[Bug 517970] Review Request: lingot-0.7.6 - musical instruments tuner
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517970
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|martin.giesek...@uos.de
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking 2009-09-12
02:55:20 EDT ---
Here is my formal review of your package. I didn't find any serious things to
be fixed. Just Requires: gtk2 should be removed as BuildRequires: gtk2-devel is
present.
A wrapper script would be a nice addition but it's not a requirement to me.
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/result/lingot-*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-
keys used in following checklist:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license.
- GPLv2+ according to the source header comments
[+] MUST: The License field in spec file must match the actual license.
[+] MUST: File containing license text must be included in %doc.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources must match the upstream source.
md5 hash is e030c45af43e59521f6207ef5c9c5687
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
- builds in koji
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672632
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile,...
[X] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires.
- Requires: gtk2 is redundant
[+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
- BuildRequires: gettext present
- %find_lang present
- %files -f %{name}.lang used
[.] MUST: Packages which store shared library files,...
- no shared libs
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, ...
- not relocatable
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: Files must not appear more than once in %files listings.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
[+] MUST: %clean section must contain rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
- no large docs
[+] MUST: Files in %doc must not affect the runtime of the application.
[.] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
- no header files
[.] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
- no static libs
[.] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
- no .pc files
[.] MUST: .so files without suffix must go in a -devel package.
- no shared libs
[.] MUST: devel packages must require the base package.
- no devel subpackage
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
[+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file.
- desktop file present
- properly installed with desktop-file-validate
- referenced svg file added to pixmaps folder
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
[+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot}.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
- builds in mock
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described.
- works as expected
[.] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
- no scriptlets necessary
[.] SHOULD: subpackages should require the base package.
- no subpackages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065
--- Comment #29 from D Haley 2009-09-12 02:26:34 EDT ---
SPEC URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro-2.rc1.spec
SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm
F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672622
F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672627
$ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'`
givaro.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgivaro.so.0.0.4
e...@glibc_2.0
givaro-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
givaro-static.i386: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ cat tmp
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote:
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-devel-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote:
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-static-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote:
/home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/givaro-debuginfo-3.2.15-0.2.rc1.fc10.i386.rpm
changelog:
* Sun Sep 12 2009 D Haley - 3.2.15-0.2.rc1
- Change to GPL+ from GPL2 per bugzilla comment
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #14 from Arun SAG 2009-09-12 02:19:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Hi, > Hi, > I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask > submitter to go through > 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess > 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > So You need to start reviewing other packages in > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html sure. > This will show you know packaging well and understands it. > > Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more > packages. yes, i tried submitting new packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522046 but it was closed as duplicate as i didn't check http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/REVIEW.html before submitting. I reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||panem...@gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-09-12 02:07:38 EDT --- Hi, I will have a look at this review on Monday but meantime I will like to ask submitter to go through 1)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess 2)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored 3)http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join So You need to start reviewing other packages in http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html This will show you know packaging well and understands it. Do you have any other new package submissions?If not try submitting few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522903] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Bug 517197 depends on bug 517155, which changed state. Bug 517155 Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - bindings to the C OpenGL library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517155 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-09-12 01:39:46 EDT --- bos built this a while back: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=129691 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517197] Review Request: ghc-GLUT - bindings to the C GLUT library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517197 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-12 01:40:12 EDT --- ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-GLUT-2.1.1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372
--- Comment #37 from D Haley 2009-09-12 01:00:26 EDT ---
SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-5.spec
SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.src.rpm
Koji Builds:
F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672567
F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672572
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint `cat tmp | awk '{print $2}'`
catmathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0
e...@glibc_2.0
mathgl-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
tmp
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[make...@spiderbox SPECS]$ cat tmp
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-devel-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mathgl-doc-1.9-5.fc10.noarch.rpm
Wrote: /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mathgl-debuginfo-1.9-5.fc10.i386.rpm
>- Please move the buildroot tag somewhere else from the middle of
>BuildRequires. I prefer the order: BuildRoot, BuildRequires, Requires.
