[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-21 03:36:00 EDT --- All right, I fixed that stuff now. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm * Wed May 21 2009 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name - 0.8.1-3 - Added Requires: libpurple - Changed the files entry for the pixmaps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Andreas Osowski th0...@mkdir.name 2009-05-21 03:38:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pidgin-gfire Short Description: Xfire plugin for Pidgin Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-05-21 03:43:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan Short Description: Mayan Long Count Calendar Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org 2009-05-21 04:09:34 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: milter-regex New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: pghmcfc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(walt...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk 2009-05-21 04:41:18 EDT --- Colin, Adel, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #26 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 04:42:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) Peter, maybe we can start an Erlang SIG or something like that? Already did :) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Erlang However, there is not much lavuable info on that page (no guidelines yet). But feel free to modify it. There are a lot of erlang packages which would be nice to have in Fedora, and it would be easier to package them up if this is a joined effort. Agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #27 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 04:42:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) However, there is not much lavuable info on that page (no guidelines yet). s/lavuable/valuable/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #6 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21 05:55:28 EDT --- Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/3/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/3/gmixer-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Bug 496718 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 06:28:08 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 06:32:24 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Bug 496718 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 06:28:08 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 06:32:24 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #28 from Hubert Plociniczak hub...@lshift.net 2009-05-21 06:46:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-1.src.rpm This release contains fixes for the problems mentioned above. Tested on koji for F-11 and EL-5 and works fine now. rpmlint is not silent but we fixed 'missing-lsb-keyword' error and the rest can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Bug 491614 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 06:46:38 EDT --- mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-21 06:45:41 EDT --- tibbs: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-21 06:51:58 EDT --- Michael: are you still reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501924] New: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Alias: mingw32-tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl-8.5.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the glade library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 07:01:54 EDT --- Ok + md5 is correct [pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz* 1dceb98bb57cd6acef90f58e96a7fce4 rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz 1dceb98bb57cd6acef90f58e96a7fce4 rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz.1 [pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ + rpmlint is not silent but these messages already explained (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224#c18 ) [pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-1.ppc.rpm rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: no-binary rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/rabbitmq 0750 rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/rabbitmq 0750 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. [pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ Ok, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?
--- Comment #7 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-21
06:59:25 EDT ---
This is completely different package. Above full review doesnt count on this
one. Will make new one after these few errors are fixed. Ok, lets see;
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture - says if
you are installing something to global site_packages directory use following:
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
Please change python_sitearch with python_sitelib as stated at link above.
Dont forget to change all %{python_sitearch} with new one.
- remove --vendor.
- desktop file has Encoding. It is assumed that encoding is UTF-8 by default so
that line is useless. Please remove it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-21 07:04:07 EDT --- Description should be: MinGW Windows Tool Command Language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-21 07:10:20 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-05-21 07:35:26
EDT ---
- This is a legacy font package, so Font guidelines are not valid here.
- Change
Requires(post): /usr/bin/mkfontscale /usr/bin/mkfontdir
to
Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils
as this is the package that provides those since Fedora Core 2 (2004).
- I'm not totally sure you need
Requires(post): fontconfig
Requires(postun): fontconfig
as you already have Requires: fontconfig. Besides, this is probably
automatically picked up by rpm. Doesn't hurt having them, though.
- Change references to /etc to %{_sysconfdir}
- Setting umask is probably not necessary as this is done by rpm.
- Replace `which mkfontdir` with plain mkfontdir.
- Drop
%dir %{catalogue}
in %files section, as
$ rpm -qf /etc/X11/fontpath.d/
filesystem-2.4.19-1.fc10.i386
is already owned on every installation.
