[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 01:59:33 EDT --- hi, new spec: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste.spec new srpm: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/fpaste-0.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm rest of the mock build stuff at : http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/fpaste/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sunda...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 02:04:33 EDT --- Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 02:27:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: fpaste Short Description: A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||srinivas_ramana...@dell.com --- Comment #10 from srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com 2009-08-13 03:06:24 EDT --- Implemented the changes suggested. Final rpmlint output: # rpmlint sblim-cmpi-network.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint ../SRPMS/sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. # rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-network-* sblim-cmpi-network-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-network-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Fixed these warnings. Spec URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network.spec SRPM URL: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-cmpi-network/sblim-cmpi-network-1.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507 Christopher Curran ccur...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccur...@redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Christopher Curran ccur...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 03:10:04 EDT --- IANAL but given the various interpretations of good and evil I think this is not an issue. All we need is to find an appropriate thesis which shows good and evil do not exist or that good and evil are overlapping variables. If good can be evil in context and the equivalent event evil not good then there is no problem as the license negates itself. I say that it is moral to accept his software as sufficiently free and save discussions of morality for the pub, where real philosophy occurs. Chris -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-13
03:58:46 EDT ---
Approving, provided:
- Please add the following text file as %doc:
http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt
(In the spec file add this with _full URL_ like
--
URL:http://rubyforge.org/projects/codeforpeople/
Source0:http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
Source1:http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt
...
...
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gemdir}
...
...
install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/
...
...
%files
...
%doc %{geminstdir}/license
--
- If we say the license is the same as Ruby's, on Fedora this
means it is licensed under GPLv2 or Ruby (on Fedora Ruby license
means the lines below or the conditions below: of
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt), so please
change the license tag to GPLv2 or Ruby (not GPLv2+ or)
-
This package (rubygem-fattr) is APPROVED by mtasaka
-
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516578] Review Request: hyphen-fo - Faroese hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516578 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-13 04:35:45 EDT --- Okay. This package (rubygem-json) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-13 04:41:20 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516336] Review Request: mmapper - Graphical MUME mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516336 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-13 04:41:15 EDT --- mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mmapper-2.0.4-2.final2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226069] Merge Review: libXevie
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226069 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226068] Merge Review: libXdmcp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226068 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226066] Merge Review: libXcursor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226066 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226071] Merge Review: libXfixes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226071 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226067] Merge Review: libXdamage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226067 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226086] Merge Review: libXres
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226086 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512505] Review Request: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein - eZ Components AuthenticationDatabaseTiein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512505 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 05:11:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-ezc-AuthenticationDatabaseTiein Short Description: Provides a Database filter for the Authentication component Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512506] Review Request: php-ezc-Feed - eZ Components Feed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512506 Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Guillaume Kulakowski llaum...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 05:12:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-ezc-Feed Short Description: This component handles parsing and creating RSS1, RSS2 and ATOM feeds Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226065] Merge Review: libXcomposite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226065 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510943] Review Request: ipplan - Web-based IP address manager and tracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510943 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-13 06:46:30 EDT --- Gary, I have submitted a request to maintain php-adodb for EPEL, I will work on bumping ipplan to 4.92 soon. If you would be so kind as to look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 if you can, which is holding up php-layers-menu which in turn will hold up ipplan. Thanks in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825
--- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 06:59:25
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
There is an issue with bickley-0.4.pc on 64 bit:
prefix=/usr
exec_prefix=${prefix}
libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib
includedir=${prefix}/include
libdir should be libdir64
The patch I provided has now been committed to upstream git. Will be in the
next release.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-13 07:02:12 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515143] Review Request: mtkbabel - Program to Operate the i-Blue 747 GPS Data Logger