Done.
>- Devel package does not contain static libraries, remove them from the
> summary.
Done.
>- The package needs to own
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/
>instead of just
> %{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm
Done
>- Add COPYING, COPYRIGHT, NEWS, TODO.
COPYRIGHT NEWS and TODO have been included. COPYING is not included as this is
a GPLv3 licence, and conflicts with the source headers.
>- License is GPLv2+ not GPLv3.
I emailed upstream again, asking for clarification (fix headers or remove GPL3
licence). I still believe that GPL3 was the better option, given the presence
of the COPYING file (gplv3 is compatible with gpl2, but not vice versa).
Regardless, this has been to changed GPLv2+, as requested.
I am aware of the wiki page that describes how to select the GPL version,
however it doesn't cover this type of internal inconsistency.
Diff:
--- mathgl-1.9-4.spec 2009-08-15 18:23:08.0 +1000
+++ mathgl.spec 2009-09-12 14:38:14.0 +1000
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
%{!?octave_api:%global octave_api %(octave-config -p API_VERSION || echo 0)}
Name: mathgl
Version: 1.9
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Release: 5%{?dist}
Summary: Cross-platform library for making high-quality scientific graphics
Summary(ru): MathGL - это библиотека для осуществления высококачественной
визуализации данных
-License: GPLv3
+License: GPLv2+
Group: Development/Libraries
Url: http://mathgl.sourceforge.net
Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tgz
@@ -18,10 +18,7 @@
#Remove empty libmgl-wx from compilation
Patch3: %{name}-no-mglwx.patch
-Requires(post): info
-Requires(preun): info
-
-Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api}
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
# mandatory packages
BuildRequires: gsl-devel libpng-devel libtool-ltdl-devel libtool
@@ -30,13 +27,17 @@
# optional packages
BuildRequires: freeglut-devel hdf5-devel libjpeg-devel libtiff-devel
fltk-devel qt4-devel
BuildRequires: wxGTK-devel giflib-devel octave-devel
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
#For autoreconf (required for patch1, libtool)
BuildRequires: autoconf
BuildRequires: automake
BuildRequires: libtool
+Requires(post): info
+Requires(preun): info
+
+Requires: octave(api) = %{octave_api}
+
%description
Mathgl is a cross-platform library for making high-quality scientific
graphics. It provides fast data plotting and handling of large data
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@
opengl applications
%package devel
-Summary: Static libraries and header files for %{name} library
+Summary: Libraries and header files for %{name} library
Group: Development/Libraries
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
@@ -73,7 +74,7 @@
%setup -q
#convert EOL encodings, maintaining timestames
-for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README; do
+for file in AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README COPYRIGHT; do
sed 's/\r//' $file > $file.new && \
touch -r $file $file.new && \
mv $file.new $file
@@ -179,10 +180,10 @@
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README
+%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog.txt README COPYING COPYRIGHT NEWS TODO
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
%{_bindir}/mgl*
-%{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts/*.vfm
+%{_datadir}/%{name}/
%{_prefix}/libexec/octave/packages/%{name}-1.9.0/
%{_datadir}/octave/packages/%{name}-1.9.0/
%{_infodir}/%{name}.*.gz
@@ -198,6 +199,11 @@
%doc texinfo/docs/*
%changelog
+* Sat Sep 12 2009 1.9-5
+- Removed the word "static" from devel description, as doesn't have static
+- Fonts now owned at datadir/name level
+- Added COPYRIGHT NEWS and TODO
+
* Sat Aug 15 2009 1.9-4
- Fix octave installation method
- Remove wx lib, which doesn't have meaningful code.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userpre
[Bug 521851] Review Request: perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk - Nagios plugin to observe Beanstalkd queue server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521851 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-12 00:49:16 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672577 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 23:44:03 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 23:44:12 EDT --- cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpptasks-1.0b5-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522903] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522903 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta - A Module::Install extension to include GitHub meta information in META.yml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Install-GithubMeta OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cw...@alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Module-Install-GithubMeta-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Module::Install::GithubMeta is a Module::Install extension to include GitHub (http://github.com) meta information in 'META.yml'. It automatically detects if the distribution directory is under 'git' version control and whether the 'origin' is a GitHub repository; if so, it will set the 'repository' and 'homepage' meta in 'META.yml' to the appropriate URLs for GitHub. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672451 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522895] New: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522895 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-java-tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwri...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Blocks: 520534 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/pki-native-tools/pki-native-tools-1.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Dogtag pki is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. These platform-dependent PKI executables are used to help make Dogtag pki into a more complete and robust PKI solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-09-11 21:50:48 EDT --- sha256sum tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz fedora/SOURCES/tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz c327f6efa2c2e36a8515d2420de7dc3307ce145574eaa28282ddfddc3ca2fd51 tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz c327f6efa2c2e36a8515d2420de7dc3307ce145574eaa28282ddfddc3ca2fd51 fedora/SOURCES/tomcatjss-1.2.0.tar.gz source matches upstream builds fine in mock and koji scratch builds http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672226 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1672206 rpmlint is quiet license is fine spec is clear approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3.4-1.fc11|0.3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:40:17 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3.4-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516698] Review Request: fpaste - A simple tool for pasting info onto fpaste.