- I can't find a single mention of a license in the tarball!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Hubert Plociniczak hub...@lshift.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Hubert Plociniczak hub...@lshift.net 2009-05-21 07:46:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rabbitmq-server Short Description: An AMQP server written in Erlang Owners: hubert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #8 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21
07:56:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
This is completely different package. Above full review doesnt count on this
one. Will make new one after these few errors are fixed. Ok, lets see;
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture - says
if
you are installing something to global site_packages directory use following:
%{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
Please change python_sitearch with python_sitelib as stated at link above.
Dont forget to change all %{python_sitearch} with new one.
- remove --vendor.
- desktop file has Encoding. It is assumed that encoding is UTF-8 by default
so
that line is useless. Please remove it.
Ok, here's the new spec * SRPM
Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/4/gmixer.spec
SRPM:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/4/gmixer-1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723
Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||randyn3...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Randall Berry randyn3...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 08:08:09
EDT ---
I'll take a crack at this since nobody else has.
If my findings are wrong please correct them.
Key:
[*] Pass
[x] Fail
[-] Not applicable
[?] Questions (see comments)
[x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be
posted in the review.[1]
rpmlint not silent.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 292 errors, 2557 warnings.
(see attachement http://fpaste.org/paste/12523 )
[*] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[*] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name},
in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
[*] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[*] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved
license and meet the Licensing Guidelines .
[*] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match
the actual license. [3]
[*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4]
[*] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[*] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[?] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for
this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package,
please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this.
The source URL
(http://ez.no/content/download/261295/1832505/version/3/file/ezpublish-4.1.0-gpl.tar.gz)
causes an error. 4.1.1 is also the current version 4.1.0 seems to be
un-available.
[-] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary
rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7]
php no binary build.
[-] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on
an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec
in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug
filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not
compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be
placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
[-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires,
except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the
Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is
optional. Apply common sense.
[*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by
using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/[ ] is strictly
forbidden.[9]
[-] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
[-] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager
must state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for relocation of that specific package.
Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which
does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples.
Package does not own ALL directories it creates. Each directory
including %{_datadir}/%{name}/ and all subdirectories therein that the
package creates must be prefixed by %dir not just the one
directory.
[*] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
[x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should
be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section
must include a %defattr(...) line.
Some questionable perms found by rpmlint. (see attachment)
[*] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains
rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ).
[*] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the
macros section of Packaging Guidelines .
[*] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
This is described in detail in the code vs. content section
of Packaging Guidelines.
[*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
(The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement,
[Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@jcomserv.net --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-05-21 08:39:15 EDT --- Minor quibble, [-] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] php no binary build. What is meant here is the product RPM as opposed to SRPM, not binary executable as opposed to script. Essentially, rpmbuild -ba foo.spec must produce something in ../RPMS/*/. FYI. :) Also, for the Requires, if any of those pear packages exist in Fedora as RPMS, they should be Required. If not, and this software needs them, they need to be packaged and included in Fedora before this can be. I see that this has a blocking bug, so maybe that's going on, I didn't dig that far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #9 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-21
08:49:09 EDT ---
Two more things:
--
in %files section change:
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info
to:
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info
Because thats the right name of the file.
--
remove %doc in files section. You have no documentation so its useless.
--
I have to go now for few hours. When I get back I'll make full review.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 09:06:40 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka Thank you. Your patch works so well. The koji build is excellent. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #10 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21
09:12:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Two more things:
--
in %files section change:
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info
to:
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info
Because thats the right name of the file.
--
remove %doc in files section. You have no documentation so its useless.
--
I have to go now for few hours. When I get back I'll make full review.
Ok, I have made the recommended changes.
