[Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #5 from Ivana Varekova varek...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 02:24:40 EDT --- The reason is to have it separated from busybox - for now busybox use it to be smaller and more optimized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin for CGI::Application provides easy ways to setup run modes. You can just write the method that implement a run mode, you do not have to explicitly register it with CGI::App anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 02:41:03 EDT --- Sorry, lost in the 100s of spec changes I was dealing with yesterday. Its now committed to cvs so I won't miss it. It will appear the next time I push the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-06-19 02:56:29 EDT --- -URL:http://www.gnome.org/~ebassi/source/ +URL:http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib Sorry, but for libccss this isn't the one either ;) I guess you meant http://people.freedesktop.org/~robsta/libccss/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 03:05:15 EDT --- Correct :) and fixed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 03:12:04 EDT --- The commit logs are also sent to cvsextr...@_fedoraproje_t.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 03:14:08 EDT --- Add BR: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 03:13:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424382 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 41d4b4587ae59e7b5518a76583172c501aa621ab CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=29, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.53 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.68 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH) = 4.00 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 03:20:38 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-06-19 03:29:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Add BR: perl(Test::More) I knew I forgot something when I submitted this package. BR added, package builds in mock fedora-rawhide-i386. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2009-06-19 04:28:50 EDT --- I don't think installing class directly under /usr/share/php is a good idea I totally agree. But I just follow the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#File_Placement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 04:56:49
EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424380
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
45651d7d33f69bbc2a19d674fd6a4f66302f2629 acheck_0.5.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package acheck-0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch =
Provides: perl(ACheck::Common) perl(ACheck::FileType) perl(ACheck::Parser)
Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(ACheck::Common) perl(ACheck::FileType)
perl(ACheck::Parser) perl(Config::General) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter)
perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File)
perl(Term::ANSIColor) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(Term::Size) perl(constant)
perl(locale) perl(strict) perl(vars)
+ Not a GUI application
Should:
1)Requires should be written as only
Requires:perl(Text::Aspell), perl-gettext, %{name}-rules
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 04:58:42 EDT --- oops sorry got missed from review tracker list. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 05:02:47 EDT --- Thank you, I owe you for many reviews. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Pod-Abstract Short Description: Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 05:09:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424569 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ee2a03edd1a6d3590cad31db733af9c32dd45d12 CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=71, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.41 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.51 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode) = 0.16 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode::FileDelegate) = 0.13 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 05:09:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1410391 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 382662ecadff11707e78053f75ea395cc37a4e79 Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=7, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.61 cusr 0.05 csys = 1.71 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03-2.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(Catalyst::Helper::View::PDF::Reuse) perl(Catalyst::View::PDF::Reuse) = 0.03 perl(Template::Plugin::Catalyst::View::PDF::Reuse) Requires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::chdir) perl(PDF::Reuse) perl(base) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506914] New: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 Summary: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.antico.netsons.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ogldel...@mail.ru QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Antico is a Qt4/X11 Desktop/Window Manager (i.e. KDE+KWin) * The goal is to create a Window/Desktop manager simple and fast. * All parameters must be configured from few files, avoiding unnecessary complications, following the K.I.S.S. philosophy. * The whole project is based only on Qt4 libraries, without any other external dependencies (e.g. kdelibs …) git: http://github.com/antico/antico/tree/master Keyboard switcher for Antico: git://github.com/disels/axkb.git p.s this is my first package request and if I did something wrong, please do not angry to me. Thanks for you time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 05:38:46 EDT --- Perfect! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 05:49:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: autodafe Short Description: Fuzzing framework Owners: jfch Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202
Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 06:05:18
EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424595
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
2238a853a7f37b19160867b77bdb0a2df43449b9 blueproximity-1.2.5.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ desktop file installed correctly.
