[Bug 529404] Review Request: cvc3 - Validity checker of many-sorted first-order formulas with theories
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529404 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466
--- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-10-19 03:18:02
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Different done:
- %doc htmldocs/* instead %doc htmldocs:
in configure is a docdir option, but now they are installed in
/usr/share/doc/linbox-html and not in /usr/share/doc/linbox-doc-1.1.6
only one file /usr/share/doc/linbox.html needs to rm.
That won't do. You're breaking the naming convention in /usr/share/doc. You
have to place the files under /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ (or
/usr/share/doc/%{name}-doc-%{version}/ ).
Note that linbox.html is the index page of the documentation and must not be
removed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-10-19 03:35:27
EDT ---
My suggestion is still to use
# Remove docs that are installed in the wrong place
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/doc
in %install and
%doc doc/linbox.html doc/linbox-html
in %files of -doc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494557] Review Request: zatacka - Arcade multiplayer game for 2-6 players on one keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494557 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 03:46:31 EDT --- Remove the blocker on FE-DEADREVIEW if you reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488
--- Comment #50 from LINBIT part...@linbit.com 2009-10-19 03:50:49 EDT ---
Spec file and SRPM:
http://people.linbit.com/~florian/drbd.spec
http://people.linbit.com/~florian/drbd-8.3.4-10.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #48)
Well,
* %description
- I don't think writing the authors of this software in
%description is needed.
Gone.
- And the description Please report bugs to drbd-...@lists.linbit.com
is in my opinion wrong (because we have our BTS)
Gone.
* BuildRequires
- BR: gcc is redundant:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
I realize that; however I still prefer to list the full build dependencies. The
packaging guidelines state that the packages are considered the minimum build
environment, but if a clueless user happens to run rpmbuild without gcc
installed, then I consider it proper to fail with an unsatisfied build
dependency, rather than with a relatively obscure error from configure, midway
during %prep.
* Dependency between subpackages
- Usually the dependency between packages rebuilt from a srpm should
be strict EVR (not just version) specific
(i.e. usually the dependency should be like:
Requires: %{name}-utils = %{version}-%{release} )
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
Fixed.
* Parallel make
- Use %{?_smp_mflags} instead of %{_smp_mflags} because %{_smp_mflags} macro
may not be defined.
Fixed.
* %bcond_without
- If you want to really use %bcond_without/%bcond_with, please support
all possible patterns carefully, or just drop to use %bcond_ method.
! For example currently passing --without utils to your srpm fails
because all other subpackages depend on -utils subpackage but
with --without utils -utils subpackage won't be rebuilt.
I had considered it convenient to still be able to provide a shortcut for
rolling, for example, a drbd-udev package without having to compile utils.
Which would absolutely be possible as far as the configure/make/make install
procedure is concerned. Apparently this convenience is not needed, thus, the
--with utils conditional is gone.
* %defattr
- Now we recommend to use %defattr(-,root,root,-)
Fixed.
* About -rgmanager subpackage
- Is -rgmanager part really needed? From the description in the spec file
currently this subpackage can be rebuilt only for F-10, which is about to
be EOL and on F-11/12/13 this cannot be supported.
Addressed by Fabio -- see comment #49.
* License tag
- scripts/drbd.ocf is under GPLv2 and installed as
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/linbit/drbd, -pacemaker subpackage should have
GPLv2 and GPLv2+ license tag (or just GPLv2)
Good catch. Both the Linux-HA and Pacemaker projects seem, for the time being,
to be GPLv2 exclusive, so I fixed the License tag for both drbd-pacemaker and
drbd-heartbeat.
* sysvinit script treatment
- Some Requires(post) or so are missing.
Fixed.
- Would you explain why condrestart is not needed at %postun (on upgrade)?
The drbd init script merely configures DRBD resources listed in drbd.conf. It
does not start or stop any daemon or similar. The only situation in which a
restart would be needed during a package upgrade would be if
a) new features (and hence, new drbd.conf keywords) would be introduced in the
new release, AND
b) a resource listed in the drbd.conf configuration file would be changed to
actually use one of those new features.