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info
is correct for F11 F12, changing it to
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info
would be wrong as well, so I changed it to
%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py?.?.egg-info
This will enable it to build with python 2.5 or 2.6
Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/5/gmixer.spec
SRPM:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/5/gmixer-1.3-4.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501957] New: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hanneq...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This widget provides a dynamic image that looks just like a Mac OS 9 progress bar. Packed around it are four Frames, north, south, east and west, within which you can stuff additional widgets. For example, see how Tk::Copy::Mac uses several Labels and a CollapsableFrame widget to create a reasonable facsimile of a Macintosh copy dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501958] New: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Summary: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Scotch is a software library for graph and mesh/hypergraph partitioning and sparse matrix ordering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #9 from Deji Akingunola dakin...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 09:17:45 EDT --- Xiphos-3.1, which includes fixes for the compile-time warnings in comment #3 have now being released. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos-3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924
Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-05-21 09:22:54 EDT ---
This one is quite hard to read, due to the frequent use of macros. However, I
don't think it can be done any other way, so I'll do my best to read through
them.
The %files list contains some redundant entries:
%dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver}
%dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/dde*
%dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/reg*
%{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver}/*
%{_mingw32_libdir}/dde*/*
%{_mingw32_libdir}/reg*/*
These can be simplified to:
%{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver}/
%{_mingw32_libdir}/dde*/
%{_mingw32_libdir}/reg*/
For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the
.spec file:
# don't run make test by default
%{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0}
%{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1}
Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary?
AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't)
The native tcl package is now at version 8.5.7. You might want to update to
that version too. See
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/tcl/devel/tcl.spec?view=log for the
complete list of changes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501960] New: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Summary: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hanneq...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: WebInject is a free tool for automated testing of web applications and web services. It can be used to test individual system components that have HTTP interfaces (JSP, ASP, CGI, PHP, AJAX, Servlets, HTML Forms, XML/SOAP Web Services, REST, etc), and can be used as a test harness to create a suite of [HTTP level] automated functional, acceptance, and regression tests. A test harness allows you to run many test cases and collect/report your results. WebInject offers real-time results display and may also be used for monitoring system response times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21 10:12:31 EDT --- The gmixer-1.3-4 srpm builds at Koji on all targets on all active dists. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368360 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368325 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368345 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 10:26:54 EDT --- #1: Ralf is right here, use the macro %cmake instead of cmake. #2: Also before creating the SRPM, change the permissions of both the spec file and the sources to 0644, currently : chitlesh(rpmbuild)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.src.rpm armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo-0.6.11.tar.gz 0640 armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo.spec 0640 #3: Swap the docs_user and LICENSE.txt from %name-devel to %name as they are user specific. #4: remove /usr/share/doc/armadillo-devel-0.6.11/examples/Makefile.cmake after make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 10:31:48 EDT --- Would you write CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(alexes...@yahoo.c | |om) | --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 10:34:15 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(kana...@kanarip.c ||om) --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 10:35:00 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ ||mail.ee) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 10:36:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dignan.patr...@gm | |ail.com)| --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 10:35:55 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this as a duplicate of the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #12 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 10:38:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Gnome2-Wnck Short Description: Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 F-10 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-05-21 10:51:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I wrote it based on spot's comment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246#c8 DO you think that was not meant for the whole plexus, but just for plexus-classworlds? Yes, I think it just applies to plexus-classworlds where that LICENSE.txt file exists. There's nothing similar in this package to warrant a and Plexus, is there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502024] New: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Alias: xsdcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Summary: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: antti.andreim...@mail.ee QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, ka...@smartlink.ee, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd-3.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CodeSynthesis XSD is an open-source, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler. Provided with an XML instance specification (XML Schema), it generates C++ classes that represent the given vocabulary as well as parsing and serialization code. You can then access the data stored in XML using types and functions that semantically correspond to your application domain rather than dealing with intricacies of reading and writing XML. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368376 Known issues: 1. The doc sub-package has a two Postscript files that rpmlint grunts about not being in UTF-8 encoding. I couldn't find any reasonable converter that can convert Postscript files to another encoding and AFAIK many printers do not support UTF-8 at all. 2. The main package contains both: the xsd schema compiler and the header files needed to build the generated code. Rpmlint does not like it at all. However there is no value in separating headers from the compiler: if You use the compiler to generate C++ code, You most certainly want to build the generated files as well. 3. Compiler binary is renamed to xsdcxx to avoid a name conflict. The same naming is currently used in the debian project (http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/xsd). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Antti Andreimann antti.andreim...@mail.ee changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ | |mail.ee)| --- Comment #8 from Antti Andreimann antti.andreim...@mail.ee 2009-05-21 11:04:01 EDT --- Thank You for Your encouragement. I have discarded the idea to package every little piece of this xsd stuff separately. I found an easy to use bundle that includes all the components and a build script. The same bundle is used by debian to build the xsd compiler package present in lenny. So I have created a new xsd package for Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-21
11:16:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Thanks for taking! That was quick!
