[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 02:27:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fpaste Short Description: A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sunda...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-13 02:04:33 EDT --- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 01:59:33 EDT --- hi, new spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec new srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm rest of the mock build stuff at : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 01:50:57 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-13 01:50:51 EDT --- blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blazeblogger-0.9.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Andrea Musuruane changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-13 01:43:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fbzx Short Description: A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer Owners: musuruan Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 Ankur Sinha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #18 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-13 01:45:06 EDT --- hi, Since the packaging process is not going to go ahead, can the cvs please be revoked? closing the bug as a WONTFIX regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #42 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 01:41:55 EDT --- You can't request CVS branches yet, since a) you have not been sponsored yet b) this package has not been approved yet. To get over a) you need to do the couple of informal reviews for me first. When I have checked them out, I will sponsor you and approve this package if I am happy with it (I haven't looked at the new spec yet). Perform the informal reviews first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Jussi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-13 01:38:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: > > %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 > %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 > > in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 No, that's just for local builds in mock. Koji checks out the newest spec & sources from CVS and rebuilds the SRPM every time a package is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455541] Review Request: dojo - javascript library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455541 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu Alias||dojo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 David Nielsen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen 2009-08-13 00:45:36 EDT --- I am no longer a Fedora developer, aside that Beagle itself is orphaned now and has no active upstream development. Sad but true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added CC|fedora-package-rev...@redha | |t.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364
--- Comment #9 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-12
23:54:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> ---
> #install /etc/rc.d/init.d/xrdp, use %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d because On
> releases older
> ---
> - You can use:
> ---
> %{!?initddir: %global initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d}
> ---
-->
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-May/msg00089.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514833] Review Request: sphinx - Free open-source SQL full-text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514833 --- Comment #4 from Allisson Azevedo 2009-08-12 22:29:04 EDT --- Update package: Spec URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/sphinx/sphinx-0.9.8.1-3.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: * Wed Aug 12 2009 Allisson Azevedo 0.9.8.1-3 - Fixed macros consistency. - Modified make install to keep timestamps. - Added libsphinxclient package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha 2009-08-12 22:28:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Remove the initial buildroot definition and in %install section. Same as the > previous review. Align the text in the description properly. > > Using wiki as a place to attach upstream tarballs is not acceptable. Ask > upstream to use the releases directory similar to > > https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/python-fedora/ > > Running fpaste by itself simply hangs. It should show the --help output > instead. A man page would be useful. hi, new spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec new srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm info from the mock build at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ @Rahul : i talked to upstream, it doesn't hang, it waits for input from standard io like cat etc. Tried it out too.. regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter...@redhat.com, ||phu...@redhat.com, ||ta...@redhat.com, ||tfuji...@redhat.com Component|Package Review |ibus-anthy AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-12 22:00:49 EDT --- I can have a quick look over the patches if you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-08-12 21:31:16 EDT --- built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516987] Review Request: ibus-anthy - features integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516987 --- Comment #3 from fujiwara 2009-08-12 21:32:22 EDT --- The following is the patches. http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus-anthy/commit/2e4bf57cf5625ad825a86b55fdfbce39eab360ab http://github.com/fujiwarat/ibus-anthy/commit/c77c9c8129900533e8415c5cc8dceb0327f37c6f -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Owen Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Owen Taylor 2009-08-12 21:28:58 EDT --- Built successfully: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-12 20:48:23 EDT --- new version with improved initscript file. http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp.spec http://itamarjp.fedorapeople.org/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-0.1.20090811cvs.fc12.src.rpm I am generating rsakeys.ini file in %post section, but the file is un-owned, how to fix this ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-12 20:39:45 EDT --- Successful Koji build against the devel branch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 Gareth John changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gareth.l.j...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Gareth John 2009-08-12 20:37:19 EDT --- Links are dead!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #41 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 20:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sys_basher Short Description: Hardware reliability and performance tester Owners: bjrosen Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #37 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:05:54 EDT --- There already is a F-11 branch of this package. Make sure you do a 'cvs update -d' to get new directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516341] Review Request: pcc - The Portable C Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516341 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:07:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:04:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:01:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:02:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 20:03:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516849] Review Request: espresso-ab - A boolean minimization tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:59:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509445] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-rpm - CIM access to rpm and other information about installed packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509445 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:58:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:56:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516654] Review Request: gnome-shell - Window management and application launching for GNOME [3]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 19:55:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517029] Review Request: shotwell - A photo organizer for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517029 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #8 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:34:23 EDT --- One more thing, I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 (RHEL5 doesn't support the new digest algorithms that Fedora 10/11 use). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 Gary T. Giesen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gie...@snickers.org --- Comment #9 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:33:19 EDT --- I believe the SRPM will have to be rebuilt with: %_source_filedigest_algorithm md5 %_binary_filedigest_algorithm md5 in ~/.rpmmacros in order for this to build properly for EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 Gary T. Giesen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gie...@snickers.org --- Comment #7 from Gary T. Giesen 2009-08-12 19:06:23 EDT --- I too would like to see this packaged, specifically in EPEL. Unfortunately, php-adodb does not have an EPEL branch right now, and the maintainer (abombard) is not interested in maintaning it. So there's a couple of options: 1) I would be willing to maintain the EPEL branches of php-adodb to ensure that ipplan gets packaged 2) If you're interested, you could maintain the php-adodb EPEL branch. Now, since my interest in php-adodb is only because of ipplan, I would prefer option 2, but I will do option 1 if that ensures that ipplan gets packaged. Let me know which you prefer. Also note that an updated package (4.92) is available from upstream so you may want to consider packaging that instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12 18:49:23 EDT --- Looks good. Now builds in koji and the other issues have been addressed. The only thing left is that there's now a tarball for the django-south-0.6 release but this is still building from an hg snapshot. That's not a huge issue but there are several advantages to using the tarball: * Since most people are going to be using the tarball, there's more QA effort going into the release from other ditributions and other people downloading it. * The hg snapshot includes the hg repository so it's larger than the tarball. Make that change and have the Source0: line point to the new tarball location and I'll approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695
Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #15 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12
18:44:52 EDT ---
easy_install.pth no longer conflicts. Package builds in koji.
Two problems that you can fix when you import the package:
There's a new version sqlalchemy-0.5.5 that you might want to update to before
pushing this to EPEL for the first time. 0.5.5 contains a rarely used API
breaking change so getting it into the first release will make sure that no one
is depending on the old behaviour if you need to update later.
The egg info files are executable. I believe this is a bug in
python-setuptools that I submitted a patch for and was fixed for Fedora but
it's still plaguing the RHEL5 version of setuptools. You can probably change
your chmod line like this:
- find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib} -name '*.py' | xargs chmod -x
+ chmod -R a-X $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}
Since there shouldn't be any scripts under %{python_sitelib}.
Provided you make those two changes when you import, this package is APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-08-12 18:22:57 EDT --- I think you mean this SRPM: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-3.fc11.src.rpm Checking it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517197] New: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Summary: Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com, fedora-haskell-l...@redhat.com Depends on: 517155 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell GLUT library for ghc. This is a set of bindings to the C freeglut library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||517197 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515247] Review Request: tint2 - a lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515247 --- Comment #3 from Chess Griffin 2009-08-12 17:49:04 EDT --- Sorry, I had this done last week but have not had an opportunity to post back. Updated Spec: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2.spec Updated SRPM: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tint2/tint2-0.7.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec, SRPM, and RPM are rpmlint clean. Builds cleanly in x86_64 and i386 F11 mock. Builds cleanly in dist-f11 koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1601993 Builds cleanly in dist-f12 koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1602016 I am still trying to get to the informal reviews when I have the chance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kana...@kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-08-12 17:47:49 EDT --- This piece is from codeforpeople and I had mistakenly assumed the license was MIT; according to http://rubyforge.org/projects/codeforpeople/ which lists fattr, the license should be Ruby; New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-fattr.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Lamien 2009-08-12 17:28:06 EDT --- * URL I've no preference, i just omitted to fix that url. * Non-gem support We have some codes which not use Ruby gem. for remind, my first approach was to add ruby-json to fpc and currently have no objection to add and maintain both. * gem script fixed * %check fixed and passed. New updates: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json.spec http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/rubygem-json-1.1.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #1 from Christof Damian 2009-08-12 17:25:18 EDT --- two remarks: rpmlint complains about these errors/warnings: zero-length, hidden-file-or-dir, htaccess-file . As these are files needed for symfony I don't think this should be a problem. I called the package "php-symfony-symfony", because there is a "php-channel-symfony" and this package is build from the symfony pear package. Another choice would be "php-symfony" or just "symfony" and then use the normal tgz from the symfony website which would also be possible, but this might be more in line with the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] New: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 Summary: Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris...@damian.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-symfony-symfony.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-symfony-symfony-1.2.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Symfony is a complete framework designed to optimize the development of web applications by way of several key features. For starters, it separates a web application's business rules, server logic, and presentation views. It contains numerous tools and classes aimed at shortening the development time of a complex web application. Additionally, it automates common tasks so that the developer can focus entirely on the specifics of an application. The end result of these advantages means there is no need to reinvent the wheel every time a new web application is built! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||2.10.1.1-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:52 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:56:09 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:38 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515360] Review Request: pipestat - anonymous pipe information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515360 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:58:03 EDT --- pipestat-0.3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pipestat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.5.0-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.34.9-1.fc10 |0.34.9-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|2.10.1.1-1.fc11 |2.10.1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:57:24 EDT --- dansguardian-2.10.1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:56:36 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-3.fc10 |0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516327] Review Request: perl-latest - Use the latest Perl features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516327 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:58:10 EDT --- perl-latest-0.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] New: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Summary: Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tg...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/mip6d/mipv6-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://www.infradead.org/~tgr/mip6d/mipv6-daemon-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain reachable while moving around in the IPv6 Internet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502388] Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:54:23 EDT --- mingw32-enchant-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4-3.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.34.9-1.fc10 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469470] Review Request: mausezahn - A fast versatile packet generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469470 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:52:01 EDT --- mausezahn-0.34.9-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512627] Review Request: MiniCopier - Graphical copy manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512627 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 16:53:17 EDT --- MiniCopier-0.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #40 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 16:41:58 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.20-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm I think this should do it. I've installed the koji tools, signed up for an account, uploaded my public key, and installed the cert. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136 --- Comment #2 from Cédric OLIVIER 2009-08-12 16:27:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=357233) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=357233) mock build log I can't generate any rpm for gettext-commons with mock (tested on fc10 and fc11) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515049] Review Request: dvisvgm - Converts DVI files to SVG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515049 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 15:49:56 EDT --- dvisvgm-0.8.1-5.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dvisvgm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EL-5/FEDORA-EPEL-2009-0276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.2-3.fc10 |3.2-3.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-12 15:50:11 EDT --- zikula-module-scribite-3.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Victor G. Vasilyev changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Victor G. Vasilyev 2009-08-12 15:40:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cobertura Short Description: Java tool for calculating the test coverage Owners: victorv Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 15:20:36 EDT --- We can't live with the icons as is. Either remove them or replace them. (We should also stop using them on publictest15 asap.) Mo and the Fedora Design Team might be able to help whip up some freely licensed replacements for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #8 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-12 15:15:25 EDT --- I took the time to contact upstream over their mailing list, trying to explain the issue at hand and how to best solve it. I'll wait for an answer and then get back to this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #49 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 15:00:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > The only remaining issue I'm unsure is about shipping the pre-compiled > binaries. Sure, they are not in the binary rpm, but they are still in the > source rpm. Is this OK or is there any need to re-package the upstream tgz > without them? Well, if you know the licensing for all of the pre-compiled binaries and you are 100% sure that we have permission to freely redistribute them without restriction, you can leave them in the tarball (and delete the files in %prep). If you're not 100% sure, make a new tarball that doesn't have them. Either way, you should ask upstream to consider removing the pre-built binaries from the source tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517155] New: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-OpenGL.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-OpenGL-2.2.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell OpenGL library for ghc. These provide bindings to the OpenGL graphics library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-12 14:54:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: blazeblogger Short Description: A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line Owners: sdz Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:45:40 EDT --- Technically, yes, but the WTFPL is a ... poorly drafted license. MIT achieves the same end result and is far less offensive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(josephsm...@gmail ||.com) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-12 14:45:09 EDT --- The legal blocker nonwithstanding, there's still been no response to my review commentary in over a month now. Setting needinfo; I will close this ticket soon if there is no response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #48 from Christian Krause 2009-08-12 14:44:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > Looks like there are no outstanding issues for FE-Legal here, lifting it. > > If I'm wrong, just let me know. :) Yeah, the licensing issue should be solved. The only remaining issue I'm unsure is about shipping the pre-compiled binaries. Sure, they are not in the binary rpm, but they are still in the source rpm. Is this OK or is there any need to re-package the upstream tgz without them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mathys 2009-08-12 14:38:08 EDT --- spot: Wouldn't the WTFPL be much closer to 'public domain' and be fine for integration into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #47 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:30:42 EDT --- Looks like there are no outstanding issues for FE-Legal here, lifting it. If I'm wrong, just let me know. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397
Bryan O'Sullivan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||b...@serpentine.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com
Flag|needinfo?(peter...@redhat.c |fedora-review+
|om) |
--- Comment #7 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-12 13:07:47
EDT ---
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review.
