[Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 02:32:45 EDT --- Pierre, I think I can do it with the new version 0.9.1 I will do an update in this week and post the links, of course. Let's see -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dho...@redhat.com |d...@danny.cz Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #10 from Richard Hughes rhug...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 03:38:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) At this point all I'd like to see is an ack from legal that they're OK with this, and then I think we can go ahead. Great, thanks for the review. Do we need to poke legal, or do they find us? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] New: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Summary: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: br...@wolff.to QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus.spec SRPM URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is my first package submission and I need a sponsor. This is an implementation of the game Titan. You can read more about the game at http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/103 . This is going to need a careful legal review. I suspect that at least the artwork for the original sets of legion markers will need to be replaced. Also the character counter artwork is similar enough to that of the original game, that in many cases it may need to be replaced as well. I can probably get some help from the upstream project with that and have some options for temporary solutions depending on what needs to get replaced. The artwork for the masterboard and battleboards has some functional components and is generally simplified in the computer implementation. I think it is likely that these are OK, but I am not an expert in this. Note for purposes of comparing the artwork, you need to look at the Avalon Hill edition, not the Valley Games edition which has all new artwork. The BGG site has a lot of pictures of the game, and I can provide hi res scans if needed for comparison. rpmlint output:bash-4.0$ rpmlint /home/bruno/rpmbuild/SRPMS/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.src.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-javadoc-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-debuginfo-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm colossus.spec colossus.src: W: strange-permission colossus-gen-tarball.sh 0755 colossus.i586: E: no-binary colossus-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. bash-4.0$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-06-30 04:31:44 EDT --- ping Christoph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508849] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yan...@declera.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module implements the Bayeux Protocol (1.0draft1) from the Dojo Foundation. Also called cometd, Bayeux is a low-latency routing protocol for JSON encoded events between clients and servers in a publish- subscribe model. $ rpmlint mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc12.*.rpm mock/fedora-10-i386/result/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc10.*.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||508031 --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 05:04:37 EDT --- Some years ago I accidentially imported the Estonian dictionaries as hunspell-ee but ee is the language code for Ewe, so I'd like to fix this up and re-import this dictionary as hunspell-et and remove hunspell-ee as a dead.package to leave it free for a future Ewe hunspell-ee. So the above hunspell-et.spec Obsoletes/Provides the last version of hunspell-ee in Fedora on upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508850] New: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-et.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-et-0.20030606-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: Estonian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-06-30 05:07:04 EDT --- Sorry, I was on Linuxtag and FUDCon last week, so I didn't have time for this review. Will do it tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 05:06:12 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443362 looks ok but where can I find python-tgext-crud? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 05:07:14 EDT --- can you put correct SRPM URL please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 05:10:29 EDT --- yes hunspell-et looks ok now for Estonian dictionaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr 2009-06-30 05:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) can you put correct SRPM URL please? /me signs. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 05:36:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443364 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 39e0fb1f9209fb82d8f086ba9165fcc1b8a7ebcc CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=28, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.14 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc12.noarch = Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Dispatch) = 2.16 perl(CGI::Application::Dispatch::Regexp) = 2.13 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exception::Class::TryCatch) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 05:42:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443524 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a633ab90e5e37981360143b5ee2b63bc62c4e0df ispell-et_20030606.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-06-30 05:41:13 EDT --- As per bug 508772 the ownership of this package was transferred to me Package Change Request == Package Name: par2cmdline New Branches: EL-5 Owners: epienbro konradm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-06-30 05:53:57 EDT ---
some notes
- tool name shouldn't be repeated in summary (e.g. LD_AUDIT feature frontend
for glibc 2.4+), but IMHO it should be description
- license tag should be GPLv3+, because you have GPLv3 or any later version
in the sources
- s/dl/download/ in the URL tag
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net)
- at least bison, asciidoc and xmlto are missing in the BuildRequires - you
should try building the package in mock to find all the BRs
- run make with V=1 in %build, options passed to gcc must be visible
- doesn't build in Rawhide, I get an error
...
Note: Writing latrace.1
ASCIIDOC doc/latrace.html
ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11.css
ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11-manpage.css
ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11-quirks.css
make: *** [doc/latrace.html] Error 1
chyba: Špatný návratový kód z /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.q7Pndh (%install)
chyby sestavení RPM:
...
