[Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 --- Comment #6 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-08 02:51:42 EDT --- The server program is in Requires, so it needs to be installed. (In case of sblim-cmpi-dhcp bind is in Requires too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521724] Review Request: perl-Makefile-DOM - Simple DOM parser for Makefiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521724 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||521723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521723] Review Request: perl-Makefile-Parser - Simple parser for Makefiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521723 Ruediger Landmann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||521724 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #51 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-08 02:41:11 EDT --- Sorry to continue changing things, but this version is close to complete: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.6-4.20091007svn2404.fc11.src.rpm I've rechecked which files fall under which license, and updated to SVN 2404 (which clarifies the licensing on some of the source files). I also added the tetex conditional for EL builds. Finally, I've updated the Buildrequires: mmdb must be >= 1.19, according to upstream. clipper must be >= 2.1-7 (which corresponds to the 090522 snapshot release, required according to upstream and testing). So Jess, would you mind updating your packages? If J. Tibbitts is still watching this bugreport, I'd appreciate feedback - things are "review-worthy" for fedora, IMO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 Bug 527245 depends on bug 527231, which changed state. Bug 527231 Summary: Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-08 02:27:09 EDT --- Imported and built in F-13 rawhide. F-12 on its way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #43 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-08 02:20:04 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks all for your assistance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527231] Review Request: couchdb-glib - A glib api to access CouchDB servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527231 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 02:01:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525831] Review Request: vim-perl-tt2 - Syntax highlighting for the Template-Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 02:00:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:57:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:59:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:54:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:56:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:55:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:56:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527544] Review Request: python-decorator3 - Module to simplify usage of decorators
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527544 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:51:18 EDT --- cvs done. Note that devel is always created, so you might dead.package and get it blocked in devel now and only leave the EL-5 branch active. ;) Luke: I assume the "APPROVED" is good enough, but could you set the fedora-review flag to + just to follow the procedure? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:52:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:53:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527753] An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:47:31 EDT --- cvs done. Better than package review here would just be the package that you are needing the cvs for. ie, in this case just file it against sblim-cmpi-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #36 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:48:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 srinivas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from srinivas 2009-10-08 01:36:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libnetdevname Short Description: development files required to build libnetdevname-based software. Owners: srini praveenp Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #18 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 01:25:27 EDT --- updated SPEC : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts.spec updated SRPM : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/bitmap-fonts-0.3-11.fc11.src.rpm different license for each subpackage is done in smc-fonts, but i am not sure about license of these fonts, please guide if anything -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-08 01:17:10 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License GPLv2+
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253 parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2
acf9085b49cf41469ce41076e6915253 parole-0.1.90.tar.bz2.orig
See below - BuildRequires correct
OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install
OK - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
OK - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions)
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane.
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
Notes:
Two of the files are LGPLv2+, but that should make the package still GPLv2+.
(parole-subtitle-encoding.[ch])
rpmlint is silent.
Issues:
1. A few optional packages we might be able to build with:
checking for optional package libnotify >= 0.4.1... not found
checking for optional package taglib >= 1.4... not found
Other than that I don't see any blockers, so this package is APPROVED.
Check into the optional packages above before importing.