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515143 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-13 07:02:06 EDT --- mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mtkbabel-0.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Bug 515081 depends on bug 515080, which changed state. Bug 515080 Summary: Review Request: R-preprocessCore - A collection of pre-processing functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515080 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2009-08-13 07:11:42 EDT --- License tag has been corrected in the cvs: http://fgc.lsi.umich.edu/cgi-bin/blosxom3.cgi/affy R-preprocessCore is in stable now :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #43 from Joshua Rosen bjro...@polybus.com 2009-08-13 07:18:48 EDT --- Hoefully I've gotten the spec right this time. Let me know what you want me to look at. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466
--- Comment #45 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 07:46:24
EDT ---
Ugh, and the BuildRoot tag is wrong. Use
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #44 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 07:45:42 EDT --- OK: rpmlint output is clean NEEDSWORK: source does not match upstream: $ md5sum sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz ../SOURCES/sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz 729bdb57a9477b9d3c0fdef6bfc31ba9 sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz 18b02243dde1bef9560016a947647728 ../SOURCES/sys_basher-1.1.20.tar.gz ** Regenerate the SRPM using the correct tarball, or put the correct tarball on the web site. Do the informal reviews ASAP, give links to them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504424] Review Request: rubygem-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Xavier Lamien lxt...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 07:45:45 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-json Short Description: A JSON implementation in Ruby Owners: laxathom Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191
Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@topdog.za.net
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-13
07:52:35 EDT ---
I think you can fix the .htaccess errors by using an apache config file
%{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/symfony for all the configurations provided by the
.htaccess. This is recommended because some sites will not allow overriding
configurations using .htaccess files.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517300] New: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Summary: Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobin...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ccss.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/ccss-0.5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libccss offers a simple API to * Parse CSS stylesheets. * Query for style configurations on a user-provided document representation. * Draw query results onto cairo surfaces. Original package review (from 2 months ago) for libccss is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Announcement of version 0.5.0 including the dropping of lib from the naming: http://lwn.net/Articles/346658/ The above package is very similar to the previous package with some updates to current packaging recommendations and splitting out the developers docs to a -docs noarch sub package and the appropriate provides/obsoletes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-13 08:38:32 EDT --- I don't think they need to be in the Apache configuration, because they are either related to tests: ./test/functional/fixtures/project/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfPropelPlugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess ./lib/plugins/sfCompat10Plugin/test/functional/fixtures/web/.htaccess or are used on project creation as a template. ./lib/task/generator/skeleton/project/web/.htaccess The symfony library directory itself is usually not accessible from the web anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 --- Comment #5 from Diego Búrigo Zacarão dieg...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 08:42:28 EDT --- Done! SPEC: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south.spec SRPM: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/Django-south/Django-south-0.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515308] Review Request: usbmuxd - Daemon for communicating with Apple's iPod Touch and iPhone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515308 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 08:42:19 EDT --- And now in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-13 08:45:35 EDT --- Oh okay thats fine then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||yan...@declera.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|yan...@declera.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com 2009-08-13 09:14:38 EDT --- Diff looks good. Builds in mock. Provides/Obsoletes work as expected. APPROVED again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517300] Rename Request: ccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517300 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 09:28:40 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ccss Short Description: A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #50 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-08-13 09:42:07 EDT --- Well, I got answer from Karl J. Runge. Since x11vnc 0.9.4 the full java source is available: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=500970 So, I think we can redistribute its in src.rpm and delete binaries at built time. Also I ask him to devide x11vnc to separate packages with viewer applets - he answer what not interested in doing that upstream. I think we may leave all as is now. Tom, thank you for the check and lifting FE-legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455507] Review Request: jsmin - JavaScript minifier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455507 --- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 10:10:06 EDT --- Red Hat Legal (who are lawyers) disagree. Its a bad license, with unenforceable clauses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] New: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Summary: Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: npajk...