[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Till Bubeck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Till Bubeck 2009-08-05 02:50:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: vacation Short Description: Automatic mail answering program Owners: bubeck Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:14:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:16:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:13:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-08-05 02:13:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review :) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: R-preprocessCore Short Description: A collection of pre-processing functions Owners: pingou Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:15:18 EDT --- Unfortunately we can only accept FAS account IDs for Owners and InitialCC, not email addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:12:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:11:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:10:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:09:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-05 02:06:37 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Till Bubeck changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Till Bubeck 2009-08-05 02:00:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: vacation Short Description: Automatic mail answering program Owners: t.bub...@reinform.de Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: t.bub...@reinform.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174
--- Comment #22 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-05 01:35:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> %files -n nimbus-icon-theme
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING
> %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/
> %ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache
> %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc
> %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/
> %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/
Now I am really confused ... you said %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache
is covered by %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/, but instead of removing this
duplicity, you add two more of them %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/ (which is
certainly covered) and %dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/ ???
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-05 01:34:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dvisvgm Short Description: A DVI to SVG converter Owners: mgieseki Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034
Jesse Keating changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||jkeat...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jkeat...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-05 01:03:51
EDT ---
Taking this review at Bob's request.
First, the source is just listed as a tarball, with no URL to verify where it
came from. Also since the tarball has "stripped" in the name, I'm assuming
that some work is being done to remove content. How that's done needs to be
listed in the spec for verification purposes.
There are a lot of interesting things being done in the spec with very little
comments to explain what's going on. I'd suggest being a bit more verbose.
When using install, it's preferred to preserve the timestamp with -p. Also,
calling mkdir to make dirs, and then install to install files seems odd, when
install can just as easily make dirs too.
You're installing something into the prelink.conf.d/ dir but not Requiring
prelink as far as I can tell. That needs to be fixed.
Your %files section has you taking ownership of the prelink.conf.d directory.
prelink and only prelink should own that.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
Is there a particular reason why you use %dir for %{_includedir}/nss3 and then
list a ton of files in it? Are there files that you don't want to package that
wind up in that directory?
I can't build this to test, because I'm missing nssutil-devel >= 3.12.3.99.3
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 00:50:43 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513543] Review Request: znc-extra - Extra modules for ZNC IRC bouncer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513543 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-05 00:50:48 EDT --- znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/znc-extra-0.074-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #7 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-05 00:44:51 EDT --- Is there a way to also consider sblim-sfcb also as a possible CIMOM instead of only considering tog-pegasus? It was discussed before at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183#c10, wouldn't it be better to have Requires:cim-server/cimserver instead of tog-pegasus. This allows sblim-sfcb also to be a possible CIMOM. Since the sblim-sfcb package already has "Provides:cim-server", it is better we leverage that in this package. But I am concerned about the "BuildRequires" and also about mentioning the right devel packages in "BuildRequires" and "Requries". Any suggestions?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunda...@redhat.com --- Comment #21 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-05 00:42:20 EDT --- You should also replace the OpenSolaris logo that replaces the GNOME foot with the Fedora Logo or fall back to the foot one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|UPSTREAM|CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #12 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-05 00:33:55 EDT --- Builds on all the branches. Closing this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510865] Review Request: ccze - A robust log colorizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-08-05 00:02:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > 8 character tabbing is the standard, You are in error. 8 char tabs are pretty common, but that's all. > and you should use it. You've got a learning curve ahead - Better concentrate on technical issues and not on cosmetic issues in reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:33:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Lots of deprecation warnings from the test suite; I guess that's related to > the > FileCache thing. actually, they're not - as well as wanting deprecated FileCache, the test application itself does two other deprecated things - no warnings are generated for the actual PageCache module, though, so not too troublesome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp Short Description: DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache Short Description: Cache the output of entire pages Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 23:22:32 EDT --- python-tgext-admin-0.2.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-tgext-admin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-08-04 23:23:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache Short Description: Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Iain Arnell changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 23:09:12 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. The only statement of the GPL version in use is in setup.py; the source file just says # This software may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU # general public license. which isn't all that specific. setup.py is sufficient for us to establish intent, even though it contradicts what's on the upstream web site. It would probably be a good idea to contact upstream and ask them to more clearly and consistently state the code license, and to follow the instructions in the "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs" section of the GPL for indicating GPL version in individual pieces of code. I installed this and it seems to work, although there's no documentation at all so I didn't do anything other than run it in a pipe. The %description promises multiple scripts but I found only one. None of these issues are significant enough to hold up this review, but it would be nice to get the license stuff cleaned up before the code base grows much more. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 818856108f0cb4799dc3baad0f841fdc20bc80dcddc902ffbf932085b4d19dc0 pipestat-0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK (besides promising more than one script). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pipestat = 0.2-1.fc12 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||515080 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 21:26:06 EDT --- Setting the blocker since this won't build until R-preprocessCore is in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515080] Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||515081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 21:08:41 EDT --- And yet another cookie-cutter review. As I always build in rawhide I don't see the above failure. The only interesting thing here is the huge dependency list sucked in by graphviz. That package could really use a split. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 4a1fa7c96d655073bc48f893980a8290414ecdd69c91d792136e3a389eff3033 DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(DBIx::Class::TimeStamp) = 0.12 perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp = 0.12-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(DBIx::Class) perl(DBIx::Class::DynamicDefault) perl(DateTime) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=22, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 1.47 cusr 0.18 csys = 1.70 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:41:35 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6.3-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|20070829-2.fc10 |20070829-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:25 EDT --- audtty-0.1.11-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:18 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-common-proofgeneral'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:24 EDT --- python-sprox-0.6.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.4-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:36 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512272] Review Request: surl - A URL shortening command line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512272 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:37:53 EDT --- surl-0.5.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512574] Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512574 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.03-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.4-2.fc11 |3.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512574] Review Request: perl-Titanium - Strong, lightweight web application famework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512574 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:36:05 EDT --- perl-Titanium-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:34:25 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vifir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8277 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515144] Review Request: vifir - A viewer for electronic aviation charts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515144 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:19 EDT --- vifir-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update vifir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512272] Review Request: surl - A URL shortening command line tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512272 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.5.4-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.11-3.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.11-3.fc10 |0.1.11-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511336] Review Request: apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts - New Athena Unicode is a freeware multilingual font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511336 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:38:07 EDT --- apa-new-athena-unicode-fonts-3.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 |0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512263] Review Request: audtty - A ncurses based terminal client for the Audacious
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512263 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:37 EDT --- audtty-0.1.11-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:06 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.6.1-1.fc11|1.6.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:30:54 EDT --- supybot-meetbot-0.1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:19 EDT --- autoarchive-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:33:52 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:30:41 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update emacs-common-proofgeneral'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.6.1-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1.2-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.2-1.el5 |0.1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-4.fc11 |1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.2-2.fc11|0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:05 EDT --- xorriso-0.3.8-6.pl00.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473835] Review Request: autoarchive - Simple backup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473835 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:31:32 EDT --- autoarchive-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514984] Review Request: R-AnnotationDbi - Annotation Database Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514984 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:29:08 EDT --- R-AnnotationDbi-1.6.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:28:34 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.0-5.el5 |1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||20070829-2.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:28:03 EDT --- efte-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 511219] Review Request: conakry-fonts - N'Ko font by well-known Unicode.org expert & font designer Michael Everson
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511219 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-04 20:27:52 EDT --- conakry-fonts-20070829-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490988] Review Request: libvdpau - Wrapper library for the Video Decode and Presentation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490988 Jarod Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwil...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jarod Wilson 2009-08-04 20:25:24 EDT --- Is this something we should perhaps discuss in the next FESCo meeting? I've finally got personal reason to want to see this included in *some* repo, so we should answer the question of whether this can go into Fedora, or if it has to be relegated to a 3rd-party repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515107] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp - DBIx::Class extension to update and create date and time based fields