Let me know if you would like a co-maintainer, happy to help.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526204] Review Request: ucs-fixed-fonts selected set of bitmap fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526204 Pravin Satpute changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(psatp...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Pravin Satpute 2009-10-08 00:46:38 EDT --- Done all the changes, not much sure about license, please guide me if any problem SPEC URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts.spec SRPM URL : http://pravins.fedorapeople.org/ucs-miscfixed-fonts-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459211] Review Request: oolite - A space sim game, inspired by Elite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459211 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Rich Mattes 2009-10-07 22:51:42 EDT --- I downloaded and built the latest Oolite SRPM on F11 x86 (1.73.4-1) for an informal review. Here are some of my observations: 1. No errors in rpmlint. 2. gcc-objc not specified in BuildRequires. My machine tried to build it without that package, and obviously failed. 3. Launcher in Applications/Games folder doesn't work for me, I have to launch it from the command line. 4. Program runs fine when launched from command line. Hope this helps! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #79 from Jens Petersen 2009-10-07 22:24:29 EDT --- (I just mention in passing that people who like awesome might want to take a look at bluetile too: which is also pretty cool and works in fedora today... See pkg review bug 522821 or something like this should work: # yum install cabal-install ghc-X11-devel ghc-gtk-devel ghc-glade-devel # cabal update # cabal install bluetile # ~/.cabal/bin/bluetile to give it a spin.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #13 from Ryan Rix 2009-10-07 21:44:05 EDT --- Okay, it's no hurry, just want to make sure it didn't fall into a black hole. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 21:29:58 EDT --- I'm very low on time right now; let me see if I can carve some out over the next couple of days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 Matthew Daniels changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Daniels 2009-10-07 21:21:34 EDT --- This package became irrelevant when Ian Weller updated mw-render anyway, so I'm closing the bug request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 --- Comment #11 from Ryan Rix 2009-10-07 21:16:00 EDT --- Hi Jason, just seeing how this is coming along... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227027] Review Request: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE Summary|Merge Review: |Review Request: |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |Collection of tasks for Ant |Collection of tasks for Ant --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 20:40:47 EDT --- Hmm, maybe this isn't a merge review. This package has a proper review request and was accepted. I assume this ticket was simply filed in error, because the package had been in the distro for several months when this ticket was submitted. Orcan, of course you're welcome to look over the existing package and suggest improvements if you think that's a good use of your time. We currently have no mechanism for doing re-reviews, however. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 193894 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193894] Review Request: ant-contrib - A collection of tasks for Ant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193894 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rafa...@redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-10-07 20:40:47 EDT --- *** Bug 227027 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227027] Merge Review: ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - Collection of tasks for Ant
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Merge Review: |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |ant-contrib-1.0-0.b2.1jpp - |Collection of tasks for Ant |Collection of tasks for Ant -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #26 from Bruno Cornec 2009-10-07 19:51:41 EDT --- Yes, I still plan to ork on this. I'm waiting for an approval by HP OSRB to be able to work on this. Shouldn't take too long now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spur...@students.uni-mainz. ||de --- Comment #25 from Thomas Spura 2009-10-07 19:08:06 EDT --- ping: bcornec, wolfy any update on this? If you don't plan to add these packages, cvs can be deleted again… How to commit it to cvs is described at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #11 from David Huff 2009-10-07 17:44:23 EDT --- Ok, we have decided include include the recipe, ks file for the node image, and the deployment tools in a sub package of this rpm. This simplifies things and only requires maintenance of one package. The new srpm and spec file are here: http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.src.rpm http://huff.fedorapeople.org/ovirt-node.spec rpmlint output below only real issue is with ovirt-functions,a nd form dgilmore's comments above looks like the can be ignored. $ rpmlint /home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/ovirt-node-tools-1.0.3-4.fc12.noarch.rpm ovirt-node-tools.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized oVirt Node tools for building and running an oVirt Node image 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/david/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ovirt-node-1.0.3-4.fc12.x86_64.rpm ovirt-node.