[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-07-24 02:47:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Adding --with-arpack enables building of a "driver" binary that is part of the > tools folder, which is just copied to the share directory in the > install-data-local macro, so its not required for APBS. Would it be best to > set up a -tools subpackage with all the extras? (see here: > http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/An_overview_of_the_APBS_package#Other_tools_distributed_with_APBS > for more info) And I'm also worried about having a binary just called "driver" > lying around - could that be an issue? Yes, "driver" is a no-go and must be renamed to e.g. abps-driver if packaged. If it is compiled, how is it installed in the share directory..? Actually, you'll have to rename everythin in the tools/ folder in the package. IMHO they should be packaged, since they are included in the abps distribution. > Adding --enable-python doesn't do anything other than build ZSI (which it > shouldn't do) - which I realized, python-ZSI should be a requires so > ApbsClient.py runs properly. That's odd. After all http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/An_overview_of_the_APBS_package#Python_development_tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-07-24 02:39:48 EDT --- Licensing issues are taken care of in this new upstream zipfile. It looks like the license tag in the spec file should be GPLv2+ rather than GPLv2. You can fix that when you import. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #3 from Silas Sewell 2009-07-24 02:21:02 EDT --- SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/lamson-1.0.0-0.1.pre1.fc12.src.rpm Spec Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn289&r=289&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/lamson/lamson.spec&old_path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/lamson/lamson.spec&old=272 rpmlint [si...@fox ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. NOTE: lamson now requires python-daemon which is only in devel. python-daemon is also currently broken because it requires python-lockfile which is not available in Fedora for yet. I've packaged and submitted a review request for python-lockfile ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 ) and filed a bug against python-daemon ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513546 ). If you want to test lamson 1.0pre1 you'll need to: - Have Fedora 11+ - rpm -i http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-daemon/1.4.6/1.fc12/noarch/python-daemon-1.4.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm - build and install http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-lockfile-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm - build and install lamson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502556] Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-07-24 02:19:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This seems to be an interesting project - nice to have it packaged for Fedora. > I will look forward to play with it. I have looked briefly at the package. > > Upstream tar contains GPLv3 LICENSE file. But PKG-INFO has "License: UNKNOWN" > and I can't find any other references to what role the LICENSE file has - if > it > is GPLv3 only or if later versions also can be used. Why are you using the > license tag GPLv3+? Anyway: Upstream should be asked to clarify the license. The README specifies the license as GPLv3 and does not add the later clause. I have removed the "+" from the spec. > Upstream has released 0.9.3 - please base the package on that version. Or > perhaps go directly to one of the 1.0 pre releases where the chances of > getting > changes upstreamed are bigger. When I originally submitted this it was the latest package, I've updated to 1.0pre1. > The package installs a python library and a management binary. I am not > familiar with lamson (except for quick browsing through the fine > documentation), but using Fedora terminology i would call it an mail > application server framework. The application group you have chosen supports > that. It can easily generate a mail server which can and should be customized, > but that doesn't make it a mail server. It isn't a running server in which you > can create mail applications, but it can create individual "servers" for each > application. I suggest that you make that clearer in the description. Updated summary and description. > I would expect a mail server to be integrated with Fedora, with for example > init.d script and logging to /var/log, and it should only require minimal > configuration to get up and running. Obviously those who use lamson as a > framework doesn't want that. But perhaps that could be placed in a subpackage? > And perhaps a default mail server in an (other?) subpackage? > > Perhaps the main package could contain an init.d scripts which starts the > lamson servers listed in a sysconfig file? > > I expect lamson mail servers to have issues with SElinux. Have you tried or > any > opinion on that? But again, as long as the lamson package is a framework and > not a server then SElinux isn't its business... Upstream recommends using another "dequeue server ... if you feel you need that security", so I'm going to keep it in the current category for now. http://lamsonproject.org/docs/faq.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513544] Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 Silas Sewell changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513546 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 --- Comment #14 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-24 01:51:33 EDT --- * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. O.K. * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. FAIL My fault -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Ed Brand changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(edbr...@brandint. | |com)| --- Comment #37 from Ed Brand 2009-07-24 01:39:43 EDT --- Pong. Please bear with me. My day job is sucking up way too much my time. I've have looked at your wiki/review requests. Expect an update shortly. -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513544] New: Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513544 Summary: Review Request: python-lockfile - Platform-independent file locking module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: si...@sewell.ch QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-lockfile/python-lockfile.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-lockfile-0.8-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The lockfile module exports a FileLock class which provides a simple API for locking files. Unlike the Windows msvcrt.locking function, the Unix fcntl.flock, fcntl.lockf and the deprecated posixfile module, the API is identical across both Unix (including Linux and Mac) and Windows platforms. The lock mechanism relies on the atomic nature of the link (on Unix) and mkdir (on Windows) system calls. rpmlint [si...@fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513543] New: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543
