[Bug 502554] New: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Alias: mingw32-boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-mi...@lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Boost C++ library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2009-05-26 02:42:26 EDT --- Fixed release/version, tweaked requires and updated to latest snapshot. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/thrift-0.2-0.20090525svn777690.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn269r=269format=sidepath=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/thrift/thrift.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #12 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 02:56:32 EDT --- If no response received in next 15 days, I will close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502556] New: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Summary: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: si...@sewell.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/lamson/lamson.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/lamson-0.8.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lamson is a modern Pythonic mail server built like a web application server. rpmlint [si...@silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26
03:09:42 EDT ---
Fedora review
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
2009-05-26
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376692
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mingw*.rpm mingw32-libgnurx.spec
mingw32-libgnurx-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libregex.a
mingw32-libgnurx-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored.
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
+ Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to
stick to the native version
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
LGPLv2.1
! License matches the actual package license
Its not BSD
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING.LIB)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
35c8fed3101ca1f253e9b6b191f6 mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-src.tar.gz
35c8fed3101ca1f253e9b6b191f6 x/mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-src.tar.gz
n/a Package builds in mock
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
+ Static libraries should be in -static
n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell si...@sewell.ch 2009-05-26 03:39:34 EDT --- Fedora 7 was end-of-life a while ago, only Fedora 9 and up are currently active and Fedora 9 will be end-of-life soon. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life Fedora 10 also uses Python 2.5, but Fedora didn't support creating eggs in distutils until Fedora 9. I would highly recommend using a non-EOL product when doing package reviews or use mock and a more recent build tree. I changed my setup.py to use setuptools instead of distutils which should fix the issue you were seeing. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/funcshell-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn274r=274format=sidepath=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/funcshell/funcshell.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:52:23 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1-1.fc10 |1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:52:03 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:53:54 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:51:39 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:53:00 EDT --- R-Biostrings-2.12.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:51:57 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.12.1-2.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:55:19 EDT --- R-Biostrings-2.12.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.2-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.12.1-2.fc10 |2.12.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:56:36 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 03:56:28 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com Summary|Review Request: mingw32-tcl |Review Request: |- MinGW Windows Boost C++ |mingw32-boost - MinGW |library |Windows Boost C++ library --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 04:26:55 EDT --- Fixed Summary line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 04:57:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Tue May 26 2009 Erik van Pienbroek epien...@fedoraproject.org - 2.5.1-2 - Fixed license tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 05:05:48 EDT --- The static subpackage contains some leftovers from libsoup: %description static Static version of the MinGW Windows Libsoup library. The %defattr line should be: %defattr(-,root,root,-) What's the dependency problem with the test framework library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26 05:17:39 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 05:22:24 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libgnurx Short Description: MinGW Regex library Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26 05:53:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Fixed Summary line. Thanks! (In reply to comment #2) What's the dependency problem with the test framework library? All of: libboost_prg_exec_monitor.lib libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mt.lib libboost_test_exec_monitor.lib libboost_test_exec_monitor-mt.lib libboost_unit_test_framework.lib libboost_unit_test_framework-mt.lib link to external, undefined functions. While under unix, this is possible, under windows, DLL's do not allow undefined external references. Therefore, we can only provide static libraries for these. Specifically, test_exec_monitor wants test_main(int, char**), prg_exec_monitor wants cpp_main(int, char**), and unit_test_framework wants init_unit_test_suite(int, char**). The static subpackage contains some leftovers from libsoup: %description static Static version of the MinGW Windows Libsoup library. The %defattr line should be: %defattr(-,root,root,-) An update for these is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387
Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26
06:13:51 EDT ---
Fedora review
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
2009-05-26
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint *
mingw32-hunspell.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libparsers.a
mingw32-hunspell-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libhunspell-1.2.a
mingw32-hunspell-static.noarch: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings.
As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored.
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
+ Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to
stick to the native version
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MPLv1.1
+ License matches the actual package license
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING,COPYING.LGPL,COPYING.MPL)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
- IMO, you don't need to include the whole history of the native package
in %changelog, just a reference that it was derived from the native package
would be sufficient
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
1177af54a09e320d2c24015f29c3a93e hunspell-1.2.8.tar.gz
1177af54a09e320d2c24015f29c3a93e x/hunspell-1.2.8.tar.gz
n/a Package builds in mock
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
+ Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
Have you tried to upstream your patches?
Especially hunspell-build-dll.patch seems like very upstream-worthy.