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions 0644 None ovirt-node.x86_64: E: init-script-non-executable /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: no-chkconfig-line /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-functions ovirt-node.x86_64: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ovirt-firstboot 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #21 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-07 17:40:44 EDT --- This package is already available in F-12 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527840] Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-10-07 17:41:40 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review later tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527840] New: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527840 Summary: Review Request: parole - Media player for the Xfce desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cwick...@fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parole.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/parole-0.1.90-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Parole is a modern simple media player based on the GStreamer framework and written to fit well in the Xfce desktop. Parole features playback of local media files, DVD/CD and live streams. Parole is extensible via plugins. The project still in its early developments stage, but already contains the following features: * Audio playback * Video playback with optional subtitle * Playback of live sources Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1734083 Notes: The 'Mute' menu entry doesn't work. Should I remove it from the menu for now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516293] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-OpenSsh - OpenSsh configuration files editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516293 David Hannequin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||516281 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516281] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-TkUI - Tk GUI to edit config data through Config::Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516281 David Hannequin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||516293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516287] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-Itself - Model editor for Config::Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516287 --- Comment #2 from David Hannequin 2009-10-07 16:43:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: > http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself.spec > SRPM URL: > http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-modules/perl-Config-Model-Itself/perl-Config-Model-Itself-1.211-1.fc10.src.rpm > Description: The Config::Itself and its model files provide a model of > Config:Model. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #20 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 16:38:43 EDT --- Was someone going to request this to be tagged for F-12? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #50 from Tim Fenn 2009-10-07 16:24:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > > I can also try on fedora 10. Is there anything specific to try? I'm working on setting up a %check macro in the rpm now, I'll try to have that ready soon. I'm also working with upstream to clarify the license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516280] Review Request: perl-Config-Model-CursesUI - Curses interface to edit config data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516280 --- Comment #4 from David Hannequin 2009-10-07 16:20:09 EDT --- It 's build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524147] Review Request: libnetdevname -Development environment for libnetdevname
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524147 --- Comment #19 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-10-07 15:49:31 EDT --- Everything looks good. Please go ahead and request CVS. Thanks Praveen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503939] Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:44:13 EDT --- Why do we need two versions of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503727] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:43:42 EDT --- For these sorts of things, do they *require* the server program (dhcp, bind, etc.) to be present, or will they return appropriate "not configured/not installed" data to the requester if it's not? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #8 from Luke Macken 2009-10-07 15:38:31 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited-0.7.10-1.fc11.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/orbited.spec * Wed Oct 07 2009 Luke Macken - 0.7.10-1 - Update to 0.7.10 - Apply a patch to add a --daemon argument * Sat Aug 08 2009 Luke Macken - 0.7.9-2 - Ship a working version of urlparse for Orbited on RHEL5 http://orbited.org/ticket/24 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-10-07 15:34:28 EDT --- I sent a modified version of spots patch upstream for inclusion. I also tested the patch locally, and it seems to do the trick. http://groups.google.com/group/orbited-users/browse_thread/thread/2fe09fefb9295421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #23 from Bill Nottingham 2009-10-07 15:26:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > sblim-sfcb-base will need a minor update after this package is approved, to > BR: > sblim-indication_helper-devel, to automatically pick up indication support. This part didn't appear to happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520479] Review Request: myproxy - Manage X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (PKI)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520479
--- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-10-07 15:18:13
EDT ---
Thanks.
Updated packages include white space changes, change in how initddir is
set for epel, removal of useless _name variable and removal of redundant
%attr flags.
Also:
- Add ASL 2.0 license as well.
- Explicitly add /etc/grid-security to files list
- For .el4/5 build only add globus-gss-assist-devel as requirement
to myproxy-devel package.
i.e everything you mentioned.
Also I swapped %{_sharedstatedir} for %{_var}/lib since the former
is /usr/com on .el5 it seems.
