release: 1%{?dist}.20090503cvs
Have a link?
Concern over %{dist} tag location when using snapshot release
It is indeed correctly used.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-12 13:30:05 EDT --- Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1350918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #29 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 13:39:05 EDT --- Yes, thanks! I'll try to contact jebba first and see if he is around; if no, I'll be happy to take this package and re-open my review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #17 from Mauricio Henriquez buhochil...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 13:25:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) Sorry, I've been busy this past week. I'm waiting on you to merge the changes from Ryan that you think are appropriate and then post new versions of the spec file and srpm. Ok, that is the kind of stuff that I don't know hoe to procede, that is way I ask things like that is the way in witch packages are treated.., meaning that I don't know ho is making the changes and from ho are they take itI was under the impresion that the Ryan attached .spec files was the updated ones, so no idea that you was waiting to me to merge the changes... So, ok here are the updated files: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.fc10.src.rpm Hope that sitll can make it at least for fed11 updates...what about the gdb one? Cheers, Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org 2009-05-12 13:51:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: smem Short Description: Report application memory usage in a meaningful way Owners: mattdm mschmidt Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Nussbaumer patrick.nussbau...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 13:59:44 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. I've added the license file to %doc and made a new SRPM. New spec file : http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover.spec New srpm : http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover-0.3-2.20090503cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-12
14:05:42 EDT ---
Good:
+ Basename of SPEC files matches with package name
+ Package name fullfill naming guildelines
+ Package contains no subpackages
+ Package contains valid license tag
+ License tag has GPLv2+ as an valid OSS license
+ Package contains verbain copy of the license text
+ URL tag contains URL of project home page
+ Could download source tar ball from upstream with spectool -g
+ Tar ball matches with upstream source
(md5sum: 8f3eccaeff900cd68e19785f13c813ab)
+ Local build works fine
+ Koji scratch build works fine
+ Rpmlint is quite on source rpm
+ %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra subpackage
+ Files has proper file permissions
+ %files stanza doesn't contains duplicate entries
+ All package files are owned by this package
+ No packaged files belong to another package
+ Package contains proper %Changelog
Bad:
- Please replace:
%build
make PREFIX=/usr
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=/usr sysconfdir=/etc
by:
%build
make PREFIX=%{_prefix}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix}
sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir}
- No smp enabled build
- Please replace
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
- Package contains a source file with has a public domain copyright note
in the header. License tag should be 'GPLv2+ and Public Domain'
- Rpmlint has warning on binary rpm:
rpmlint cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
- Package python-gobject2 doesn't exist in Fedora.
If you want to introduced this missing package in Fedora, please set a blocker
bug to this review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-12 14:48:11 EDT ---
Thats for the review!
Bad:
- Please replace:
%build
make PREFIX=/usr
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=/usr sysconfdir=/etc
by:
%build
make PREFIX=%{_prefix}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix}
sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir}
Done.
- No smp enabled build
The build step is a single sed call.
I will add smp if you insist, but it really makes no sense at all.
- Please replace
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
I don't think these are supposed to be config files.
See gdm, NetworkManager, ConsoleKit, etc. None of them mark them as config.
Users should not be editing these. It's just a bug that they are under /etc/ I
guess.
- Package contains a source file with has a public domain copyright note
in the header. License tag should be 'GPLv2+ and Public Domain'
Ah, good point. Fixed.
- Rpmlint has warning on binary rpm:
rpmlint cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
Which I think can be ignored.
- Package python-gobject2 doesn't exist in Fedora.
If you want to introduced this missing package in Fedora, please set a blocker
bug to this review.
Oops. That should be pygobject2. Fixed.
Spec URL:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-12
14:57:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The build step is a single sed call.
I will add smp if you insist, but it really makes no sense at all.
- Please replace
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf
I don't think these are supposed to be config files.
See gdm, NetworkManager, ConsoleKit, etc. None of them mark them as config.
Users should not be editing these. It's just a bug that they are under /etc/ I
guess.