This one is quite hard to read, due to the frequent use of macros. However, I
don't think it can be done any other way, so I'll do my best to read through
them.
I modified the native tcl package spec file.
The %files list contains some redundant entries:
Fixed.
For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the
.spec file:
# don't run make test by default
%{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0}
%{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1}
This is again from the native spec file. I kept it there to minimize the
differences. So the %check section could probably completely go...
Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary?
AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't)
I don't think the renaming is strictly necessary. I did it to make it extra
clear that the .a files are implibs, not static libraries...
The native tcl package is now at version 8.5.7. You might want to update to
that version too. See
Woohoo. Just when you think you're up to date :)
But there does not seem to be a successful build of 8.5.7 in koji. So I'm ahead
now :)
Updated:
Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl.spec
SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-1.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Bug 492397 depends on bug 499341, which changed state. Bug 499341 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-05-21 11:53:56 EDT --- Hi Xavier, Could you share latest spec file and SRPMS for (hope so) final review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639
--- Comment #12 from Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com 2009-05-21
11:56:16 EDT ---
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review. YES
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
YES
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. YES
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. YES
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines. YES
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. YES
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. YES
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. YES
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. YES
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this. YES
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. YES
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. YES
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. N/A
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. NO
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. YES
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. YES
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. YES
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. YES
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. N/A
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
# MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
# MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability). N/A
# MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. N/A
# MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release} N/A
# MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built. N/A
# MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
YES
# MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here
[Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 MartinG grons...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||grons...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from MartinG grons...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 12:08:46 EDT --- I would also like to see this in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Igor Jurišković juriskovic.i...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(liangsuil...@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek jan.kle...@hp.com 2009-05-21 11:56:18 EDT --- Hi, any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21 12:10:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gmixer Short Description: Just a simple audio mixer Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502054] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons Alias: perl-Lingua-Flags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Flags/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-Flags.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Module with small flags icons. You can get them in base64 inline HTML image or as a gif image. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368784 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #13 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-05-21 12:09:39 EDT --- Hi Igjurisk, Thank you for reviewing gmixer for me. Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 12:23:57 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl-1.320-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235(FE-Legal)
--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21
12:23:58 EDT ---
Some pre-remarks:
About license
Well, actually almost all the files in this tarball are
under GPLv3+, however sslogger.c is under BSD with advertising,
which conflicts with GPLv3+:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
For this package, actually sl.c (under GPLv3+) actually calls
execvp() for sslogger, which is written in sslogger.c (BSD with
advertising), licenses really conflict.
* Please consider to use %?dist macro:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag
* BuildRoot does not honor Fedora's packaging guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* Source0 must be specified with full URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
* Some needed Requires(pre) or so are missing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets
* Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly
honored:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo
* Please use macros for standard directories. For example,
you should use %{_localstatedir} for /var:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
* For binary names
- In Fedora other rpm already uses the name %{_bindir}/sl
- And IMO the name %{_bindir}/replay is too generic.
- Also I recommend to change %log_dir to %_localstatedir/log/sslogger
or so.
* Fedora considers that deleting user/group automatically by
rpm scriptlets is dangerous and this must be done manually
by sysadmin
%post
chown -R %{suser}.%{sgroup} %{log_dir}
* - is actually useless. This scriptlet is executed only when this rpm
is installed or upgraded and does nothing when this rpm
is actually used.
