[Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #59 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-05-20 01:59:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) I am using links compiled with NSS for some time and I got connection error to this server: https://lug.wsu.edu/ May I dare to ask how does this relate to a closed review request? (And no, this question doesn't need an answer here.) If there's an issue that bothers you, please open a separate bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 02:17:03 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 02:16:08 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 02:17:44 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959
Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jan.kle...@hp.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jan.kle...@hp.com
Flag||fedora-review?,
||needinfo?(david.hanneq...@g
||mail.com)
--- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-05-20 02:32:15 EDT ---
Hi David,
I couldn't see you in packager cvs group, is this your first package for
fedora?
1] how do you get Source0,Source1,Source2?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
2] latest version is 0.8.4, wouldn't be better to have this version packaged?
3] use %{__cp} -p to preserver timestamps, better would be not to use %{__cp}
at all, you are doing a lot of chmods later, couldn't you use install? Most of
chmods are related to 5]
4] vendor/rails contains ruby library files: which have licensing: MIT for
actionmailer, actionpack, activerecord, activeresource, activesupport, GPLv2
for activemodel
5] this libraries are present as packages in fedora, so why do you need to
package it by yourself? put that into requirements.
Except activemodel for which I couldn't see any package. So create package for
activemodel library ( use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby )
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501655] New: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msu...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-docs/spacewalk-proxy-docs.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-docs/spacewalk-proxy-docs-0.6.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package includes the installation/configuration guide, and whitepaper in support of an Spacewalk Proxy Server. Also included are the Client Configuration, Channel Management, and Enterprise User Reference guides. rpmlint is silent Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1365447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501655] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||spacewalk-proxy-docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501655] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs - Spacewalk Proxy Server documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Miroslav Suchy msu...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |spacewalk-proxy-docs|spacewalk-proxy-docs - ||Spacewalk Proxy Server ||documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 04:29:32 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 04:29:46 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 04:29:39 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501660] New: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Summary: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo-0.8.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/mrepo/ Description: mrepo builds a local Apt/Yum RPM repository from local ISO files, downloaded updates and extra packages from RHN and 3rd party repositories. It can download all updates and extras automatically, creates the repository structure and meta-data, enables HTTP access to the repository and creates a directory-structure for remote network installations using PXE/TFTP. mrepo supports ftp, http, sftp, rsync, rhn and other download methods. With mrepo, you can enable your laptop or a local server to provide updates for the whole network and provide the proper files to allow installations via the network. rpmlint output: mrepo.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided yam mrepo.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mrepo.conf 0600 mrepo.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-var mrepo mrepo.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mrepo $prog 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. These should all be OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-20 04:45:05 EDT --- ping?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 05:28:38 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jargs-1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 05:28:32 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jargs-1.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-05-20 06:00:53 EDT --- Check out older redhat-rpm-config packages' macros file, e.g. in F8, to see the old definition where it copied files as Karsten says. You can use rpm --eval %configure, btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-20 06:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) Check out older redhat-rpm-config packages' macros file, e.g. in F8, to see the old definition where it copied files as Karsten says. OK, but that's no problem anymore since rawhide is F12 :) You can use rpm --eval %configure, btw. Duh, true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||487044 Bug 496433 depends on bug 477750, which changed state. Bug 477750 Summary: Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-20 06:58:33 EDT --- Hint. It's ok to wrote '(#501498)' as an abbrevious in the changelog. Because you package look good. I will APPRROVED you. You can create a FAS account and done the cla. Please request membership in the packagers group, so I can sponsor you. Unfortunately, I'm away until sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-20 08:01:54 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Everything's okay, no further changes required == The package mingw32-zfstream is APPROVED by epienbro == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #5 from Federico Hernandez ultrafre...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 08:09:45 EDT --- THX for the changelog abbreviation hint. FAS account and cla are done and ready. I have requested now requested membership in the packagers group. Grüsse Federico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-20 08:22:52 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-zfstream Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 david.hanneq...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(david.hanneq...@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #6 from david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 09:27:57 EDT --- Hello, Yes, it's my first package for Fedora. I have read your comment and i correct spec file. Thank for your comment. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-05-20 09:43:37 EDT --- Friendly ping to Yaakov ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|jan.kle...@hp.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-05-20 09:43:32 EDT --- Hi David, In that case, you need to get sponsored first. You should read following link for more information about packaging and becoming packager. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Please incorporate all my last comments and give us link to updated specfile and SRPM when you will have them ready. I will help you with unofficial review on this package, final review needs to be done by person who will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-20 10:02:27 EDT --- The _lock_file issue has been reported upstream by Ryan McDougall (sempuki) @ https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2794382group_id=2435atid=102435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-20 11:59:15 EDT --- Now approving. -- This package (me-tv) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #74 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 14:13:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mumble Short Description: Voice chat software primarily intended for use while gaming Owners: igjurisk Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #75 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 14:18:45 EDT --- Do I have to download new cert on FAS because my status changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-20 14:23:32
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This doesn't seem to me to be a pidgin plugin, more like a purple plugin. Thus
the name should be purple-gfire and BuildRequires: libpurple-devel.