Also, what is the failure mode of AC_FUNC_MALLOC? I guess a bug report with
autoconf would be in order.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 06:36:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Have you tried to upstream your patches? Especially hunspell-build-dll.patch seems like very upstream-worthy. Filed at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2796772group_id=143754atid=756395 Also, what is the failure mode of AC_FUNC_MALLOC? I guess a bug report with autoconf would be in order. The AC_FUNC_MALLOC is some kind of fallback for environments which don't have a malloc() function in their libc. If this is the case (apparently it is for MinGW), then a '#define malloc rpl_malloc' is added to config.h. According to rjones, the rpl_malloc() function is part of gnulib. We don't have gnulib in our MinGW toolchain, so this ends up in a undefined reference (to rpl_malloc). After removing the AC_FUNC_MALLOC from the configure.ac file, the compile completes without problems (and the malloc from the MinGW libraries is used). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26 06:46:21 EDT --- The promised update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26 06:56:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) The AC_FUNC_MALLOC is some kind of fallback for environments which don't have a malloc() function in their libc. If this is the case (apparently it is for MinGW), then a '#define malloc rpl_malloc' is added to config.h. I agree we don't want rpl_malloc. The question is why does it fail to find the malloc in libmsvcrt.a (or newer friends). libmsvcrt.a provides _malloc: i686-pc-mingw32-nm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libmsvcrt.a dxnmbs00676.o: b .bss d .data i .idata$4 i .idata$5 i .idata$6 i .idata$7 t .text U __head_libmsvcrt_a I __imp__malloc T _malloc But that shouldn't hold up packaging. APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 07:06:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dinotrace Short Description: X11 waveform viewer for electronics Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 07:12:33 EDT --- Brennan, can you continue with the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502591] New: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Summary: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-0.4.11-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: btnx is a daemon that enables rerouting of mouse button events through uinput as keyboard and other mouse button combinations. For example, you can configure an extra mouse button to send a Ctrl+Alt+Right command to switch workspaces. This is especially useful for mice with more buttons than Gnome or KDE can properly handle, or mice that need evdev and a 100 step howto to register button events at all. btnx integrates revoco, a program that allows changing MX Revolution's wheel behavior. So, rpmlint is clean, and Koji scratch builds are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376801 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376787 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||502592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502592] Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Zarko (grof) zarko.pin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||502591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 07:26:16 EDT --- Thomas, thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-hunspell Short Description: MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-05-26 07:24:45 EDT --- On the fedora-mingw mailing list Fridrich Strba clarified the AC_FUNC_MALLOC behaviour: Easy! The AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC try to execute a program to see whether malloc(0) will return a NULL pointer. If that is not the case, it will use the rpl_malloc. Since cross-compiling, binaries cannot be executed and the test fails even though the malloc and realloc are in MS C runtime. Those malloc and realloc functions are compliant in the sense of AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC test, so patching them out is safe when cross-compiling for win32. Cheers Fridrich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502592] New: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Summary: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx-config.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-config-0.4.9-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: btnx-config is a graphical user interface for btnx So, rpmlint is clean, and Koji scratch builds are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376808 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 07:40:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) (In reply to comment #18) Using %cmake instead of cmake ... will likely resolve your issue. I tried this, and rpmlint still generates a warning. Does it ? can you post your SRPM please. My scratch build for F-10 gives me only these warnings: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1376830/ chitlesh(~)[0]$ls *.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpmarmadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc11.src.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpm chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint *.rpm armadillo.i386: W: no-documentation armadillo.ppc64: W: no-documentation armadillo.ppc: W: no-documentation armadillo.x86_64: W: no-documentation armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo-0.6.11.tar.gz 0640 armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo.spec 0640 13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502596] New: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Summary: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-tools-libra/sblim-tools-libra.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-tools-libra/sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The tools-libra package provides common functionality required by the task-specific resource access layers of wbem-smt tasks such as cmpi-dns and cmpi-samba. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-05-26 08:09:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) The AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC try to execute a program to see whether malloc(0) will return a NULL pointer. If that is not the case, So that means these autoconf tests can't be used when crosscompiling to any target, not just mingw. Bad. That should IMO at least be documented (it isn't in autoconf 2.63). C runtime. Those malloc and realloc functions are compliant in the sense of AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC test, so patching them out is safe when cross-compiling for win32. That's not what I'm worried about. I'm worried about the tediousness to patch these tests out in all packages that use them, vs. fixing the macro in autoconf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 08:15:04 EDT --- rpmlint is silent on this package. Koji scratch-build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502600] New: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ancient.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ancient is an OCaml module that allows you to use in-memory data structures which are larger than available memory and so are kept in swap. If you try this in normal OCaml code, you'll find that the machine quickly descends into thrashing as the garbage collector repeatedly iterates over swapped memory structures. This module lets you break that limitation. Of course the module doesn't work by magic. If your program tries to access these large structures, they still need to be swapped back in, but it is suitable for large, sparsely accessed structures. Secondly, this module allows you to share those structures between processes. In this mode, the structures are backed by a disk file, and any process that has read/write access to that disk file can map that file in and see the structures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #26 from Charles Lopes tja...