- 32-bit Intel platform should be encoded as %{ix86} in the ExclusiveArch tag
and ARM in lowercase
- don't mark the man page as %doc
Increase the release in next published iteration of the package if the version
remains the same.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 05:57:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hunspell-et Short Description: Estonian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #6 from David Hannequin david.hanneq...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 07:55:11 EDT --- Hi, I fixed desktop file. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-4.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #79 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2009-06-30 08:20:42 EDT --- Jens, Where are we now on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Alias||liblastfm Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-30 09:12:01 EDT --- OK, I'll take a look at remaining items 1. spec whitespace 2. BuildRequires ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-30 09:19:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jun 30 2009 ... - rpmlint clean(er) - BR: libsamplerate-devel - -devel: fix Requires (typo, +%%?_isa} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #9 from Colin Walters walt...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 09:52:19 EDT --- I've updated CVS. Working on a mock test build now, but feel free to jujmp in and make any changes necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Eelko Berkenpies fed...@berkenpies.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #5 from Eelko Berkenpies fed...@berkenpies.nl 2009-06-30 10:14:26 EDT --- [V] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ee...@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/SRPMS/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm liblastfm.src:41: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ee...@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ee...@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-devel-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on liblastfm/liblastfm-libs/libliblastfm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [ee...@eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-debuginfo-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [V] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Conclusion: -- APPROVED -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508922] New: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Summary: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cpa...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~cpardy/rpms/scselinux.spec SRPM URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~cpardy/rpms/scselinux-0-0.1a.src.rpm Description: To better conform with the upstream the gui code that was previously in policycoreutils has been moved into it's own package and given a rewrite to use policy kit. This code implements the 3 guis, system-config-selinux polgengui and lockdown. These have in the past been implemented as a patch on fedora systems to the policycoreutils package. This code is not yet feature complete and does not yet have an upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-06-30 10:46:02 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, thank you very much for the review. (In reply to comment #4) These days %global seems to be preferred over %define, though the differences are subtle and I don't think it makes any particular difference for the two %defines you're using. Ok, let it be %global. I think your Source0 should not be a URL if that URL is not valid, such as in the case where you're using a CVS snapshot. Fixed. I'm not sure why you'd need PECL: in the Summary; the upstream site doesn't use that in its summary, and it gives the impression that the name of the package is PECL. Ok, PECL prefix removed. Your BuildRoot: tag is missing any mention of %release. One day soon BuildRoot can go away, but that's not quite here yet and in the meantime it needs to meet the guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Added %%release part into BuildRoot tag. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora10/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc9.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora10/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pa...@hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pa...@hubbitus.info Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-06-30 10:55:17 EDT --- I have been promised many times ago review you Java package. I plan do it now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 11:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) I've updated CVS. Working on a mock test build now, but feel free to jujmp in and make any changes necessary. I'll have a look tonight if you don't have time. I was in process of getting them both on 0.6.3 (inc gobject-introspection) earlier but other things have taken my time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-30 11:24:35 EDT --- Legal has been poked, via Blocks: FE-Legal above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Jens Kuehnel bugzilla-red...@jens.kuehnel.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Kuehnel bugzilla-red...@jens.kuehnel.org 2009-06-30 11:21:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: miredo Short Description: Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs Owners: jens Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mche...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 11:28:46 EDT --- Tested here. It properly works. It would be interesting to add it also at rpmfusion and/or at epel, for usage with RHEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-30 11:31:50 EDT --- -- This package (rubygem-bacon) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-06-30 11:35:14 EDT --- For posterity, srpm link that works: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-30 12:01:29 EDT --- Well, - I have overlooked it, however it seems this package should have Requires: rubygem(rack) because lib/rack/test.rb contains: -- 5 require uri 6 require rack -- (although Rakefile does not suggest such dependency). Would you check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-06-30 12:11:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349969) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349969) rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203
--- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
2009-06-30 12:11:47 EDT ---
Here is the review:
+:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing
MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package.
rpmlint silent
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}
[=] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
# src/SevenZip is LGPLv2+ or CPL
# The rest is GPLv2+
License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ or CPL)
but changelog says what SevenZip now not included. So, I think license shoild
be GPLv2+ now only.
[-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Package include dreamfabric Dknob component
http://www.dreamfabric.com/java/knob/knob.html this is not mention any license
in sourse. License text also not included. Did you contact with author and ask
license?
Also petersalomonsen component included. License there same GPLv2+, but it is
not acceptable bundle any (source or compiled JARs) components in package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software
all such components must be separate packaged and reviewed.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
No.
Package contains script to fetch source from SVN (frinika-snapshot.sh), but it
revision number not provided. And you should add comment how you get source. In
you case it may be simple note about proper usage of frinika-snapshot.sh. It
must be command to copy/paste reproduce.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
One hint, instead of do svn checkout (svn co) and then delete .svn
directory, you may do just svn export
Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan link
is not accesable.
