[Bug 517776] Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||508351 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||517776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #11 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2009-08-17 02:03:57 EDT --- I also packaged gettext-ant-tasks at : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 --- Comment #12 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2009-08-17 02:06:08 EDT --- I have updated the josm package with svn version 1788 and adding josm-translation. Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/release2/josm.spec SRPM URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1788/release2/josm-0-1.1788svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #6 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) fed...@alexhudson.com 2009-08-17 02:20:17 EDT --- Pong Jussi - I'm so sorry, I missed your previous ping! For some reason, this bug didn't come up as needing attention from me. I have an updated csync .spec, but I haven't addressed all the issues yet: I should have this done in the next week or so. Thanks for being so persistent, it's much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517776] New: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517776 Summary: Review Request: gettext-ant-tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cedric.oliv...@free.fr QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gettext-ant-tasks/gettext-ant-tasks.spec SRPM URL : http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/gettext-ant-tasks/gettext-ant-tasks-0.9.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Gettext Commons project provides Java classes for internationalization (i18n) through GNU gettext. The lightweight library combines the power of the unix-style gettext tools with the widely used Java ResourceBundles. This makes it possible to use the original text instead of arbitrary property keys, which is less cumbersome and makes programs easier to read. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 02:45:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags Short Description: Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483863] Review Request: g3dviewer - A 3D file/object viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483863
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-17 02:41:53
EDT ---
rpmlint output is clean.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. ~OK
- For consistency I'd change
%{_bindir}/g3d*
to
%{_bindir}/%{name}
%{_bindir}/g3d-thumbnailer
(It's better style to use %{name} consistently in %files.)
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. NEEDSWORK
- Missing CREDITS.
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
**
Joshua: you missed the missing file in %doc. (However, we don't ship files
related to installation such as INSTALL.)
**
The issues are minor; with these notes the package is
APPROVED
please fix the issues before CVS import.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 02:45:30 EDT --- Thank you very much for all your reviews in short time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 02:44:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Locale-Msgfmt Short Description: Compile .po files to .mo files Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 02:46:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-PPIx-EditorTools Short Description: Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI Owners: mmaslano InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|d...@danny.cz|nob...@fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(d...@danny.cz) | --- Comment #11 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-08-17 03:28:55 EDT --- Andy, I am sorry, but I must step down as the reviewer. I am very busy with other work and can't dedicate the required amount of time for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517615] Review Request: icoutils - Utilities for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517615 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2009-08-17 05:04:28 EDT --- Spec URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://mgieseki.fedorapeople.org/icoutils/icoutils-0.28.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream maintainer Oskar Liljeblad updated the license to GPLv3+, adapted the comments accordingly, and applied the ppc build patch. koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1609039 rpmlint output is still clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||and...@topdog.za.net AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|and...@topdog.za.net --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 05:29:51 EDT --- Since doctrine requires php = 5.3.2 the requires should specify that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #3 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 05:54:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Since doctrine requires php = 5.3.2 the requires should specify that Doctrine 1.1 requires 5.2.3, but this request is just for the doctrine pear channel and doesn't require a certain php version. The bug 517643 is for the doctrine library and specifies 5.2.3 as required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-17 05:54:38
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.8.8-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
PyPE (Python Programmers' Editor) was written in order to offer a
lightweight but powerful editor for those of you who think emacs is too
much and idle is too little. Syntax highlighting is included out of the
box, as is multiple open documents via tabs.
$ rpmlint SPECS/PyPE* SRPMS/PyPE* RPMS/noarch/PyPE*
PyPE.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/PyPE/plugins/parsers.py 0644 /usr/bin/python
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings
Not sure what to do about this error - should I make the script executable or
remove the shebang line? I'm pretty sure that script is not executed
stand-alone.
Remove the shebang, Python libraries don't need it.
By the way, this is my first python-package and I hope I did everything right
:)
A few things to correct:
- Use the safer, time stamp keeping versions of the conversion tricks from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings
- Don't install manually - use setup.py to do the install. Have a look at the
sample python spec
$ rpmdev-newspec python
- You need to own
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/
not
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 06:01:02 EDT --- I do not see the point in installing a channel which may not be usable, unless the channel provides any packages that do not require = php 5.2 3 (you do realise that the channel will not be used exclusively by your other package, nothing will stop a user from running pear install pear.phpdoctrine.org/Doctrine-1.0.x) That information should be in the spec, such that anyone intending to use the spec for EPEL for instance will pick it up straight away that they cannot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743
--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch 2009-08-17 06:05:03
EDT ---
Hi Jussi, thanks for the initial review!