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 08:41:57 EDT --- Sorry for the late feedback. The current version of the gnustep-make package does not make any difference between the Local and System domains anymore. In order to restore the upstream behaviour, I made my own version gnustep-make-2.0.8-2.fc10 where I commented out the following line in the spec file: sed -i -e 's,/local,,' FilesystemLayouts/fhs-system As for gnustep-base, I successfully built the package with mock for fedora-10-x86_64 and fedora-10-i386. I did so with both the original gnustep-make-2.0.8-2.fc10 and the version modified as described earlier. So I would say that the last package is fine by me. I have used it to build sogo and did not see any issues in my tests so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502609] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-syslog/sblim-cmpi-syslog.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-syslog/sblim-cmpi-syslog-0.7.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Syslog Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502614] New: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Summary: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th.p.jans...@googlemail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/stfl-0.20-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: STFL is a library which implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals. It is needed for another (the main app i want to package for fedora) package called Newsbeuter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502621] New: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Summary: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libint.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libint-1.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libint library is used to evaluate the traditional (electron repulsion) and certain novel two-body matrix elements (integrals) over Cartesian Gaussian functions used in modern atomic and molecular theory. The idea of the library is to let computer write optimized code for computing such integrals. There are two primary advantages to this: much less human effort is required to write code for computing new integrals, and code can be optimized specifically for a particular computer architecture (e.g., vector processor). Libint has been utilized to implement methods such as Hartree-Fock (HF) and Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS DFT), second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) method, as well as explicitly correlated R12 methods. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #9 from David Nalley da...@gnsa.us 2009-05-26 11:47:41 EDT --- So I talked to a FPC member and the gist of the conversation is: These libraries have to go. In order of preference: 1) Upstream the patches, eg have upstream (enano) commit their changes to the library project in question. 2) Fork from upstream. eg, have enano essentially fork the packages and begin maintaining a fork of each of those libraries (which will then need to be packaged) 3) Other solution I don't know what other solution exists to be honest, though I imagine that there exists some novel solution. Unfortunately a lot of this seems very much out of your hands and in the hands of upstream. Let me know how I can help you proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 12:02:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-testosterone Short Description: Text-based UI for running Python unit tests Owners: dmalcolm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713
Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #7 from Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 11:23:29
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.src.rpm
Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
md5sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
bc0c5ccc95bf0fcbc68b372c5f00d2d5 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
sha1sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
8acbdc11fc93f8b304b3ddb804506415e963c6c3 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
- Added LICENSE.GPLv2 which contains the full text of the GPLv2
- changed %{_inittddir} to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #27 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-05-26 11:25:47 EDT --- Thats sounds fine. Please talk to the maintainer of gnustep-make about the topic you have described in your comment. At least it may be fine to have a formal review and approvement of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 11:24:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: 389-ds-base Short Description: 389 Directory Server base package Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 10:51:42 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Fridrich Strba fridrich.st...@bluewin.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fridrich.st...@bluewin.ch --- Comment #7 from Fridrich Strba fridrich.st...@bluewin.ch 2009-05-26 10:47:01 EDT --- OK, I don't see how you want to change that. You need to run a programme to be sure that malloc(0) returns NULL or non-null. You have some other situations where you cannot determine something without actually running a programme, like allignments of types. The standard way of proceding is either to patch the system for known platform with values that we know to be true (I did this here http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-data-server/trunk/configure.in?r1=9959r2=9961 ) or to pre-populate the compile cache with values for tests that cannot be run. In this case, it is just to pre-fill the cache with: ac_cv_func_malloc_0_nonnull=yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502622] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xav...@bachelot.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Config-Properties.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Config-Properties-1.70-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Config::Properties is a near implementation of the java.util.Properties API. It is designed to allow easy reading, writing and manipulation of Java- style property files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 13:12:22 EDT --- A fair amount of the repoze stack has failing tests, even though we know the code works fine, which is why it is commented out. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-repoze-who-friendlyform Short Description: Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-05-26 13:34:10 EDT --- Good deal, still waiting on libglpng to show up in my mock buildroot. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 13:43:46 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 13:43:32 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 13:43:40 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 13:43:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Good deal, still waiting on libglpng to show up in my mock buildroot. . . Hmm, are you pointing mock at rawhide + F-11 updates ? rawhide == F-11 GA, so get the latest and greatest you need rawhide + F-11 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554
--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-05-26 14:39:01 EDT ---
While trying to build this package using rpmbuild I noticed several occurences
of lines like this:
gcc.archive
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/libboost_math_c99f.lib
/usr/bin/ar rc
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/libboost_math_c99f.lib
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/acoshf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/asinhf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/atanhf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/cbrtf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/copysignf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/erfcf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/erff.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/expm1f.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fmaxf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fminf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fpclassifyf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/hypotf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/lgammaf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/llroundf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/log1pf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/lroundf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/nextafterf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/nexttowardf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/roundf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/tgammaf.o
bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/truncf.o
It looks like the native 'ar' is used (/usr/bin/ar) instead of
i686-pc-mingw32-ar. This might need some further investigation.
