[Bug 507052] Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-01 02:47:30 EDT --- Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Panini-0.71.103-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #25 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 02:35:27 EDT --- Awesome! Thank you, Jason Tibbitts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-01 02:39:28 EDT --- Ok, understood. Until then, I'm adding NotReady keyword to the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 Devrim Gündüz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dev...@gunduz.org --- Comment #14 from Devrim Gündüz 2009-08-01 02:36:45 EDT --- Tom, 4.0 was released -- maybe it is the right time to push that version instead of 3.8.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 01:58:34 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, yes, I'm plan handle bugs himself. If there will be necessity, I "fork" project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-01 01:16:11 EDT --- Off course! Many time ago I was try build it, but it is impossible due bug: http://trac.qutim.org/task/258 I directly speak with maintainer, and problem occurred in directly patching bundled copy of gloox library. This way is unacceptable for Fedora. So, waiting until bug resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #13 from Tom Lane 2009-08-01 01:07:14 EDT --- Yes, please; I don't know of a reason why that shouldn't still work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510864] Review Request: colorize - Perl script to colorize logs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510864 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 01:00:59 EDT --- I think that the package simply shouldn't have a URL if the URL isn't valid or doesn't have anything to do with the package. You can include a comment referring to the archived site, or even refer to the archived site directly if you like. Of course, the state of the web site begs a more important question: is upstream still around, and if not then are you sure you want to package undeveloped software? Who will handle the bugs? Are you prepared to fork and maintain this software yourself. (Yes, it's just a log colorizer, but someone still has to maintain it.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 00:52:30 EDT --- Let me ask in a different manner. Is this what you want reviewed: Spec URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL.spec SRPM URL: http://tgl.fedorapeople.org/PyGreSQL-3.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ? That's all I've been trying to ascertain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #11 from Tom Lane 2009-08-01 00:31:02 EDT --- Postgresql has changed. And there is a new version of PyGreSQL, as noted in comment #1. What has not changed in awhile is the version of PyGreSQL we are (improperly) embedding in the postgresql SRPM. I would like to get that fixed before there is any discussion of version updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-01 00:08:58 EDT --- Well, sure. What I'm asking is if the version originally posted actually matches what you want reviewed. I have no idea if the postgreql package that this is split from has actually changed in the 13 months since the PyGreSQL package was generated, but I'm assuming that it has. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #9 from Tom Lane 2009-07-31 23:56:16 EDT --- As I said in an earlier comment, I'd prefer to get this split out of the postgresql SRPM first, and then worry about version updates. postgresql is still building, so I *think* this ought to still work, if I didn't blow it too badly in constructing the new specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515040] New: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 Summary: Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wtog...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash.spec SRPM URL: http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/spamassassin-plugin-ixhash-1.5.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: iXhash is a plugin for the popular spam filter SpamAssassin. It computes MD5 checksums of fragments of the body of an e-mail and compares them to those of know spam. As such it works similar to the now standard plugins that use the Pyzor, Razor and DCC software packages from within SpamAssassin. NOTE: This RPM defaults to 1 point per hit instead of upstream's 0.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:46:43 EDT --- Sorry, what didn't work was Devrim's offer to review in comment #5. I haven't even tried to build the package; just wanted to check to see if you still wanted the original version reviewed or if an updated package would be necessary before a review could start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #7 from Tom Lane 2009-07-31 23:41:06 EDT --- I haven't looked at this since it was submitted, so problems don't surprise me ... what didn't work? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ti...@math.uh.edu --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:29:26 EDT --- Sorry nobody's taken a look at this yet; we have far more submissions than reviewers. Honestly I don't know much about vim plugins; I don't even know how to test this. (I use vim for quick edits but I spend most of my time in emacs. Somehow using both at the same time fails to melt my brain.) I did build it on rawhide without incident; the only rpmlint complaint is: vim-bash-support.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/bash-support/templates/bash-file-header 0644 /bin/bash which is obviously bogus as that's a template file, not an actual script. It just happens to start with "#!/bin/bash". If you're still interested in getting your packages into Fedora and you drop some hints as to how to test them, I'll try to take a look in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:30:55 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 23:31:40 EDT --- Setting the fedora-review flag as that seems to have been overlooked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 Bug 478372 depends on bug 513744, which changed state. Bug 513744 Summary: Swig update required https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513744 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA Resolution|ERRATA | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469894] Review Request: cglib - Code generation library for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469894 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:58:10 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462458] Review Request: drupal-workspace - Allows users to have a central place to view and manage their content