Summary: Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC
bouncer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: n...@fedoraproject.org
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra.spec
SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description: Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
0.074 of ZNC is not pushed to stable yet (I just submitted it tonight), you
will either have to grab it from koji or wait for it to be pushed, this package
Requires: znc = %{version} and BuildRequires: znc-devel = %{version}
Source is not available at the URL in the spec, because the znc-extra source is
still named 0.072, no changes were made to the znc-extra source for 0.074, but
it is necessary to have the versions the same because the modules have to be
compiled against the version of ZNC that they are to work with.
[...@nb-desktop SPECS]$ rpmlint znc-extra.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[...@nb-desktop SRPMS]$ rpmlint znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[...@nb-desktop i586]$ rpmlint znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11.i586.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[...@nb-desktop i586]$ rpmlint znc-extra-debuginfo-0.074-1.fc11.i586.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513069] Review Request: ovirt-server - The oVirt Server is an open cross-platform virtualization management system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513069 Scott Seago changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Scott Seago 2009-07-24 00:58:35 EDT --- Built in Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513541] New: Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513541 Summary: Review Request: cpulimit - CPU Usage Limiter for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ashay.hum...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit.spec SRPM URL: http://ashay.info/rpm/cpulimit-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: cpulimit is a simple program that attempts to limit the cpu usage of a process (expressed in percentage, not in cpu time). This is useful to control batch jobs, when you don't want them to eat too much cpu. It does not act on the nice value or other scheduling priority stuff, but on the real cpu usage. Also, it is able to adapt itself to the overall system load, dynamically and quickly. More info here: http://cpulimit.sourceforge.net/ The original source did not use autotools and had a simple Makefile. I converted the source to use autotools. Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: cf-bonveno-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-24 00:17:13 EDT --- cf-bonveno-fonts is available in the repos. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/cf-bonveno-fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha 2009-07-24 00:11:34 EDT --- hi, spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini-0.71.103-2.fc10.src.rpm I've tried to use upstream's jpg file as the icon: I changed the .desktop file[1] and tested it. It *din't* work. How is one supposed to do it? I've already read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage . It doesn't have much info on the .desktop. [1]http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/Panini.desktop Other results from the mock build (logs etc.) : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509609] Review Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 21:59:07 EDT --- mediawiki-rss-1.5-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-rss-1.5-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509609] Review Request: mediawiki-rss - rss tag extension for mediaiwki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509609 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 21:57:46 EDT --- mediawiki-rss-1.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-rss-1.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #27 from Tim Fenn 2009-07-23 21:42:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > apbs has support for: > --with-mpich=PATH toplevel MPICH directory > --with-mpich2=PATH toplevel MPICH2 directory > --with-lam=PATH toplevel LAM-MPI directory > --with-openmpi enable OpenMPI compilation > so I suggest you add these to the package in the future. > > I have suggested an MPI packaging draft and an environment modules packaging > draft, which would standardize the way MPI stuff is packaged. > > - Add BR: arpack-devel and --with-arpack to enable support for ARPACK. > > - Add BR: python-devel and --with-python to enable support for Python. > Adding --with-arpack enables building of a "driver" binary that is part of the tools folder, which is just copied to the share directory in the install-data-local macro, so its not required for APBS. Would it be best to set up a -tools subpackage with all the extras? (see here: http://cardon.wustl.edu/MediaWiki/index.php/An_overview_of_the_APBS_package#Other_tools_distributed_with_APBS for more info) And I'm also worried about having a binary just called "driver" lying around - could that be an issue? Adding --enable-python doesn't do anything other than build ZSI (which it shouldn't do) - which I realized, python-ZSI should be a requires so ApbsClient.py runs properly. I'm working on the remaining issues, but I wanted to check with this before I finish it off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512639] Review Request: ibus-table-translit - Translit table for IBus Table.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512639 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-07-23 20:01:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-table-translit Short Description: Translit table of IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-11 EL-6 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512637] Review Request: ibus-table-quick - Quick table of IBus Table.