[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664
--- Comment #3 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-05 02:04:39 EDT ---
Amanieu (upstream lead) told me that the copy of libjpeg in the tarball is a
modified version, specific to Trem{ulous,Fusion}. So we need to build against
the tarball version.
The system copy of zlib works fine, but there's a version mismatch between
libspeex in the tarball and libspeex in speex-devel that makes the package not
build. However upstream told me to kill the VoIP feature (the only thing that
uses libspeex) because it's broken, so that's not a problem anymore ;)
And so:
* Thu Jun 4 2009 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 0.99-2.r3
- Use system version of zlib
- Disable VoIP at upstream's request since it's broken
Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-2.r3/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210
--- Comment #29 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05
02:00:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
* rpmlint on the installed package complains:
$ rpmlint opal
opal.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libopal.so.3.6.2
/lib64/libdl.so.2
This looks like a pkgconfig issue to me. Could you give a hand?
I don't see any of that. I just got an error on space vs tab which is now
fixed.
[perobin...@neo SPECS]$ rpmlint opal.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/opal*
../SRPMS/opal-3.6.2-2.fc11.src.rpm
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[perobin...@neo SPECS]$
Yes, but you can also run rpmlint against installed packages, which may show
other flaws if there are any. One of these flaws that doesn't show up when you
run rpmlint against the actual rpm files is the unused-direct-shlib-dependency
warning.
Just simply run
$ rpmlint opal
and you will see
* %configure --prefix=/usr
Please use the %{_prefix} macro
Updated as it seems upstream have finally fixed the build without the need to
specify the prefix :-)
Nice. Btw, %configure should define the prefix for you among other things. You
can run
$ rpm -E %configure
to see what else it defines.
You can see the update here, I'm not going to push a new build for a few minor
changes. They'll go into rawhide when I can push 3.6.3
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/opal/devel/opal.spec?view=markup
All good. I'll go over the package one last time and let you know if there's
anything else.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #30 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 04:24:41 EDT --- Yes, but you can also run rpmlint against installed packages, which may show other flaws if there are any. One of these flaws that doesn't show up when you run rpmlint against the actual rpm files is the unused-direct-shlib-dependency warning. Just simply run $ rpmlint opal and you will see And you get those errors for glib2 and others as well. I don't see it as a blocker. All good. I'll go over the package one last time and let you know if there's anything else. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:36:09 EDT --- ping, what's the status? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:35:33 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:36:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:37:17 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:36:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:37:44 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:37:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:35:59 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503148] Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503148 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:38:47 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:39:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:39:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:40:48 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #43 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:39:07 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:39:36 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 06:40:34 EDT --- ping, have you done any other submissions or informal package reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 07:50:27 EDT --- Shakthi, this is NOT serious. You have not yet build the package on the build system. It is already 2 weeks since you committed. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mcu8051ide Is there any blocker I am not aware of ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-07-05 08:06:16 EDT --- Minor error: $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-ekg-0.4.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm python-ekg.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ekg/migration/manage.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Suggest to remove the shebang from that file if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #21 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-07-05 08:05:03 EDT --- After discussion on the Fedora-MinGW mailing list ( http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001739.html ) we decided that it's okay to keep the commented out blocks and -tools subpackage if that's what the packager desires. Now that's cleared up we can continue with the review. $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer.spec mingw32-gstreamer.spec:196: E: files-attr-not-set mingw32-gstreamer.spec:553: W: macro-in-%changelog doc mingw32-gstreamer.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 9, tab: line 7) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-gstreamer-* mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: description-line-too-long The mingw32-gstreamer-static package contains static library for mingw32-gstreamer development. mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstcontroller-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstbase-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstdataprotocol-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libgstnet-0.10.a mingw32-gstreamer-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized common tools and files for GStreamer streaming media framework mingw32-gstreamer-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. All these rpmlint messages need to be fixed with the exception of the arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object and no-documentation ones (as they're false positives for the mingw32 toolchain). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502692] Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows port of the libatomic_ops library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-07-05 08:07:37 EDT --- The URL http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops-1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm gives me a 404 right now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516
--- Comment #36 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 08:19:11
EDT ---
- MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
- MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}
- MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package is licensed (GPLv2) with an open-source compatible license
and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
- MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is
included in %doc.
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible.
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
- MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least i386.
- MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires.
- MUST: The spec file handles locales properly.
- MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the
dynamic linker's default paths
- MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable
- MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates.
- MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
- MUST: Permissions on files are set properly.
- MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in
detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines.
- MUST: There are no Large documentation files
- MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If
it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present.
- MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries
- MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix
- MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives
- MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
- MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
SHOULD Items:
- SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as LICENSE
- SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386.
- SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
- SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane.
- SHOULD: No subpackages present.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-07-05 08:20:05 EDT --- This package doesn't compile on my Fedora 11 environment using rpmbuild: libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV411.exe RGBtoYUV411.o common/libconv_common.a ../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a libtool: link: i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -o .libs/RGBtoYUV420.exe RGBtoYUV420.o common/libconv_common.a ../../libdirac_common/.libs/libdirac_common.a common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV420.exe] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:62: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' common/libconv_common.a(setstdiomode.o):/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion/common/setstdiomode.cpp:54: undefined reference to `__imp___ZN8dirac_vu4_iobE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [RGBtoYUV411.exe] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/dirac-1.0.2/util/conversion' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502691] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-07-05 08:29:32 EDT --- This package fails while executing the ./configure command on both my F11 x86_64 notebook and on Koji: checking build system type... Invalid configuration `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu failed and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1454965name=build.log I think it's caused by an ancient version of the autotools which was used to generate the ./configure script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #69 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 08:42:17 EDT --- Give me your latest spec srpm, I'll do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 08:47:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) I think I got this done. I replaced the URL parameter with the full path to the source tar on OpenOCD's project site. No actually, source0 should have the full URL for downloading the sources. URL is the url for the upstream website. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 08:49:41 EDT --- Sorry, I was in Berlin for the Fedora's FUDCon. Can you fix all the rpmlint warnings on each generated rpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-05 09:06:54 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455007 SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2944/fife-2009.0-0.3.r2944svn.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2944/fife.spec RPMLINT: fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/pythonize.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/savers.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/pychan/__init__.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/loaders.py fife.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/fife/engine/extensions/fifelog.py fife-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fife-2009.0_r2944/engine/core/loaders/native/audio_loaders/sounddecoder_ogg.h fife-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/fife-2009.0_r2944/engine/core/loaders/native/audio_loaders/sounddecoder_ogg.cpp fife-editor.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/fife-editor/__init__.py fife-editor.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/LayerTool.py 0644 fife-editor.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/__init__.py fife-editor.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/fife-editor/plugins/ObjectEdit.py 0644 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 2 warnings. I added LinuxDonald as CC, because he is a part of upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136
--- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 09:52:09
EDT ---
Whoops, sorry for the delay, somehow this slipped under my radar.
- Use the %{version} macro in Source0.
- You have duplicate ownership of files in %{_sysconfdir}/csync. As you specify
the files in that directory, just change
%{_sysconfdir}/csync
to
%dir %{_sysconfdir}/csync/
(I recommend using the trailing slash whenever listing a directory, makes the
spec file easier to read).
- You might want to put an explicit require on the libs package in the main
package, since the license is in -libs.
- There is a test option, so you should use it. You probably need just BR:
check(-devel?) and then the section
%check
make test
- Is the config used just by the binary or by the libraries too?
rpmlint output:
csync-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. NEEDSWORK
- Change the Source0 line to use %{version}.
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK
- Duplicate ownership as stated above.
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Missing AUTHORS and TODO.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. OK
- Libs package required.