rpmlint is unchanged:
myproxy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy
myproxy-server.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/myproxy myproxy
myproxy-server.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/myproxy 0700
myproxy-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/myproxy-server
$prog
a .fc13 and .el5 koji build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1733813
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1733819
and the update:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy.spec
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/myproxy/myproxy-4.8-4.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:24:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-typepad Short Description: A helper Django app for making TypePad applications Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:24:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-typepad Short Description: Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:21:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-batchhttp Short Description: Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:16:25 EDT --- Ah! Missed the fedora-cvs flag, adding that now. Request as above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:19:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-remoteobjects Short Description: An Object RESTational Model Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:15:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-oauth Short Description: Library for OAuth version 1.0a Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527317] Review Request: django-flash - A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527317 --- Comment #3 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 14:15:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-flash Short Description: A Django extension to provide support for Rails-like flash Owners: sdz Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 Lennart Poettering changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(michael.silvanus@ ||gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523553] Review Request: mutrace - Mutex Tracer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523553 --- Comment #17 from Lennart Poettering 2009-10-07 14:01:56 EDT --- Thanks. Merged your patch (thanks for prepping that!), and added the GPL3 license text. Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/mutrace-0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Matthias Clasen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-07 12:49:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: umlgraph Short Description: Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams Owners: akurtakov Branches: F-12 InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Booth 2009-10-07 12:11:27 EDT
---
MUST items:
*** rpmlint reports errors shown above [1]
Package is named according to the package naming guidelines
spec file name matches the base package name
Package meets the packaging guidelines
Package is licensed with a Fedora approved license
License field in spec file matches actual license
Spec file is written in American English
Spec file is legible
*** Upstream sources are not available [2]
Package successfully builds on i686 and x86_64
*** Package uses ExclusiveArch [3]
All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires
Upstream does not contain localisation
ldconfig is called in %post and %postun for vm-dump-metrics
Package does not bundle copies of system libraries
Package is not relocatable
Package owns all directories that it creates
No files are listed more than once in %files
Permissions on files are set properly
Package has a %clean section containing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Package uses macros consistently
Package contains only code
Package does not include 'large documentation files'
%doc files are not required for correct function
Header files are in -devel package
Static libraries are not built
Package does not include pkgconfig files (but autoconf still uses pkgconfig)
Bare .so file is in -devel pacakge
-devel subpackage requires parent subpackage
Package does not contain .la libtool archives
Package does not contain a gui application
Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages
%install runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
All filenames are valid UTF-8
SHOULD items:
Source package includes license text
*** Description and summary sections do not contain translations (not blocker)
Package builds in mock (see koji build in original submission)
Package compiles and builds for supported architectures (but see [3])
*** Package caused system to become unstable requiring reboot [4]
Scriptlets are sane
Subpackage does not need to require base package in this case
Package does not contain pkgconfig files
Package does not have file dependencies
Misc:
Did you consider any of the other approaches to removing the use of rpath in
the spec file?
Notes:
[1] If the 2 DTDs are genuinely not configuration files, they should be
removed. I note that they're already in %doc, which seems appropriate.
[2] It's not clear how the tarball was obtained or can be reproduced exactly
from source. I'm not able to verify this.
[3] I'm taking ExclusiveArch here to be semantically equivalent to
ExcludeArch. I note that xen (which is a dependency), also has an
ExclusiveArch. libvirt has a solution to this which involves not building
against xen where it is not available. Is this possible in this package?
[4] Starting vhostmd on my F-11 host flooded /var/log/messages with:
Oct 7 14:51:06 mbooth libvirtd: 14:51:06.616: error :
qemudDomainLookupByID:3028 : Domain not found: no domain with matching id 0
Oct 7 14:51:06 mbooth libvirtd: 14:51:06.619: error :
qemudDomainLookupByName:3080 : Domain not found: no domain with matching name
'0'
Oct 7 14:53:51 mbooth vhostmd: Error retrieving metric UsedMem
Oct 7 14:53:53 mbooth vhostmd: Failed to collect vm metrics during update
and the following 2 AVC messages:
Oct 7 14:42:33 mbooth kernel: type=1400 audit(1254922953.004:17101): avc:
denied { read write } for pid=32590 comm="virsh"
path="/dev/shm/vhostmd/disk0"
dev=tmpfs ino=2946820 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 tclass=file
Oct 7 14:42:33 mbooth kernel: type=1400 audit(1254922953.012:17102): avc:
denied { getsched } for pid=32590 comm="virsh"
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0 tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:xm_t:s0
tclass=process
The system became sluggish after only a few seconds, and unresponsive
requiring a reboot shortly after that. This may be a problem with SELinux
policy or the default configuration file. Either way, I'd be uncomfortable
shipping the package with this as the default behaviour. Is this still a
problem on rawhide? I didn't test there.
-
Rich,
Can you respond to Misc and 4 Notes above first?