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516698 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:36:15 EDT --- fpaste-0.3.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481030] Review Request: emacs-pmd - an interface to PMD for (X)Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481030 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:35:56 EDT --- emacs-common-pmd-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521525] Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek ty peface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||20090902-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521525] Review Request: gfs-philostratos-fonts - A revival of the “Griechische Antiqua” Greek ty peface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521525 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:34:10 EDT --- gfs-philostratos-fonts-20090902-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:31:11 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11, voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.1.1-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:31:16 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc11, voms-1.9.11-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc10|3.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:48 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10, voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:55 EDT --- voms-mysql-plugin-3.1.1-1.fc10, voms-1.9.11-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517763] Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.1.1-1.fc10|3.1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517764] Review Request: voms-mysql-plugin - VOMS server plugin for MySQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517764 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||3.1.1-1.fc10 Resolution||ERRATA Bug 517764 depends on bug 517763, which changed state. Bug 517763 Summary: Review Request: voms - Virtual Organization Membership Service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517763 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||1.9-3.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 510255] Review Request: cobertura - a Java tool for calculating the test coverage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510255 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:28:11 EDT --- cobertura-1.9-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc11 |1.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518766] Review Request: auto-destdir - Automate DESTDIR support for "make install"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518766 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 19:24:57 EDT --- auto-destdir-1.11-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 19:19:21 EDT --- Added an entry to the changelog and posted the updated spec file and src rpm: http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss.spec http://people.redhat.com/kwright/tomcatjss/tomcatjss-1.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Gareth John changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 18:17:04 EDT --- The spec file has been updated to fix the issues noted above. Both the spec file and src.rpm file have been updated and posted to the location above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-09-11 18:11:07 EDT --- graphem-0.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/graphem-0.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 Christoph Wickert changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Fixed In Version||0.17.1-4.fc11 Resolution|CANTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521979] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521979 Bug 521979 depends on bug 520719, which changed state. Bug 520719 Summary: New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520719] New Package for Dogtag PKI: tomcatjss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520719 Dennis Gilmore changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:57:33 EDT --- Since Owners: is empty above, I'm stull not sure what to do. Matt, Chris has indicated that you should be the owner of the EPEL branch. If that's what you want, please submit a new CVS request with your FAS ID in the Owners: field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cw...@alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-09-11 16:49:20 EDT --- Ack! EPEL branch here is a-ok, so long as the requester takes ownership of the new branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 --- Comment #18 from Sean Middleditch 2009-09-11 16:41:26 EDT --- Jan, I didn't push to F10/F11 because I'm simply not comfortable pushing updates to stable distros yet. Once I get a little more in swing with how packaging for Fedora works I'll consider pushing the packages to those distros, if they're even still in support then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233845] Review Request: perl-XML-XPathEngine - Re-usable XPath engine for DOM-like trees
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:29:43 EDT --- The CVS request is missing an owner. The current owner of the package allows EPEL branches but requests that he be made a comaintainer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/ContributorStatusNo Please submit a corrected CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 233846] Review Request: perl-XML-DOM-XPath - Perl extension to add XPath support to XML::DOM, using XML::XPath engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233846 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:30:11 EDT --- The same issues apply here as in bug 233845. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 220218] Review Request: perl-Module-Find - Find and use installed modules in a (sub)category
