[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 pjp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(pj.pan...@yahoo.c | |o.in), | |needinfo?(pj.pan...@yahoo.c | |o.in) | --- Comment #44 from pjp 2009-08-21 02:02:52 EDT --- Hey, hello Itamar, (In reply to comment #43) > you're shipping cbd [1] inside djbdns, I have ported cdb to gnu-autotools and > make it as shared library, what you think about linking in it and removing cbd > code inside of djbdns? Sure, that sounds reasonable. Nonetheless as I see, it won't be fast or easy change to do. Plus linking with external library means having a dependency on that package. So if you don't mind, I would like to be sure about few things, - does your shared library works on all operating systems, both 32/64 bit Linux/*BSD/Solaris etc. and all innumerable dirstributions of each? If not, I suggest *please* aim for that. - Is it packaged for any distribution? And does it have enough *useful* documentation for each API you provide. - Are you up for maintaining and supporting the library as long as it is in use? For it should not happen that I remove the code from djbdns source, start using the library and then one day you stop maintaining the library and then I'll be stuck somewhere nowhere. Besides that I'll need your help to do the actual transition. Thanks so much. PS: can I have a look at the library source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896
--- Comment #17 from Mark Goodwin 2009-08-21 01:50:29
EDT ---
Jarod, thanks - I think I've addressed most of your questions, apart
from the C source files, which I'll get to early next week if not sooner.
Comments below.
In Comment #15 from Jarod Wilson wrote:
> "GPLv2+" is only for "GPLv2.anything or later", if it doesn't say "or later",
> then simply "GPLv2" is the tag you want.
Thanks for the clarification, fixed.
> I think it might be cleanest/most obvious to users if the -devel package were
> renamed to pcp-libs-devel, since its really the devel headers for the
> libraries. Then we're even reasonably satisfying the guidelines, I'd argue.
done. consulted the PCP community and they agree, good suggestion.
> >> > > * SHOULD: Subpackages other than devel should require the base package
> >> > > using a fully versioned dependency. NO, but it seems ok
> > >
> > > Comment: if -libs and the base package require each other, then what's the
> > > point
> > > of splitting out -libs since they can never be installed separately?
>
> Welcome to multiarch. :) Splitting the libs out allows you to have
> pcp.x86_64,
> pcp-libs.x86_64 and pcp-libs.i686 all installed at the same time without any
> file conflicts (in theory).
ah ok, that's a good reason then :)
> > > So based on the above, I'm leaving the run-time and build-time
> > > dependencies
> > > as they strictly need to be. If the final Fedora reviewer and/or sponsor
> > > insist
> > > on additional dependencies, then I'll conform, reluctantly :)
>
> I don't think its necessary on this one, there's a reasonable reason not to.
> I presume this is the srpm I should be looking at now?
> ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm
yes and I see you found it. The new version will be pcp-3.0.0-4.fc10 after the
changes in this update.
In Comment #16 from Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Okay, there's still some slightly alarming rpmlint spew... I understand the
> header files need to be in the main package, but what about all these c files?
> Particularly the ones under 'sample' and 'demo' sub-directories. These should
The /usr/share/pcp/demos directory can easily enough be moved to
/usr/share/doc/pcp-*/demos so I'll do that (haven't in this update
though because I need to investigate the QA fall-out).
> ... go into somewhere like /usr/share/doc/pcp/{sample,demo}/, not into
> /usr/share/pcp or /var/lib/pcp.
I'll investigate simply not installing the source for the 'simple',
'trivial' and 'sample' agents at all. This source was shipped back
in the days when PCP was proprietary; nowdays of course it's all readily
available anyway :)
> The .NeedRebuild touch and rm in the scriptlets is also... Not pretty. Files
> created by an rpm need to be owned by the rpm, even if they're temporary
> files.
> You could add an empty file to the rpm %files list itself, so the rpm lays it
> down and owns it, and there's technically no harm in the file being deleted
> from the system after this rebuild takes place.
OK, I've added .NeedRebuild as an install target in src/pmns/GNUmakefile
(since other platforms need it too, so just touching it during %install in
the spec would be sub-optimal), and added an entry in %files for it.
> If the file continues to exist,
> an rpm -e will remove it, no need for the rm in the %postun scriptlet.
ok fine, removed.
> Speaking of the scriptlets... Standard convention is to put them before the
> %files lists, not after. %files is generally the last thing before the
> %changelog.
ok, fixed.