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
- Only builds in rawhide due to missing iniparser package in =F11.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #8 from Robert Spanton rspan...@zepler.net 2009-07-05 10:05:27 EDT --- ping? Yep, I'm still on this. No time slices have been allocated recently, but they will soon ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #22 from Levente Farkas lfar...@lfarkas.org 2009-07-05 10:16:57 EDT --- i updated the spec and hope to fix everything except the W: macro-in-%changelog doc since it's comes from the native part of the changelog and i'd not like to change it: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SPECS/mingw32-gstreamer.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SRPMS/mingw32-gstreamer-0.10.23-3.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455083 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455085 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #5 from Eric Sandeen esand...@redhat.com 2009-07-05 10:51:11 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, other stuff came up. I need to see what the rules are for setuid binaries etc, and probably at least do some good code review of it before it goes in. I appreciate the very quick review, sorry for the slowness on my end. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Zabolotny anp...@mail.ru 2009-07-05 11:04:54 EDT --- Ok, fixed the tab issue: [3|z...@zap|~/rpm/SRPMS]rpmlint -v QtDMM-0.8.12-1.fc11.zap.src.rpm QtDMM.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. the updated spec and src.rpm is on the same URLs as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 11:08:59 EDT --- There are still some warnings on the debug rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(linuxdon...@linux ||donald.de) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-07-05 11:14:54 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-05 11:48:08 EDT --- wrong kojitask above. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455087 here is the correct one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #23 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 11:58:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xorriso-0.3.8-5.pl00.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/xorriso_servicemenu.desktop fixed. Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10.src.rpm f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455129 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-05 12:22:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) It sounds like you are using gcj as your java. gcj doesn't support everything required by frinika. Run # alternatives --config java and make sure that you have openjdk selected. NO... yes. But I had not even installed gcj before it is inspired by frinika dependencies!: s...@x-www frinika]$ sudo yum install frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm ... Setting up Install Process Examining frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch Marking frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package frinika.noarch 0:0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: toot2 = 3 for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: tootaudioservers = 3 for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: RasmusDSP for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: SevenZip for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: flexdock for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: jVorbisEnc for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: jgoodies-looks for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: jjack for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: jmod for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: skinlf for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: soundfont2-default for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Processing Dependency: tritonus-shared for package: frinika-0.5.1-6.551svn.fc11.noarch -- Running transaction check --- Package RasmusDSP.i586 0:0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libfftw3.so.3 for package: RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11.i586 --- Package SevenZip.i586 0:4.65-1.fc11 set to be updated --- Package flexdock.i586 0:0.5.1-13.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: ant-commons-logging for package: flexdock-0.5.1-13.fc11.i586 --- Package fluid-soundfont-gm.noarch 0:3.1-3.fc11 set to be updated --- Package jVorbisEnc.i586 0:0.1-3.fc11 set to be updated --- Package jgoodies-looks.noarch 0:2.2.1-2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package jjack.i586 0:0.3-2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package jmod.i586 0:0.9-1.fc11 set to be updated --- Package skinlf.noarch 0:6.7-7.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: laf-plugin for package: skinlf-6.7-7.fc11.noarch --- Package toot2.noarch 0:3-0.4.beta2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package tootaudioservers.i586 0:3-0.1.beta2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package tritonus.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: tritonus-aos = 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: tritonus-core = 0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: jorbis for package: tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11.i586 -- Running transaction check --- Package ant-commons-logging.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: ant = 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 for package: ant-commons-logging-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: ant-nodeps = 1.7.1-9.2.fc11 for package: ant-commons-logging-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 --- Package fftw.i586 0:3.2.1-2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package jorbis.i586 0:0.0.17-2.fc11 set to be updated --- Package laf-plugin.noarch 0:1.0-5.fc11 set to be updated --- Package tritonus-aos.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated --- Package tritonus-core.i586 0:0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package ant.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: java-devel = 1.5.0 for package: ant-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: xerces-j2 for package: ant-1.7.1-9.2.fc11.i586 --- Package ant-nodeps.i586 0:1.7.1-9.2.fc11 set to be updated -- Running transaction check --- Package java-1.5.0-gcj-devel.i586 0:1.5.0.0-28.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: libgcj-src = 4.1.2-5 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: gcc-java = 4.1.2-5 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: eclipse-ecj = 3.2.1 for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/gcj for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/gcj for package: java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-28.fc11.i586 --- Package xerces-j2.i586 0:2.7.1-11.3.fc11 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: xml-commons-resolver =