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515107 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-04 19:49:24 EDT --- Fixed Obsoletes: and Provides: sections http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 19:48:24 EDT --- Generic boring Perl module review follows: * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d8ac902870fbe0916aba2b4cc9b3aa2f1a12c94ef704003cc9fb1fd6153d4112 Catalyst- Plugin-Session-Store-Cache-0.01.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::Cache) = 0.01 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache = 0.01-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Session) >= 0.06 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=3, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.11 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.17 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509158] Review Request: fedora-gnat-project-commo n – files shared by Ada libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509158 --- Comment #10 from Björn Persson 2009-08-04 19:45:33 EDT --- Updated to version 1.2: http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common.spec http://www.rombobjörn.se/packages/fedora-gnat-project-common-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514889] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session-Store-Cache - Store sessions using a Catalyst::Plugin::Cache
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514889 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 19:41:20 EDT --- Thanks for the well-commented spec; I don't think I'd have understood what was going on with FileCache module without the comments. The way you're doing this makes sense to me. Lots of deprecation warnings from the test suite; I guess that's related to the FileCache thing. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 6ac9804279b68588d51cb3df2667f7f7e54571e32639d966f05e7d9406c2b2b1 Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache-0.22.tar.gz 9e3e8a177c61857491f5c20e26f79fcfaa3a6c53ca00d4bb4864aab0770b6b07 FileCache.pm * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::PageCache) = 0.22 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache = 0.22-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Catalyst::Runtime) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(MRO::Compat) perl(base) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=16, Tests=130, 17 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.04 sys + 6.88 cusr 0.57 csys = 7.57 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515614] New: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Summary: Review Request: offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jkeat...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/python-offtrac.spec SRPM URL: http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/review/python-offtrac-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: There is the offtrac python library which offers the TracServer class. This object is how one interacts with a Trac instance via xmlrpc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515034] Review Request: nss-softokn - Cryptographic Module of NSS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515034 --- Comment #4 from Bob Relyea 2009-08-04 19:29:33 EDT --- err. I believe Elio meant: SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-softokn/devel/nss-softokn-3.12.3.99.3-1.fc12.src.rpm bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174
--- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert
2009-08-04 19:05:41 EDT ---
I was wrong, there is another file listed twice, this time in the icon theme:
%files -n nimbus-icon-theme
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING
%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/
%ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache
icon-theme.cache is already covered by %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/. I don't
really care about this that much, many other icon theme packages have the same
problem, but the proper solution clould look like this:
%files -n nimbus-icon-theme
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING
%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/
%ghost %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/icon-theme.cache
%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/iconrc
%{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/*x*/
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/nimbus/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514540] Review Request: papyon - Python libraries for MSN Messenger network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514540 --- Comment #2 from Brian Pepple 2009-08-04 18:58:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/papyon.spec SRPM URL: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/rpms/papyon-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Tue Aug 4 2009 Brian Pepple - 0.4.1-2 - Update URL. Didn't fix the rpmlint error since it's not a blocker, and I could care less about mixing of space & tabs. The scratch build from comment #1 should still be fine to use since the only thing that changed was the project url. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506804] Review Request: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-08-04 18:34:53 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: anerley Short Description: Moblin widgets for people information Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 Rajiv Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514883] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-PageCache - Cache the output of entire pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514883 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-04 17:58:52 EDT --- In case you aren't aware there are 550 package review tickets in the queue to be looked at. We have far too few reviewers to be able to look at any ticket instantaneously. You should certainly expect to wait more than four hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #10 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 17:57:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Checking the "need additional information" box was a bad idea. the Request for review got cancelled, how to I reactivate it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-04 17:45:21 EDT --- Added Obsoletes: openal <= 0.0.9 and remove Conflicts: openal-devel http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo? --- Comment #9 from Elio Maldonado Batiz 2009-08-04 17:35:49 EDT --- I'm wondering if I set a wrong flag somewhere since no one has taken this for review and the code freeze for fedora 12 alpha is today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 461393] Review Request: congruity - Application t o program Logitech® Harmony® universal remote control s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #32 from Adam Williamson 2009-08-04 17:36:37 EDT --- Stephen, I just filed an upstream issue to change the .desktop file, since we changed the MIME types in libconcord to match upstream (Logitech): https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2832287&group_id=231128&atid=1082218 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-08-04 17:24:36 EDT --- Thanks for your help. (In reply to comment #13) > An initial review. Mostly looks good. Just some rpmlint bits to cleanup as you > previously mentioned. > > + rpmlint output The rpmlint output now [...@laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint sugar-record* sugar-record.i586: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-record.i586: E: no-binary sugar-record.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/camerac/camera.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I removed the embedded gst stuff and added it as a requirement. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #19 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-04 17:11:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Did you get any feedback on the license? If not release it strict LGPLv2. No, I haven't. > Update the package and consider it APPROVED. Thanks. New package is on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus-0.0.17-5.fc11.src.rpm and spec on http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/nimbus.spec Building it in koji as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1581664 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Matej Cepl 2009-08-04 17:09:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: nimbus Short Description: Desktop theme originally from Sun Owners: mcepl Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