* Fedora uses %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} as directory
to install documents
- By the way currently the directory %{_docdir}/sslogger/ itself
is not owned by this package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
Setting FE-Legal
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(yansta...@googlem | |ail.com)| --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 12:37:55 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 12:38:30 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 12:39:04 EDT --- ping again, someone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479
Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
Flag||fedora-review?,
||needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c
||om)
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-21
12:39:07 EDT ---
Seems I'm a slacker at heart. Sorry for the delay. Anyway:
1. the source is in macosx zip format. Since the people in charge of rpm and
unzip refused to fix their support for osx zip archives, you need to perform
the un-zipping manually to avoid leaving a stray __MACOSX directory behind in
the build root (annoys people doing full-distro rebuilds). Use something like:
%setup -q -c -T
unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0}
(the gfs font packages have the same problem)
2. Microsoft considers faces in modern font families should only differ on
weight, width or slope) and a lot of software is confused by anything else.
Therefore, the shadow face should be split in a
woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts subpackage IMHO, making it a multi-family
package.
3. the font is definitely sans-serif, your fontconfig file should declare it
there
The rest of the packaging seems fine
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 12:41:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(a...@unix.sh) | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21 12:40:18 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 12:43:36 EDT --- To quote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Maintainers_Flags_Policy EOF When a package contains flag images that are used (in the user interface, in documentation, etc.) to represent locations, countries, nations, other kinds of geopolitical entities, languages, other kinds of ethnocultural concepts, religions, political movements and institutions, and the like, and where such use is not technically or substantively essential to the package, those flag images must be placed in an -flags subpackage. The -flags subpackage cannot be Required by the main package. EOF This package may contain flag images, but they are not used ... to represent anything at all. And even if they were used, I'm pretty sure that such use is both technically and substantively essential to this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 13:05:22 EDT --- Is this covered under the Sun re-licensing that also affected other RPC implementations in Fedora? http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-May/msg01673.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(sanjay.an...@gmai ||l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-21 13:18:59 EDT --- First review: 1. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt ⇒ please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging guidelines 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is really needed 5. your URL does not work 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) 7. I'd drop the first § of your description 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig file. For version 1.1, it will be NotCourierSans 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502065] New: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Alias: slashem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Summary: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://slashem.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarn...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem-0.0.8-0.1.E0F1.fc12.src.rpm Description: From the land before 3DFX, before VGA graphics and DOOM, before the IBM PC, way back in the dark ages of Unixland, there was a game. They called it Rogue. People played it, and found it good. From this basis, Hack was born. Soon Hack became Nethack, because it was developed by many people (and has nothing to do with hacking the internet). And people played this on many machines, from Unices to Macs to PCs, due to the amazing power of Open Source Code. But the DevTeam, the reclusive masterminds of Nethack, are a rather quiet bunch, gracing the world with new versions as they see fit, and when they see fit. Which is usually a new version every good number of years. And there was much gnashing of teeth. But because of the Freely Available Source Code Phenomenon, people began making their own versions of Nethack to tide themselves between magical releases. SLASH'EM is the (continuing) saga of one such variant... Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368974 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #17 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-21 13:43:47 EDT --- Not at the moment, we had to request the license changes on a per package, per file basis from Sun, and the list we sent them was before I was aware of this one. We have already sent them an additional list of the affected files in this package and requested the same relicensing, but we have not yet heard back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 13:43:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix-0.04.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.04.4-1 - Update to 0.04.4 - Drop upstreamed patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.an...@gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 13:52:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) First review: 1. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt ⇒ please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging guidelines 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is really needed 5. your URL does not work 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) 7. I'd drop the first § of your description 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig file. For version 1.1, it will be NotCourierSans 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts bah... they edited it all on may 17.. I'll redo the package.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250
--- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-05-21
14:01:25 EDT ---
Well
* Please address the issues of
- directory ownership (mentioned in my comment 4)
- and changing tetris word on script name and
in documents (mentioned in spot's comment 5)
* About patching
---
patch -p0 -b --suffix .warning %{SOURCE1}
---
- This can be replaced by
---
%patch1 -p0 -b .warning
---
* Make build log more verbose
- This package also shows build log like:
---
77 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command -e mkpath blib/lib/Goo/Canvas
78 [ CC xs/goocanvas.c ]
79 [ CC xs/goocanvasbounds.c ]
80 [ CC xs/goocanvasellipse.c ]
81 [ CC xs/goocanvasgroup.c ]
---
which is not so useful.