[+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one supported architecture.
Build successful - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444150
[+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
This is noarch package.
[-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
BuildRequires: ant
missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed.
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro.
Package does not have locale files.
[+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just
symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in
%post and %postun.
No shared library files here.
[+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review
I think package is not relocatable.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
[=] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
There only may be considered move examples into separate subpackage. But its
have small size, and I do not require it.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
No header files, this is java package
[+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
No static libraries.
[+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
No such files.
[+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a
[Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817
--- Comment #2 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-06-30 12:11:05 EDT ---
Source URL: Please read
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net for dealing
with Source0's URL properly. (Note you can't use %{name}-%{version}.whatever
because the package is WHOAcompletely different.)
Macros: Those look like the Zikula-specific macros at the top and in reality
they aren't really helping all that much. One is redundant, and it would be
much cleaner in the specfile to just type out limesurvey and %{_datadir} so
people don't get lost.
(On the same note, having files under /usr/share/limesurvey/limesurvey seems
mildly redundant and probably shouldn't be done.)
Requires: Are you supposed to require a webserver? Check with somebody on that
and paste the IRC log (or whatever) here.
rpmlint: is very loud. Output will be attached. The gist of it is
file-not-in-%lang warnings; take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] New: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Summary: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/volume_key.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/volume_key-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a command-line tool for manipulating storage volume encryption keys and storing them separately from volumes. The main goal of the software is to allow restoring access to an encrypted hard drive if the primary user forgets the passphrase. The encryption key back up can also be useful for extracting data after a hardware or software failure that corrupts the header of the encrypted volume, or to access the company data after an employee leaves abruptly. Note: the package builds against a static, patched copy of libcryptsetup. This is temporary, to make volume_key available in Fedora sooner. The upstream maintainer has accepted the proposed functionality, and I'll remove the static copy of libcryptsetup as soon as the patch is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-06-30 12:13:49 EDT --- Hey, now that you are sponsored, I guess I'll take this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-06-30 12:18:05 EDT --- [ianwel...@deathray review]$ rpmlint /home/ianweller/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/license.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/install.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/needles_howto.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/credits.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/changelog.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. please fix :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class |php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class |providing HTTP |providing HTTP |authentication methods |authentication methods Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-30 12:22:25 EDT --- Okay -- This package (php-pear-Auth_HTTP) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-06-30 12:30:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pear-Auth_HTTP Short Description: Class providing HTTP authentication methods Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||508960(volume-key-escrow) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203
--- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-06-30
12:51:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Here is the review:
Whee! Thanks a lot!
[=] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
# src/SevenZip is LGPLv2+ or CPL
# The rest is GPLv2+
License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ or CPL)
but changelog says what SevenZip now not included. So, I think license shoild
be GPLv2+ now only.
Ouch, I forgot to update the license tag after I packaged SevenZip separately.
[-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Package include dreamfabric Dknob component
http://www.dreamfabric.com/java/knob/knob.html this is not mention any license
in sourse. License text also not included. Did you contact with author and ask
license?
Also petersalomonsen component included. License there same GPLv2+, but it is
not acceptable bundle any (source or compiled JARs) components in package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software
all such components must be separate packaged and reviewed.
It looks like I missed these ones. I'll do them next.
[-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL.
No.
Package contains script to fetch source from SVN (frinika-snapshot.sh), but it
revision number not provided. And you should add comment how you get source.
In you case it may be simple note about proper usage of frinika-snapshot.sh.
It must be command to copy/paste reproduce.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
One hint, instead of do svn checkout (svn co) and then delete .svn
directory, you may do just svn export
Actually the revision number is provided:
I issue svnversion between svn checkout and delete .svn directories to
get the svn revision number. How can I do this with svn export?
Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan
link is not accesable.
Other sources? I didn't get your point. %{name}.sh, %{name}.desktop,
%{name}-snapshot.sh are all written by me.
[-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
BuildRequires: ant
missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed.
Strange that I missed this.
[=] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
Error: Missing Dependency: SevenZip is needed by package
frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch)
Error: Missing Dependency: tootaudioservers = 3 is needed by package
frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch)
This dependencies is only in rawhide?
They are also submitted to stable. They will arrive there in a few days.
[-] Patches. Each included patch must have link to upstream bagtracker or
comment why it can't be done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus
The patches are all strictly Fedora specific. I'll add a comment.
Should:
[=] I think in command:
ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \
Will be cool replace 0.5.1 by something like %{version}
That 0.5.1 is flexdock's version, not frinika's.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-06-30
13:16:49 EDT ---
For -2:
* Directory ownership issue
- Well, I don't know well which package should own the directory
%{pear_phpdir}/HTML/.