(In reply to comment #1)
Remove the shebang, Python libraries don't need it.
Okay :)
A few things to correct:
- Use the safer, time stamp keeping versions of the conversion tricks from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
and
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingTricks#Remove_DOS_line_endings
Hmm...what I'm using is actually what I was told to use in another review, but
I'll look into this tricks :)
- Don't install manually - use setup.py to do the install. Have a look at the
sample python spec
$ rpmdev-newspec python
Well, I did use the python spec-template. The thing is: there is no `setup.py
install` that does this thing for you and if you try to do it like that, you
only get the information that you should just copy the directory to wherever
you want to execute it from.
- You need to own
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/
not
%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/*
Good catch!
I'll implement those changes ASAP, whenever I've got some minutes :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 _pjp_ pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in changed: What|Removed |Added URL|http://pjp.dgplug.org/tools |http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdn |/djbdns-1.05.tar.gz |s/djbdns-1.05.3.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #36 from _pjp_ pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in 2009-08-17 06:14:55 EDT --- Hi, I'm *happy* to announce the new release of djbdns-1.05.3. Please take a look at: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns And for package review SPEC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns.spec SORC: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3.tar.gz SRPM: http://pjp.dgplug.org/djbdns/djbdns-1.05.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 06:25:05 EDT --- This is covered by multiple licenses (LGPLv2+,BSD,MIT) your spec should reflect that -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
--- Comment #13 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 06:24:56
EDT ---
* To be consistent with other distributions (Debian ATM) you should use 0.0
instead of 0 as version. This is not mandatory though.
* Release tag is still wrong. It should be 0.X.1788svn%{?dist} and not
1.1788svn%{?dist}. The first 0 indicate that this is a pre-release version. The
X is an incremented number (start at 1) you should bump at *each* new release.
1788svn is the svn version of the checkout you used.
* The version-release couple in the changelog is not consistent (0-1788svn)
with the one declared at the beginning of the spec file. Always run rpmlint on
the rpm produced by rpmbuild. Errors like this one can be easily caught in this
way.
* All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
In general, it is a good practise to state what a patch does.
* Description can be improved. The following is from the Debian package:
JOSM is an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java.
The current version supports stand alone GPX tracks, GPX track data
from OSM database and existing nodes, line segments and metadata tags
from the OSM database.
OpenStreetMap is a project aimed squarely at creating and providing
free geographic data such as street maps to anyone who wants them.
The project was started because most maps you think of as free actually
have legal or technical restrictions on their use, holding back people
from using them in creative, productive or unexpected ways.
* Adapt this Debian patch not to include the dependencies into the target jar
file
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/josm/0.0.svn1529-1/10_build
* After that add gettext-commons and metadata-extractor to Requires.
* Please remove junk from the SPEC file. Like:
#find . -name 'jfcunit.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
#find . -name 'josm-translation.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
#find . -name 'metadata-extractor-2.3.1-nosun.jar' -exec rm -f '{}' \;
* I have some doubt about the following:
install -p -m 644 dist/%{name}-custom.jar
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar
%{name}-%{version}.jar will be josm-0 for a long time. I wonder if you should
call it like upstream josm-snapshot-svn_version. Maybe some more experienced
java packager should help here :)
* You should add an alias for josm.jar and use it to run the program without
having to edit run script at each release.
* Desktop file category you use is not right. Network is used by a Network
application such as a web browser:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html
You should use Categories=Education;Science;Geoscience;
* You should also add a comment line in the desktop file, like:
Comment=Editor for OpenStreetMap.org
This is not mandatory but it could help the final user.
* A man page is available from Debain. Please include it:
http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/debianonly/view/josm/0.0.svn1529-1
* In the generate-tarball script, please:
- clean up temporary directories at the end of the script.
- you could reuse the same tarball in more then one Fedora release therefore do
not use Fedora tags in the filename. Call it something like
josm-0.0.svn.tar.gz. You can also generate the filename based on
$JOSM_SVN_TAG. This means you can drop the $NAME_VERSION and $RELEASE
variables.
- are you sure plugins are needed? Debian do not check them out.