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #14 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-05 12:34:41 EDT --- Previous run was on my work notebook. Today I upgrade my home computer to Fedora 11, but frinika still not work: $ ll `which java` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Фев 10 2008 /usr/bin/java - /etc/alternatives/java [pa...@x-www frinika]$ [pa...@x-www frinika]$ ll /etc/alternatives/java lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Июл 5 12:31 /etc/alternatives/java - /usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.6.0-openjdk/bin/java [pa...@x-www frinika]$ [pa...@x-www frinika]$ frinika Using language: русский Creating frinka user settings directory /home/pasha/frinika Can't find file /home/pasha/frinika/FrinikaConfig.xml. It will be created when you quit the program or change configuration options. config: MULTIPLEXED_AUDIO=false FrinikaConfigure: javasound.output=null loaded jjack native library /usr/lib/jjack/libjjack.so natively registering jack client Frinika JACK is not available.. Toot using language: русский javasound=PulseAudio Mixer PulseAudio Mixer null javax.sound.sampled.LineUnavailableException at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openImpl(PulseAudioMixer.java:714) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openLocal(PulseAudioMixer.java:588) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.openLocal(PulseAudioMixer.java:584) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioMixer.open(PulseAudioMixer.java:579) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioDataLine.open(PulseAudioDataLine.java:95) at org.classpath.icedtea.pulseaudio.PulseAudioSourceDataLine.open(PulseAudioSourceDataLine.java:75) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.JavaSoundAudioServer$JavaSoundAudioOutput.open(JavaSoundAudioServer.java:353) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.JavaSoundAudioServer.openAudioOutput(JavaSoundAudioServer.java:225) at uk.org.toot.audio.server.MultiIOJavaSoundAudioServer.openAudioOutput(MultiIOJavaSoundAudioServer.java:57) at com.frinika.audio.toot.FrinikaAudioServer.openAudioOutput(FrinikaAudioServer.java:104) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.createMixer(ProjectContainer.java:466) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.defaultInit(ProjectContainer.java:531) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.init(ProjectContainer.java:241) at com.frinika.project.ProjectContainer.init(ProjectContainer.java:542) at com.frinika.sequencer.gui.menu.CreateProjectAction.actionPerformed(CreateProjectAction.java:50) at com.frinika.FrinikaMain.main(FrinikaMain.java:112) Sorry but I do not want to go on without an audio output device. Bye bye . . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] New: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Summary: Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gie...@snickers.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize.spec SRPM URL: http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/daemonize-1.5.4-1.src.rpm Description: daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(linuxdon...@linux | |donald.de) | --- Comment #11 from Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de 2009-07-05 12:54:40 EDT --- In bug 501132 will be addressed whether by openal openal-soft in f12 replaced. But so far there is no response came from the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 12:53:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) That is because some of the dependency libraries of frinika (jVorbisEnc, jorbis, ...) require the minimum java version 1.5 which is lower than frinika's requirement. Now you might ask: I already have openjdk installed which provides java 1:1.6 which is higher than 1.5; why is gcj being dragged in? This is a good question. The answer is: For java libraries that the minimum dependency can be met by gcj, the AOT bits are being built and included in the package. These AOT bits are .so files and naturally they are linked to libgcj. RPM's automatic dependency generator is picking this up as a dependency. There have been a couple discussions in the fedora-java mailing list to drop the requirement of building the AOT bits but the idea got rejected, mainly because the AOT bits bring a performance improvement, especially in slow computers and in ppc* architectures. I'm sure this topic will be revisited in the future as starting with F-13, ppc* are going to be dropped from primary archs. (In reply to comment #14) Did you configure jack as explained in /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #6 from Juha Tuomala t...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 12:57:26 EDT --- Fixed the summary and COPYING file. Waiting for leagal. http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp.spec src: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp-0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455171 f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 --- Comment #2 from Hicham HAOUARI funnylife...@yahoo.com 2009-07-05 12:55:11 EDT --- Fixed the warning. Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/compat-libgdamm.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/compat-libgdamm-3.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build page : https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1454719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #1 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-07-05 12:53:41 EDT --- This is a new package and I require a sponsor. daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon. As defined in W. Richard Stevens’ 1990 book, Unix Network Programming (Addison-Wesley, 1990), a daemon is “a process that executes ‘in the background’ (i.e., without an associated terminal or login shell) either waiting for some event to occur, or waiting to perform some specified task on a periodic basis.” Upon startup, a typical daemon program will: - Close all open file descriptors (especially standard input, standard output and standard error) - Change its working directory to the root filesystem, to ensure that it doesn’t tie up another filesystem and prevent it from being unmounted - Reset its umask value - Run in the background (i.e., fork) - Disassociate from its process group (usually a shell), to insulate itself from signals (such as HUP) sent to the process group - Ignore all terminal I/O signals - Disassociate from the control terminal (and take steps not to reacquire one) - Handle any SIGCLD signals Most programs that are designed to be run as daemons do that work for themselves. However, you’ll occasionally run across one that does not. When you must run a daemon program that does not properly make itself into a true Unix daemon, you can use daemonize to force it to run as a true daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-05 12:57:48 EDT --- The ticket this one depends on has been closed because the submitter has gone away; I'm closing this one as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Bug 467814 depends on bug 467813, which changed state. Bug 467813 Summary: Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467813] Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-05 12:57:13 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(cristian.bal...