+ GUI App
Should:
1) blueproximity.1 is man page file. So it should be installed as man page not
just documentation.
use following patch
--
--- blueproximity.spec 2009-06-18 22:58:54.0 +0530
+++ blueproximity-new.spec 2009-06-19 15:31:42.0 +0530
@@ -34,11 +34,13 @@
install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/
install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/
+install -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
# Install Files
install -p -m 0755 start_proximity.sh %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}
install -p -m 0755 proximity.py %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
install -p -m 0644 proximity.glade %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/
+install -p -m 0644 doc/blueproximity.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
# Install Languages
for i in $(ls LANG/); do
@@ -67,9 +69,10 @@
%files -f %{name}.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc ChangeLog COPYING README doc/
+%doc ChangeLog COPYING README doc/manual*
%{_datadir}/%{name}
%{_bindir}/%{name}
+%{_mandir}/man1/blueproximity*
%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop
%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}_base.svg
Make sure you fix this thing and then import this package to cvs.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506914] Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-19 06:15:14 EDT --- I don't see a spec file or source RPM for review. If you just want to make a request for someone else to package this software, add it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList. There are no guarantees that someone else will volunteer to maintain the package, however. If you want to actually submit this package yourself and maintain it in Fedora, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and follow the instructions there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506914] Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 --- Comment #2 from RJ ogldel...@mail.ru 2009-06-19 06:24:16 EDT --- Ok. Thank you. I'll try to adapt the spec file from another rpm distribution and add it here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 07:15:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) IMO, and all that. The code says it's GPLv2+, so, there shouldn't be any blocker license-wise. The author is trying to place additional restrictions on copies downloaded from his site, which is questionable, but shouldn't be relevant here as the software will be distributed by the fedoraproject (or other downstream projects). You may be right, but the upstream website is so confusing, that I would rather have unequivocal statement of the upstream author on this topic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ska...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 07:22:04 EDT --- One nit in %description Simply - Simple -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #7 from Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 07:45:50 EDT --- New files are here: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/ But the problem is that there still are conflicts with lzma after /usr/bin/*lz* removal. Man pages are conflicting. Only the obsolete man pages are shipped. There are actually no man pages remaining after nuking the lzma related ones... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-06-19 07:54:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode Short Description: CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 07:52:56 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-3.fc10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-3.fc11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-06-19 08:02:12 EDT --- Thanks. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH Short Description: Easy DBI access from CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] New: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Summary: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: har...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/dracut/dracut.spec SRPM URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/dracut/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: dracut is a new, event-driven initramfs infrastructure based around udev. Will be the mkinitrd/nash replacement. See also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #1 from Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 08:33:37 EDT --- $ rpmlint /home/harald/git/dracut/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/harald/git/dracut/noarch/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /home/harald/git/dracut/noarch/dracut-generic-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm dracut.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:33:05 EDT --- perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:32:49 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0-1.r8442.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:34:44 EDT --- vfrnav-0.3-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0-1.r8442.fc11 |0-1.r8442.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:36:40 EDT --- perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3-8.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.00-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.12-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:37:30 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:35:39 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:37:20 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.6.3-3.fc11|0.6.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6.3-3.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.37.0-4.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.06-3.fc10 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:41:35 EDT --- mingw32-boost-1.37.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:43:03 EDT --- perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-19 09:40:08 EDT --- perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.20-1.fc11 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117
--- Comment #10 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 09:43:01 EDT ---
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl
All perl modules must include the versioned MODULE_COMPAT Requires:
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version))
This is to ensure that perl packages have a dependency on a perl which provides
the appropriate versioned directory structure (otherwise, the modules won't be
found).
Requires: perl-SVN-Notify = %{version}-%{release}
fixed
We should remove the following lines:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
fixed
The descriptions for the svnnotify contains a line with more the 79 characters.
