[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #24 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com 2009-09-06 01:59:38 EDT --- Yes it doesn't build against php 5.3.0, even CVS version (it's the main reason why I didn't do the review as I'm using it for more than a year) I have also note than for EL5, you need to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to xulrunnner library directory (to be check again, my tests are old). As my tests are quite old, I will do more with latest SVN where some commit seems php 5.3.0 related. http://svn.php.net/viewvc/gtk/php-gtk/trunk/ If ok, it seems reasonnable to do a review for 2.0.1 stable for fedora 10+11 and for a SVN snapshot for rawhide (various other extension runs beta or patched version in rawhide for this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521458] New: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Summary: Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthim...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/vrq.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/vrq-1.0.56-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: VRQ is modular verilog parser that supports plugin tools to process verilog. Multiple tools may be invoked in a pipeline fashion within a single execution of vrq. It is a generic front-end parser with support for plugin backend customizable tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shakthim...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 02:06:15 EDT --- Successful Koji builds for F-10, F-11 and EL-5 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658001 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658004 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa and...@topdog.za.net 2009-09-06 04:43:54 EDT --- Thanks Remi, I have updated the spec with the changes requested. http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx.spec http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-sphinx/php-pecl-sphinx-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521458] Review Request: vrq - Verilog tool framework with plugins for manipulating source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521458 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|chitl...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us 2009-09-06 05:46:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gnome-mud Short Description: MUD client for GNOME desktop Owners: elanthis Branches: F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us 2009-09-06 05:45:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libtelnet Short Description: TELNET protocol parsing framework Owners: elanthis Branches: F12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 T Sue-Ako tsue...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tsue...@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from T Sue-Ako tsue...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 05:55:33 EDT --- I noticed the following messages when I downloaded http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm and began to build under my user id and also root: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, installing and using it in emacs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 --- Comment #1 from Sean Middleditch s...@middleditch.us 2009-09-06 05:57:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc.spec SRPM URL: http://middleditch.us/sean/clc-0.01-2.fc12.src.rpm Fixed a typo I just caught in the source URL for the spec file. Updated to release -2 and added a changelog note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548
--- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-09-06
06:11:49 EDT ---
Well, while I am not familiar with PHP:
I based on http://www.metal3d.org/repo/fedora/9/SRPMS/ ,
modified for rawhide and succeeded to build on rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658076
srpm is under
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/task_1658076/
! Note that I just tried to build on rawhide and did not
try anything else (i.e I have not checked any packaging
guideline issue)
Two thing:
- The reason vanilla php-gtk 2.0.1 won't build due to error messages
like
--
ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c: At top level:
ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1531: error: duplicate 'static'
ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1542: error: duplicate 'static'
ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1548: error: duplicate 'static'
ext/gtk+/gen_gtk.c:1554: error: duplicate 'static'
--
is due to a slight API change in /usr/include/php/Zend/zend_API.h:
--
#define ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFO_EX(name, pass_rest_by_reference, return_reference,
required_num_args) \
- zend_arg_info name[] = {
\
+ static const zend_arg_info name[] = {
\
{ NULL, 0, NULL, 0, 0, 0, pass_rest_by_reference,
return_reference, required_num_args },
--
So simply removing static before using ZEND_BEGIN_ARG_INFOXXX
in php-gtk source code will solve this.
The following script is _very slow_ however it will work anyway:
---
%if 0%{?fedora} = 12
set +x
echo Fixing source code for PHP 5.3.0 ...
grep -rl '^ZEND_' . | while read file
do
cp -pf $file $file.orig
echo -n -e \tfor $file ...