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462458 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:54:52 EDT --- Wow, this is an old one. I know nothing of drupal and there are no specific packaging guidelines to go by, but I suppose I could look at existing approved packages for guidance. However: The currently recommended version seems to be 1.4 rc1 or somesuch. (Not unexpected since this ticket is 10.5 months old.) Should it be updated before review? Where do you see that the license is restricted to GPLv2 only? I just see a copy of the GPL with no statement of the version in use, which would imply GPL+. Is there a more explicit indication of the license that I'm missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460894] Review Request: ocsigen - Web programming framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460894 --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:41:04 EDT --- What's the status of this ticket? Given comment #11, I'm not sure if this is ready for review, but I built the package from comment #4 on rawhide and it seems to at least build and install OK. (I've zero idea how to test it.) One thing I noticed is that the %pre scriptlet references %contentdir, which isn't defined so it gets inserted literally into the scriptlet which almost certainly doesn't do what's expected, and also causes: ocsigen.x86_64: W: percent-in-%pre There's also ocsigen.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/lib64/ocsigen/extensions/ocsidbm ocsigen.x86_64: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/ocsigen which I've not seen before. rpmlint says that nothing should build with ocamlc -custom. I don't see '-custom' anywhere in the build log so I'm not sure what's up there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462176] Review Request: hybserv - Hybrid IRC Services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462176 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:43:12 EDT --- No response in two months. Given the description above, I'll mark this as not being ready; clear the whiteboard if you have something ready for review. Ray, honestly I'd say that if you have a package that's actually ready for review, just submit it and close this ticket as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459872] Review Request: asn1c - Free, open source compiler of ASN.1 specifications into C source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459872 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:30:14 EDT --- Just going back over some of these older tickets. I wonder it is permissible for us to distribute the sources of those sample files that you have to explicitly not include in the package due to licensing restrictions. In other words, don't they need to be removed from the source tarball completely? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code Otherwise, we still ship them in the source package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452321] Review Request: PyGreSQL - Python client library for PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452321 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:19:00 EDT --- Wow, that didn't exactly work. Tom, is the above package still what you'd like to have reviewed? (Probably not, over 13 months later.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||515032 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 22:02:09 EDT --- What's your ID in the Fedora account system? A search didn't turn anything up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||515034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #1 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-07-31 20:26:58 EDT --- nss-softkn is one of two packages, nss-util being the other, that are being proposed as spin-off of the full NSS package. nss-softkn requires nss-util and they in turn will be required by nss. Please hold-off reviewing them until I fix some problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] New: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 Summary: Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographinc Module of NSS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emald...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softkn.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Network Security Services Cryptographic Module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390
--- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert
2009-07-31 19:59:43 EDT ---
REVIEW FOR b9e3e00e3ad9a0c99ea5b190c14fa84f rakudo-0.2009.07-2.fc11.src.rpm
FAIL - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
$ rpmlint Desktop/rakudo-0.2009.07-2.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint fedora/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rakudo-0.2009.07-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
rakudo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/perl6
see comment # 10 for a fix.
FAIL - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines:
Versioning is not correct
OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
FAIL - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not
honored, SourceURLs not ok.
OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines: Artistic 2.0
OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc.
OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English.
OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible.
OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by
MD5 df841289a91a804a5bd2fe3125dfc06b
OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on
x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro.
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (none except in
docdir)
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes
a %defattr(...) line.
OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros
section of Packaging Guidelines.
OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content.
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage.
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application.
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section.
OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by
other packages.
OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.
SHOULD Items:
N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described.
N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is
vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase,
and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel
pkg.