Please make build.log more verbose, to show if Fedora specific
compilation flags are correctly honored, for example.
For this package the following works.
---
make %{?_smp_mflags} NOECHO=
---
And please change the release number.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924
--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-05-21 14:38:17 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for taking! That was quick!
I'm waiting for somebody to review my review requests, so it's best to do other
reviews in return :)
For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the
.spec file:
# don't run make test by default
%{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0}
%{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1}
This is again from the native spec file. I kept it there to minimize the
differences. So the %check section could probably completely go...
Yeah, I've also seen it in the native spec file. However, I still think such
pieces of code need to be near the top of .spec files as it helps people who
are manually rebuilding the package to find out there's an option to enable the
testsuite. Right now, it's hidden somewhere in the .spec file and easily
overlooked.
Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary?
AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't)
I don't think the renaming is strictly necessary. I did it to make it extra
clear that the .a files are implibs, not static libraries...
Have you tried compiling TCL-based applications (or other libraries) against
this package to test whether the compiler can find the .dll.a file? (Normally
libtool takes care of that, but as TCL isn't libtool based it's best to verify
this)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(cristian.bal...@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 17:01:06 EDT --- The submitter has not responded. I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 17:01:15 EDT --- I have reviewed the package. Everything seems good. - rpmlint can be ignored: globus-gssapi-error-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369237 -- This package (globus-gssapi-error) is APPROVED by oget -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(mefos...@gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2009-05-21 17:03:19 EDT --- The submitter has not responded. I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502101] New: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Summary: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/agedu.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/ Description: Agedu is a program that helps you to track down wasted disk space by creating a graphical representation of last access times and occupied disk space of files and directories. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 17:20:54 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smem-0.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 17:29:51 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smem-0.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-05-21 17:32:34 EDT --- Package imported, built on devel, F-11 and F-10, updates submitted. Closing this review. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-05-21 17:39:58 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gssapi-error Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 2009-05-21 18:00:27 EDT --- 389-ds-base-devel.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - This is the only remaining warning. I believe this is because the devel package installs two shared library symlinks in /usr/lib/dirsrv: /usr/lib/dirsrv/libslapd.so /usr/lib/dirsrv/libns-dshttpd.so This is the usual convention for -devel packages, to install symlinks called .so that point to the real shared lib. I don't know why rpmlint doesn't like it, and I would like this error waived. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502117] New: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Summary: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_log_post.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: mod_log_post can be used for logging all HTTP POST messages. The module is based on mod_security but in difference it never returns any error messages to the visitors of your websites. Logging of POST data can be very useful for debugging purposes or analyses. As the module is loaded and run after the SSL decryption, it even can log POST data transmitted before via SSL to the Apache web server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #19 from Brennan Ashton bash...@brennanashton.com 2009-05-21 19:14:27 EDT --- I will evaluate this new package tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:24:14 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:23:13 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.2.5-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:24:31 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-memcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:24:00 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:23:24 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:26:47 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:25:10 EDT --- xfce4-cddrive-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:26:33 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.0.5-1.fc10|0.0.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.2-2.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.0.5-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||4.0-1.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:25:21 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:26:17 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:28:27 EDT --- xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-21 19:27:28 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