- you could use svn export and not remove .svn directories later.
- instead of creating a i18n directory and moving into it, you could do it all
in one line, specifying i18n as the destination directory instead of the
current directory .. The same would apply to plugins if they are required.
- do not bother to remove macosx directory. Moreover, it can be useful. It has
an .icns file with icons at different resolutions. These can be used instead of
a single 128x128 icon. The libicns-utils can be used to extract them.
- IMHO it would be better to get rid of src/org/apache in the %prep section of
the SPEC file.
* Add the following files in %doc:
Contribution gpl-2.0.txt
gpl-2.0.txt is required because of the text of the license must be included in
%doc:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #5 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 06:28:49 EDT --- But the channel is usable by anyone, just not the Doctrine 1.1 package. If any more packages get added to the doctrine channel in the future which don't require 5.2.3 I would have to change the minimum again, this doesn't make sense. Or once Doctrine 2.0 is released I would have to change it to 5.3, which is even worse. But the main thing is: this channel doesn't require 5.2.3, Doctrine does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Graf tg...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 06:33:10 EDT --- I've integrated all your recommendations and replaced the spec file and srpm with new versions. I've also included an example /etc/mip6d.conf and /etc/sysconfig/mip6d and fixed the reload init script target. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 06:34:22 EDT --- That's why am asking you if the channel provides other packages apart from doctrine if it does then fine, if it is just dedicated to doctrine then you have to enforce the checking. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 06:37:00 EDT --- As far as i can tell this channel is dedicated only to doctrine pear list-all -c pear.phpdoctrine.org All packages [Channel pear.phpdoctrine.org]: Package Latest Local pear.phpdoctrine.org/Doctrine 1.1.3PHP Doctrine ORM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 --- Comment #8 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 06:41:40 EDT --- At the moment it is. And at the moment it is mainly for Doctrine 1.1, but it is not going to stay this way. And it doesn't matter, because the channel doesn't require php 5.2.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|and...@topdog.za.net|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517641] Review Request: php-channel-doctrine - Adds doctrine project channel to PEAR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517641 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #2 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 06:51:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) This is covered by multiple licenses (LGPLv2+,BSD,MIT) your spec should reflect that You are right, I didn't see that. I uploaded new versions: Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm I set it to: LGPLv2 and MIT and BSD. I couldn't find any reference to LGPLv2+, but maybe I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 06:56:31 EDT --- A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #8 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-08-17 07:01:14 EDT --- I am back in work from vacations, so the review continues. I have still found few issues: - you should have the license as GPLv2+ and MIT for the ppd subpackage because at least PPDs for Brother, OKI and SHARP are licensed under GPLv2+ - add the COPYING file from foomatic-db-20090702 as %doc for the main package - the question is who should own the /usr/share/foomatic/db/sources directory, because when only the ppds subpackage is installed then this dir (and all upper dirs) will be unowned. If the ppds subpackage can be installed independently then creating foomatic-db-filesystem subpackage (containing the empty /usr/share/foomatic/db structure) looks like an option to me. The rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517822] New: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517822 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-mr - Marathi hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-mr.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-mr-0.20090813-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Marathi hyphenation rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517821] New: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517821 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-bn - Bengali hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnem...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-bn.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/hyphen-bn-0.20090813-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bengali hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #4 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 07:22:55 EDT --- The LICENSE file contains: GNU LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2.1, February 1999 It doesn't state or higher as far as I can see. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 07:25:50 EDT --- Just read comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 --- Comment #37 from Dan Peterson dpi...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 07:31:09 EDT --- Please change the name. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517643] Review Request: php-doctrine-Doctrine - PHP Object Relational Mapper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517643 --- Comment #6 from Christof Damian chris...@damian.net 2009-08-17 07:39:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Just read comment #3 OK, changed to LGPLv2+ : Spec URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SPECS/php-doctrine-Doctrine.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.damian.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-Doctrine-1.1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517416] Review Request: awl - Andrew's Web Libraries - PHP Utility Libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517416
Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||and...@topdog.za.net
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17
07:41:38 EDT ---
There is an issue with the file placement, Non PEAR classes should be placed in
%{_datadir}/php
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #9 from Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 07:53:53 EDT --- Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/foomatic-db/foomatic-db-4.0-3.20090702.fc11.src.rpm * Mon Aug 17 2009 Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 4.0-3.20090702 - License for ppds sub-package should include GPLv2+. - Ship COPYING file in main package. - Added filesystem sub-package for directory ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-08-17 08:21:25 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #11 from Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 08:31:03 EDT --- Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 --- Comment #13 from Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 08:33:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: foomatic-db Short Description: Database of printers and printer drivers Owners: twaugh Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 08:32:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: foomatic-db Short Description: Database of printers and printer drivers Owners: twa...@redhat.com Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-08-17
09:25:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for the submission. Everything looks pretty good. See comments below.