fixed
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #11 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 09:44:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348665) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348665) perl-SVN-Notify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #12 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 09:45:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348666) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348666) perl-SVN-Notify-2.79-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #13 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 09:45:55 EDT --- I have found out, that a new release 2.79 is available now. fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #2 from Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 09:54:46 EDT --- forgot to add, that to test the dracut, you have to: %define with_switch_root 1 in the dracut.spec, until /sbin/switch_root is provided by util-linux-ng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #4 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 10:00:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348670) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348670) perl-Text-Trac.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #3 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 09:59:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348669) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348669) perl-Text-Trac-0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #5 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 10:00:36 EDT --- new version perl-Text-Trac-0.15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Villani lvill...@binaryhelix.net 2009-06-19 10:07:49 EDT --- Did you fix directory ownership? Side notes: until 9 or 10th of July it's exams time for me.. Maybe I should step back and allow another reviewer to complete the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506954] New: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 Summary: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: st...@traylen.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp-2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: UberFTP is the first interactive, GridFTP-enabled ftp client. It supports GSI authentication, parallel data channels and third party transfers. There is a successful koji build here. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424838 $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/uberftp-2.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I require a package sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 10:18:57 EDT --- Correct me if I'm wrong. But you wasn't still sponsored, so you don't have commit access into cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen st...@traylen.net 2009-06-19 10:28:07 EDT --- Excuse me. I left a load of debugging the spec file. Updated now: Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424869 Still no errors with rpmlint. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 10:39:55 EDT --- Right, but we explicitly discourage static linking, much less static linking to another C library. (I know that the busybox-anaconda package is actually dynamically linked.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #53 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 10:47:30 EDT --- Can I have a change to have an answear and for the remaining fix to be done ? blender 2.49a is been built, please give it a try. (but it's still crash with yafaray). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #7 from Timon timo...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 10:49:42 EDT --- yup. I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #9 from Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org 2009-06-19 10:50:37 EDT --- Dansguardian already went through RH legal. Their response was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643#c8 And that was already implemented in my spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment mime|application/octet-stream|text/plain type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-06-19 10:56:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse Short Description: Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit rpan...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 11:03:51 EDT --- Thanks, will fix before importing New Package CVS Request === Package Name: acheck Short Description: Check common localisation mistakes Owners: rakesh Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nott...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 11:03:55 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - GPLv2+ - License field in spec matches - *** *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+. It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the requirements are there. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - *** generic package description: This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic all purpose initramfs. Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma. - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - a6cbc2b0c1dbdec0b37a6ecfadf0a33c1f2e1122 - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux in so we don't need this? - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Handles devel libs/ldconfig/pkg-config/etc. correctly - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested x86_64 building noarch, x86_64 building x86_64) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - OK - final provides and requires are sane: - *** The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems wrong.) That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship it. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK (see above) - Should build on all supported archs - didn't try - Should function as described. - didn't try - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - OK - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - OK Other notes: - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs when /usr isn't present? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-19 11:06:41 EDT --- Cool, lifting FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Lennart Poettering lpoet...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506971] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides a plugin framework for displaying runtime information about your CGI::Application app in a popup window. A sample Timing plugin is provided to show how it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506976] New: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Summary: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides an easy way to do external redirects in CGI::Application. You don't have to worry about setting headers or worrying about return types, as that is all handled for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317
--- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-06-19 12:18:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
the other reason for these much comment because as we discussed earlier and as
i wrote in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues#devel_package_split if we
start to create static sub-packages then we've to rethink the packaging to
create devel subpackages similar to the native case. mainly in this case as
there're binaries in the main packages not just dlls.
Yeah, this is an issue which should probably be brought up on the mailing list
so we can decide which direction we want to go with subpackages. The question
which type of executables are allowed also needs to be discussed there as win32
applications aren't really welcome in Fedora (only libraries).
I had one remaining question:
- Why are the binaries split across two packages?
To comply with the Fedora packaging guidelines, the %define's at the top of the
.spec file need to be changed to %global's as mentioned in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
It's okay to just replace all occurences of '%define' with '%global'
In the latest .spec (0.10.23-1) you've added %{_mingw32_libdir}/*.a to the
-static subpackage. The *.a also catches the .dll.a files while those should be
in the main package.
- All the *.dll.a files need to be part of the main package
- All the *.a (NOT *.dll.a) files need to be part of the -static subpackage