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp.spec SRPM: http://package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm PATCH: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-config.patch Description: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network * Sending and receiving messages in irssi's query windows * A roster with contact resource tracking (contact list) * Contact management (add, remove, manage subscriptions) * Tab completion of commands, JIDs and resources * Many extensions supported (XEP) including Multi-User Chat (MUC) * Support for multiple accounts * Unicode support (UTF-8) * SSL support * ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510734] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510734 --- Comment #51 from Christian Krause c...@plauener.de 2009-08-13 11:08:19 EDT --- Pavel, thanks for asking upstream regarding this issue. Since it looks like that most of the issues are addressed, I'll do the complete review on the weekend. Please apologize the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunda...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sunda...@redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 11:27:12 EDT --- Remove the buildroot definition and you dont need to clean it in %install section anymore. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Add a comment explaining what the patch does and it's upstream status https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #46 from Joshua Rosen bjro...@polybus.com 2009-08-13 11:25:57 EDT --- http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher.spec http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.21-1.fc11.src.rpm http://www.polybus.com/sys_basher/sys_basher-1.1.21-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm I've created a script that runs rpmlint, md5sums and spectool so I shouldn't have anymore problems with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 --- Comment #14 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-08-13 11:40:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Remove the buildroot definition and you dont need to clean it in %install section anymore. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag To be more precise: It's is only not needed, if the package is not going into EPEL 5 or 4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] New: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Summary: Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: saga...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package adds a Haskell major mode to Emacs. The Haskell mode supports font locking, declaration scanning, documentation, indentation, and interaction with Hugs and GHCi. Links to koji builds: Fedora 10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1603637 Fedora 11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1603639 Note:This is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jwil...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 12:14:59 EDT --- I've started reviewing the package, have a few spec changes to recommend, will get some more details in here after lunch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||saga...@gmail.com Version|rawhide |11 Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 12:42:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-sqlalchemy0.5 Short Description: Modular and flexible ORM library for python Owners: lmacken, toshio Branches: F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #47 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 12:47:52 EDT --- OK, I think this package is good to go now. But I won't approve it formally yet, you have to do the informal reviews first so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 13:13:32 EDT --- #01 It should be: Patch0: Patch1: with capital 'P'. #02 Don't rename the source file. Although the latest sources say haskell-mode.tar.gz, please use the exact version: haskell-mode-2.4.tar.gz You have mentioned the same in the .spec file as Version: 2.4 #03 You should add the -b .patch extension when applying %patch -p1 #04 In the Makefile patch, substitute install command with a variable, like: INSTALL = /usr/bin/install #05 Put the 'clean' target in the Makefile as the last target, at the bottom. #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check for the same in other files. #07 Don't include ~ files in the source package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #48 from Joshua Rosen bjro...@polybus.com 2009-08-13 13:33:52 EDT --- OK let me know what you want me to review. Also I have a CentOS question. In installed the rpmdevtools on CentOS5.3 and built the package. The distro name was not included in the rpm name, sys_basher-1.1.21-1.i386.rpm Is there something different that I need to do on CentOS to get it to build the packages with the distro name included? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-13 13:47:20 EDT --- Is this essentially the same thing as bug 351441? Do the same issues which caused the closure of that review still apply? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486721] Review Request: beagle-xesam - Xesam adaptor for Beagle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486721 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516779] Review Request: libbitmask - multi-word bitmask library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516779 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516782] Review Request: libcpuset - Processor and memory placement library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516782 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466
--- Comment #49 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 13:50:51
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #48)
OK let me know what you want me to review.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess
Have your pick from the review list at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/ReviewRequests - unassigned
review requests
but please review only bugs not tagged with FE-NEEDSPONSOR.
Also I have a CentOS question. In installed the rpmdevtools on CentOS5.3 and
built the package. The distro name was not included in the rpm name,
sys_basher-1.1.21-1.i386.rpm
Is there something different that I need to do on CentOS to get it to build
the
packages with the distro name included?
Actually I'm not sure which package ships the %{dist} macro, I tried to search
for it today. But if you build the package in mock for EPEL it will get the
correct value. (And the Fedora build system uses mock.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 Jason Landstrom jjlandst...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jjlandst...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Jason Landstrom jjlandst...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 13:51:13 EDT --- I'm a newbie running Fedora 11 trying to run xfce4-screenshooter. Everything works great except when I select a region with copy to clipboard I am unable to paste it into OpenOffice Impress like I can with gnome screenshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-13
13:58:48 EDT ---
For -0.1:
* _initddir
- Well, actually the macro written at the top should be
_initddir, not initddir, sorry...