Another issue I noticed in the .spec file is this:
if a2dll libboost_thread-mt.lib libboost_thread-mt -lpthreadGC2; then
As of mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-8{.fc11,.fc12} it isn't necessary to use
'-lpthreadGC2' anymore. It should be sufficient to use just '-lpthread' here.
For the link errors in the testsuite libraries. I might have found out a way to
get it operational as shared libraries. Would it be possible to add a main()
function to those testsuite libraries which looks something like this:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
void (*test_main_func) (int, char**);
test_main_func = GetProcAddress(NULL, test_main);
if (!test_main_func) {
printf(No test_main() function found\n);
return -1;
}
test_main_func(arg1, arg2);
return 0;
}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-26 14:46:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345498) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345498) laconic shadow fontconfig rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-26 14:50:44 EDT --- ⵖⵖⵖ APPROVED ⵖⵖⵖ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |tcall...@redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-26 14:49:55 EDT --- Behdad suggests the rules in the attached file for laconic shadow. (20:31:14) behdad: nim-nim: yes. in target=scan (20:31:16) behdad: I suggest: (20:31:34) behdad: 1) in target=scan append LaconicShadow as family name (not replace). (20:31:56) behdad: humm. then add LaconicShadow to decorative queue … (20:42:43) behdad: nim-nim: I believe so. I never used target=scan myself though... (20:42:43) behdad: so test The rest of the packaging is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-05-26 15:06:02 EDT --- Is there any practical difference between native 'ar' and i686-pc-mingw32-ar? I thought it was just a generic archive tool ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maths...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 15:12:14 EDT --- Looks good to me. There's some trailing whitespace in the spec file (Version and Source0 lines), but not a showstopper. Changelog is missing release. rpmlint output: % rpmlint *.rpm virtuoso-opensource.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.11 ['5.0.11-1.fc11', '5.0.11-1'] virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbc.so virtodbc.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbc.so e...@glibc_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbcu.so virtodbcu.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbcu.so e...@glibc_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbc_r.so virtodbc_r.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbc_r.so e...@glibc_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbcu_r.so virtodbcu_r.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbcu_r.so e...@glibc_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /var/lib/virtuoso/db/virtuoso.ini ../../..//etc/virtuoso/virtuoso.ini virtuoso-opensource-apps.x86_64: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-conductor.noarch: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11/libsrc/Wi/xmllazy.c virtuoso-opensource-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11/libsrc/Wi/sparqld.c virtuoso-opensource-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2009-05-26 15:30:22 EDT --- [bu...@fawkes ~]$ cat /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-i586.cfg config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-rawhide-i586' config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i586' config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall buildsys-build' config_opts['dist'] = 'fc12' # only useful for --resultdir variable subst config_opts['yum.conf'] = [main] cachedir=/var/cache/yum debuglevel=1 reposdir=/dev/null logfile=/var/log/yum.log retries=20 obsoletes=1 gpgcheck=0 assumeyes=1 # repos [fedora] name=fedora mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhidearch=i586 failovermethod=priority [local] name=local baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/i386 cost=2000 enabled=0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org 2009-05-26 16:49:03 EDT --- We also need libiodbc from http://www.iodbc.org/ packaged, it's used by Soprano to communicate with Virtuoso. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 16:54:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.04.5-1 - Update to 0.04.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:02:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:06:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:05:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:07:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=50 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:08:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:08:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:10:36 EDT --- CVS done, with the caveat that I did not add an InitialCC because we can only CC FAS accounts (or group accounts), not addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:12:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 478919 depends on bug 478918, which changed state. Bug 478918 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:13:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-05-26 18:20:39 EDT --- Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 466737, which changed state. Bug 466737 Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 466737, which changed state. Bug 466737 Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:27:00 EDT --- CVS requests are processed by a human and are not seen at all unless you set the fedora-cvs flag as Mamoru did for you. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:27:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:31:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:30:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:35:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:36:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:33:14 EDT --- There seems to be no FAS account truch. Please correct the CVS request and re-set the fedora-cvs flag to '?' when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:37:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:38:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 18:41:54 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-26 18:42:14 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:39:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-05-26 18:40:51 EDT --- CVS done (no release branches were requested, so there's only a devel branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