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512637 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-07-23 19:59:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-table-quick Short Description: Quick table of IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-11 EL-6 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512636] Review Request: ibus-table-xinhua - Xin Hua table of IBus Table.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512636 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-07-23 19:58:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ibus-table-xinhua Short Description: Xin Hua table of IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-11 EL-6 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Miloslav Trmač changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Miloslav Trmač 2009-07-23 19:33:04 EDT --- Built. Jochen, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #6 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-07-23 19:05:49 EDT --- Fantastic, I'll wait for that before we proceed. I was going to take a crack at some of them but have been busy with other packages, but if upstream it taking care of it that's great news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 Alex Burger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ale...@users.sourceforge.ne ||t --- Comment #5 from Alex Burger 2009-07-23 19:00:19 EDT --- The bugs reported by Ville Skyttä have been fixed in SNMPTT 1.3 which is currently in beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513497] New: Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513497 Summary: Review Request: ovirt-viewer - A vnc viewer for oVirt managed vms Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmo...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/ovirt-viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://mohammed.morsi.org/blog/files/ovirt-viewer-1.0.0-5.fc10.src_.rpm Description: ovirt-viewer is a vnc viewer which integrates nicely into the ovirt framework. When running the program, the user is prompted for the ovirt server url and login credentials, after which a list of accessible vms is retrieved, any of which the user may connect to via vnc. ovirt-viewer manages all connections on the backend and allows the users to seamlessly switch between managed vms via ui. Latest Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1496325 This is intended to be used in conjunction with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513069 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Jeff Johnston changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Jeff Johnston 2009-07-23 17:50:55 EDT --- eclipse-rse-3.0.3-1.fc12 successfully built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513486] Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513486 --- Comment #4 from Chris Lumens 2009-07-23 17:50:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-meh Short Description: A python library for handling exceptions Owners: clumens Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #4 from Sven Lankes 2009-07-23 17:30:42 EDT --- Oh - while I'm at it - it's a gui-program so it'll need a .desktop-file as per the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512273] Review Request: php-pear-File-Bittorrent2 - Decode and Encode data in Bittorrent format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512273 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |needinfo?(sticks...@gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Paul W. Frields 2009-07-23 17:30:21 EDT --- Approved per comment #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513486] Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513486 Jeremy Katz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ka...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Katz 2009-07-23 17:25:31 EDT --- Looks good, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509158] Review Request: fedora-gnat-project-commo n – files shared by Ada libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #9 from Björn Persson 2009-07-23 17:17:40 EDT --- New version: http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common.spec http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Apparently the buildroot tag is still required for bureaucratic reasons, so I added one. I also fixed some other RPMlint warnings. The only one that remains now is "only-non-binary-in-usr-lib", and I can't really do anything about that without also modifying GNAT. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513486] Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513486 --- Comment #2 from Chris Lumens 2009-07-23 17:17:42 EDT --- These should all be taken care of at the same URLs as above, if you want to take another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 Mohammed Morsi changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #31 from Mohammed Morsi 2009-07-23 17:17:20 EDT --- Once again shouting out to look for a sponsor as there has been no activity on this review request for a few days and the F12 deadline is coming up in less than a week (also adding the FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag) I've received several requests from people interested in seeing this go in. Any help doing so would be greatly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509160] Review Request: mine_detector – a mine-finding game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509160 --- Comment #3 from Björn Persson 2009-07-23 17:18:12 EDT --- Apparently the buildroot tag is still required for bureaucratic reasons, so I added one. http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/mine_detector.spec http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/mine_detector-5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509159] Review Request: PragmARC – a comp onent library for Ada