%{!?_initddir: %global _initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d}
* Macros
- If you want to use %__install and %__rm, please use
%__sed, %__make for consistency (and you also use
rm)
* Directory ownership issue
- Still the directory %_datadir/xrdp itself is not owned
by any packages.
* About %_sysconfdir/xrdp/rsakeys.ini:
- You have to use %verify(not ), like:
-
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
# rsakeys.ini
touch %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
chmod 06?? %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
%files
%verify(not size md5 mtime) %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
-
* By the way, when I try xrdp-keygen, rsakeys.ini
is created with 0600 permission.
- If this permission (0600) is correct, %attr(0600,root,root)
is also needed.
- If the permission should be 0644 or so, %post scriptlet
needs fixing.
( I think anyway changing permission on %post explicitly
is preferred )
* Currently rsakeys.ini is recreated every time xrdp
is upgraded. Is this correct?
If not, something like
-
[ -s %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini ] || \
xrdp-keygen xrdp %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini /dev/null
chmod 06?? %{_sysconfdir}/xrdp/rsakeys.ini
-
is needed so that rsakeys.ini won't be overwritten.
( I used -s here, not -f, because at first install,
0 size rsakeys.ini is installed )
* Note that I think /dev/null is okay, however /dev/null 21
should be avoided. If this command outputs some errors, we
should check them and examine what was wrong.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-13 14:15:27 EDT --- This closed review is not the place for bugs. ;) Please file a new bug on the xfce4-screenshooter package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #50 from Joshua Rosen bjro...@polybus.com 2009-08-13 14:37:59 EDT --- I have a review question. I've downloaded the files for 481030, pmd-emacs and fetched the source file using spectool -g. Are all the sources including patches required to be in that file or is reviewer supposed to install the SRPM? Does the source archive format matter? This package was supplies as a .zip instead of a .tar.gz or a .tar.bz2. Zip is not a standard way to archive files on a *nix system although it's fully supported. Also should I be posting my review comments on that bug report given that I'm doing this as a learning experience? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-13 14:44:34 EDT --- Patches will be in the src.rpm; if all you have is the spec, you will generally not have what you need to build the package although in many situations it's enough. We generally have to consume what upstream provides when it comes to archive format. When given a choice, we prefer whatever is smaller. If upstream provides a .zip, we use a .zip. (And this is by far not uncommon, and certainly nothing against the package.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #52 from Joshua Rosen bjro...@polybus.com 2009-08-13 14:59:23 EDT --- One more question. Is there a way to unpack an SRPM into a local directory rather than installing it or should I just do this inside of a VM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #53 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 15:13:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #52) One more question. Is there a way to unpack an SRPM into a local directory rather than installing it or should I just do this inside of a VM? I do all my reviews in mock. It uses a chroot to build the packages, so your build directory is clean. Another option is to have a second user on your system with which you build the packages (better this way, so you don't end up blowing all your files away when building a crappily written spec file). Just run $ rpmdev-setuptree and build the SRPM with $ rpmbuild --rebuild package.src.rpm Or you can build using your normal user name, this way your SPEC, SOURCES and RPMS directories just get messier with every package you review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478659] Review Request: xfce4-screenshooter - Screenshot utility for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478659 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com 2009-08-13 15:16:17 EDT --- Filed as bug 517408. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517409] New: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Summary: Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dieg...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-authority/django-authority-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a Django app for generic per-object permissions, custom permission checks and permission requests. It also includes view decorators and template tags for ease of use. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517412] New: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Summary: Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dieg...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-profile/django-profile-0.6-0.1.20090813svnr420.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a user private zone/profile management application, allowing the user to take control of his account and insert information about him in his profile. Inside this package you will find a demo application which will show you what can be accomplished with the rest of the utilities included in the package. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517410] New: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Summary: Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dieg...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-piston/django-piston.spec SRPM URL: http://diegobz.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-piston/django-piston-0.