(
sed -i -e 's|^static$||' $file
line=0
num=0
num_a=0
hold=0
cat $file.orig | while read line
do
num=$((num + 1))
num_a=$((num_a + 1))
if [ $num_a -ge 1 ] ; then num_a=0 ; echo -n * ; fi
if [ $hold = 1 ] ; then
hold=0
if echo $line | grep -vq '^ZEND_' ; then
num_b=$((num - 1))
sed -i -e ${num_b}s|^.*$|static| $file
fi
fi
if echo $line | grep -q '^static$' ; then hold=1 ; fi
done
)
echo -e \tdone
done
set -x
- And the following patch is needed
http://rpms.famillecollet.com/files/php-gtk-php53.patch
(the argument of zend_set_timeout() changed)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst DBIx::Class powered Wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 07:22:50 EDT --- Another upstream update. SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/mojomojo-0.999040-1.fc12.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1658116 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #9 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 07:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) I noticed the following messages when I downloaded http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm and began to build under my user id and also root: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root other than that, I have not noticed any problems after building the rpms, installing and using it in emacs. Hi, Thanks for the review.You are getting the warnings as you don't have the user zer0c00l in your machine. Please build the src.rpm as normal user. 'rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm' works fine for me (no warnings). You can install resulted rpms using 'yum localinstall rpm --nogpgcheck' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #10 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 07:54:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) Another question, How did you built the binary rpms from the source rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #11 from T Sue-Ako tsue...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 08:48:53 EDT --- Running under my user id produces aforementioned user/group warnings, but does not seem to stop the creation of the rpms. i.e. rpmbuild --rebuild emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm Installing emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: user zer0c00l does not exist - using root warning: group zer0c00l does not exist - using root Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9GAaOw + umask 022 + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + LANG=C + export LANG + unset DISPLAY + cd /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf haskell-mode-2.4.20090815 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/kkalihi/rpmbuild/SOURCES/haskell-mode-2.4.20090815.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' (etc.) I had originally created the binary rpms in this manner: rpm -i emacs-haskell-mode-2.4-5.20090815cvs.fc11.src.rpm rpmbuild -bb rpmbuild/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec BTW, I ran this under both i686 and x86_64 machines with identical outcomes (i.e. successful outcomes in spite of warnings). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 09:52:05 EDT --- nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514105] Review Request: courier-imap - The Courier IMAP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514105 Rafael Gomes rafaelgo...@projetofedora.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafaelgo...@projetofedora.o ||rg --- Comment #11 from Rafael Gomes rafaelgo...@projetofedora.org 2009-09-06 10:21:13 EDT --- Please don't forget this bug! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 --- Comment #7 from Rafael Gomes rafaelgo...@projetofedora.org 2009-09-06 10:20:08 EDT --- Please don't forget this bug! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #5 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 10:47:28 EDT --- Hi, I'm sorry for the delay. SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-2/gnomenu.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-2/gnomenu-1.9.9-2.fc11.src.rpm [lon...@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint gnomenu-1.9.9-2.fc11.noarch.rpm gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gnomenu.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gnomenu/prefix 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. Can I ignore this? gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib rpmlint is still complaining about /etc/gnomenu/prefix do not look like an .conf file, but this file only contains this parameter: /usr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 11:11:43 EDT --- Built for Rawhide and F-11. Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516114] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Trac plugin for account registration and management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 11:15:03 EDT --- trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trac-accountmanager-plugin-0.2.1-0.3.20090522svn5836.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352
--- Comment #2 from Julian Aloofi julian.fed...@googlemail.com 2009-09-06
11:55:00 EDT ---
rpmlint output of all files is clean:
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. OK
MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines. OK
- You should try to ask upstream to include a COPYING file.
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc. N/A
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK
- you should change %{python_sitelib}/* to %{python_sitelib}/pip*
- why don't you use the default file permissions for %{_bindir}/pip?
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A
MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A
MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files
ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A
MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A
MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A
MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. NEEDSWORK
-
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK
-The package builds in mock for Fedora 10, 11 and rawhide
-Koji scratch builds for F11 and rawhide successful
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-09-06 12:18:57 EDT --- For -5: * Initscripts (condrestart) - condrestart in %post scriptlet is no longer needed ( as condrestart is called at %postun ) * Documents - Usually the file INSTALL is for people installing the software by building it by themselves and not needed for people using packaged rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-06 13:01:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Can I ignore this? gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib Yes, that's really not an error. rpmlint is still complaining about /etc/gnomenu/prefix do not look like an .conf file, but this file only contains this parameter: /usr I'd mark it as a config file. Of course, if you do then you'll get the warning about the file not being noreplace... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #7 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 13:17:55 EDT --- Surry, but, how can I do that? I'd mark it as a config file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-06 14:23:25
EDT ---
Oh, you can safely drop
%{_builddir}/%{name}
from the commands in %prep.