Matt
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:45 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:50 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:55 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525210] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525210 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-10-07 11:57:40 EDT --- rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-ditz-0.5-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601
--- Comment #3 from Ionuț Arțăriși 2009-10-07
11:55:19 EDT ---
> [rak...@dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint swish-e.spec
> swish-e.spec:92: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*cgi
> swish-e.spec:94: E: hardcoded-library-path in
> %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/swishspider
> swish-e.spec:95: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*pl
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
> Ignore all of them .. I cannot find any macro which specially expands to
> /usr/lib/ on 64bit and not to /usr/lib64/
Strangely, it seems that the configure sets a hardcoded library path of /lib
and your hardcoding actually counters that, so it's ok.
> file-not-utf8 please ignore this one as some names are in not utf-8 and
> changing them would make sense either.
I skimmed the text in those files and failed to find any non-utf-8
characters. The problem with those files is that they're in the old iso-8859-1
charset (as `file -i` reveals). Converting them to UTF-8 is painless:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8
Please don't mix macros styles:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
These errors also require changed permissions
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#script-without-shebang
perl-SWISH.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/Filter.pm
perl-SWISH.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/SWISH/TemplateFrame.pm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527402] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527402
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.giesek...@uos.de
--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking 2009-10-07
11:45:24 EDT ---
A couple of comments:
- you must probably add Requires: gtest >= 1.4.0 because it's not recognized
automatically
- is the required gtest version always greater or equal than the version of
gmock? If not, I'd suggest to replace BR:gtest-devel >= %{version} by
BR:gtest-devel >= 1.4.0
- the lines in the %description section shouldn't exceed 80 characters
- add the version and revision number to the first line of the changelog entry:
Sun Oct 4 2009 Tejas Dinkar - 1.4.0-1
$ rpmlint /home/mgieseki/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gmock-*
gmock.i586: E: description-line-too-long Inspired by jMock, EasyMock, and
Hamcrest, and designed with C++'s specifics in mind,
gmock.i586: E: description-line-too-long Google C++ Mocking Framework (or
Google Mock for short) is a library for writing and using C++ mock classes.
Google Mock:
gmock.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
gmock.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgmock.so.0.0.0 _e...@glibc_2.0
gmock-debuginfo.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
gmock-devel.i586: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
gmock-devel.i586: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 5 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #49 from Jess R Jones 2009-10-07 11:37:00 EDT --- I've thrown up the clipper and gtkglext packages here: http://people.bath.ac.uk/cs1jrj/software/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527753] New: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527753 Summary: An EPEL branch request for sblim-cmpi-devel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrho...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? The existing sblim-cmpi-devel package is missing review ticket, so I'm opening new bug in accordance with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#other to request an EPEL branch. Package Change Request == Package Name: sblim-cmpi-devel New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: vcrhonek I'm not sure if "Package Review" is correct component, please let me know if not - because there will be probably need to do this procedure with few more packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 Andrew Overholt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-10-07 11:19:58 EDT --- Thanks, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #14 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-10-07 11:13:47 EDT --- Fixed and fixed. New spec file is up, and new SRPM is at http://www.nebrwesleyan.edu/people/stpierre/qbrew-0.4.1-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 11:10:53 EDT --- > couchdb-glib-devel is listed as a BuildRequirement, but I can't find it in > bugzilla. Have you submitted it for review? Check the dependencies of this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526688] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526688 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-10-07 11:05:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Only issue: missing BR/R on graphviz Fixed. New sources: Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/umlgraph-5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm > > - sources fine (md5sums match) > - naming fine > - license fine > - builds fine > - files good > - macros good > - rpmlint fine (ignore maven fragment warning) > > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/umlgraph-5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/umlgraph-* > umlgraph.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/umlgraph > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 11:05:22 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527245] Review Request: evolution-couchdb - An evolution backend to CouchDBs for PIM information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527245 Ionuț Arțăriși changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maple...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Ionuț Arțăriși 2009-10-07 11:05:13 EDT --- Hi! (this is not a review) couchdb-glib-devel is listed as a BuildRequirement, but I can't find it in bugzilla. Have you submitted it for review? Also, why does the description describe couchdb-glib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502854] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 11:03:55 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 --- Comment #48 from Adam Huffman 2009-10-07 10:26:30 EDT --- Re https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150#c46 - yes, that would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-07 10:09:12 EDT --- According to upstream a new release will come out soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2009-10-07 10:12:20 EDT --- There is still no new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479598] Review Request: aopalliance - AOP offers a better solution to many problems than do existing technologies
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479598 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-10-07 10:08:04 EDT --- That's unfortunate for JBoss. You might try reaching out to the members individually: http://aopalliance.sourceforge.net/members.html Also, you could try emailing Andrei Popovici directly: popov...@inf.ethz.ch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150
--- Comment #47 from Pascal Parois 2009-10-07 10:05:45
EDT ---
I used http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=118213 but it's not
compiling on centos, because of the conditions %if 0%{?fedora} < 8
I managed to get a rpm anyway.