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509159 --- Comment #2 from Björn Persson 2009-07-23 17:18:09 EDT --- Apparently the buildroot tag is still required for bureaucratic reasons, so I added one. http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/PragmARC.spec http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/PragmARC-20060427-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511277] Review Request: comoonics-cluster-py - general cluster library for querying different clusters (used for open-sharedroot)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511277 --- Comment #6 from Marc Grimme 2009-07-23 17:07:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: comoonics-cluster-py Short Description: Comoonics cluster configuration utilities written in Python Owners: elcody02 markhla Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #14 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-23 17:07:21 EDT --- mh, no answer http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bauble-0.9.2/bauble.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/bauble-0.9.2/bauble-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513198] Review Request: osr-dracut-module - Dracut modules for open sharedroot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513198 --- Comment #9 from Marc Grimme 2009-07-23 17:04:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: osr-dracut-module Short Description: Dracut modules for open sharedroot Owners: elcody02 markhla Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #4 from Bowe Strickland 2009-07-23 16:50:50 EDT --- hmmm... must be a 64 bit thing... i've got %__arch_install_post as speced, and still seeing a clean build: >> Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.odUISp >> >> extracting debug info from >> /home/bowe/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/qrencode->3.1.0-1.fc11.i386/usr/lib/libqrencode.so.3.1.0 >> 230 blocks >> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot >> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress >> ... also, i'm familiar with concept but not implementation, but can't find rpath reference in executable: [b...@granny d]$ rpm2cpio /home/bowe/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/qrencode-3.1.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm | cpio -id 194 blocks [b...@granny d]$ readelf -a usr/bin/qrencode | grep -i -e rpath -e lib64 [b...@granny d]$ at any rate, blindly added second solution in guidelines. updated spec file at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode.spec updated srpm at http://people.redhat.com/bowe/rpms/qrencode/qrencode-3.1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 16:57:28 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bios_extract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 16:57:42 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bios_extract'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-4/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513486] Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513486 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Katz 2009-07-23 16:46:39 EDT --- NEEDSWORK: * rpmlint output isn't clean python-meh.src: E: no-buildroot-tag 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. * Fails to build in mock (missing buildrequires on intltool at least) * Should have directions for creating the tarball above the source line (git clone, etc) rather than just saying source is only in the tarball. See the guidelines for building out of an SCM snapshot * make should be run in %build, not %prep * Should include a license file as COPYING and then include that in %doc Otherwise, looks okay but those have to be fixed for an import -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513486] New: Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513486 Summary: Review Request: python-meh - A python library for handling exceptions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: clum...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://clumens.fedorapeople.org/exn/python-meh.spec SRPM URL: http://clumens.fedorapeople.org/exn/python-meh-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a simple python library for handling and reporting exceptions. It is mainly the exception handling dialog from anaconda broken out into a separate library, to replace rhpl.exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #3 from Bowe Strickland 2009-07-23 16:17:27 EDT --- missed comment #1 notification. looking now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513345] Review Request: iwak - Detect the openssh keys affected by CVE-2008-0166 among authorized_keys
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513345 --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2009-07-23 16:04:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > How did this ticket get reviewed without being assigned to anyone? I fixed > that up. Sorry, lazy @redhat.com bastards just did review over IRC and reviewer was lazy to be a good bureaucrat. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509807] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.01-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509806] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.061-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461393] Review Request: congruity - Application t o program Logitech® Harmony® universal remote control s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:12:36 EDT --- congruity-12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509807] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config - Defines a standard configuration API for CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509807 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:12:19 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Standard-Config-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512138] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DebugScreen - Add Debug support to CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512138 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:10:50 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DebugScreen-0.06-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509806] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Server - Simple HTTP server for developing with CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509806 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:14:58 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Server-0.061-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0.6-2.fc11|1.0.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:15:24 EDT --- python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-crud'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512138] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DebugScreen - Add Debug support to CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512138 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.06-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461393] Review Request: congruity - Application t o program Logitech® Harmony® universal remote control s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|12-1.fc10 |12-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512027] Review Request: zikula-module-News - Manages news articles on your Zikula site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512027 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:09:10 EDT --- zikula-module-News-2.4.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492810] Review Request: RabbIT - proxy for a faster web