N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin,
/sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the pack
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 19:54:42 EDT --- I cannot fetch the upstream source; http://bioconductor.org/packages/2.4/bioc/src/contrib/AnnotationDbi_1.6.0.tar.gz returns the usual 404 error. I find "spectool -g *spec" handy for testing this kind of thing. I went to the upstream web site and found 1.6.1; perhaps they just don't host older versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #1 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-07-31 19:49:21 EDT --- nss-util is one of two packages, nss-softokn being the other, that are being proposed as spin-off of the full NSS package. Please hold-off reviewing it until I get the other one ready for submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] New: Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Summary: Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emald...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.4-1.src.rpm Description: Utilities required by Network Security Services and its Softokn Cryptographic Module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390
Thomas Moschny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.mosc...@gmx.de
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Moschny 2009-07-31
18:31:32 EDT ---
You should remove the "exit 0" statements because that prevents the debuginfo
from being extracted. Then you can also remove the %define debug_package %{nil}
line.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 17:57:10 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ccrypt-1.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 17:57:04 EDT --- ccrypt-1.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ccrypt-1.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.1.4-3.el4 |1.1.4-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 17:28:05 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 17:28:30 EDT --- sipcalc-1.1.4-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Thomas Moschny 2009-07-31 17:24:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: trac-tracnav-plugin Short Description: Navigation Bar for Trac Owners: thm Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509883] Review Request: sipcalc - "advanced" console based ip subnet calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509883 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.1.4-3.el4 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512726] Review Request: perl-Test-Refcount - Assert reference counts on objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512726 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:19:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 307601] Review Request: libHX - General-purpose library (needed by recent pam_mount)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307601 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:16:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:18:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:14:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:15:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466863] Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466863 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:17:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-31 17:13:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Dominic Hopf changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065
--- Comment #4 from Dominic Hopf 2009-07-31 17:05:25 EDT ---
$ rpmlint trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUSTs
-
OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines
OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec
OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines
OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines
OK: license file is included in %doc
OK: specfile is written in AE
OK: specfile is legible
OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source,
md5sum fits
OK: package compiles successfully
OK: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
N/A: package handles locales properly
there are no locales installed with this package
N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun
there is no binary installed with this package
OK: package is not designed to be relocatable
OK: package owns directorys it creates
OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing
OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly
OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK: macros are consistently used
OK: package contains code
N/A: subpackage for large documentation files
there are no large documentation files
OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc
N/A: header files are in a -devel package
there are no header files
N/A: static libraries are in a -static package
there are no static libs
N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc)
there is no pkgconfig file
N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix
there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library
N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package
there is no devel package
N/A: any libtool archives are removed
there are no libtool archives
N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application
I assume this program will be called via webinterface, this may is a GUI,
but I think a desktop file is not necessary for this kind of GUI
OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages
OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install
N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8
not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames
SHOULD
--
N/A: non-English translations for description and summary
there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does
not
provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this
package.
OK: package builds in mock
N/A: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures
this is a noarch package
N/A: program runs
I did not test myself if the program works as it should since I do not
have
installed trac and don't use it
N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package
there are no subpackages
N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package
there is no pkgconfig file
N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself
no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Try to bail out the 80 chars in the description.
>
> If you insist, but normally I have emacs' fill-column set to 70 (the default,
> as far as I know).
I do not insist on that. I think it is also okay to have 70 chars per line,
even if I would prefer 80 and rpmlint allows until 79 chars per line. It's not
worth changing your emacs settings at all.
> > I don't like the %{python_sitelib}/* construct in the %files section
>
> Unless there's a guideline that forces me to do so, I'd prefer not to list
> individual files or directories here, because removing redundancy makes
> maintaining the package much easier.
Since there is no guideline about this - at least no guideline I know - there
unfortunately doesn't seem to be any way to force you to write the %file list
more human readable. ;)
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||fed...@christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-31 17:02:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Unless there's a guideline that forces me to do so, I'd prefer not to list > individual files or directories here, because removing redundancy makes > maintaining the package much easier. On the other hand, life is easier for other maintainers, when they can read something directly out of the spec and don't need to use rpm -qpl. Changed status to assigned, as Dominic already started the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2009-07-31 16:25:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Issues I found:
> According to [1] %global is preferred over %define, so line 3 should be
> changed
> to %global.
Fixed.
> Try to bail out the 80 chars in the description.
If you insist, but normally I have emacs' fill-column set to 70 (the default,
as far as I know).
> I don't like the %{python_sitelib}/* construct in the %files section
Unless there's a guideline that forces me to do so, I'd prefer not to list
individual files or directories here, because removing redundancy makes
maintaining the package much easier.