@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-05 13:00:29 EDT --- And another month; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) |182235(FE-Legal)| Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(j...@mikkonen.biz | |) | --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-05 13:05:05 EDT --- It's been months with no progress here; there have been several pings and it's been over a month since needinfo was set. I'll close it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-05 13:04:45 EDT --- Orcan thank you for the detailed explanation about AOT, it is very intresting. (In reply to comment #14) Did you configure jack as explained in /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? No, I'll try do it now. But can we make package work out of box?? Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. I'm generally not kill it, it is failed start (first master appear, and after few steps its end with provided backtrace). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #31 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 13:08:51 EDT --- rpmlints are usually blockers. If not, the packager should explain/defend why each rpmlint can be disregarded. In this case, the fix should be straightforward. Some X package gives those errors too is not a proper way of defending this. Please file bugs to those packages too. They need to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(ita...@ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-05 13:12:00 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 13:27:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) Orcan thank you for the detailed explanation about AOT, it is very intresting. You're welcome. (In reply to comment #14) Did you configure jack as explained in /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.116.1/README.Fedora ? No, I'll try do it now. But can we make package work out of box?? The jack setup is pretty much a standard procedure for folks using audio production software. ardour, hydrogen, muse, etc. they all need a jack to run properly. During this setup, you will need to give certain permissions/priorities to your user. Making these packages work out of the box means giving these permissions/priorities globally to all users. I am not a jack maintainer, but sometime in the past, they decided to not to do so. I assume that they had valid reasons. This topic might be revisited too. But as I said, audio production people are usually familiar with setting up jack. Also, after setting up jack, one has to know how to use it. There are GUI applications such as qjackctl which help with using jack. (I realized that this started going a bit out of topic now. :)) Also, wait a little for frinika to launch. Don't kill it right away. In my system it takes ~15 seconds to launch. I'm generally not kill it, it is failed start (first master appear, and after few steps its end with provided backtrace). Before you start frinika, it is good to have a running jack daemon. You can use qjackctl for this purpose. Now when you start frinika, you will get a splash screen. There is a Setup button on that screen. When you go to the setup, you will want to select jjack (java jack) as your preferred backend. I advise for not selecting/using pulseaudio in audio production software such as frinika. pulseaudio is not designed for this purpose. But jack is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-05 13:39:15 EDT --- * Sun Jun 5 2009 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 0.99-3.r3 - Upstream changed 0.99r3 tag Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-3.r3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Ryabitsev i...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-05 13:42:48 EDT --- Yeah, I'll take care of it shortly. I just need to rewrite the mime files to actually work with KDE 4 (the existing ones are obsolete). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 13:49:09 EDT --- When you go to the setup, you will want to select jjack (java jack) as your preferred backend. I advise for not selecting/using pulseaudio in audio production software such as frinika. pulseaudio is not designed for this purpose. But jack is. I need to add to this: For audio production software there is another viable option: Instead of jack, one can also use plain alsa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] New: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/solang-0.1-1.20090624git.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the Cloud. Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509745] New: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509745 Summary: Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SPECS/solang.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.iblogger.org/linux/fedora/releases/11/Everything/source/SRPMS/solang-0.1-1.20090624git.fc11.src.rpm Description: Solang is a free photo manager that will act as a front-end for directory based local storage as well as remote photo-storage systems, as can be said, on the Cloud. Basic editing support is also planned as well as a small pipeline for RAW processing. The aim of this project is to break the performance characteristics of current popular photo management softwares and provide a fast and reliable alternative that does not place humongous demands on user's hardware resources even to meet basic functionality. This package depends on compat-libgdamm, which is still in review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 13:52:50 EDT --- Ok, seems fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 14:47:06 EDT --- *** Bug 509745 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||509744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Depends on||509670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509745] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509745 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 14:47:06 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 509744 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 14:53:23
EDT ---
- You don't need to specify
-n daemonize-%{version}
in %setup, as this is the default value.
- What is
$common_flags
doing in %configure?
- You are using incorrect characters in the description: change ’ to ' and “ to
.
- The provide
Provides: daemonize
is redundant, since by default all packages provide themself (with a versioned
provide).