- it would be nice to use %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but it's not
a blocker
Fixed.
- my generated source tarball has a different md5sum but the contents are the
same (likely timestamp differences)
I think so.
- will we build with maven once it's updated?
Yes, once maven is updated to new enough version and all the needed plugins are
packaged.
- other than the non-conffile-in-etc for the maven pom, everything is rpmlint
clean
- what provides %add_to_maven_depmap? I don't see it doing much in my log.
Do
we need a BR on maven?
It's provided by jpackage-utils so we don't need a BR on maven.
- please provide a link to the origin of the OSGi manifest
Done.
It builds fine locally for me.
New links:
Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock.spec
SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/easymock-2.5-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #5 from Colin Coe colin@gmail.com 2009-08-17 09:28:41 EDT --- OK, point taken. Spec file fixed and RPM rebased to v0.8.1.1 http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517849] New: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849 Summary: Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.leht...@iki.fi QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mpiwrappers.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mpiwrappers-1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides a compatibility layer with the use of environment modules for the MPI compilers in RHEL to ease packaging of MPI software in Fedora EPEL. ** See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MPI#EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517849] Review Request: mpiwrappers - Environment module wrappers for MPI packages in RHEL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517849
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dledf...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-08-17 09:43:00
EDT ---
CC Doug, you might want to take a look at this.
**
I'm not totally sure if support for mvapich{,2} should be added, too. As they
aren't available on all architectures building packages against them would
require the use of conditionals in spec files using them. Besides, I don't
think rpm on RHEL 4 and 5 can't cope with subpackages that don't have the same
build arch as the main package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #3 from Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 09:40:31 EDT --- SPEC: http://www.package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp.spec SRPM: http://package-review.xf.cz/irssi-xmpp-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm Now without patch. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1609791 I hope it's enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 09:41:43 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517851] New: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Summary: Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: skoma...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/beacon.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/beacon-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Satya Komaragiri skoma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kw...@redhat.com, ||loupgaroubl...@gmail.com Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||and...@topdog.za.net --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-08-17 10:01:09 EDT --- You need to increment you spec file version when ever you make a change to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 10:03:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: easymock Short Description: Easy mock objects Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517338] Review Request: irssi-xmpp is an irssi plugin to connect to the Jabber network
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517338 --- Comment #5 from Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 10:11:46 EDT --- I thought that's not needed in initial build. Because there will be written only my mistakes when I tried to make new package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517858] New: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 Summary: Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: colin@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/RackTables-0.17.4-1.src.rpm Description: RackTables is a datacenter asset management system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517859] New: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Summary: Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: colin@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~coec/vmpsd-1.4.01-1.src.rpm Description: VMPS (VLAN Management Policy Server) is a way of assigning switch ports to specific VLANs based on MAC address of connecting device. OpenVMPS is a GPL implementation of VMPS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463808] Review Request: robotfindskitten - A game/zen simulation.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463808 Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 10:48:16 EDT --- Oh oops - this bug should have been closed when the package got pushed live, but I think I forgot to add the bug ID to the update request. Anyway, package is now live in F10/F11 updates and Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-08-17 11:19:17 EDT --- Taking this. Satya: I'm wondering if you did any informal package reviews. In case you didn't it might be a good idea to do a couple of them, so that you can demonstrate that you're familiar with packaging guidelines in order to get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502689] Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit |mingw32-cppunit - MinGW |testing framework |Windows C++ unit testing ||framework --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 11:18:52 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ unit testing framework Changelog - Fix BR mingw32-gcc-c++ - Update description - Disable duplicated docs with native package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||504493 Depends on|504493 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||504493 Depends on|504493 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516340] Review Request: fupt - Fedora Unity Paste tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516340 --- Comment #21 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 11:35:38 EDT --- Fix for searching is in the packagedb devel branch but we're in the middle of some extensive changes right now. So it may be awhile before it's deployed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516874] Review Request: eqntott - Generates truth tables from Boolean equations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516874 --- Comment #5 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 11:38:40 EDT --- I have now kept only README and ChangeLog in the %doc section. SPEC URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/eqntott.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/eqntott-9.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Successful Koji builds for dist-f10, dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610099 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517851] Review Request: beacon - WYSIWYG editor for docbook xml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517851 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy loupgaroubl...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 11:53:53 EDT --- Satya: as your GSoC mentor, if you do some reviews informally, and can get sponsored as a packager before the program is over, i can definitely take that into account as part of your evaluation. Let me know if you have any questions about this process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #6 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 12:09:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) #08 The %changelog entry should be 2.4-3.20090815cvs. Please change that. #09 If you are using a cvs snapshot, why are the sources still using emacs-haskell-2.4.tar.gz? #06 Please remove control characters in haskell-site-file.el (^L), and check for the same in other files. This still exists in the .src.rpm! SPEC File: http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Link to koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610169 -Fedora 10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1610177 -Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-17 12:29:17 EDT --- For -2: * Timestamps - Forgot to mention, however when using install or cp commands, add -p option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * Dependency/pkgconfig file - And please address the below: (In reply to comment #2) - For example installed /usr/include/tcrdb.h contains: --- 30 #include tcutil.h 31 #include tcadb.h --- so at least tokyotyrant-devel should have Requires: tokyocabinet-devel. And tokyotyrant.pc should have Requires: tokyocabinet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-08-17 12:48:17 EDT --- Disabling some option on configure is allowed (however the reason should be commented on the spec file so that other people can find the reason easily) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 John (J5) Palmieri jo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jo...