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Piston is a relatively small Django application that lets you create application programming interfaces (API) for your sites. This package is needed to suppress a dependency for the new Transifex 0.7-RC1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517191] Review Request: php-symfony-symfony - Open-Source PHP Web Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517191 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-13 15:23:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Is this essentially the same thing as bug 351441? Do the same issues which caused the closure of that review still apply? I didn't see that bug. But I guess they still apply. I had a quick grep through the sources and found these in the vendor directories: ./lib/plugins/sfCompat10Plugin/lib/vendor: phpmailer ./lib/plugins/sfDoctrinePlugin/lib/vendor: doctrine ./lib/plugins/sfPropelPlugin/lib/vendor: phing, propel, propel-generator ./lib/vendor: lime - phpmailer, phing, propel and propel-generator are already available in Fedora. - doctrine isn't. - lime is just used by symfony anyway, as far as I know. It is just one file. Personally I think it is not a big problem, because symfony requires certain versions of the libraries. For example if I create a doctrine package of the current 1.1 it probably won't work with symfony 1.2. I would suggest bringing symfony into Fedora as is, with the plan to remove these duplicated libraries in one of the next releases where possible. I think this was how it was done in other packages which bundled libraries. Then I probably would: - remove the sfCompat10Plugin with the ancient phpmailer completely. - create the doctrine package, which I planned anyway. - check if symmfony works with the fedora propel phing packages. If it doesn't I would remove that plugin too. - create a patch to make symfony look at the default library locations instead of vendor directories. Thank god I don't have to think about EPEL, because RHEL is still stuck at PHP 5.1 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517416] New: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416 Summary: Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: serein...@online.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl.spec SRPM URL: http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/awl-0.37-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains Andrew's Web Libraries. This is a set of hopefully lightweight libraries for handling a variety of useful things for web programming, including: - Session management - User management - DB Records - Simple reporting - DB Schema Updating - iCalendar parsing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481030] Review Request: pmd-emacs - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-13 15:58:44 EDT --- Taking over review. Joshua Rosen will perform an informal review first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 16:32:32 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de --- Comment #34 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2009-08-13 16:33:36 EDT --- SPEC: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba.spec SRPM: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/zorba/zorba-0.9.5-7.fc11.src.rpm I'd also like to see zorba packaged for Fedora. Unfortunately, the review process seems to have stalled. To keep it alive, I digged into the source and fixed the build problems. There are still some spec file issues to be resolved but that should be doable. Paul, if you can afford the time, please continue working on this package. :) $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i586/zorba-* zorba.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so.0.9.5 e...@glibc_2.0 zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/options_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/path_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/zorbastring_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/c/html/options_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/properties__base_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/simplestorec_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/simplestore_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/identtypes_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libzorba_simplestore.so zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/smart__ptr_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/debugger__exception_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/store__consts_8h__incl.map zorba.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/zorba-0.9.5/cxx/html/version_8h__incl.map zorba-python.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized zorba Python module for zorba zorba-python.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/_zorba_api.so zorba-python.i586: W: no-documentation zorba-ruby.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized zorba Ruby module zorba-ruby.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/i386-linux/zorba_api.so zorba-ruby.i586: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183
--- Comment #2 from Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 16:37:44 EDT
---
Okay, so a few issues to work out...
1) without solid justification, the initscript should not be enabled by
default, it should be up to the user to enable it.
2) in one place, the initscript says 'config: /etc/mip6d.conf', then later you
test for /etc/sysconfig/mip6, then you source /etc/sysconfig/mip6d. And the
package has no config file whatsoever mentioned anywhere. :)
To resolve the enabled-by-default and three different names for the config, I'd
suggest:
--- mip6d.init.orig 2009-08-13 16:09:39.219807916 -0400
+++ mip6d.init 2009-08-13 16:22:46.888931134 -0400
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
#
# mip6d Start script for the Mobile IPv6 daemon
#
-# chkconfig: 2345 55 25
+# chkconfig: - 55 25
# description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain \
# reachable while moving around in the IPv6 Internet.
# processname: mip6d
-# config: /etc/mip6d.conf
+# config: /etc/sysconfig/mip6d
#
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: mipv6-daemon
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
# Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network
# Should-Start: $syslog
# Should-Stop: $network $syslog
-# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
+# Default-Start:
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Start and stop Mobile IPV6 daemon
# Description: The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
# Source function library.
. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions
-if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/mip6 ]; then
+if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/mip6d ]; then
. /etc/sysconfig/mip6d
fi
On to the spec file itself...
