[Bug 509619] New: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509619 Summary: Review Request: srtp - Secure Real-Time Transport Protocol (SRTP) Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/srtp/srtp.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/srtp/srtp-1.4.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The libSRTP library is an open source implementation of the Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) originally authored by Cisco Systems, Inc. SRTP is a security profile for RTP that adds confidentiality, message authentication, and replay protection to that protocol. It is specified in RFC 3711. More information about the SRTP protocol itself can be found on the Secure RTP page. Author: David A. McGrew mcg...@cisco.com, Cisco Systems, Inc. l@@k - http://www.callweaver.org/wiki/TCP+TLS+SRTP https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=5413 koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1453779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #6 from Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 02:27:19 EDT --- Ping? Does anyone continue to do package review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210
--- Comment #28 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 03:42:44
EDT ---
* There is a new upstream version 3.6.3 now.
I'm aware of it but I'm waiting for the new version of ekiga that will work
with it.
* rpmlint on the installed package complains:
$ rpmlint opal
opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2
/lib64/libdl.so.2
This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand?
I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now
fixed.
[perobin...@neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal*
../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[perobin...@neo SPECS]$
* There is a new guideline now, that says the license file (actually any doc
file) should be only in one package. Having it on other subpackages is
considered as file duplication.
Removed the extra copy of the licence in devel
* %configure --prefix=/usr
Please use the %{_prefix} macro
Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to
specify the prefix :-)
You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor
changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #3 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-07-04 03:53:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) - the package contains a rather old snaphost from 1/2008 - can you package a newer snapshot e.g. from 6/2009? Not done yet. Should be finished in a couple of days. I've just had a deeper look into the download directories of enlightenment and unfortunately even if there are newer snaphot directories, they don't always contain all packages, only the updated ones. And indeed version 0.5.2.042 seems to be the most recent one... I'm sorry for this - I should have looked more carefully yesterday... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 438452] Review Request: java-gnome: Java GNOME bindings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438452 --- Comment #17 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2009-07-04 06:38:39 EDT --- I've posted an updated package here, informally: http://www.root.snowtree.se/abo/fedora/reviews/java-gnome/ New release, added javadocs etc. I did not attempt to address everything in comment #14 (and for example I don't know if a JAR symlink would be a good thing), but hopefully this saves Colin Walters some time. Feel free to check/fix/repost it for review. Also, I put the examples in the -javadoc package, which isn't really correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@root.snowtree.se --- Comment #8 from Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se 2009-07-04 06:38:41 EDT --- Moblin (the distro) version 2.0 beta has been released, so it seems reasonable to package the individual components for rawhide now. If these shows up automatically on GNOME logins then it's a bug that breaks existing functionality, where functionality means a GNOME desktop that is not cluttered with broken and irrelevant icons. In that case I agree that it should be a priority to fix that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462625(FedoraOLPCDelta) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 07:59:12
EDT ---
My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post
section, so they should be ghosted.
We run ldconfig primarily to update the dynamic linker's cache file. ldconfig
creates the *.so.N symlink, if it isn't present already (or it changes it, if a
newer library version is found). However, the *.so.1 symlink ought to be
included in your package already. If make install ... doesn't create it, you
can do it yourself:
%install
...
make install ...
/sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is
/usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient?
It is, but only for Fedora = 11.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-04 08:29:47 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-04 08:31:15 EDT --- oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508630] Build eclipse-phpeclipse for EPEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #7 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-07-04 08:41:03 EDT --- Unfortunately, one of the dependencies is missing (htmlparser) so I've sent an email to the maintainer asking for an EL5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750
Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de
--- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert fed...@christoph-wickert.de 2009-07-04
10:16:03 EDT ---
Some more comments:
* URL should be http://trash-cli.googlecode.com/
* License is GPLv2+, take a look at the headers of the scripts (...any later
version).
* Try to preserve timestamps when modifying files in %prep. Can be done similar
to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
* Timestamp of Source0 does not match
* Most of the docs are missing, at least AUTHORS and COPYING *must* to be
included in the package
* What's the use of this?
install -d $(dirname %{buildroot}%{_mandir})
mv %{buildroot}/usr/man %{buildroot}%{_mandir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 10:22:41 EDT --- Updated to the latest upstream release - 0.0.13 SPEC: as above SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley-0.0.13-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 vivek shah boni.vi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(boni.vi...@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #10 from vivek shah boni.vi...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 10:31:49 EDT --- Pong. Sorry about the long delay. I have updated the package to the new version 1.0.6. Can someone please check if the bug exists for x86_64 for the new upstream release as well. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnujump.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnujump-1.0.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #12 from Marcin Wojdyr woj...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 10:44:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) It's because it isn't supposed to be used that way. It defeats the whole purpose of autotools: a simple(ish) way of configuring and building software on many platforms. Sorry, but do you really mean that using well-documented, portable libtool script defeats the whole purpose of autotools? It's much more elegant way than hacking Makefile.am and running autotools. If for some reasons using libtool is not recommended in fedora project (but I haven't seen such a statement in docs and there is a number of specs in fedora CVS that _are_ using libtool in this way), the second most portable way is to just call install. Marcin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #19 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-07-04 12:32:33 EDT --- Bit of an update: - Update to 2.0.17. - Add OSGI manifest info to the runtime jar. - Bundle generator docs with the generator in the main package. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.17-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 13:02:49
EDT ---
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
sh ./build
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot, not both at once.