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492810 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp 2009-07-23 15:10:09 EDT --- === REVIEW RabbIT === template: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. FAIL: RabbIT.noarch: W: name-repeated-in-summary RabbIT The name of the package is repeated in its summary. This is often redundant information and looks silly in various programs' output. Make the summary brief and to the point without including redundant information in it. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18 rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/access rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/public/smallRabbIT3.png rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/public rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/cache_only.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/Help.txt rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/RabbIT.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/README rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/nocache.conf rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/users rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/doc/RabbIT-3.18/LICENSE rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /etc/RabbIT/allowed rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/RabbIT rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/index.html rabbit A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. RabbIT.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/RabbIT/htdocs/javadoc rabbi
[Bug 512027] Review Request: zikula-module-News - Manages news articles on your Zikula site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512027 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.4.1-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461393] Review Request: congruity - Application t o program Logitech® Harmony® universal remote control s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:05:36 EDT --- congruity-12-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 |0.5.1-7.551svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:10:17 EDT --- gnujump-1.0.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461393] Review Request: congruity - Application t o program Logitech® Harmony® universal remote control s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||12-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 |0.1-0.1.a9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:05:24 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:03:43 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:06:55 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:03:55 EDT --- python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-crud'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7945 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 15:00:32 EDT --- gnujump-1.0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0.6-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 14:59:17 EDT --- frinika-0.5.1-7.551svn.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-23
14:49:10 EDT ---
Initial comments:
* License
- As far as I checked the whole source code, the
license tag should be "LGPLv2+".
* Description
- You should not repeat the same description already
written in the main package in every subpackage.
* About Requires/BuildRequires
- Usually "BuildRequires: pkgconfig" is redundant.
Any -devel package containing .pc pkgconfig files should
have "Requires: pkgconfig" or "Requires: /usr/bin/pkgconfig"
and for example gtk2-devel has this.
- Please explain why you want to add version specific dependency
for ImageMagick-c++. Currently Fedora supports F-10/11/12
and the lowest version of ImageMagick in these branches
is 6.4.0.10, ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
- (Related to the above "Explicit Requires"),
"Requires: gtk2" for -gtk subpackage, and "Requires: qt > 4" for -qt
subpackages are redundant (and should be removed).
- Usually the dependency between packages rebuilt from the
same srpm should be exact EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific
( for example -gtk should have "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}")
ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
- -pygtk subpackage should depend on -gtk subpackage
---
$ ldd -r ./zbarpygtk.so 2>/dev/null | grep zbargtk
libzbargtk.so.0 => not found
---
- The following line has typo.
---
Provides: libzbarqt-static = {%version}-%{release}
---
(should be %{version}) (but for static archives
see below)
* Conditional BR
- build.log shows:
---
161 checking for xmlto... no
189 checking for X11/extensions/Xvlib.h... no
---
* Please check if "BuildRequires: xmlto" is not needed.
* Please consider to add "BuildRequires: libXv-devel"
* Timestamps
- Please consider to use
---
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
---
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works for Makefiles generated from
recent autotools.
* %files
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries
- Please explain why you want to ship static archives (i.e. *.a
files). Fedora strongly discourages this. Expecially
as this package provides shared libraries currently I cannot
figure out why these .a files are needed, ref:
- libtool .la files must be removed (see the URL above)
- Please use %{_mandir} instead of %{_datadir}/man :
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
- Usually the file "INSTALL" is for people who want to build/install
the package by themselves and not needed for people using rpm:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation
- You don't have to install the document files already in main
package also to every subpackage.