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #13 from Bryson Lee bamab...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 12:20:46 EDT --- Posted updated spec and SRPM: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-5.fc10.src.rpm This update includes a patch called tcl-snmptools-redirection.patch that addresses a somewhat nasty misfeature of the extension whereby any redirections of stdout/stderr for extension clients are lost when commands provided by the extension are invoked. The extension author freopen()'s stdout / stderr in order to capture output from the underlying NetSNMP library calls for inclusion in the TCL result string, and then does not restore the original streams correctly. The patch has been submitted upstream as tcl-snmptools-Bugs-2808814: stdout, stderr redirections lost https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=1035638aid=2808814group_id=215927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #4 from Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 12:29:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) - License - GPLv2+ - License field in spec matches - *** *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+. It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the requirements are there. oh, yes, will change - Spec in American English - *** generic package description: This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic all purpose initramfs. Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma. ok, will change - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux in so we don't need this? yes, we still have to have this for F-11 and have to wait a little bit for F-12 The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems wrong.) ok, then I rename it to dracut-buildall? That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship it. if the tools haven't been installed.. so you mean running a lvm / crypto / raid root without the tools ? Other notes: - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs when /usr isn't present? good point! and plymouth? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 12:35:25 EDT --- OK, then this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 12:50:32 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes mbar...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 12:51:02 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-06-19 13:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) Lubomir: How about: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Umm, somehow. Please try to follow the review guidelines and note the things you have checked: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines You may search bugzilla for closed review requests to see how are they usually done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-19 13:07:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I received the following reply from Boris Kolpackov == Thanks for your effort in packaging XSD for Fedora, it is very much appreciated. Regarding the licensing issue, unfortunately relicensing the code under GPLv2 or later is not an option at the moment and making it GPLv2 with exceptions opens up a potential maintenance problem. Let me explain: the files that are under GPLv2 are from the base libraries that provide functionality that is not related to (nor is aware of) Xerces-C++. In other words, code from, say libcult, is used to parse command line arguments and just happens to be in the same executable (xsdcxx) as code that uses Xerces-C++. Since this GPLv2 code is not interacting in any way with the Xerces-C++ code under ASL 2.0, my understanding of the licenses suggests that there is no issue in having these two pieces of code in the same executable. NO. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation i.e. Having these two pieces of code in the same executable makes these all parts one big program and in this case all these codes must be GPLv2+ compatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #3 from Stepan Kasal ska...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 13:14:54 EDT --- The build failed because of an unresolved symbol in Class/XSAccessor.so. To fix that, I updated perl-AutoXS-Header to 1.02-1.fc12 and then rebuild perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.03-2.fc12 So an hour after now, when the repo catches the *XSAccessor-*-2.fc12 rpm, there is a chance that the reviewed rpm could build OK. I'm in a hurry right now, could you please try to build the rpm yourself? (If it still fails, then please accept my apology and return the NotReady to whiteboard.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-06-19 13:25:18 EDT --- Okay. Thank you for the Review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dansguardian Short Description: Content filtering web proxy Owners: heffer Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org 2009-06-19 13:54:10 EDT --- because it was done in this way in the native packages and i follow it. yes this guidelines created after i made this spec but now i change this define. i fix the .a files. http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SPECS/mingw32-gstreamer.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SRPMS/mingw32-gstreamer-0.10.23-2.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1425246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-06-19 15:11:37
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
tcl-snmptools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-4 ['1.0-5.fc11',
'1.0-5']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
- You are missing the latest version from the changelog.
- The line
install -d %{buildroot}%{tcl_sitearch}
should be dropped since it doesn't do anything (it's after the install
command).
- You seem to be missing BR: tcl, since
Mock Version: 0.9.16
ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/tcl-snmptools.spec'], False,
'/var/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 500, 494, None,
logger=mock.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0xc86c50)
Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64
--nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/tcl-snmptools.spec']
sh: tclsh: command not found
sh: tclsh: command not found
sh: tclsh: command not found
- A comment on style: I suggest using trailing slashes for directories in the
%files section:
%{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/
instead of
%{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/
Apart from these minor issues I think the package is good to go.
Do you have other submissions? Have you done informal reviews of other people's
packages? Before I sponsor you, you need to show me you're worth it :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-06-19 15:28:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems wrong.) ok, then I rename it to dracut-buildall? Well, I'm not sure it needs to exist. More below. That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship it. if the tools haven't been installed.. so you mean running a lvm / crypto / raid root without the tools ? anaconda never runs mkinitrd; it simply relies on the kernel %post script to run it to make a working initramfs. If you're doing an install to a RAID device, or LVM, or encrypted FS, etc., those tools need to be on the installed system when the kernel package is installed and mkinitrd/dracut is run. Without Requires: in the mkinitrd/dracut package, there's no guarantee that this is the case. (We had to respin mkinitrd to require kbd for F-11 because of this, as it wasn't getting the proper keymaps for the user to enter passwords.) So, we likely just need all these requires in the main package itself. Other notes: - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs when /usr isn't present? good point! and plymouth? Hm, when you put it that way, maybe it's not such a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 17:37:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348714) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348714) Selinux denial from the yafaray package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507030] New: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Summary: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspan...@zepler.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: I just packaged pymunk. I think it complies with all the regs. Pymunk is a Python wrapper for the wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine. A review would be marvellous :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Jonathan Steffan jonathanstef...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Steffan jonathanstef...@gmail.com 2009-06-19 18:28:20 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/blueproximity-1.2.5-4.fc9.src.rpm New Package CVS Request === Package Name: blueproximity Short Description: Detects you via your bluetooth devices and locks/unlocks the screen Owners: jsteffan Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