Since b) is impossible as the configuration file is listed as
%config(noreplace) and is hence not touched upon upgrade, a condrestart is not
required on upgrade.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets
- Please use %{_initddir}
Fixed. I now use %{_initddir} and if that is not defined, I fall back to
%{_initrddir} -- the spec has to build on CentOS 5, which does not have
%{_initddir} defined.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem
* Duplicate files
- You don't have to include COPYING file as %doc other than -utils
subpackage because all other packages depends on -utils subpackage.
Now I have two conflicting reviewer comments. Fabio (in comment #17) tells me
that all subpackages should contain the COPYING file. Mamoru (in comment #48)
tells me they shouldn't.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text is
inconclusive and doesn't mention sub-packages specifically. What should I do?
Build logs:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1753544 (f12)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1753549 (f13)
Changelog:
093e841... drbd.spec.in: remove reference to authors and bug reports
38114ad... drbd.spec.in: fix dependencies to include release number
[Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-10-19 04:17:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Ankur, This version is good. If you hear from upstream make them write a better description. I'll recontact them. Lets hope for a reply this time. ⚺⚺⚺ APPROVED ⚺⚺⚺ You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Continuing from here. I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation on the fonts mailing list. Yup, it was pleasant and I'm going to continue packaging fonts :) . You're taking good care of the fonts-sig, I really have no improvements to point out yet. :) Thank you for your contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-10-19 04:20:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: gargi-fonts Short Description: A Free Unicode OpenType Font Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-12 F-11 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 04:24:33 EDT --- test name=size, even. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528675] Review Request: knm-new-fonts - 12x12 JIS X 0208 Bitmap font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528675 Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(ta...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH ta...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 04:23:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) 4. you should put /etc/X11/fontpath.d/knm-new and /usr/share/fonts/knm-new/fonts.dir in a separate legacy subpackage Is there any template or the proposed subpackage name for that? knm-new-fixed-legacy-fonts? or knm-new-fixed-fonts-legacy? 7. It would be nice to include a fontconfig file for the font I'm not quite sure if this kind of the bitmap fonts only available for some pt. really helps though. hmm, I haven't tested but something like this? ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 !DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM ../fonts.dtd fontconfig alias familyFixed/family default familymonospace/family /default /alias match test name=lang stringja-jp/string /test test name=family stringmonospace/string /test test name=size compare=eq double12/double /test edit name=family mode=prepend binding=same stringFixed/string /edit /match /fontconfig FWIW I don't think Japanese people wants to see the bitmap glyphs for the desktop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Bug 496133 depends on bug 529512, which changed state. Bug 529512 Summary: internal compiler error when building EMBOSS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529512 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526916] Review Request: orc - The Oil Runtime Compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916 --- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2009-10-19 04:51:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=365216) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=365216) local build log I've attached my build log. However, the tests succeed in a koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1753565 Currently, I have no clue why they fail on my system (F-11, x86_64). As you can see in the koji build logs, the tests also crash with a segfault on ppc systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Mihai Limbășan mi...@limbasan.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529569] Review Request: mingw32-speex - MinGW build of the Speex voice compression codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569 Mihai Limbășan mi...@limbasan.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Mihai Limbășan mi...@limbasan.ro changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 06:05:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sblim-tools-libra Short Description: The tools-libra package provides common functionality required by the task-specific resource access layers of wbem-smt tasks such as cmpi-dns and cmpi-samba. Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502843] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Vitezslav Crhonek vcrho...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 06:13:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sblim-cmpi-fsvol Short Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Fsvol Providers. Owners: vcrhonek Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:08:15 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:08:12 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529024] Review Request: GNUsTicker - Gnome RSS feed reader applet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529024 --- Comment #6 from Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 07:10:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/GNUsTicker.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/rpms/GNUsTicker-0.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm There you, properly cleaned up as per your notes. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2009-10-19 07:12:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: opensaml Short Description: Security Assertion Markup Language Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515136] Review Request: gettext-commons - Java internationalization (i18n) library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515136
Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk 2009-10-19 07:13:59 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #5)
You mix $THIS_STYLE and %{this_style} variables, which is bad form so the
guidelines say. You can easily fix this by replacing all instances of
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}
AFAIK What I did is perfectly acceptable. I didn't use both $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
and
%{buildroot} - I only used the first.
Moreover, all other macros are in the second style because they do not have an
equivalent in the first syntax.