I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the Fedora guidelines. You need to
read and understand the packaging and review guidelines, and to demonstrate
your knowledge you need to make at least one other submission, and do
unofficial package reviews of packages of other people.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664
Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?(i...@ianweller.org
||)
--- Comment #5 from Peter Gordon pe...@thecodergeek.com 2009-07-05 15:14:04
EDT ---
The only other issue I see at first glance is that the some of the data (in
%{_datadir}/%{name}) could potentially be in its own noarch subpackage, for
less churn when updating, etc.; but that data is reasonably small enough (just
over a megabyte) that splitting the package even further just for this purpose
seems a bit overkill. Oh well.
Full review of tremfusion 0.99-3.r3 follows.
++ GOOD:
* rpmlint against the binary packages is clean.
* Naming and version/release are good. Spec file name is %{name}.spec as
required.
* %changelog section is valid.
* BuildRoot is properly defined, and cleaned both as the first step in
%install and as the only step in %clean.
* Other than the server subpackage, the Licenses (mix of CC-BY-SA and GPLv2+)
are acceptable for Fedora and match the actual licenses (as mentioned in the
README file), copies of which are properly included in the %doc listings.
* Spec file is in American English, and is legible.
* Successfully builds in mock on both Rawhide and F-11 (tested on x86_64).
* It installs and runs just fine (which was why I waited until today to do the
review, sorry... XD)
* Timestamps are kept (install -p)
* Sources match those of upstream. (Not a pristine tarball, so I only checked
that the included method of acquiring the sources produced a tarball whose file
listings matched those provided in the linked SRPM.)
* Ownership and permissions of files/directories are sane with no duplicates
in the %files listing; and the %defattr line is good.
* Final Requires/Provides list is sane.
* Macro variable usage is consistent.
* Builds/runs agains the system libraries instead of local copies (except for
the libjpeg difference, as you noted).
* Files marked as %doc are not required at runtime.
* Dependencies OK between subpackages and the main package.
* No libtool (.la) files present in built package.
* All filenames in built package are valid UTF-8.
* Package contains no translations (so %find_lang stuff is not necessary).
* Package contains no static libraries, header files, or pkconfig data.
+ Game data (tremulous-data, required by tremfusion-common) is separate from
the content/binaries.
+ License files included as part of %doc.
++ BAD:
(1) The server subpackage needs a License tag.
(2) The server should run as its own user, not as 'root' or 'games' or any
other system user account. (See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for detailed
instructions).
(3) You should also use the opengl-games-utils wrapper, as indicated on the
Games SIG wiki page:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging#OpenGL_Wrapper .
Fix up those three issues, and it'll garner my approval. :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509744] Review Request: solang - A Photo Manager for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509744 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509670] Review Request: compat-libgda - compat libs for libgdamm-3
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509670 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739
--- Comment #3 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-07-05 15:37:03
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
- You don't need to specify
-n daemonize-%{version}
in %setup, as this is the default value.
- What is
$common_flags
doing in %configure?
I had used another package spec file as a template and I believe that was some
garbage leftover.
- You are using incorrect characters in the description: change ’ to ' and “
to
.
Was a cut and paste from the package site. Corrected in updated spec file.
- The provide
Provides: daemonize
I believe I was following the convention in the template spec I was using, I
have since reviewed that particular guideline, and corrected accordingly
.
is redundant, since by default all packages provide themself (with a versioned
provide).
I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the Fedora guidelines. You need to
read and understand the packaging and review guidelines, and to demonstrate
your knowledge you need to make at least one other submission, and do
unofficial package reviews of packages of other people.
Understood. Will submit at least one other package and submit some reviews.
I've also reviewed the packaging guidelines (again), as well as the review
guidelines (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines). I
believe the updated package now meets all of those.
Thanks,
GG
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #20 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-07-05 15:47:25 EDT --- And again: - Fix version number on the java libraries. Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.17-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 15:49:32 EDT --- Please post the updated package spec srpm (increment the release tag and add a changelog entry). Also, you might want to change the original entry from RHEL to Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #5 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-07-05 15:51:50 EDT --- The eventual goal for this package is EPEL, should I use a combined Fedora/EPEL or should I maintain two seperate spec files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - daemonize runs a command as a Unix daemon.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 15:54:26
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
The eventual goal for this package is EPEL, should I use a combined
Fedora/EPEL
or should I maintain two seperate spec files?
EPEL is a part of Fedora, not RHEL. And the primary target of Fedora is Fedora,
EPEL is sort of an addon.