I have done a look ok gdm and have to disagree with you. On gdm you see
%config in fromt of the files which an in %{_sysconfigdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wco...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 15:08:12 EDT --- I can easily take the Java side of things but I'd appreciate Will's help with the non-Java stuff. Will, would you mind reviewing the C++ stuff? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lemen...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 15:09:10 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-05-12 15:19:24 EDT --- Odd. I was told by the gdm maintainer that they were not config files. ;) I only looked at ConsoleKit and gdm. I guess we can run this by the packaging folks and see what they suggest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437
--- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-12
15:39:44 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Odd. I was told by the gdm maintainer that they were not config files. ;)
I have look in the devel branch of gdm and shows, that the files in
%{_sysconfdir}
was prefixed with %config.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500476] New: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Summary: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first package for Fedora, so I am looking for a sponsor! Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.2.tar.gz Description: This package contains a backend for CUPS for Canon printers using the proprietary BJNP network protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #34 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 16:48:29 EDT --- It is done. Revision 315.It is working fine for me on F10 nvidia 7600. It would be nice if someone could finish the review. The .src.rpm creates two rpms: yafaray and yafaray blender. SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-0.1.svn.20090512.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/yafaray.spec [cascavel:~/SRPMS] listrpm yafaray /usr/bin/yafaray-xml /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libDarkSky.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libDebugIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libEmissionIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libEmptyVolumeIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libExpDensityVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libGridVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libNoiseVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSingleScatterIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSkyIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSkyVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libUniformVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libarealight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbasicnodes.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbasictex.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbidirpath.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libblendermat.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libcoatedglossy.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libdirectional.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libdirectlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libglass.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libglossymat.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libgradientback.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libpathtrace.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libphotonmap.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libpointlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libshinydiffuse.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsimplemats.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libspherelight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libspotlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsunlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsunsky.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libtextureback.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libvolumetrics.so /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0 /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/CODING /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct [cascavel:~/SRPMS] listrpm yafaray-blender /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafrayinterface.so /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_material.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_object.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_texture.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafqt.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafrayinterface.py /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0 /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 16:54:32 EDT --- I would point out to globus upstream that they do not have permission to change the licensing terms on that file. Also, since this is an exact copy of the openssl headers, why are we even using it? We should be using the system openssl-devel files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kwiz...@gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 17:04:59 EDT --- Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct is probably not wanted there. Abput /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py , Are you sure we haven't any problem with the use of such architecture independant directory, against files been in /usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/ ? (every .so and .py? should be in the same architecture dependent directory, probably - at least It, that's what I would expect) Furthermore, yafaray may require to write configuration files (relative to the given user), so this is aimed to be This file : /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh Doesn't need to be in %doc as it has nothing to do with yafaray-blender subpackage. (can be provided within the cvs anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 17:41:57 EDT --- taglib-extras-0.1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/taglib-extras-0.1.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #1 from Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl 2009-05-12 17:49:50 EDT --- I am the author and upstream maintainer of this backend. It has been available on sourceforge for some time. The package is included in FreeBSD ports collection. Similar code is also included in Sane 1.20 for support of Canon network scanners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500492] New: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Summary: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rviny...@cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: dbus-cxx is yet another dbus C++ wrapper. What differentiates dbus-cxx from other C++ wrappers is that dbus-cxx relies heavily on sigc++ and explicitly exposes the wrapped dbus C API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-05-12 18:22:22 EDT --- Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=226358 ;-) He/she was added to cc a long time ago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #16 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-12 18:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) I would point out to globus upstream that they do not have permission to change the licensing terms on that file. Also, since this is an exact copy of the openssl headers, why are we even using it? We should be using the system openssl-devel files. I have filed a bugzilla report upstream about the license issue: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6736 Globus is using the system openssl-devel header files when possible. However, this file is not installed by a normal openssl installation, and is therefore not part of the openssl-devel package. So there is no system version to use of this file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #17 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-12 18:26:46 EDT --- I'm not sure if that is better or worse, because it means they're using unpublished private openssl API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #36 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti pro...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 18:27:05 EDT --- SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #35) Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. Is this a question or an affirmative? /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct is probably not wanted there. I adapted the spec for building either the snapshot or the official release. Abput /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py , Are you sure we haven't any problem with the use of such architecture independant directory, against files been in /usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/ ? (every .so and .py? should be in the same architecture dependent directory, probably - at least It, that's what I would expect) Furthermore, yafaray may require to write configuration files (relative to the given user), so this is aimed to be I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. This file : /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh Doesn't need to be in %doc as it has nothing to do with yafaray-blender subpackage. (can be provided within the cvs anyway). Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] New: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506
Summary: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rmegg...@redhat.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil-1.1.8-2.src.rpm
Description: 389-adminutil is used to administer 389 Directory Server and Admin
Server, and in the 389 Gateway.
Note: this is a package rename - the adminutil package is being renamed to
389-adminutil. I have put in the appropriate Provides and Obsoletes:
Provides: adminutil = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes:adminutil 1.1.8-2
and
Provides: adminutil-devel = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: adminutil-devel 1.1.8-2
Source URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2
See also https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1380#comment:2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 18:48:02 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 18:48:27 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shai...@redhat.com Alias||389-adminutil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 19:32:15 EDT --- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #37 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 19:57:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. Is this a question or an affirmative? yes, it's a question. given user), so this is aimed to be I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. Probably need to be tought along with upstream (blender, yafaray) advices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-05-12 20:04:59 EDT --- Any others thoughts about this package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:20:38 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:21:38 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.4.4-1.fc10|1.4.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:21:27 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.5.1-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0.7-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:20:30 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:24:31 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:24:16 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:23:12 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:22:51 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:23:22 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:22:14 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:21:49 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.4-1.fc9 |1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.2.3-1.fc11|1.2.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.2-2.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.4-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.3-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.3.2-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.4.4-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Bug 490592 depends on bug 488542, which changed state. Bug 488542 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:21:16 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:21:59 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Context'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:26:28 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:27:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc10 |1.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3.2-1.fc10|1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc11 |1.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:24:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:25:02 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:24:41 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:23:01 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.2.3-1.fc9 |1.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.6-1.fc10 |0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.6.1-3.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.2.3-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.4-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:25:24 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Context'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:23:32 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:27:16 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4900 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:26:18 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.4.4-1.fc11|1.4.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.6.1-3.fc9 |1.6.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