New srpm, spec and *.tgz uploaded to ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3
and pushed the changes up to git://oss.sgi.com/markgw/pcp/pcp.git dev
(see the git log in that tree for commits)
Thanks
-- Mark Goodwin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-08-21 00:46:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: zyx-liveinstaller Short Description: Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #3 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:19:50 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:06 195.38 KiB 29.98 KiB/sec Created task: 1619537 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619537 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619541 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, i586): open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619538 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) 1619540 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619539 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619541 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, i586): open (x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 1619539 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 1619540 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 1619538 buildArch (vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc2.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm): open (ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1619537 build (dist-f11, vmpsd-1.4.01-2.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517858] Review Request: RackTables - RackTables is a datacenter asset management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517858 --- Comment #3 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:20:30 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:09 382.60 KiB 39.93 KiB/sec Created task: 1619497 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619497 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): free 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): free -> open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619498 buildArch (RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619498 buildArch (RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1619497 build (dist-f11, RackTables-0.17.4-1.fc11.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489424] Review Request: editarea - EditArea is a free javascript editor for source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489424 --- Comment #6 from Colin Coe 2009-08-21 00:19:00 EDT --- koji build --scratch dist-f11 ../SRPMS/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm Uploading srpm: ../SRPMS/editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm [] 100% 00:00:08 295.27 KiB 36.46 KiB/sec Created task: 1619542 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1619542 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): free 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): free -> open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 1619543 buildArch (editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) 1619543 buildArch (editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm, noarch): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm): open (ppc9.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 1619542 build (dist-f11, editarea-0.8.1.1-1.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 --- Comment #19 from Stefan Becker 2009-08-21 00:15:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I tried the src rpm included in comment #16 on my FC11 x86_64 system. It > worked > fine with one small change though. I had to move the installed libaraies from > /usr/lib/pidgin/ to /usr/lib64/pidgin to make it work. I just tried to build an RPM from pidgin-sipe-1.6.1 and git HEAD with the RPM SPEC file from git HEAD. In both generated RPMs the library ends up in the correct place: $ rpm -qlp RPMS/x86_64/pidgin-sipe-1.6.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/pidgin/libsipe.so ... Either the SPEC needs to be updated or you didn't build it correctly by hand. Here is the configure command line from my git HEAD build for you to compare: running ./configure --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --datadir=/usr/share --libdir=/usr/lib64 --with-krb5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517462] Review Request: voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu - Chinese voice data from gcin project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517462 --- Comment #1 from Ding-Yi Chen 2009-08-20 23:53:53 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu.spec New SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/voicedata-zh_TW-gcin-EdwardLiu-20090221-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516971] Review Request: tokyotyrant - A network interface to Tokyo Cabinet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516971 --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell 2009-08-20 22:36:56 EDT --- OK, think I finally got it. diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/detail?r=315 srpm: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/tokyotyrant-1.1.33-4.fc12.src.rpm rpmlint [si...@fox rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant tokyotyrant.i586: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/tokyotyrant tokyotyrant 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518445] Review Request: moblin-panel-applications - Moblin Panel for launching Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518445
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||michael.silva...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|michael.silva...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim
2009-08-20 22:11:43 EDT ---
ReviewTemplate
MUST
• rpmlint: OK
• package name: OK
• spec file name: OK
• package guideline-compliant: OK
• license complies with guidelines: OK
• license field accurate: OK
• license file not deleted: OK
• spec in US English: OK
• spec legible: OK
• source matches upstream: OK (md5sum = 62783ff603f2fc215d7748a0793ed736)
• builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK (Koji)
• build dependencies complete: OK (Koji)
• locales handled using %find_lang, no %{_datadir}/locale: OK
• own all directories: OK
• no dupes in %files: OK
• permission: OK
• %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK
• macros used consistently: OK
• Package contains code: OK
• clean buildroot before install: OK
• filenames UTF-8: OK
SHOULD
• package build in mock on all architectures: OK (Koji)
• package functioned as described: Unknown
There is currently a bug with mutter-moblin:
Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library
[/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so
(/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: cannot open shared object file:
No such file or directory)]
Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins
and then mutter --mutter-plugins=moblin-netbook --replace terminates, returning
me to my normal gnome-shell setup.