Spec URL:
http://thm.fedorapeople.org/trac-tracnav-plugin/trac-tracnav-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
http://thm.fedorapeople.org/trac-tracnav-plugin/trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513797] Review Request: gnome-applet-cpufire - GNOME panel applet showing the CPU load as a fire
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513797 Edwin ten Brink changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-07-31 16:18:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > NOT OK: I agree that you need libgnomeui-devel, but libgnomeui-devel gets > > pulled in by gnome-panel-devel. Again, as per > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires, it > > should > > be removed. > > You are confusing Requires and BuildRequres here. rpm has a dependency > generator for Requires, but not for BuildRequires. > > > We implicitly agreed on this during the review of > > gnome-applet-bubblemon (bug 497525): > > No, we agreed on leaving gettext in although it's already pulled in by > intltool. That's just like gnome-panel-devel and libgnomeui-devel, but I can > remove it if you insist on doing so. That's what we agreed then explicitly, indeed. Implicitly we agreed (i.e. I wrote it, you had no comment) on the following lines (lines 27-28): # libgnomeui gets pulled in by gnome-panel-devel #BuildRequires: libgnomeui-devel And I unfortunately have to disagree with you. If you look at the root.log for gnome-applet-bubblemon (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gnome-applet-bubblemon/2.0.14/1.fc11/data/logs/i586/root.log) you'll see the following lines: DEBUG util.py:256: Installing for dependencies: (...) DEBUG util.py:256: libgnomeui-develi586 2.24.1-1.fc11 build 330 k Nevertheless OK: Since it is a BuildRequires and not a Requires, you could leave it as it is according to the motivation below. My personal preference is to keep the explicit (Build)Requires as clean as possible, but it seems the Guidelines give a little leeway on this point. > > If you indeed require >= 2.6, then this version is also 'very > > old'. Fedora 7 included 2.18.3-1. As per > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires, you > > should drop te version requirement. > > Again, these are BuildRequires. I want to make live easier for people who are > rebuilding our packages - even on ancient distros if they want. OK, since it is indeed a BuildRequires. I must mention I did not read that explicitly from the Packaging Guidelines, though on careful inspection, BuildRequires is discussed separately from the Requires, which includes the statement. I stand corrected and I'll accept your motivation. > > - contact the upstream author to see if he would include the text and > > actions > > as mentioned in GPLv2 (lines 282-311) in the next release > > I did twice, but no avail. OK, alas then. With this, all outstanding issues have been resolved or otherwise agreed upon, therefore the package is APPROVED. Good luck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 --- Comment #49 from Dominic Hopf 2009-07-31 16:12:16 EDT --- Just added geany-plugins to the Fedora CVS, built it and added it to the updates-testing repository. According to [1] the status is still pending at the present. Sorry for my delayed work on this. ;) [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/geany-plugins-0.17.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura 2009-07-31 16:06:38 EDT --- I talked upstream and I am now kind of upstream^^ Project moved to: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/gbirthday.git The patchs are applied, license is GPLv2+, gettext will probably used in the future. Using it now won't make sense as the translations for now will be missing and none are there… Ready for Review Spec URL: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/gbirthday.spec SRPM URL: http://student.physik.uni-mainz.de/~spurath/gbirthday-0.4.1-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514065] Review Request: trac-tracnav-plugin - Navigation Bar for Trac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514065
--- Comment #1 from Dominic Hopf 2009-07-31 15:12:23 EDT ---
$ rpmlint trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint trac-tracnav-plugin-4.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUSTs
-
OK: packaged is named according to the package naming guidelines
OK: specfile name matches %{name}.spec
OK: package seems to meet packaging guidelines
OK: license in specfile matches actual license and meets licensing guidelines
OK: license file is included in %doc
OK: specfile is written in AE
OK: specfile is legible
OK: sourcefile in the package is the same as provided in the mentioned source,
md5sum fits
OK: package compiles successfully
OK: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
N/A: package handles locales properly
there are no locales installed with this package
N/A: call ldconfig in %post and %postun
there is no binary installed with this package
OK: package is not designed to be relocatable
OK: package owns directorys it creates
OK: does not list a file more than once in the %files listing
OK: %files section includes %defattr and permissions are set properly
OK: %clean section is there and contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
OK: macros are consistently used
OK: package contains code
N/A: subpackage for large documentation files
there are no large documentation files
OK: program runs properly without files listed in %doc
N/A: header files are in a -devel package
there are no header files
N/A: static libraries are in a -static package
there are no static libs
N/A: require pkgconfig if package contains a pkgconfig(.pc)
there is no pkgconfig file
N/A: put .so-files into -devel package if there are library files with suffix
there is no library with suffix, in fact there isn't any library
N/A: devel package includes fully versioned dependency for the base package
there is no devel package
N/A: any libtool archives are removed
there are no libtool archives
N/A: contains desktop file if it is a GUI application
I assume this program will be called via webinterface, this may is a GUI,
but I think a desktop file is not necessary for this kind of GUI
OK: package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages
OK: buildroot is removed at beginning of %install
N/A: filenames are encoded in UTF-8
not necessary since there are no non-ASCII filenames
SHOULD
--
N/A: non-English translations for description and summary
there are no other languages supported by this package, in fact it does
not
provide any localization. I assume localizations are not needed for this
package.
OK: package builds in mock
N/A: package builds into binary rpms for all supported architectures
this is a noarch package
N/A: program runs
I did not test myself if the program works as it should since I do not
have
installed trac and don't use it
N/A: subpackages contain fully versioned dependency for the base package
there are no subpackages
N/A: pkgconfig file is placed in a devel package
there is no pkgconfig file
N/A: require package providing a file instead of the file itself
no files outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin are required
Issues I found:
According to [1] %global is preferred over %define, so line 3 should be changed
to %global.