All pass cleanly, with a few warnings that are expected given Haskell packaging
issues.
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] .
Yes.
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
Yes.
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
BSD.
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license. [3]
Yes.
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
Yes.
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Yes.
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
Yes.
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
Yes.
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Yes.
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
N/A.
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
N/A.
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. [11]
N/A.
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. [12]
Yes.
# MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. [13]
Yes.
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line. [14]
Yes.
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15]
Yes.
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16]
Yes.
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17]
Yes.
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18]
Yes.
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
Yes.
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19]
Yes.
# MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20]
N/A.
# MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability). [21]
N/A.
# MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package. [19]
N/A.
# MUST: In the vast ma
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433 Martin Gieseking changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12 14:26:17 EDT --- Since the package is clean, I can already finish the review here. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516433] Review Request: blazeblogger - A simple to use but capable CMS for the command line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516433
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-08-12
14:24:58 EDT ---
Hello Sebastian,
this is a small, pretty clean package. I couldn't find any issues that have to
be fixed. Here comes my review:
$ rpmlint blazeblogger*.rpm
blazeblogger.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/blaze-config
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
The warning is expected and can safely be ignored.
-
keys used in following checklist:
[+] OK
[#] OK, not applicable
[-] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
- GPLv3 (executables) and GFDL (docs)
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
COPYING and FDL listed in %doc
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL.
- md5 hash is 79b240e196cdb2f2a765e4ef10546163
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[#] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture,...
- it's a Perl package that is expected to work on all architectures
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
- no explicit build dependencies required
[#] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
- no locales
[#] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[#] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[#] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- no directories created
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[#] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
- no large docs
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application.
[#] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[#] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[#] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability).
[#] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[#] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
[#] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[#] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
- no GUI
[#] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
- doesn't own any directories
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROO
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:27:36 EDT --- The short answer is that French citizens cannot put works into the Public Domain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_copyright_law#Moral_rights "Any agreement to waive an author's moral rights is null and void, although the author cannot be forced to protect his work." Basically, what this means is that we need the AOP Alliance to actually give us licensing terms, even if they're extremely permissive ones. I would suggest the MIT license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #39 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-12 14:25:49 EDT --- There are two forms of the open command and I'm using both which is why I wasn't using a prototype on it. I've just changed the second instance to pass a 0 arg for the don't care term. I'm going to have to run the sys_basher disk tests to make sure that this doesn't effect anything. If it works I'll create a 1.20 release which will resolve the warning. I've taken care of the other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509658] Review Request: h5py - A Python interface to the HDF5 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 14:20:42 EDT --- The proposed License tag of "BSD and (BSD or GPLv2+)" with a comment explaining the situation seems like the correct solution to me. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517144] New: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517144 Summary: Review Request: ghc-HUnit - unit testing support for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-HUnit.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-HUnit-1.2.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell HUnit library for ghc. HUnit is a unit testing framework for Haskell, inspired by the JUnit tool for Java. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517141] New: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517141 Summary: Review Request: ghc-fgl - functional graph library for Haskell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: b...