About Coot which is the main thing here, centos is not happy:
+ find . -executable '(' -name '*.cc' -o -name '*.cpp' -o -name '*.h' -o -name
'*.hh' ')' -exec chmod 644 '{}' ';'
find: invalid predicate `-executable'
[pas...@localhost rpmbuild]$ find --version
GNU find version 4.2.27
I just removed -executable to continue
I also modified the latex part:
%if "%{dist}" >= ".fc"
BuildRequires: tex(latex)
%else
BuildRequires: tetex-latex
%endif
I built it against mmdb 1.19
Finally it's working. I don't know coot, so I couldn't test correctly. I load a
mdb file and got the structure on the screen, that's it.
I don't know the consequence of using an old mmdb either.
I can also try on fedora 10. Is there anything specific to try?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Ben Boeckel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maths...@gmail.com --- Comment #38 from Ben Boeckel 2009-10-07 10:02:03 EDT --- FWIW, with sed as complex as that, I would suggest using a patch, but I do agree with Kevin here. The patch would be much easier to maintain than sed commands (if a flag gets added, the sed line has to be fixed then tested to make sure something else doesn't get chomped where the patch just needs updated). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) 2009-10-07 09:48:05 EDT --- thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527319] Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for building online communities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 09:47:26 EDT --- And another build, which adds sqlite as a dependency. Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527431] Review Request: python-batchhttp - Parallel fetching of HTTP resources through MIME multipart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527431 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527445] Review Request: django-typepad - A helper Django app for making TypePad applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527445 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||527316, 527428, 527431, ||527433 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Dziallas 2009-10-07 09:39:25 EDT --- Whoa! Thanks for all the reviews - great stuff... :) Yes, you're right. Sorry, I missed the dependencies in this request (and have added them now). The ones in the other reviews should be accurate, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527428] Review Request: python-remoteobjects - An Object RESTational Model
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527428 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527433] Review Request: python-typepad - Connectivity to the TypePad API through remote objects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527433 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527316] Review Request: python-oauth - Library for OAuth version 1.0a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527316 Sebastian Dziallas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||527445 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503495] Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-10-07 09:10:25 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515090] Review Request: moblin-menus - Moblin config and data file for desktop menus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515090 Peter Robinson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-10-07 09:07:35 EDT --- Closing as the redhat-menus provides enough of what's required. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517488] Review Request: vhostmd - Virtualization host metrics daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517488 Matthew Booth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mbo...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mbo...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527706] New: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: d...@adsllc.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-libgeotiff.spec SRPM URL: http://www.adsllc.com/tmp/mingw32-libgeotiff-1.3.0-svn1664.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library GeoTIFF represents an effort by over 160 different remote sensing, GIS, cartographic, and surveying related companies and organizations to establish a TIFF based interchange format for georeferenced raster imagery. This is my second package submission, and I am looking for a sponsor. See also: mingw32-proj. The source for this is SVN rev 1664 from https://svn.osgeo.org/metacrs/geotiff/trunk/libgeotiff, then './autogen.sh' and 'mingw32-configure' and 'make dist'. The latest release has build system issues that make porting difficult so a SVN snapshot is used instead for now - I expect libgeotiff-1.3.0 to fix this when it is released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