Hmm, I no longer agree with myself :D
This is after all a pidgin plugin, at least the home page clearly says so. So
the name should be after all pidgin-xfire. Sorry for the hassle.
Now:
- You should Requires: libpurple explicitly for dir ownership, even though
this should be automatically picked up by rpm as a lib dependency. Also, please
make a comment about the dir ownership section of Requires, so that you/other
people will not remove it without knowing why it's there.
- Please don't use macros when not necessary (%{__chmod} is just chmod).
- Change
%{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/*
%{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/scripts/server_detection/*
to
%{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/
as this will own the directory (necessary) and everything in it. Now the
package doesn't own the directory /usr/share/purple/gfire and you are listing
stuff twice:
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.py
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.pyc
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.pyo
warning: File listed twice:
/usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/tools
- You can fit the make install -stuff into one line.
- Description uses some odd characters. ’ should be ' and ” should be .
- License is GPLv3+ not GPLv2+.
- BR: libpurple-devel is redundant, it's already pulled in by pidgin-devel. So
is glib2-devel, which is pulled in by pidgin-devel - gtk2-devel.
- What is the line
sed -i -e '/#\!/d'
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/scripts/server_detection/4097.py
for? I assume it removes a shebang in the python file. Please, add a comment!
***
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. NEEDSWORK
- Don't use %{__chmod} for chmod.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
NEEDSWORK
- Should be named pidgin-xfire (yes, my mistake) :)
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
- Remember to rename this back too.
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
NEEDSFIX
- License is GPLv3+ not GPLv2+.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK
- Should Requires: libpurple explicitly.
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK
- Use %{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/ to own everything you should.
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #76 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-20 14:26:19 EDT --- As far as I know it is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 13:41:27 EDT --- Yeah... can you add the email conversations with upstream(s) where they clarify licensing as a README.Licensing in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 14:41:00 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #73 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-20 13:49:16 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow Join wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #72 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 13:40:51 EDT --- Moved Requires to murmur subpackage. SPEC and SRPM are on the same links as above. FAS: igjurisk (without quotes). I applied for packagers group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #71 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-20 11:50:42 EDT --- For -13: - Well, I don't know why I didn't notice this, however these Requires 24 Requires(pre): shadow-utils 25 Requires(post): chkconfig 26 Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts 27 Requires(postun): initscripts should all be moved to murmur subpackage and should not be in mumble main package. Please fix above when importing this package into Fedora CVS. This package (mumble) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ste...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 13:43:21 EDT --- The SunRPC licensing is now replaced entirely by the BSD license, with explicit permission from Sun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag--drop oriented client for MPD
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-20 12:48:17 EDT --- It finally built successfully on F11 and upwards thanks to Milos Jakubicek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 12:04:07 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 14:56:29 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.mosc...@gmx.de
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmx.de 2009-05-20 15:03:32
EDT ---
Source0 gives a 404 error, should be
http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libidn/libidn-%{version}.tar.gz instead.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #12 from Balaji G balaji...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 12:42:12 EDT --- Hi Jochen Thank you so much for your extensive review.I have addressed the review comments and have placed the package and the spec file at the following location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-05-20 12:15:21 EDT --- imo, preserving historical/old changelog is ok, preferred actually, to provide history and attribution. (Provided it's not huge and doesn't impact pkg size anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-20 12:46:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/purple-gfire-0.8.1/purple-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/purple-gfire-0.8.1/purple-gfire-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * Wed May 20 2009 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name - 0.8.1-1 - New upstream version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 12:03:42 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |purple-gfire - Xfire plugin |pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin |for libpurple |for Pidgin --- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-20 15:44:18 EDT --- I hope everything is fixed now, I didn't notice upstream's license change. When adding Requires: libpurple, rpmlint says E: explicit-lib-dependency libpurple so I dropped that tag again... RPM is recognizing it by itself. Besides, Requires: pidgin automatically pulls in libpurple. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 15:56:57 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 15:57:02 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 15:56:51 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||501812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #26 from Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 16:03:52 EDT --- Thanks for review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: me-tv Short Description: GNOME desktop application for watching digital television Owners: grof Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:22:08 EDT --- I wrote it based on spot's comment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246#c8 DO you think that was not meant for the whole plexus, but just for plexus-classworlds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:25:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dumbster Short Description: Fake SMTP Server Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #9 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:34:00 EDT --- Yes, I've got the 2.0 from the initial comment from Andrew. Change that to 1.1 would be easy. But there is no point as we do not have a resolution w.r.t. to that small file with the LICENSE in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:39:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: directory-naming Short Description: Directory Naming Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253
--- Comment #5 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:38:32
EDT ---
The release tag has %{_dist} this is just a srpm created for review outside the
build system, Koji will fill it with the right value. Note that during the
bootstrap, intermediate (non-final) versions may have a weird release tag but