1) as previously mentioned, the config file isn't accounted for anywhere in the
spec, and it needs to be, complete with %config(noreplace) labelling.
2) missing a chkconfig --add %post call
3) BuildRequires: /etc/init.d looks bogus, just flex and bison should be
sufficient.
4) 'Requires: initscripts, chkconfig' should be sufficient for Requires.
5) Generally, you don't want to inclue INSTALL files in %doc, because they're
irrelevant for a packaged install. Also, traditionally, %doc is the first line
after %defattr in the %files section.
6) use %{_initrddir} instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d/
7) %attr shouldn't be necessary on the initscript, you already install -m755'd
it.
I'd suggest the following spec file changes:
--- mipv6-daemon-orig.spec 2009-08-13 11:36:05.068932552 -0400
+++ mipv6-daemon.spec 2009-08-13 16:26:20.352931018 -0400
@@ -11,9 +11,8 @@ Source1: mip6d.init
Patch0: mipv6-daemon-header-fix.patch
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
-BuildRequires: flex bison /etc/init.d
-Requires: initscripts
-Requires(post): chkconfig = 0.9, /sbin/service
+BuildRequires: flex bison
+Requires: initscripts, chkconfig
%description
The mobile IPv6 daemon allows nodes to remain
@@ -31,8 +30,10 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d
-install -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/rc.d/init.d/mip6d
+install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}
+install -m755 %{SOURCE1} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_initrddir}/mip6d
+install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig
+touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mip6d
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
@@ -44,6 +45,9 @@ then
/sbin/chkconfig --del mip6d
fi
+%post
+/sbin/chkconfig --add mip6d
+
%postun
if [ $1 -ge 1 ]; then
/sbin/service mip6d condrestart /dev/null 21 ||:
@@ -51,12 +55,13 @@ fi
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
+%doc AUTHORS BUGS COPYING NEWS README README.IPsec THANKS extras
+%ghost %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/sysconfig/mip6d
+%{_initrddir}/mip6d
%{_sbindir}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%{_mandir}/man5/*
%{_mandir}/man7/*
-%attr(0755,root,root) /etc/rc.d/init.d/mip6d
-%doc AUTHORS BUGS COPYING INSTALL INSTALL.kernel NEWS README README.IPsec
THANKS extras
%changelog
* Tue Aug 12 2009 Thomas Graf tgraf at, redhat.com 0.4-1
With these changes applied, the only noise I get from rpmlint is a complaint
about the initscript name not matching the package name, which we can ignore.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 16:39:21 EDT --- Oh, I just did a touch and %ghost for the config file, but if you have a default config file (one of the example files maybe?) you want to drop in place, just with all the options commented out, that might not be a bad idea either, so that people know what the config file is supposed to look like without going hunting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-08-13 16:48:29 EDT --- Thanks; New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-fattr.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-fattr Short Description: Fatter attribute for Ruby Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516547] Review Request: Django-south - Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516547 Diego Búrigo Zacarão dieg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Diego Búrigo Zacarão dieg...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 17:03:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: Django-south Short Description: Intelligent schema migrations for Django apps Owners: diegobz Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: diegobz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516364] Review Request: xrdp - Open source remote desktop protocol (RDP) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516364 --- Comment #11 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-08-13 17:42:10 EDT --- done http://ispbrasil.com.br/xrdp/xrdp-0.5.0-0.2.20090811cvs.fc12.src.rpm http://ispbrasil.com.br/xrdp/xrdp.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rrel...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rrel...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #11 from Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com 2009-08-13 17:57:32 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu praveen_palad...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032
Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||needinfo?(rrel...@redhat.co
||m)
--- Comment #14 from Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 18:03:19 EDT
---
1. URL - points to a generic NSS page. Is there a worry that mozilla may move
the actual FTP site around. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL for examples. I believe this
tar was pulled for an NSS cvs tag and then the split.sh was ran on it. The wiki
has examples for this case (you've partially included the right thing with the
comment and conclusing of the nss.split.sh script.