@serpentine.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? Spec: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-fgl.spec SRPM: http://www.serpentine.com/bos/files/ghc-fgl-5.4.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides the Haskell fgl library for ghc. This is a library of types and functions for addressing graph problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-08-12 14:04:41 EDT --- Excellent. I see no further blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Feel free to request cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal)| --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-12 13:58:46 EDT --- Yeah, looks okay to me. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-08-12 13:51:16 EDT --- Looks good now, approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516311] Review Request: ueagle-atm-firmware123 - Firmwares for usb adsl modems based on Eagle I, II and III chipsets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516311 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-12 13:39:34 EDT --- Could you point out where you find the license described? I don't see it in the tarball, nor at the upstream web site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513848] Review Request: fbzx - A ZX Spectrum emulator for FrameBuffer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513848
--- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-08-12 13:32:04
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/fbzx.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/fbzx-2.1b-2.fc10.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Icon is now installed into %%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps
- Added missing desktop-file-utils to BuildRequires
- Added missing hicolor-icon-theme to Requires
- Preserved timestamps
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-08-12 13:23:55 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466
--- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 13:23:40
EDT ---
And here's the review of this package:
rpmlint output:
sys_basher.src: W: strange-permission sys_basher.spec 0770
sys_basher.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.9-1 ['1.1.19-1.fc11',
'1.1.19-1']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Still, the spec file you used to generate the srpm has strange permissions. Run
chmod 644 on it and regenerate the srpm. Fix the version in the changelog as
well.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK
- You need to fix the source URL:
$ spectool -g sys_basher.spec
--2009-08-12 20:20:24--
http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.19.tar.gz
Resolving www.polybus.com... 38.113.1.181
Connecting to www.polybus.com|38.113.1.181|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2009-08-12 20:20:25 ERROR 404: Not Found.
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
- During compilation I get
sys_disk.c: In function 'fileWrite':
sys_disk.c:150: warning: implicit declaration of function 'open'
you might want to fix this.
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-12
13:21:33 EDT ---
For -2:
The following issues on comment 2 are not yet addressed:
(In reply to comment #2)
> * Miscs
> - In comments or %changelog, please use %% instead of % to avoid
> macros expansion.
>
> * Files
> - Please example what package should own the directory
> %_datadir/xrdp
* Naming
- Would you clearify if this is the "post" version of 0.5.0
or "pre" version of 0.5.0 (i.e. has 0.5.0 already been
released)? If this is the "pre" version. the release
number should be "0.X.%{cvs_related_tag}%{?dist}":
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
! Requires
- Note that Fedora tightvnc-server has "Provides: vnc-server", so
even on Fedora "Requires: vnc-server" should be enough.
* Macros
---
#install /etc/rc.d/init.d/xrdp, use %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d because On
releases older
---
- You can use:
---
%{!?initddir: %global initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d}
---
! Creating rsakeys.ini
- (First of all, please use macros: /etc -> %_sysconfdir)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
- The following command
%install
xrdp-keygen xrdp %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
won't work because xrdp is not yet installed (under the system
structure). If rsakyes.ini is to be created here, something like:
%install
.
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/xrdp
export PATH=%{buildroot}%{_bindir}:$PATH
xrdp-keygen xrdp %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
chmod 644 %{buildroot}/etc/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
is needed.
However, while I am not familiar with xrdp, is it expected that
all machines using Fedora have the same rsakeys.ini? (again
I don't know well how this rsakeys.ini is used)
If not, this script should be moved to %post (and some hacks
like marking rsakeys.int as %verify(not md5,) or so is
needed).
* sysinit
[r...@localhost ~]# ps auwwx | grep xrdp
root 15211 0.0 0.1 5332 824 pts/5S+ 02:09 0:00 grep xrdp
[r...@localhost ~]# service xrdp status
xrdp is running
- ??
[r...@localhost ~]# service xrdp start
Starting: xrdp and sesman . . [r...@localhost ~]#
- There should be the output like [OK] and the cursor should be
moved to the new line.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515614] Review Request: python-offtrac - Trac xmlrpc library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515614 Jesse Keating changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jesse Keating 2009-08-12 13:20:24 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-offtrac New Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-12 13:05:03 EDT --- It's described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join but first you need to get sponsored in the packager group, which means you have to do a couple of informal package reviews for me. Please review only bugs not marked with FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