- -devel subpackage should own %{_includedir}/zbar directory:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
- For -python subpackage, please don't use "%{_libdir}/python*" but
use %{python_sitearch}, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture
By the way please change the release number of your spec file
every time you modify your package to avoid confusion.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #3 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-07-23 14:48:19 EDT --- The first scratch build has a patch added for the file 'build/Makefile.in' so that the make starts. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1495665 There is to see that 'build/gen_objectref_pmc.pl' as to be patched as next. Parrot 1.4.0 and Rakudo 2009.07 is used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452636] Review Request: mod_proxy_html - Module to rewrite content as it passes through an apache proxy.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452636 --- Comment #49 from Philip Prindeville 2009-07-23 14:26:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > FYI, Philip, I attempted to reply to your email, but: > >- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - > > (reason: 554 mail.redfish-solutions.com ESMTP not accepting messages) > >- Transcript of session follows - > ... while talking to mail.redfish-solutions.com.: > <<< 554 mail.redfish-solutions.com ESMTP not accepting messages > 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable I added whitelisting for 76.204.165.225. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-23 14:15:24 EDT --- Hi Praveen, Slow reply, sorry. It looks to be the same, I don't still have the old one lying around to check if it is. checking for CMPI headers... checking standard... checking /usr/include/cmpi... checking /usr/local/include/cmpi... checking /src/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /opt/tog-pegasus/include/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /usr/include/Pegasus/Provider/CMPI... checking /usr/include/openwbem... checking /usr/sniacimom/include... configure: error: no. Sorry cannot find CMPI headers files. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.r6y1BD (%build) $ md5sum /tmp/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm cc21850d37fe2ba4d62cd259add38ae6 /tmp/sblim-cmpi-rpm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm When you make a new rpm can you increase the Release number at least to avoid confusion. Thanks, Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509856] Review Request: qrencode - The libqrencode library and application encodes QR Code symbols (2d barcodes)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509856 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-23 14:16:00 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-07-23 13:12:57 EDT --- Well, okay: -- This package (munge) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- It seems that Dennis is going to sponsor you. When you really get sponsored, would you notice it on this bugzilla? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 --- Comment #9 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2009-07-23 13:46:36 EDT --- zbar results from koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1495552 Cheers, Douglas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||506446(FedoraMoblin) Depends on||506804, 506825, 507377, ||508318, 511895, 506486, ||506721 Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mutter-moblin - |mutter-moblin - Moblin ||Netbook plugin for Mutter --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-23 13:40:58 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-moblin.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-moblin-0.30.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511895] Review Request: clutter-imcontext - IMContext Framework Library for Clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511895 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507377] Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513452] Review Request: mutter-moblin - Moblin Netbook plugin for Mutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||506848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||513452 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513452] New: Review Request: mutter-moblin -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mutter-moblin - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513452 Summary: Review Request: mutter-moblin - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-23 13:36:44 EDT --- Lightweight Media Player -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 13:20:45 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 13:20:55 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #11 from Steve Traylen 2009-07-23 13:20:51 EDT --- Yes I'll notice for sure. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 13:20:49 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513150] Review Request: bios_extract - Tool to extract the different submodules of common legacy bioses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513150 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-23 13:20:59 EDT --- bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bios_extract-0-0.2.20090713git.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513420] Review Request: whaawmp - Media Player written in pygtk that uses GStreamer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-07-23 13:17:50 EDT --- I personally don't believe gst should be mentioned either, ie, describe the app, what it does, what distinguishes it without resorting to jargon or mentioning technical details like toolkits or media engines. Just my $0.02 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-07-23 13:11:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) I don't have sponsor power, Mamoru Tasaka is the guy and have the power to sponsor you and review your package, I recommend you to use fedorapeople to upload your .spec and src.rpm files. look -> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-23 13:09:53 EDT --- Practically not, theoretically yes. Do as you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513253] Review Request: perl-Sys-Virt-TCK - libvirt Technology Compatability Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513253 Daniel Berrange changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Daniel Berrange 2009-07-23 13:04:27 EDT --- Built into rawhide. Will fix the CC in pkgdb later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2009-07-23 13:03:58 EDT --- Build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1495451 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511966] Review Request: zbar - bar code reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511966 --- Comment #7 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf 2009-07-23 13:01:14 EDT --- Just a note: Thanks also to Itamar Reis Peixoto for reviewing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