2. You are creating a new empty directory %{libdir}/nss3 is there a reason (if
so comment it, if not remove it).
3. the %define nspr-version should technically be %global
4. uncomment the Requires: nss-util in the nss-util-devel package section.
5. This last on is the biggest one: The issue showed up in multiple locations,
including rpmlint.
In the %build you are creating nss-util.pc and nss-util-config and placing them
into the build root. This is a non-standard use of the build root, and requires
the first command in %install which clears the buildroot to be removed. A
better way would be to create nss-util.pc and nss-util-config in %build and
place the results in mozilla/dist (where NSS build results are placed), then
install them into their final location in the %include.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(emald...@redhat.c ||om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032
Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(rrel...@redhat.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #15 from Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 18:05:47 EDT
---
rpmlint output:
bobs-laptop(79) rpmlint nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc11.test.1.src.rpm
nss-util.src: W: strange-permission nss-split-util.sh 0775
nss-util.src:97: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig
nss-util.src:104: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/nss-util.pc
nss-util.src:114: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}
nss-util.src:122: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config
nss-util.src:124: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
and just for the .spec, which has better line numbers
rpmlint nss-util.spec
nss-util.spec:100: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig
nss-util.spec:107: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/nss-util.pc
nss-util.spec:117: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %{__mkdir_p}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}
nss-util.spec:125: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config
nss-util.spec:127: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build chmod 755
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/nss-util-config
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||allis...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|allis...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 18:30:26 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||allis...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|allis...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 18:29:53 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517410] Review Request: django-piston - A mini-framework for Django for creating RESTful APIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517410 Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||allis...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|allis...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-08-13 18:29:10 EDT --- I'll make review soon as posible :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(emald...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #16 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 20:10:44 EDT --- Bob, Please check the updated .spec and src.rpm files at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util.spec and at http://fedorapeople.org/~emaldonado/nss-util/devel/nss-util-3.12.3.99.3-8.fc12.test.1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(emald...@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #17 from Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 20:36:31 EDT --- neither the original nss, not this package ever puts any shared libraries in /usr/lib/nss3, so you should remove the creation of that directory and it's ownership in the .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(emald...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #18 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 20:55:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Line and comments above removed. Updated the .spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515032] Review Request: nss-util - Utilities for Network Security Services (NSS) and Softoken module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515032 Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Bob Relyea rrel...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 21:04:15 EDT --- OK, much better. ACCEPT. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccha...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 21:51:22 EDT --- $ rpmlint irssi-xmpp.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. FYI (not mandatory), you could use marcos like %__rm and %__make to replace rm and make. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-08-13 21:55:20 EDT --- mock failed: DEBUG util.py:256: ## DEBUG util.py:256: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/irssi-xmpp-0.50.tar.gz;4a84c470: cpio: read failed - Invalid argument DEBUG util.py:256: error: /builddir/build/originals/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm cannot be installed DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-08-13 22:01:44 EDT --- $ rpmlint perl-DBIx-Simple.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517021] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Simple - Easy-to-use OO interface to DBI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517021 Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-08-13 22:05:05 EDT --- mock done successfully: INFO: Done(perl-DBIx-Simple-1.32-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 1 minutes 28 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-08-13 22:09:53 EDT --- tokyocabinet is still 1.4.23 at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k...@kaio.me --- Comment #1 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-08-13 22:17:16 EDT --- rpmlint is done: $ rpmlint viewnior.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Caio 'kaio' Chance k...@kaio.me 2009-08-13 22:19:32 EDT --- mock is done: INFO: Done(viewnior-0.6-1.fc12.src.rpm) Config(fedora-rawhide-i386) 4 minutes 35 seconds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