Try to bail out the 80 chars in the description.
I don't like the %{python_sitelib}/* construct in the %files section because it
does not contain any package or module name. Another packager would not see
what
files and/or directories the package exactly includes and has to build and
rpmls
the package first to find this out. I would like to see the module name
mentioned
and would recommend to list the other directory as
%{python_sitelib}/TracNav-4.1-py*.egg-info/ to avoid problems or unneccessary
work with next python update.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-31 15:01:09 EDT --- Correct reason for closing this ticket is NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-31 14:53:22 EDT --- Ver. 0.2_beta2 is out. Please, consider updating your srpm, and I'll continue. http://www.qutim.org/uploads/src/qutim-0.2_beta2.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] New: Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Summary: Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pin...@pingoured.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-AnnotationDbi.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Provides user interface and database connection code for annotation data packages using SQLite data storage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||511421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:07:59 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #17 from Stefan Becker 2009-07-31 14:19:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I can confirm that with this patch pidgin-sipe builds on all architectures. > \o/ Good to know. THANKS! > Now, if we can get someone to review this package. :) I've asked Warren Togami. I'll also talk again to our RH TAM about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-07-31 14:14:42 EDT --- Looks good so far, stay tuned for the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:08:25 EDT --- kmess-2.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kmess'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:08:34 EDT --- pycdio-0.15-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pycdio'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225913] Merge Review: irqbalance
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225913 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-07-31 14:05:39 EDT --- Ok, I just uploaded my fixes and requested rebuild for devel branch. I think this ticket can be closed now, and package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 |1.0-0.2.b3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:06:42 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.90-2.fc11 |0.1.90-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:07:21 EDT --- ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 |1.0-0.2.b3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 |1.0-0.2.b3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510736] Review Request: pycdio - A Python interface to the CD Input and Control library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510736 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:05:49 EDT --- pycdio-0.15-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pycdio'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513307] Review Request: Netdisco - A web-based network management tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513307 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.95-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:06:36 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide-en-US - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #96 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:08:05 EDT --- fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-17.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:06:48 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc10, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide-en-US - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-17.fc10 |1.0-17.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #62 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:02:47 EDT --- gnome-do-plugins-0.8.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-do-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.1.90-2.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:03:09 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8142 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide-en-US - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0-17.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512482] Review Request: lxrandr - Simple monitor config tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512482 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:04:01 EDT --- lxrandr-0.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484226] Review Request: ruby-icon-artist - Supporting libraries for icon artists
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484226 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:00:59 EDT --- ruby-icon-artist-0.1.90-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513307] Review Request: Netdisco - A web-based network management tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513307 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:05:06 EDT --- netdisco-0.95-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510982] Review Request: psimedia - Audio and video RTP services for Psi-like IM clients
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510982 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:02:37 EDT --- psimedia-1.0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update psimedia'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8138 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514101] Review Request: KMess - KDE Messaging client for MSN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514101 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:00:54 EDT --- kmess-2.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kmess'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8130 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 13:59:33 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11.2, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 13:59:44 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11.2, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide-en-US - A security guide for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #95 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 14:02:17 EDT --- fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-17.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.0-0.2.b3.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity -
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-31 13:59:39 EDT --- kobby-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11, libqinfinity-1.0-0.2.b3.fc11.2, libinfinity-0.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #16 from Konstantin Ryabitsev 2009-07-31 13:43:19 EDT --- I can confirm that with this patch pidgin-sipe builds on all architectures. \o/ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1570379 Updated .spec and .src.rpm: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pidgin-sipe.spec http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/pidgin-sipe-1.6.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Now, if we can get someone to review this package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #7 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-07-31 13:12:49 EDT --- Fixed. The final versions of the files can be found at: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc10.src.rpm http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 --- Comment #8 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-07-31 12:30:04 EDT --- The spec-file at the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/rakudo.spec it updated. The SRPM according to this spec has the URL: ftp://ftp.uni-siegen.de/pub/parrot.rpms/rakudo/SRPMS/rakudo-0.2009.07-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful scratch builds for F11 and F12 are at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1570122 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1569940 The rpmlint output for the spec-file and the srpm has 0 errors and 0 warnings. The rpmlint output for the binary rpm has 0 errors and 1 warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896 --- Comment #7 from Eric Sandeen 2009-07-31 12:55:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355832) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355832) modified specfile This is what I'd propose, assuming it works, and assuming I'm not being too draconian based on misunderstandings of how things actually work :) If stuff needs to go back in, with justification, I'll let you talk that over w/ the final reviewer. Thanks for your patience and understanding ;) -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