If moblin-netbook.so.3400 is symlinked to moblin-netbook.so, I get further:
Window manager warning: Log level 16: Could not load library
[/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so
(/usr/lib64/mutter/plugins/moblin-netbook.so: undefined symbol:
meta_window_is_modal)]
Window manager warning: Log level 8: failed to load plugins
Window manager warning: Log level 8: meta_screen_tab_popup_destroy: assertion
`screen->tab_handler != NULL' failed
but apart from a barebone mutter, and my app windows, nothing else is displayed
(no moblin-panel-applications)
• scriplets are sane: OK
• require package not files: OK
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518574] New: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518574 Summary: Review Request: compat-libgee01 - GObject collection library (v0.1.5) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michael.silva...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee01.spec SRPM URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/gnome/compat-libgee01-0.1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a slight modification of the libgee package, renamed and made parallel-installable. Needed to support some applications (currently rygel) that strictly depends on libgee 0.1.5, since the header files change considerably in 0.1.6 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-20 21:40:37 EDT --- Zach, are you going to update the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-08-20 21:33:52 EDT --- Yaakov, it's "haskell-sig". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?(pj.pan...@yahoo.c ||o.in) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480724] Review Request: djbdns - A Domain Name System by D. J. Bernstein
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480724 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(pj.pan...@yahoo.c ||o.in) --- Comment #43 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-08-20 21:02:37 EDT --- Hi pjp. you're shipping cbd [1] inside djbdns, I have ported cdb to gnu-autotools and make it as shared library, what you think about linking in it and removing cbd code inside of djbdns ? 1 - http://cr.yp.to/cdb/install.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2009-08-20 19:48:20 EDT --- I haven't had time, sorry. This should probably be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #65 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 19:28:29 EDT --- What's the criteria for moving from testing to stable? I figured I'd make an announcement about the testing package in comp.os.linux.hardware and on the Fedora forums, wait a couple of weeks to see if I get any feedback, and then push it to stable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #3 from Stewart Adam 2009-08-20 19:20:01 EDT --- Alright, build dependencies fixed. I also disabled the test bench as it requires a large amount of system resources as well as a specific firewall configuration (see comment in SPEC). SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec SRPM: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.3.rc2.20090721svn.fc11.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618669 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:19:02 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytnef-2.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:18:57 EDT --- ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytnef-2.6-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:15:07 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-record-64-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 19:15:01 EDT --- sugar-record-64-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-record-64-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512170] Review Request: pidgin-sipe - Pidgin plugin for connecting to MS Communications Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512170 Suresh Siddha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suresh.b.sid...@intel.com --- Comment #18 from Suresh Siddha 2009-08-20 19:09:37 EDT --- I tried the src rpm included in comment #16 on my FC11 x86_64 system. It worked fine with one small change though. I had to move the installed libaraies from /usr/lib/pidgin/ to /usr/lib64/pidgin to make it work. I built with: # ./configure --prefix=/usr # make install We have to fix the installation paths for x86_64 and other 64bit archs too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #64 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 19:09:47 EDT --- You don't need to issue update requests for rawhide; as long as we are not in a freeze, it will appear with the next compose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #63 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 19:07:36 EDT --- I pushed the F10, F11 and EL5 packages to testing but the F12 package gave me the following error, sys_basher-1.1.23-2.fc12 not tagged as an update candidate -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #62 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 18:27:57 EDT --- I added ExcludeArch: ppc, that fixed it. I don't have access to any IBM servers so there is no way for me to test sys_basher on that architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515081] Review Request: R-affy - Methods for Affymetrix Oligonucleotide Arrays
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ti...@math.uh.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 18:14:11 EDT --- Any chance of being caught up soon? Should this ticket stay open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 18:10:19 EDT --- I took a look at the package from comment #9. Unfortunately it failed to build in rawhide: if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I. -I./inc -g -O2 -MT lanplus.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/lanplus.Tpo" -c -o lanplus.o lanplus.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/lanplus.Tpo" ".deps/lanplus.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/lanplus.Tpo"; exit 1; fi lanplus.c:70:26: error: openssl/rand.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [lanplus.o] Error 1 Perhaps a missing build dependency? A scratch build with a full log is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618755 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from José Matos 2009-08-20 18:02:14 EDT --- Review: The source package is the same as upstream. The license is correct (BSD) and appropriate for Fedora. This is even more appropriate in the case since the copyright comes from Berkeley. :-) The package build in the supported Fedora architectures. (see #2) Build on F11 and rawhide. The package follows the packaging guidelines. The package is _approved_. PS: One small detail, I noticed that you have placed README.devel in the devel sub-package, after reading it I am not sure how useful the file is. I think that the content is useless for any developer, but I leave to you the final decision. The README file on the other hand is really helpful and in a sense it belongs more to devel than to the main package. If you think that I am being pedantic in the last argument (README) then I agree with you and you are free to ignore me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 361701] Review Request: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(mmasl...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 17:59:10 EDT --- It's been many months now with no response; I'm closing this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 248067] Review Request: opie -- One-time Passwords In Everything