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220218 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:27:53 EDT --- We need an ack from the current owner beforce branching their packages for EPEL. Have you read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Getting_a_Fedora_package_in_EPEL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514509] Review Request: pyhunspell - Python bindings for hunspell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514509 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:23:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512523] Review Request: graphem - Mouse Gesture based Authentication Program and Screen Locker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512523 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:24:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:19:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521319] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521319 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:20:26 EDT --- These are done by hand and occasionally it takes a bit for a human to find the time to run through the queue. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:17:39 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:18:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 16:14:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519538] Review Request: clutter-sharp - C#/.NET bindings to Clutter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519538 --- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2009-09-11 15:24:52 EDT --- Ping? There are some small changes that need to be made, otherwise the package is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Dan Williams changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Dan Williams 2009-09-11 15:09:16 EDT --- The hostapd openssl EAP-FAST patches already got upstreamed into openssl >= 0.9.8j (F11 and later). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428181 so those patches shouldn't be relevant anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-11 14:48:21 EDT --- Thanks Steve, - I will fire an email to upstream as to the license issue. - As for the php requirement, i thought adding php-common automatically pulling in php. I have now added the requirement. Updated spec & rpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation-0-0.3.20090910svn.fc11.src.rpm http://topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-email-address-validation/php-email-address-validation.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521996] New Package for Dogtag PKI: pki-silent
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521996 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:40:58 EDT --- Description: The Dogtag Silent Installer may be used to "automatically" configure the following Dogtag PKI subsystems in a non-graphical (batch) fashion including: the Dogtag Certificate Authority, the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager, the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, the Dogtag Registration Authority, the Dogtag Token Key Service, and/or the Dogtag Token Processing System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522204] New Package for Dogtag PKI: dogtag-pki-common-ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522204 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:33:09 EDT --- Description: Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag PKI Common Framework User Interface contains the graphical user interface for the Dogtag PKI Common Framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521995] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-java-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521995 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:30:54 EDT --- Description: Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. These platform-independent PKI executables are used to help make Dogtag into a more complete and robust PKI solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516513] Review Request: globus-authz-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516513 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521989] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-util
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521989 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:24:52 EDT --- Dogtag is an enterprise software system designed to manage enterprise Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) deployments. The Dogtag PKI Utility Framework is required by the following four Dogtag PKI subsystems: the Dogtag Certificate Authority the Dogtag Data Recovery Manager the Dogtag Online Certificate Status Protocol Manager, and the Dogtag Token Key Service -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521993] New Package for Dogtag PKI:pki-setup
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521993 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:28:43 EDT --- Description: Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) setup scripts used to create and remove instances from Dogtag PKI deployments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-11 14:16:23 EDT --- Hi, This all looks good, it is of course incredibly simple from a packaging point of view. $ rpmlint SPECS/php-email-address-validation.spec \ SRPMS/php-email-address-validation-0-0.2.20090910svn.fc11.src.rpm \ RPMS/noarch/php-email-address-validation-0-0.2.20090910svn.fc11.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. A mock build is fine. It clearly is BSD licensed but if you could encourage upstream to include a LICENSE file that would be good. The PHP guidelines mentioned above. Other Packages PHP addons which are neither PEAR nor PECL should require what makes sense (either a base PHP version or a php-api, php(zend-abi) as necessary). suggest to me that php should be a requirement and given this does not work with out php installed this makes perfect sense to me. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516058] Review Request: php-email-address-validation - A PHP class for validating email addresses
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516058 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521255] New package for Dogtag PKI: pki-selinux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521255 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Wright 2009-09-11 14:14:08 EDT --- The description of this package is as follows: Selinux policies for the Pubic Key Infrastructure (PKI) components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-09-11 13:57:25 EDT --- Ok, this has all been done (and for quite a while), but keep in mind it doesn't build yet -- cpphs, ghc-haskell-src-exts, and ghc-hscolour will all need to be updated to newer versions first. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512217] Review Request: geany-plugins - A bundle of plugins for Geany