* -1 binary rpm owned this directory
* now -2 binary rpm does not own this directory
* On dist-f12 tree only php-pear-HTML-Common binary rpm
owns this directory, however currently this rpm
(php-pear-HTML_Javascript)
does not depend on php-pear-HTML-Common
So two solutions. Either:
- make php-pear-HTML_Javascript depend on (i.e Requires)
php-pear(HTML_Common)
- or make php-pear-HTML_Javascript also own %{pear_phpdir}/HTML/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-pear-HTML-Javascript - |php-pear-HTML_Javascript - |Class for creating simple |Class for creating simple |JS scripts |JS scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2009-06-30 13:53:31 EDT --- Note to self... 1. Remove mysql-server from Requires 2. Add webserver to Requires 3. Package in F11 as the rpmlint in CentOS 5.3 isn't catching everything, apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-06-30 14:44:21 EDT --- Where are the updates in bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-06-30 14:47:11 EDT --- I want to poke the submitter of this package, that this review is APPROVEd. So he should create the CVSAdmin request for inclussion of this package into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-06-30 14:50:37 EDT --- Looks good to me, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-06-30 14:54:09 EDT --- Question: If you have talk to the Fedora maintainer of libcryptsetup. Because that this is a patch which should included into ghe general version of libcryptsetup, I would suggest, that we should add this patch into the Fedora package of libcryptsetup until this patch will been integrated into the upstream package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 steve st...@lonetwin.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from steve st...@lonetwin.net 2009-06-30 14:57:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ldd-pdf Short Description: Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Owners: lonetwin Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 15:03:37 EDT --- Milan Broz is actually Cc: ed. I prefer to keep the patch inside volume_key, because it adds new interfaces to the library. If the Fedora cryptsetup package is patched, other users might mistakenly think these interfaces were accepted upstream, and might release code that depends on libcryptsetup that actually compiles only against the Fedora version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-06-30 15:11:10 EDT --- Ok, all issues were fixed. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #3 from Milan Broz mb...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 15:18:42 EDT --- Library extensions are planned to be included in uspstream cryptsetup but not in current 1.0.x stable branch (I expect it in cryptsetup 1.1, but discussion still ongoing). All library extensions must be checked in upstream first, with proper library version increase. I think that for the testing there is no problem with local static library, everything written to disk (LUKS header) is still fully compatible with unpatched cryptsetup). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-06-30 15:27:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sK1 Short Description: illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|joc...@herr-schmitt.de Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-06-30 15:26:52 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package source tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: dd18ab3f61f390fbc96a8dc8a15aa447) * Package has proper License tag + License Tag says GPLv2 and Artistic as OSS license * Copyright note in the source files matches with license tag + Package has proper Buildroot definition + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Proper Buildroot definition + BuidRoot will be clean at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package will be built for noarch * Local build works fine + Package has a %check stanza + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm + rpmlint is quite for binary rpm + Scratch build on koji works fine + Local install and uninstall works fine + %doc stanza is small, no extra subpackage in required + Files has proper files permission + %files contains no duplicated entries + All packaged files are owned by this package + No packaged files belong to another package + package has proper Changelog Bad: - Package doesn't contains verbain copy of the license (no blocker) ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info
2009-06-30 15:30:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Actually the revision number is provided:
I issue svnversion between svn checkout and delete .svn directories to
get the svn revision number. How can I do this with svn export?
No. To check source I run:
$ sh frinika-snapshot.sh
and got frinika-548.tar.bz2 tarball opposite your frinika-521.tar.bz2.
So, my suggestion here to take in that script at least one argument - revision
number, and checkout exactly provided revithion. Then, in spec file comment
near this source you write instruction like:
# ./frinika-snapshot.sh 521
or, on you choice:
# ./%{name}-snapshot.sh %{svnver}
Example how I think about it (both revision number as parameter, and svn
export here) - http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/frinika-snapshot.sh
Hope if it help. And off course I do not insist on exactly that implementation.
Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan
link is not accesable.
Other sources? I didn't get your point. %{name}.sh, %{name}.desktop,
%{name}-snapshot.sh are all written by me.
Excelent! And add this two words into comment.
[-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
BuildRequires: ant
missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed.
Strange that I missed this.
See buld log:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1444151name=build.log
Straight sfter invoke:
$ build-jar-repository -s -p lib toot2 jmod jVorbisEnc jgoodies-looks
jakarta-commons-logging skinlf SevenZip
next command from it is:
$ ant jar javadocs
This dependencies is only in rawhide?