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248067 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-08-20 17:57:14 EDT --- After another month, I'm going ahead and closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(mtas...@ioa.s.u-t ||okyo.ac.jp) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-08-20 17:47:07 EDT --- Mamoru can you review the package please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 --- Comment #1 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-08-20 17:39:24 EDT --- Hey Vitezslav, The link for the SRPM is not working. Could you please check? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||praveen_palad...@dell.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|praveen_palad...@dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||praveen_palad...@dell.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|praveen_palad...@dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #27 from Simon Wesp 2009-08-20 17:31:21 EDT --- Okay, I got the trick... weekend froscon, then continue vacation in france for a couple of weeks... http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2955/fife.spec http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/fife-2009.0-r2955/fife-2009.0-0.14.r2955svn.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-08-20 17:32:50 EDT --- Andrew please continue the process as described on this page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518550] New: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518550 Summary: Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: overh...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-cli-1.2-7.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 17:11:18 EDT --- Full review request (not just a pre-review): bug #518550. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunda...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-08-20 17:05:32 EDT --- Quick note: Unless you are branching this for EPEL, you don't need to define the buildroot or remove it in %install section anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.10.1-3.fc11 |3.10.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518018] Review Request: zyx-liveinstaller - Install a running LiveOS rebootlessly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518018 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||tcall...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 17:02:03 EDT --- == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (feeaff2f9078bf86ad52a5b15cafbb528cf90e8e) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file OK Nice package, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514342] Review Request: rubygem-fattr - Fatter attribute for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:02:07 EDT --- rubygem-fattr-1.0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-fattr'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||3.10.1-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:01:40 EDT --- emacs-common-proofgeneral-3.7.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:03:07 EDT --- cxxtest-3.10.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515463] Review Request: cxxtest - A JUnit-like testing framework for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515463 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 17:04:08 EDT --- cxxtest-3.10.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.7.1-4.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:42 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-8782 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:49 EDT --- colossus-0.9.1-2.20090817svn4489.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update colossus'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-8783 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3.0-2.fc11|0.3.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:54:43 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:56:27 EDT --- liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3.0-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #4 from José Matos 2009-08-20 16:51:45 EDT --- Yes, I noticed that after reading the documentation. Sorry. :-) Being an assistant professor I can say that the schoolbook nature of the spec is a bonus. :-) Expect a full review soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #39 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-20 16:49:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: apbs Short Description: adaptive poisson boltzmann solver Owners: timfenn Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 Tim Fenn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510822] Review Request: maloc - Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510822 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn 2009-08-20 16:48:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: maloc Short Description: Minimal Abstraction Layer for Object-oriented C/C++ programs Owners: timfenn Branches: F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Tim Fenn changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 16:43:09 EDT --- Because the patch for shared support applies to configure.ac, rather than configure, I need to rerun autoconf. As to the schoolbook nature of the spec, that's a good thing, right? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@fc.up.pt --- Comment #2 from José Matos 2009-08-20 16:39:17 EDT --- Just curious, why the call to autoconf at the end of the prep section? After a general analysis of the spec it looks like it was taken from a schoolbook. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498029] Review Request: kio-ftps - An ftps KIO slave for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498029 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517183] Review Request: mipv6-daemon - IPv6 Mobility Daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517183 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 16:29:11 EDT --- mipv6-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mipv6-daemon-0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513320] Review Request: boxbackup - A fast, secure and automatic online backup system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #2 from Stewart Adam 2009-08-20 16:29:15 EDT --- Thanks for pointing this out. I've fixed this and I'm doing a scratch build now, if it succeeds I will post updated links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 504050] Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518546] New: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518546 Summary: Review Request: libva - VAAPI video playback acceleration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awill...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva.spec SRPM URL: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libva-0.30.4.1.sds3-1.aw_fc12.src.rpm Description: libva contains a library and tools relating to the VAAPI video playback acceleration specification. At present the only really working implementations of VAAPI support on the video driver side are in two proprietary drivers (VIA's own driver for its Chrome chipsets, and the infamous Intel Poulsbo driver), but there's a borderline-functional implementation of MPEG-2 acceleration for mainline Intel chipsets in the package, and more free implementations are definitely planned for the future, so this isn't like VDPAU, and the Packaging Committee meeting which discussed VDPAU was firmly in favour of allowing libva in. This package is the patched version of libva maintained by Gwenole Beauchesne of Splitted Desktop Systems, at http://www.splitted-desktop.com/~gbeauchesne/libva/ . Upstream libva is slated to include his changes from version 0.50 onwards. Some already seem to be merged, but not all, and building current upstream git doesn't give a libva that works with Poulsbo, so I'd prefer to go with Gwenole's patched version for now. I've got a spec on file for the upstream version too, so it'll be easy to switch when appropriate. Upstream libva lives at http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/vaapi , just for reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466
--- Comment #61 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-08-20 16:15:02
EDT ---
As you can see from the koji root.log, the error is
DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for lm_sensors-devel
This is probably a package that is only in Client RHEL (and on ppc only Server
is available), so you need to put in a
%if 0%{?rhel} > 0
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64
%endif
(or instead of ExclusiveArch put ExcludeArch: ppc).