And I'd replace
find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name *.xml -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name *.py -type f -exec chmod a+x {} \;
find %{_builddir}/%{name} -name *.sh -type f -exec chmod a+x {} \;
with
find -name *.xml -type f -exec chmod 644 {} \;
find \( -name *.py -o -name *.sh \) -type f -exec chmod 755 {} \;
for consistency.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-06 14:21:04
EDT ---
Replace
%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/prefix
with
%config %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/prefix
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-09-06 14:24:03
EDT ---
And instead of
sh %{_sourcedir}/%{name}-shebang.sh
just run
sh %{SOURCE1}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521525] New: Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fon ts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Gre ek typeface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek typeface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Summary: Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek typeface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mail...@laposte.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521525] Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek ty peface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-09-06 14:40:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Griechische Antiqua was one of the historical Greek typefaces of the late 19th and early 20th century. It was designed by Μaurice Εduard Pinder, a German erudite artist and a member of the Academy of Science in Berlin. This is the most popular version which has appeared from 1870 to 1940 in the German speaking philological literature and in many classical and Byzantine editions by publishers like Teubner (in Leipzig) and Weidmann (in Berlin) such as: Anthology of Byzantine Melos by Wilhelm von Christ and Matthaios Paranikas (Leipzig 1871), Epicurea, by Heinrich Usener (Leipzig 1887), Mitrodorous by Alfred Koerte (Leipzig 1890), Pindar by Otto Schroeder (Leipzig 1908), του Aeschylus by U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff (Berlin 1910, 1915), Bachylides by Bruno Snell (Leipzig, 1934), The Vulgata by Alfred Rahlfs (Stuttgart 1935), Suidas Lexicon by Ada Adler (Leipzig 1928-1938) etc. E.J. Kenney lamented the abandonment of the type after the 2nd World War as a great loss for Greek typography (“From Script to Print”, Greek Scripts: An illustrated Introduction, Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, 2001, p. 69). GFS Philostratos was digitized by George D. Matthiopoulos. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Philostratos_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.5.5-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.4.2-3.fc11 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4.2-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:42:42 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes s...@lank.es 2009-09-06 16:39:05 EDT --- Only remaining issue is that you're using a vendor-tag of 'fedora' in desktop-file-install. I'll approve the review once this is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:47:49 EDT --- perl-BZ-Client-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519118] Review Request: nforenum - A format correcter and linter for the NFO language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519118 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:41:58 EDT --- nforenum-3.4.7-0.2.r2184.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nforenum'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9354 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4.2-1.fc11|0.4.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:39:35 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:43:35 EDT --- sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:39:23 EDT --- python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513083] Review Request: gbirthday - birthday reminder for evolution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513083 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:44:39 EDT --- gbirthday-0.4.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4.2-3.fc11|0.4.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517720] Review Request: perl-BZ-Client - A client for the Bugzilla web services API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517720 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.02-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520714] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema - Easy DBIx::Class access from CGI::Application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520714 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 16:43:03 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #8 from Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 17:49:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec SRPM URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm md5sums feca9c1d51d977d6110215635050f8b4 graphem.spec a5617606668fa120ecac8ed629430ca7 graphem-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm This fixes the issue with the vendor tag and adds also a patch which adds the graphem icon to the desktop-file. Patch URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem-0.3.add-icon-to-desktopfile-00.patch 3e20d525764b03218f15021a36a36afa graphem-0.3.add-icon-to-desktopfile-00.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #9 from Dominic Hopf dma...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 18:02:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/graphem/graphem.spec d2b588f6d84f2aa6950b1fb201e84068 graphem.spec Removed an unneccesary commented line from the specfile. Packages are the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521431] Review Request: lxde-icon-theme - Default icon theme for LXDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521431 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-06 18:05:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-06 18:08:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-06 18:09:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #45 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-06 18:07:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-06 18:13:09 EDT --- How can it be unsafe? Exposing the contents of messages to a 3rd party? It only sends the hash I thought... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515040] Review Request: spamassassin-plugin-ixhash - iXhash fuzzy network hash plugin for spamassassin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515040 --- Comment #5 from Warren Togami wtog...