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 Dominic Hopf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX --- Comment #51 from Dominic Hopf 2009-09-11 13:38:32 EDT --- Since the review is done I think we could do so, yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516059] Review Request: dokuwiki - Standards compliant simple to use wiki
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516059 Steve Traylen changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 Jim Radford changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522821] New: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Summary: Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroubl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/bluetile-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bluetile is a tiling window manager for X based on xmonad. Windows are arranged automatically to tile the screen without gaps or overlap, maximising screen use. Bluetile's focus lies on making the tiling paradigm easily accessible for users coming from traditional window managers by drawing on known conventions and making all features available using the mouse. It also tries to be usable 'out of the box', making configuration unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 409361] Review Request: dkim-milter - DomainKeys Identified Mail sender authentication sendmail milter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=409361 --- Comment #31 from Jim Radford 2009-09-11 12:05:44 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dkim-milter New Branches: EL-5 Owners: radford -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||522819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522820] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||522821 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522821] Review Request: bluetile - A modern tiling window manager with a gentle learning curve
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522821 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||522820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522819] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||522820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522820] New: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522820 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad addon libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroubl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-bluetilebranch-0.8.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: These are a fork of the contrib libraries for XMonad, necessary to build the bluetile window manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522819] New: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522819 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch - bluetile branch of xmonad libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroubl...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-bluetilebranch-0.8.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: XMonad is a tiling manager written entirely in Haskell. The bluetilebranch is a fork of xmonad for the purposes of doing some custom tricks in bluetile, another tiling manager written entirely in Haskell and based on XMonad. This package contains the branch of the core XMonad libraries, and is necessary to build bluetile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:57:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: maven-plugin-build-helper Short Description: Build Helper Maven Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:56:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: maven-plugin-exec Short Description: Exec Maven Plugin Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 Andrew Overholt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:53:35 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #26 from Zach Oglesby 2009-09-11 11:52:04 EDT --- ghc-X11-xft is in rawhide now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 Andrew Overholt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:53:46 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486570] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486570 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||li...@forevermore.net --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 11:39:27 EDT --- *** Bug 208064 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522732] Review Request: perl-Text-Diff-Parser - Parse patch files containing unified and standard diffs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522732 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-09-11 11:43:09 EDT --- Upstream has released a new version, fixing a bug I reported. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Text-Diff-Parser/perl-Text-Diff-Parser-0.1001-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 208064] Review Request: courier-authlib - Courier authentication library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208064 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-09-11 11:39:27 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 486570 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:38:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X one file is under ASL 2.0 (everything else is MIT) so please update License > to reflect Fixed. > X please use your full name and email address in %changelog :) Fixed :) > X please add Requires(post) and postun on jpackage-utils Fixed. > > - source matches upstream > - macros good > - builds fine > - versioning good > - %files fine > - rpmlint fine: > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: no-documentation > maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-build-helper > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-javadoc-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > -standard-dir-perm /usr/share/javadoc/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4/org 0775 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-09-11 11:33:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > X let's put a version requirement on maven2-common-poms Fixed. > ? should we add versions to other BRs/Rs? No, it builds fine in koji. > X need changelog entries Fixed. > X need %post/%postun requires on jpackage-utils Fixed. > X LICENSE.txt and all other licensing text conflicts; remove LICENSE.txt and > report upstream? > > - %files good > - sources match upstream > - naming good > - macros fine > - sources match > - builds fine > - rpmlint will be fine once changelog entries added: > > $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm > maven-plugin-exec.src: E: no-changelogname-tag > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: no-documentation > maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-exec > > $ rpmlint > /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-javadoc-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-09-11 11:30:44 EDT --- These are updated packages with new myproxy version and also contain some corrections. Spec: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec SRPM: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2009-09-11 11:28:02 EDT --- Updated for 1.0.1; specfile is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard.spec and SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm I dropped the "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" as suggested in comment #9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522726] Review Request: maven-plugin-build-helper - Build Helper Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522726 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 11:19:18 EDT --- X one file is under ASL 2.0 (everything else is MIT) so please update License to reflect X please use your full name and email address in %changelog :) X please add Requires(post) and postun on jpackage-utils - source matches upstream - macros good - builds fine - versioning good - %files fine - rpmlint fine: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-plugin-build-helper.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-build-helper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-build-helper-javadoc-1.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm -standard-dir-perm /usr/share/javadoc/maven-plugin-build-helper-1.4/org 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799 Gareth John changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518799] Review Request: gtk-splitter - A file splitter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518799
--- Comment #6 from Gareth John 2009-09-11
11:03:08 EDT ---
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the reviewOK
* MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
GuidelinesOK
* MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemptionOK
* MUST: The package must meet the Packaging GuidelinesOK
* MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing GuidelinesOK
* MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
licenseOK
* MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %docOK
* MUST: The spec file must be written in American EnglishOK
* MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.OK
* MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.??
* MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architectureOK
* MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch lineN/A
* MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common senseOK
* MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbiddenN/A
* MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postunN/A
* MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blockerOK
* MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directoryOK
* MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listingsOK
* MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) lineOK
* MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)OK
* MUST: Each package must consistently use macrosEach mention in
description of {%name} could use the macro!!!
* MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable contentOK
* MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity)N/A
* MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not presentOK
* MUST: Header files must be in a -devel packageN/A
* MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static packageN/A
* MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
(for directory ownership and usability)N/A
* MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
packageN/A
* MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}N/A
* MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are builtOK
* MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your
explanationOK
* MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by
[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Jan Klepek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 522727] Review Request: maven-plugin-exec - Exec Maven Plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522727 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-09-11 10:41:46 EDT --- X let's put a version requirement on maven2-common-poms ? should we add versions to other BRs/Rs? X need changelog entries X need %post/%postun requires on jpackage-utils X LICENSE.txt and all other licensing text conflicts; remove LICENSE.txt and report upstream? - %files good - sources match upstream - naming good - macros fine - sources match - builds fine - rpmlint will be fine once changelog entries added: $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm maven-plugin-exec.src: E: no-changelogname-tag $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm maven-plugin-exec.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: no-documentation maven-plugin-exec.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/maven-plugin-exec $ rpmlint /home/overholt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/maven-plugin-exec-javadoc-1.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517859] Review Request: vmpsd - vmpsd is a GPL implementation of Cisco Systems' VMPS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517859 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-11 10:33:43 EDT --- For now you don't have to submit push requests on bodhi for F-12. Packages rebuilt for F-12 are automatically pushed into rawhide tree next day. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515832] Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-09-11 10:32:34 EDT --- Closing this bug as F-12/13 builds are already done. If F-11 or F-10 branches are also required, please write CVS request on this bug again following: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520343] Review Request: clc - command line client for MUDs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520343 Bug 520343 depends on bug 515832, which changed state. Bug 515832 Summary: Review Request: libtelnet - TELNET protocol handling library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 518017] Review Request: php-pecl-sphinx - PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-09-11 10:28:21 EDT --- Thanks Remi, New Package CVS Request === Package Name: php-pecl-sphinx Short Description: PECL extension for Sphinx SQL full-text search engine Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