**
To build the srpm in mock for EPEL the srpm must have MD5 checksums instead of
SHA1 that Fedora 11 uses. Add
%_source_filedigest_algorithm 0
%_binary_filedigest_algorithm 0
to ~/.rpmmacros of the user you build the srpms as. (Or, you can probably also
disable the checking of the checksums but I don't remember out of the blue how
to do that.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 16:10:55 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518381] Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518381 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 16:11:25 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128152 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 --- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-20 16:13:22 EDT --- New package and spec file uploaded to my webserver. Please take another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz 2009-08-20 16:13:08 EDT --- New package and spec file uploaded to my webserver. Please take another look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-08-20 16:11:17 EDT --- Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1618494 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518539] New: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518539 Summary: Review Request: xblas - Extra Precise Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcall...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xblas.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/xblas-1.0.248-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The XBLAS library of routines is part of a reference implementation for the Dense and Banded Basic Linear Algebra Subroutines, along with their Extended and Mixed Precision versions, as documented in Chapters 2 and 4 of the new BLAS Standard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
2009-08-20 15:55:48 EDT ---
It was intended be (small mistake):
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}
But you are right, when install used with -p flag it explicit creation is not
needed anymore. I delete it. If you does not require - I'll not do new build
now because only this changes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||akurt...@redhat.com Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 15:51:33 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-08-20 15:51:10 EDT --- Built in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=128120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983
--- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-20 15:50:02
EDT ---
Ok, let's wait for the reaction from Fedora-Legal.
BTW, I proposing anoother one small cosmetic change - these lines no longer
needed:
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-20 15:41:29 EDT --- Sorry, off course: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy-0.6-3.fc11.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/3proxy/3proxy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 Peter Lemenkov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-08-20 15:30:56 EDT --- I think LGPLv2+ is fine. However, to be really sure, I'm raising FE-LEGAL here. Please, update your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517983] Review Request: 3proxy - Tiny but very powerful proxy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517983 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-08-20 15:22:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > REVIEW: > > - rpmlint is not silent (I added numbering for the sake of simplicity); > > [pe...@sulaco ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc/3proxy-* > 1. 3proxy.ppc: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/3proxy.cfg > 2. 3proxy.ppc: E: script-without-shebang /etc/3proxy.cfg > 3. 3proxy.ppc: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/3proxy > 4. 3proxy.ppc: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/3proxy > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > [pe...@sulaco ~]$ > > 1st and 2nd warnings should be fixed - just use 644 as a parameter for > "install" utility (seems that this is a typo) Yes, this is typo. I've replace config at end of packaging :) > 3rd may be omitted, but it's a generally good idea to provide add-on for > logrotate in such cases. According to http://3proxy.ru/0.6/Release.notes.txt (see chapter 3) log rotation possibility included in main functionality. > 4th should be fixed - just replace "# chkconfig: 2345 02 98" with "# > chkconfig: > - 02 98" (note the dash sign instead of 2345). Fixed. > Missing BR dos2unix. Please, try to build in koji before submitting Review > Requests. Sorry. BR dos2unix added. > + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual licenses. Not exact :) So, you dont answer on my first question - how I should pint license LGPL >= 2.1 (not 2.0)?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516466] Review Request: sys_basher - multi-threaded hardware tester
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516466 --- Comment #60 from Joshua Rosen 2009-08-20 15:22:26 EDT --- I need a little help building the EL5 version. I was able to build the Fedora packages without any problems. My guess is that the problem occurred because I built the SRPM on a CentOS5.3 system, as a result the packages did not include the distro in the label. I tried to do a mock rebuild but I clearly don't know what I'm doing with mock. Here is what I tried, mock -r epel-5-x86_64 --rebuild sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm INFO: mock.py version 0.9.16 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-x86_64) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.16 INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum ERROR: Exception(sys_basher-1.1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm) Config(epel-5-x86_64) 0 minutes 7 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/result ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/epel-5-x86_64/root/ install buildsys-build Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have: Current : Thu Aug 20 10:48:52 2009 Downloaded: Wed Jun 24 19:08:12 2009 *** koji e-mail Package: sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: failed Built by: bjrosen ID: 128117 Started: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:03:44 UTC Finished: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:06:02 UTC sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5 (128117) failed on ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com (noarch), ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com (ppc): BuildError: error building package (arch ppc), mock exited with status 10; see root.log for more information SRPMS: sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5.src.rpm Failed tasks: - Task 1618329 on ppc5.