Also,
install -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
should be
install -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
to preserve timestamps, see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps
Quite often one needs to add INSTALL=install -p as an argument to 'make
install' to make it preserve time stamps too.
Is the man page not installed automatically by make install..?
P.S. You don't have to create the directory, instead of
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
install -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1
you can
install -D -p -m 0644 daemonize.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/daemonize.1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: daemonize - |Review Request: daemonize - |daemonize runs a command as |run a command as a Unix |a Unix daemon. |daemon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 446991] Review Request: python-coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446991 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:01:59 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499023] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:03:04 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kon...@tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-07-05 16:12:04 EDT --- Ah, sorry, I didn't notice that I wasn't receiving email from this account for the past month or so. I plan to follow up on the review, I'm just catching up to all the mail I've missed. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-07-05 16:15:14 EDT --- It is not intentional; I'll update to the latest. As I've mentioned in other reviews, I didn't notice I wasn't fetching mail from this account for the past month or so :(. Sorry for all the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-07-05 16:17:32 EDT --- Yes, it was settings related. I can start it now. So, as I very far from music production, I don't even try use it. But it started ans GUI seemed ready to use. So, package APPROVED. Oget, thank you for the patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:15:23 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:15:44 EDT --- Once you sponsor someone, please remember to remove the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag to avoid noise in the blocker bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509739] Review Request: daemonize - run a command as a Unix daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509739 --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-07-05 16:27:00 EDT --- Strangely enough, it's not installed automatically. A quick perusal of Makefile.in reveals nothing that even touches that file. Incremented release tag and posted update files to http://dirtypackets.net/software/rpm/daemonize/ Made the changes to install as you suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:32:02
EDT ---
Also, you don't need to create the directories with
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}
mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_mandir}/man1
if you just pass the -D switch to install.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-07-05 16:32:47 EDT --- KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1455359 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2947/fife.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2947/fife-2009.0-0.7.r2947svn.fc11.src.rpm RPMLINT: (silent) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. @Thomas, I added your (and mine) sponsor Mamoru Tasaka as CC. He should take a look at this, because he is ultra-high skilled and perhaps he find things, which we won't find. I believe that this step is very important; you are biased, because you are a part of upstream. Please don't take it personally... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-07-05 16:31:25
EDT ---
- The
-n %{name}-%{version}
in %setup is redundant, as it is the default setup path.
- Any reason why SMP make is not enabled? If it doesn't work, document it with
a comment in the spec file.
- Use the -p argument in all of the install commands. (At least for the files
that are not generated in the %build phase.)
- The %post and %trigger stuff seems very cumbersome. Two easier possibilities
come to mind:
Create the symlinks in %install and make the package own them. Additionally,
for the dir ownership:
1) Require sendmail, which provides the directory. [If the package works also
with postfix, exim c then this is not adviseable.]
2) Make the package own the /etc/smsrh/ directory. [This creates a double
provides, but a necessary one.]
Or, you could even put the symlinks in a subpackage, say vacation-sendmail,
which would require sendmail and own the symlinks.
- You might want to change
%{_mandir}/*/*
to
%{_mandir}/man1/*.1
to be a bit more precise, or even list the two files explicitly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-07-05 16:37:50 EDT --- Well, I thank you for your patience too. Audio production in Linux is getting better every day. IMHO frinika needs some more work for professional use, but the project seems promising and it is active and it is a nice example for what can be done with java sound api. I'm confident the glitches will be resolved in time. And thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: frinika Short Description: Music Workstation Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509664] Review Request: tremfusion - Enhanced modification of the free software first person shooter Tremulous
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509664 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(i...@ianweller.org | |) | --- Comment #6 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-07-05 16:35:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) ++ BAD: (1) The server subpackage needs a License tag. Whoops :) (2) The server should run as its own user, not as 'root' or 'games' or any other system user account. (See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups for detailed instructions). Is this necessary? The server doesn't have an init/upstart script. (3) You should also use the opengl-games-utils wrapper, as indicated on the Games SIG wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging#OpenGL_Wrapper . Done. * Sun Jul 5 2009 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 0.99-4.r3 - Add OpenGL wrapper - Upstream changed 0.99r3 tag again (hg:1421) - Switch VERSION buildflag to the release version and add release macro to it Spec and SRPM in http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tremfusion/0.99-4.r3/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek linuxdon...@linuxdonald.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