that will be discarded with the rebuilds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #6 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 16:41:55 EDT --- - release is 2 but in last changelog entry its 1. - remove INSTALL from %doc. You are making installation so other users have no need to look at it. Other than that don't see any other problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:41:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jakarta-commons-jxpath Short Description: Simple XPath interpreter Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:44:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: easymock Short Description: Easy mock objects Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:42:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: jakarta-commons-configuration Short Description: Commons Configuration Package Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||470293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2009-05-20 16:56:32 EDT --- fails to build on Fedora 10 * sblim-cmpi-base libraries have wrong permission (#501812) * other failure I haven't diagnosed (see below) Missing dependency on sblim-testsuite. Includes it's own schema file, instead of using the cim-schema package (#468287). build failure: it's trying to link libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a _before_ it has generated it. gcc -shared .libs/cmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.o .libs/cmpiOSBase_EthernetPort.o -lOSBase_CommonNetwork -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,libcmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.so -o .libs/libc mpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.so /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOSBase_CommonNetwork collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [libcmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.la] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs (cd .libs rm -f libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0 ln -s libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0.0.0 libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0) (cd .libs rm -f libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so ln -s libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0.0.0 libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so) ar cru .libs/libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a OSBase_CommonNetwork.o ranlib .libs/libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a creating libOSBase_CommonNetwork.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293
--- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2009-05-20 16:58:33 EDT
---
removing the %{?_smp_mflags} from the make resolves the build problem, meaning
it's a simple parallel build dependency failure.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 16:57:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-4.jpp6.src.rpm have the requested fixes. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2009-05-20 16:59:34 EDT --- $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-network-* sblim-cmpi-network-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib/debug 0775 sblim-cmpi-network-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-network-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. now that it builds I can do a more formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:05:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools-1.0-0.1.a10.3.jpp6.src.rpm Have the revised license. Thanks for the pre-review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:10:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools-2.1-3.jpp6.src.rpm Have the fixes. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:18:43 EDT --- The package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:20:44 EDT --- Good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:20:05 EDT --- Good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:26:15 EDT --- +- Fix license +- Fix instructions to generate source tar ball +- Refresh source tar ball +- Better description Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder-2.0.4-4.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-20 17:26:06
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I hope everything is fixed now, I didn't notice upstream's license change.
When adding Requires: libpurple, rpmlint says E: explicit-lib-dependency
libpurple
so I dropped that tag again... RPM is recognizing it by itself. Besides,
Requires: pidgin automatically pulls in libpurple.
Oh, sometimes you don't have to care about rpmlint's warnings since it does
produce some false positives; this is one very common type of them. Due to the
dir ownership issue it IS wanted that libpurple is explicitly required; the
rpmlint warning can be ignored.
I don't have an xfire account, so I can't test this. From a packaging point of
view the package looks good, though.
APPROVED
PS. A final nitpick: I'd use
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}.png
instead of
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}*
since thus one sees straight away what kind of stuff in is in those
directories.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added CC||th0...@mkdir.name --- Comment #19 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-20 17:30:05 EDT --- Again, is this still on the agenda? If so, I'll do the review. Otherwise, I'm pretty interested in getting iTALC packaged for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:37:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver-2.2-1.jpp6.src.rpm has the license fixed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:38:57 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:41:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api-1.0-0.1.a2.1.4.jpp6.src.rpm License fixed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juriskovic.i...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juriskovic.i...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:56:55 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-05-20 17:57:54 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501831] New: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Summary: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalc...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-testosterone.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-testosterone-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: Testosterone is a curses-based interface for running python tests written with the PyUnit testing framework (aka unittest in the standard library). Scratch build in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1367313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #1 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20
18:10:22 EDT ---
I'll take this one.
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review. YES
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
YES
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. YES
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. YES
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines. YES
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. YES
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. YES
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. YES
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. YES
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this. YES
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. YES
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. YES
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. N/A
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. YES
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. YES
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. YES
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. YES
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. YES
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. YES
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
# MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
# MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability). N/A
# MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. N/A
# MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} N/A
# MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built. N/A
# MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
NO
# MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-20 18:23:55 EDT --- Ok, I will create a desktop file, is it ok to add a generic mixer icon as well? Only blocker is desktop file. Its GUI application but no desktop file is installed nor you explained in spec why not. Fix that and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287
--- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2009-05-20 18:28:51
EDT ---
updated to latest schemas, and addressed the License: tag and %{_datadir} notes
above.
Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema.spec
SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema-2.21.0-1.src.rpm
$ rpmlint SPECS/cim-schema.spec SRPMS/cim-schema-2.21.0-1.src.rpm
RPMS/noarch/cim-schema-*
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #3 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-20 18:39:41 EDT --- There is nothing in wiki related to no icons in desktop file so I assume its ok to use generic one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:52:30 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.2.3-1.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:53:17 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:52:38 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-XML-Feed'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 |0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:53:58 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:54:54 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.5.1-2.fc9 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:55:19 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:57:24 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5256 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