@redhat.com 2009-09-06 18:17:41 EDT --- The possibility of false positives -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521569] New: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rland...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://rlandmann.fedorapeople.org/perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext-1.27-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Locale::Maketext::Gettext joins the GNU gettext and Maketext frameworks. It is a subclass of Locale::Maketext(3) that follows the way GNU gettext works. You start as a usual GNU gettext localization project: Work on PO files with the help of translators, reviewers and Emacs. Turn them into MO files with msgfmt. Copy them into the appropriate locale directory, such as /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/myapp.mo. Then, build your Maketext localization class, with your base class changed from Locale::Maketext(3) to Locale::Maketext::Gettext. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 Ruediger Landmann rland...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521569] Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Gettext - Joins the gettext and Maketext frameworks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521569 --- Comment #1 from Ruediger Landmann rland...@redhat.com 2009-09-06 19:24:20 EDT --- This is my first package, so I'm seeking a sponsor please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515164] Review Request: gnomenu - A consolidated menu for gnome that brings eye candy to the world of the Gnome menu's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515164 --- Comment #11 from Henrique LonelySpooky Junior henrique...@gmail.com 2009-09-06 19:40:52 EDT --- Hi, Jussi. Thanks for your patience. =) I'm really learning a lot here. Here we go: SPEC: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-3/gnomenu.spec SRPM: http://lonelyspooky.com/uploads/rpm/gnomenu/1.9.9-3/gnomenu-1.9.9-3.fc11.src.rpm Following your advice we have only this error: gnomenu.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings But, as we already know, it can be ignored. Again, thank you very much! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #6 from W. Michael Petullo m...@flyn.org 2009-09-06 20:51:47 EDT --- Fabian, are you willing to review the spec file in its current form? The reason I don't use rpmdev-newspec is that my spec files are generated from an XML project description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513896] Review Request: pcp - performance monitoring and collection service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513896
--- Comment #21 from Mark Goodwin mgood...@redhat.com 2009-09-06 21:07:18
EDT ---
Hi Jarod, v3.0.0-5 is ready for review :
Spec URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp.spec
SRPM URL: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm
Src.tgz : ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/pcp/download/v3/pcp-3.0.0-5.src.tar.gz
(spec and src.tgz are identical to what's in the SRPM).
The pcp-perl packaging (thanks for the comments) is not included - I'd
rather avoid any further delay and instead add the perl packaging later
once we're in Fedora - if this is a bad plan, please let me know :)
The demo agents that ship src have been moved into the devel package.
They're required for the PCP QA suite to run, but so is the rest of
the devel package, so no problem there. I've also merged up with the
recent 2.9.1 community release, which is stable and fully QA'd.
[mgood...@fletch rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.src.rpm
RPMS/x86_64/{pcp-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm,pcp-libs-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm,pcp-libs-devel-3.0.0-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm}
pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/pcp
pcp.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/pcp.env
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mounts/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/weblog/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /var/lib/pcp/pmns/.NeedRebuild
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mmv/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/cisco/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/mailq/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/linux/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/jstat/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/shping/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/summary/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/process/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/sendmail/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/trace/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lmsensors/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/apache/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/roomtemp/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/var/lib/pcp/pmdas/lustrecomm/domain.h
pcp.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/pcp
pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmproxy
pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pmie
pcp.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcp
pcp-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.3
e...@glibc_2.2.5
pcp-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_gui.so.1
libpcp_gui.so.2
pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp.so.2
libpcp.so.3
pcp-libs-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/libpcp_pmda.so.2
libpcp_pmda.so.3
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 25 warnings.
Many thanks
-- Mark Goodwin
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516717] Review Request: viewnior - Elegant Image Viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516717 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-06 21:48:02 EDT --- V 0.7: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/viewnior-0.7-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-09-06 22:26:06 EDT --- I think those errors are normal and can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521182] Review Request: perl-CatalystX-Component-Traits - Automatic Trait Loading and Resolution for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521182 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521525] Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek ty peface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520832] Review Request: quotatool - Disk utility for managing user quotas
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520832 --- Comment #6 from Xia Shing Zee xiash...@gmail.com 2009-09-07 01:26:49 EDT --- Ok, the license on the official website's page now reflects the LICENSE file in the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