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
cp -p README gpl.txt %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
You could simply include them with %doc in the %files section:
%doc README gpl.txt
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
gzip sap.1
cp -p sap.1.gz %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
Install it uncompressed, and rpmbuild will compress it automatically.
%{_mandir}/man1/sap.1.gz
Here prefer %{_mandir}/man1/sap.1.* as automatic compression of manual pages
makes it possible to replace gzip with a different compressor any time.
%doc
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README
%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version}/gpl.txt
These lines can be deleted in favour of the %doc README gpl.txt mentioned
above.
License: GPLv3
Actually the source files say it's GPLv3+.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509533] Review Request: sap - A small CLI audio player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509533 --- Comment #2 from Julian Aloofi jul...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-04 13:56:54 EDT --- Thanks for the correction. I updated the spec file and rebuilt the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||l...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509658] New: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Summary: Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsm...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/h5py.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/h5py-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Please Review: The h5py package provides both a high- and low-level interface to the HDF5 library from Python. rpmlint gives no warnings or errors. Builds cleanly on f-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454385 Builds cleanly on f-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454390 Builds cleanly on f-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454405 on all archs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josephsm...@gmail.com Depends on||509658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226
--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-04
15:13:03 EDT ---
+ both binary and source package passed rpmlint test
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ The package is correctly named according to Packaging Name Guideline
ruby-icon-artist
+ spec file %{name} matches the package
- Is %find_lang needed for this kind of package? If so, it should be included
for future translation.
+ Package is licensed under LGPL2+
+ COPYING which is a license file is linked under %doc
+ SPEC file is in American English and legible
+ Source used to build package matches upstream source through md5.
f5ebfea7ab6ecd4d97b1953f6cb53e97
+ Package succesfully built and compiled
--
$ rpmbuild --rebuild ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm
Installing ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc10.src.rpm
warning: user mso does not exist - using root
warning: group mso does not exist - using root
warning: user mso does not exist - using root
warning: group mso does not exist - using root
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.484N5P
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf icon-artist-0.1.90
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /home/luya/rpmbuild/SOURCES/icon-artist-0.1.90.tar.bz2
+ /bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ exit 0
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.z9uWzt
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+ export 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686'
+ CFLAGS='-O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686'
+ exit 0
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ISNvd7
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+ rm -rf /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386
+ DESTDIR=/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386
+ ./install.rb
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DHMDIL
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+ exit 0
Processing files: ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DX4wjq
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+
DOCDIR=/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90
+ export DOCDIR
+ rm -rf
/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90
+ /bin/mkdir -p
/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90
+ cp -pr doc/AUTHORS doc/classes doc/COPYING doc/created.rid doc/CREDITS
doc/files doc/fr_class_index.html doc/fr_file_index.html
doc/fr_method_index.html doc/index.html doc/rdoc-style.css
/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386/usr/share/doc/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90
+ exit 0
Provides: ruby(icon-artist) = 0.1.90
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) =
3.0.3-1
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
/home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386
warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: muamba.benashima
Wrote:
/home/luya/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.6ZJNKK
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd icon-artist-0.1.90
+ rm -rf /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-1.fc11.i386
+ exit 0
Executing(--clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.G4Nh9p
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/luya/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf icon-artist-0.1.90
+ exit 0
---
+ All dependencies are listed in spec file such as ruby
Those are initial reviews. I will work further once the listed issue is
resolved.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sourada martin.sour...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 15:27:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) - Is %find_lang needed for this kind of package? If so, it should be included for future translation. In the future most likely yes, but as of now it does not support translations, so %find_lang is superfluous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] New: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Summary: Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: i...@ianweller.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-1.r3/tremfusion.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-1.r3/tremfusion-0.99-1.r3.fc11.src.rpm Description: TremFusion is an enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-04
17:04:45 EDT ---
Here is further review
+ Permissions on files are properly set with the use of %defattr(...) line.