They are also submitted to stable. They will arrive there in a few days.
Good. I think I can test it shorly. (I test it on work notebook, and afraid use
rawhide here. Sorry.)
[-] Patches. Each included patch must have link to upstream bagtracker or
comment why it can't be done.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus
The patches are all strictly Fedora specific. I'll add a comment.
Really all Fedora related? I think frinika-sevenzip.patch fix real bug. Why you
do not wish fill it upstream?
Should:
[=] I think in command:
ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \
Will be cool replace 0.5.1 by something like %{version}
That 0.5.1 is flexdock's version, not frinika's.
Really. My mistake. But it is also error. You use unversioned
BuildRequires:flexdock
Requires: flexdock
but symlink to exact version of jar.
From this I look again on this symlinks. I think instad of doing such symlink
you should use build-classpath:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-classpath
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joc...@herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-06-30 15:35:52 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can update to the most current 0.11.2 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-06-30 15:50:34 EDT --- The version I packaged was the only listed as the featured download. I have dropped a mail to the primary upstream developer asking for clarification. Meanwhile, if you can do a review, I can import and update later even. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-06-30 16:01:00 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pecl-parsekit Short Description: PHP Opcode Analyser Owners: Hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl --- Comment #13 from Louis Lagendijk lo...@lagendijk.xs4all.nl 2009-06-30 16:17:28 EDT --- Please check if the description is ok. I believe that using registered trade names is not allowed.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-06-30 16:22:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sK1 Short Description: open-source illustration program Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-06-30 16:23:30 EDT --- I have gone with adding a dependency on php-pear-HTML-Common, Updated Spec and SRPM SPECS: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript.spec SRPMS: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #6 from Chris Cowley ch...@chriscowley.me.uk 2009-06-30 17:06:53 EDT --- Mat That sounds like a fair deal to me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Chris Cowley ch...@chriscowley.me.uk changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Package Review |eclipse-phpeclipse Version|rawhide |el5 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #13 from Milos Jakubicek xja...@fi.muni.cz 2009-06-30 17:11:14 EDT --- Orcan, I'm really sorry for my late response, but I'm having busy days now (and yes, I must have missed whatever you sent to f-d-l, sorry too). I'm generally open to any modification to the current lzma package which will help the symbiosis with xz, however, I really like the latest solution from Jindrich (only -debuginfo are conflicting, which I don't find any bad) and if nobody comes up with something we missed as far, I'm going to approve the package in a day or two. Other minor comments on packaging: * rpmlint: rpmlint ../SRPMS/xz-4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11.src.rpm xz.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary XZ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/xz-* xz-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/lzcat xz xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/unlzma xz xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/lzma xz xz.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary XZ Those are all OK imho. xz.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.999.8beta-0.5 ['4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11', '4.999.8-0.5beta'] Make rpmlint happy here please, together with adding a dot as Orcan pointed out. * specfile is sane, owns all directories, proper macros * builds fine in current F11 and rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444933 * matches upstream sources, sha256sum: 059da5a9fe51c28b38f67e5b8063a451c516f37fbb268177fd1081b70dd97f53 * handles libraries well * I have some worries regarding licensing because of the comment on upstream's homepage: Oops! Accidentally a wrong COPYING file got included in 4.999.8beta. 4.999.8beta is still under GNU LGPL, but the first stable release will be in the public domain like the incorrectly included draft of new COPYING in 4.999.8beta already hints. Currently it is definitely *not* LGPLv2.1+ (in this case) but I'm also afraid that authors claims about becoming Public domain are not right too. Hence GPLv2+ seems to be ok to me (now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-06-30 17:18:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux Short Description: Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:21:45 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||4.65-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:22:44 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:22:57 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.0-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.01-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:24:04 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:21:58 EDT --- SevenZip-4.65-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:24:59 EDT --- mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:23:53 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.16-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:24:15 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-flipsticks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:26:26 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:26:07 EDT --- bullet-2.74-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:27:01 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||45462-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.1-2.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.7.2-4.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508630] Build eclipse-phpeclipse for EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fed...@matbooth.co.uk | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@matbooth.co.uk Summary|Review Request: |Build eclipse-phpeclipse |eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP|for EPEL |plugin for Eclipse | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.00-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:25:57 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qelectrotech'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:25:42 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:29:25 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:28:37 EDT --- perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||3-0.1.beta2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.03-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.74-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.07-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:28:24 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update blueman'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-30 17:32:01 EDT --- perl-p5-Palm-1.009-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