@redhat.com --- Comment #37 from John (J5) Palmieri jo...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 13:43:44 EDT --- Ping. I would really like to see this packaged. Right now I install by hand but it tends to stop working when eclipse is upgraded. Any status on getting this in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-08-17 13:53:25 EDT --- The submitter seems to have gone away and this ticket should probably be closed. Perhaps someone else wants to submit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517507] Package Review: perl-Locale-Msgfmt - Compile .po files to .mo files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517507 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:16:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:18:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517517] Package Review: perl-PPIx-EditorTools - Utility methods and base class for manipulating Perl via PPI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517517 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:15:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:19:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:24:17 EDT --- This package was already imported in bug 500257 as a 'pre-review' for the java update. Is this a continuation and full review of it? Can you coordinate with the owner there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476829] Review Request: foomatic-db - Database of printers and printer drivers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476829 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:26:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508922] Review Request: system-config-selinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Christopher Pardy chris.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chris.pa...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Christopher Pardy chris.pa...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 14:27:26 EDT --- My RedHat email was deactivated, I'm adding my alternate email as cc. Spec URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux/system-config-selinux-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux provides the graphical tools system-config-selinux and selinux-polgen for managing SELinux systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517511] Package Review: perl-Parse-ExuberantCTags - Efficiently parse exuberant ctags files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517511 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:30:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:26:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517412] Review Request: django-profile - Django pluggable user profile zone
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517412 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:27:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-08-17 14:28:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513754] Review Request: moblin-session - Moblin User Experience Startup Scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513754 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com 2009-08-17 14:48:30 EDT --- Built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #6 from Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 14:51:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) The different config files are necessary because mip6d only supports a few options to be set via command arguments, that's the reason for adding the check for sysconfig to allow passing on arguments to mip6d directly. An empty mip6d.conf is what should be done if the node is a client node which should be the default. Ah, okay, I was assuming there was only one config file, and it was just referenced with different names and paths, having both /etc/mip6d.conf and /etc/sysconfig/mip6d is fine too, so long as they're both referenced in the spec and properly used in the initscript. About to look over the updated package in a moment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:19:22 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:19:18 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513954] Review Request: HTML_Template_PHPLIB - PHP template system based on preg_*
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513954 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:19:13 EDT --- php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-HTML_Template_PHPLIB-1.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:22:26 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:22:31 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513636] Review Request: php-layers-menu - Hierarchical PHP based DHTML menu system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513636 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:22:20 EDT --- php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-layers-menu-3.2.0-0.2.rc.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517520] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517520 Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fnas...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 15:22:23 EDT --- Just rename to easymock2 and avoid conflicts with the unversioned easymock please -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 15:28:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) As with 500252, I'd like to see a fixed SRPM with the proper license tag before letting this go forward. Spot, Do we need to put the license headers as a patch or we can just add a comment pointing to the jira issue for clarification? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #11 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 15:34:43 EDT --- Just make a new SRPM where the source files are properly licensed, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #39 from rob rob.my...@gtri.gatech.edu 2009-08-17 15:49:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) Any status on getting this in Fedora? I will take a look at it for F11/rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI command line utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(a...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #8 from Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo a...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 15:49:02 EDT --- What is the problem with python-matplotlib being explicitely required? The oscilloscope uses it. fixed the -p and msgfmt buildreq issues, new files at: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9-2.fc11.src.rpm http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna.spec http://userweb.kernel.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.9.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:58:31 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-authority-0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517409] Review Request: django-authority - A Django app for generic per-object permissions and custom permission checks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517409 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 15:58:26 EDT --- django-authority-0.3-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-authority-0.3-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 16:09:05 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514928] Review Request: rubygem-fastercsv - FasterCSV is CSV, but faster, smaller and cleaner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514928 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-08-17 16:09:11 EDT --- rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183
--- Comment #7 from Jarod Wilson jwil...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 16:13:09 EDT
---
Okay, per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines ...