+ Package has a %clean section containing rm -fr %{buildroot}
+ Use of macros is consistent
+ Package contains code
+ There is no large documentation
+ Files inside %doc do not affect runtime
+ No header files nor static libraries
+ No .la libtool archives
+ Package does not contain GUI application
+ Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, package has rm -rf %{buildroot}
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
Before approval, would you mind to give the list of command for
ruby-icon-artists and what does it do in Inkscape?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-04 17:08:04 EDT --- Scratch builds: dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454508 dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454480 dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233946] Review Request: secondlife - The Second Life client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233946 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@ianweller.org --- Comment #35 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-04 17:05:34 EDT --- What's the status on this, Callum? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] New: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/compat-libgdamm.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: this package provides compat libs for libgdamm-3.0.1 from fedora 10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-07-04 18:16:51 EDT --- You will need to fix this. [le...@localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint '/home/leigh/Desktop/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm' error checking signature of /home/leigh/Desktop/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm compat-libgdamm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 27, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [le...@localhost Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509609] Package Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||i...@ianweller.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i...@ianweller.org Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-04 18:31:20 EDT --- I'll take this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509673] New: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509673 Summary: Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: st...@lonetwin.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/bastet-0.43-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bastet stands for bastard tetris, and is a simple ncurses-based Tetris(R) clone for Linux. Unlike normal Tetris(R), however, Bastet does not choose your next brick at random. Instead, it uses a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible. As you can imagine, playing Bastet can be a very frustrating experience! Checked both spec and srpm with rpmlint. No errors for the spec and the srpm throws up just one warning: [st...@laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/steve/rpmbuild/SRPMS/bastet-0.43-1.fc10.src.rpm bastet.src: E: summary-too-long Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I don't know how i can make the summary any shorter. Thanks for your time, cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #10 from Alan Dunn amd...@gmail.com 2009-07-04 19:11:30 EDT --- It seems like a potential solution for now is to disable the X-Symbol functionality. Since I've used Proof General for a little bit now at least, it seems that the X-Symbol functionality is rather minor compared to the total functionality of the package: It's merely used to render nicer versions of symbols for certain provers. (Eg: in Coq mode, it will turn - into an actual arrow) The functionality seems to be disabled by default, so it won't prevent the package from being used. I have a version which excludes the X-Symbol part at SPEC: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral.spec SRPM: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/pg/emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Additionally, I looked at the Debian package for Proof General. It seems that their support for X-Symbol in Proof General just suggests that X-Symbol should be installed, and they have no package for it. (Actually, it seems they did at some point and it was removed: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00964.html) I'll also note that it seems that X-Symbol upstream is also dead; the last version was released in 2003 and no fixes/updates seem forthcoming. One thing that's new is that the package doesn't seem to build in the version of xemacs that's now in F12. The logs reveal (from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450936): xemacs --batch --no-site-file -q -eval '(setq load-path (append (mapcar (lambda (d) (concat /builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/ (symbol-name d))) (quote (acl2 ccc coq demoisa hol98 isar lclam lego pgshell phox plastic twelf generic lib mmm))) load-path))' -f batch-byte-compile phox/phox.el Compiling /builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/phox/phox.el... While compiling toplevel forms in file /builddir/build/BUILD/ProofGeneral-3.7.1/phox/phox.el: !! Wrong type argument ((arrayp #s(char-table type generic data ( Done Error occurred processing phox/phox.el: Wrong type argument: arrayp, #s(char-table type generic data ()) However, things seem to be fine in F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1450956 I'll look at this part now; just thought I'd post where I am on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||st...@lonetwin.net --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-04 19:54:26 EDT --- *** Bug 509673 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509673] Review Request: bastet - Tetris clone with a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509673 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-04 19:54:26 EDT --- This is already in Fedora. Please check the package database next time before you submit. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 503519 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pe...@thecodergeek.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pe...@thecodergeek.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Alias||tremfusion Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com 2009-07-04 20:08:16 EDT --- I haven't checked it thoroughly enough to be certain, but it seems to build against its own local (in-tarball) copies of zlib, libjpeg, and libspeex. These should be changed to build against and use the system copies of the libraries. Other comments, and a full review to come shortly. (Thanks for packaging this, by the way! =]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #10 from Hicham HAOUARI funnylife...@yahoo.com 2009-07-04 21:29:32 EDT --- Updated SPEC URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/pypoppler.spec SRPM URL : http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/pypoppler-0.10.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483
--- Comment #6 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-07-05
00:42:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
My thinking was that the *.so.1 files were created by the %post
section, so they should be ghosted.
We run ldconfig primarily to update the dynamic linker's cache file. ldconfig
creates the *.so.N symlink, if it isn't present already (or it changes it, if
a
newer library version is found). However, the *.so.1 symlink ought to be
included in your package already. If make install ... doesn't create it, you
can do it yourself:
%install
...
make install ...
/sbin/ldconfig -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/
Fair enough. Fixed.
One of the automatically generated requires for the devel package is
/usr/bin/pkg-config. Is that not sufficient?
It is, but only for Fedora = 11.
Fixed for Fedora = 10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #5 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-07-05 00:41:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) - probably the tests should be moved into the devel package, too Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 --- Comment #7 from John Guthrie guth...@counterexample.org 2009-07-05 00:46:43 EDT --- I have posted a new version of the package. It adds a pkgconfig requirement to the devel package if running on Fedora 10 or earlier. Here is the rpmlint output: ewl.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libewl.so.1.0.0 e...@glibc_2.0 ewl-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Here are the relevant URLs for the new version: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-7.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