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: build (dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/sys_basher/EL-5:sys_basher-1_1_23-1_el5) Task 1618333 on ppc7.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: buildArch (sys_basher-1.1.23-1.el5.src.rpm, ppc) logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1618333&name=state.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #16 from Chris Adams 2009-08-20 14:56:03 EDT --- Packages submitted to updates. Thanks everybody! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Sean Middleditch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(s...@middleditch. | |us) | --- Comment #4 from Sean Middleditch 2009-08-20 14:54:21 EDT --- Sorry guys, I was moving cross-country (Ann Arbor MI to Redmond WA) and then apartment hunting for the last two weeks. Still settling in -- I won't have Internet access at home with my Fedora machines until this weekend, thanks to Comcast's waiting queue this time of year. I'll upload the actual SRPM as soon as Comcast gets me online. Sorry about that goofup. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:48:52 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:48:57 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518482] Review Request: django-sorting - A Django application for easy sorting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518482 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:49:01 EDT --- django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-sorting-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:29:40 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:30:13 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518437] Review Request: django-filter - A Django application for allowing users to filter queryset dynamically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518437 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:30:19 EDT --- django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/django-filter-0.5.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:47 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:41 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472658] Review Request: shmpps - Shared Memory driver for PPS signals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472658 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-08-20 14:22:53 EDT --- shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shmpps-1.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518083] Review Request: rubygem-pathname2 - An alternate implementation for the Pathname library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518083 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 14:16:50 EDT --- Please refer to my comments on bug 518082 and uploade the new srpm again. (note that please change the release number of the spec file every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20 14:15:22 EDT --- On more thing * BuildArch - Looks like this package should be noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518082] Review Request: rubygem-facade - A module that helps implement the facade pattern
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518082
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-08-20
14:13:02 EDT ---
Some notes:
* Unneeded macros
- %ruby_sitelib does not seem to be used.
* define -> global
- Now Fedora recommends to use %global instead of %define for
some reasons:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement
* License
- README says facade is under "Artistic 2.0"
* About Source0
- For gem files, please consider to use
http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
because with this URL you won't have to change "61520".
* Requires/BuildRequires
- Please refer to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gems
! Some Requires are missing.
- For BuildRequire'ing gem module, using virtual dependency is preferred
to using the actual rpm name, ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides
i.e. use "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)" instead of "BuildRequires:
rubygem-rake"
- "Requires: ruby >= 1.8.2" is not needed (but please check the wiki
page above)
* %setup, %build
- Please write %setup, %build macro (even if they are empty)
* Macros usage should be consistent
- Use macros consistently. If you want to use %mkdir_p, please use
%rm for consistency
- As you defines %geminstdir, please use the macro in %files
* Directory ownership issue
- Some directories are not owned by this package properly, and
some directories which should not be owned by this package are
actually owned by this package.
Please read:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories
and make it sure that all directories which are newly created during
the install of this package are correctly owned by this package.
* Test
- As this package installs some files into under %geminstdir/test/,
please create %check stage and execute some test programs in the stage.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Bryan O'Sullivan changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(b...@serpentine.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-20 14:06:28 EDT --- Updated SRPM now at the above URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517155] Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 --- Comment #2 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2009-08-20 14:08:23 EDT --- Updated SRPM now uploaded. Sorry for the inconvenience! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518365] Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518365 Andrew Overholt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-08-20 14:03:28 EDT --- Thanks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