* MUST: rpmlint -- only 1 warning, can be ignored
$ rpmlint mipv6-daemon*
mipv6-daemon.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name mip6d ('mipv6-daemon',
'mipv6-daemond')
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
* MUST: package name -- looks fine. typically, it should match the tarball
name, but the -umip portion appears to be simply designating this as the usagi
implementation of mobile ipv6. Perhaps it would be worth noting this in the
%description field though, just so its clear. (though if this is the *only*
implementation, then its sort of implied, I guess).
* MUST: spec name matches -- ok
* MUST: package meets packaging guidelines -- ok
* MUST: license -- GPLv2, ok
* MUST: license matches source -- ok
* MUST: included license text installed w/pkg -- ok
* MUST: spec in American English -- ok
* MUST: spec legible -- ok
* MUST: sources match upstream -- ok
a8ebeb4f41ceed71037d0f5596ccc11d mipv6-daemon-umip-0.4.tar.gz
a8ebeb4f41ceed71037d0f5596ccc11d mipv6-daemon-umip-0.4.tar.gz.1
* MUST: compile on at least one primary arch -- NEEDSWORK. I just gave this a
shot in a rawhide x86_64 chroot, and the build failed. However, its simply a
missing 'BuildRequires: indent', and then it builds fine.
* MUST: ExcludeArch stuff -- n/a
* MUST: build deps -- NEEDSWORK, see above re: indent.
* MUST: locales -- n/a
* MUST: ldconfig scriptlet -- n/a
* MUST: own created directories -- ok
* MUST: no multiple listings of a file -- ok
* MUST: permissions -- ok
* MUST: %clean rm -rf -- ok
* MUST: macro consistency -- ok
* MUST: pkg contains code -- ok
* MUST: large docs in -doc sub-pkg -- n/a
* MUST: %doc bits not used at runtime -- ok
* MUST: header files -- n/a
* MUST: static libs -- n/a
* MUST: pkgconfig files -- n/a
* MUST: libs w/suffix -- n/a
* MUST: -devel req. main pkg -- n/a
* MUST: libtool droppings -- n/a
* MUST: gui .desktop file -- n/a
* MUST: doesn't own other packages dirs -- ok
* MUST: %install rm -rf -- ok
* MUST: filenames valid UTF-8 -- ok
* SHOULD: upstream need license? -- n/a
* SHOULD: description/summary translations -- n/a
* SHOULD: builds in mock -- NEEDSWORK (just the missing BR: indent)
* SHOULD: builds on all arches -- unknown
* SHOULD: functions as it should -- unknown (I don't have the time or knowledge
at the moment for functional testing, assuming packager has tested)
* SHOULD: scriptlets are sane -- ok
* SHOULD: subpkg reqs -- n/a
* SHOULD: pkgconfig files -- n/a
* SHOULD: file requires -- n/a
Basically, just add the missing BuildRequires: indent (or just tack it onto the
end of the line with flex and bison), and this package is good to go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-08-17 16:16:04 EDT --- SRPM as provided by Fernando imported. Jesse: what pre-review tag should I use for a build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