You can find a great number of spec files that do the same in Fedora CVS.
Fair enough.
I'm happy to rubber-stamp this now. APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2009-10-19 07:14:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xmltooling Short Description: XML signing and encrytion library Owners: stevetraylen Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 521430] Review Request: etckeeper - Store /etc in git, mercurial, bzr or darcs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521430 --- Comment #13 from Terje Røsten terje...@phys.ntnu.no 2009-10-19 07:23:31 EDT --- I can't find the package in F11 updates, can you please push it for F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521
--- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19
07:22:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Install license file looks bad...
What about a
%doc GLOBUS_LICENSE
instead of
%doc %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/GLOBUS_LICENSE
?
Using %doc on a non-installed file implies an implicit rm -rf on the doc
directory. For this particular package that lacks doxygen documentation in the
sources this would be harmless since there are no files installed there, but
this is not the case for properly documented Globus packages. In order to
decrease the effort needed to maintain the Globus packages the differences
between the specfiles for the different packages should be kept at a minimum.
For this reason the lines in the specfile that are responsible for the
packaging of the license file is kept the same for all Globus packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516532] Review Request: globus-scheduler-event-generator - Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516532 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:35:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) line to long. The discussion in bug 516516, comment 2 applies here as well. Quoting the above reference: The definition of the description of the debuginfo package is not part if the specfile, but is defined in the %debug_info macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:35:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gatekeeper Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516534] Review Request: globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus GRAM Jobmanager Callout Errors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516534 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:36:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Comment: The end result of this huge number of packages is excellent but the work the process to get to that point. It's worth while for sure. Liked the article. http://www.isgtw.org/?pid=1002049 Thanks. Just the trivial line to long but its easy to fix, presumably can be added to your .spec generator. Just the trivial description. The discussion in bug 516516, comment 2 applies here as well. Quoting the above reference: The definition of the description of the debuginfo package is not part if the specfile, but is defined in the %debug_info macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 07:34:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gram-client Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2009-10-19 07:44:50 EDT --- Could we at least submit a bug on the macro. It could be changed more generally I say to perhaps always word wrap at the desired length. Steve APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de 2009-10-19
08:03:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #12)
Different done:
- %doc htmldocs/* instead %doc htmldocs:
in configure is a docdir option, but now they are installed in
/usr/share/doc/linbox-html and not in /usr/share/doc/linbox-doc-1.1.6
only one file /usr/share/doc/linbox.html needs to rm.
That won't do. You're breaking the naming convention in /usr/share/doc. You
have to place the files under /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/ (or
/usr/share/doc/%{name}-doc-%{version}/ ).
Arrg, I suspected something like this :(
Note that linbox.html is the index page of the documentation and must not be
removed.
No, it's not, there is just a redirecting to linbox/index.html, so linbox.html
isself is unecessary to me.
The rest is installed with: %doc doc/linbox-html/*
So the index file lives now at /usr/share/doc/linbox-doc-1.1.6/index.html
Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/linbox-1.1.6-6.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:11:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-freeglut Short Description: Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT) Owners: rjones mingw-maint Branches: F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:09:43 EDT --- Paulo, thanks. I have no idea about the VirtualBox problem, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-10-19 08:16:09 EDT --- OK, everything seems fine now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:16:24 EDT --- Package looks sane, but any reason why you want to keep the static library? (In reply to comment #1) Wasn't able to figure out how to run make check in mock. The tests complete successfully in ~/rpmbuild, but since they generate Wiin32-PE .exe files the mock run croaks due to the missing Wine binary loader, and I'd really, really want to avoid having a mingw package BR Wine. That's simply not supported. Koji might happen to run on (eg) x86-64 or PPC builder, where Wine either can't be installed or couldn't run even if it could be installed. Don't worry about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:20:27 EDT --- Looks sane. Same comment about packaging the static library. If you want to get these reviewed, you'll have to ask someone nicely on the fedora-mingw / fedora-devel-list mailing lists, and probably swap a review with someone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529569] Review Request: mingw32-speex - MinGW build of the Speex voice compression codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529569 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:21:34 EDT --- Package looks sane. Same comment re static libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466 Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Thomas Spura spur...@students.uni-mainz.de 2009-10-19 08:32:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: linbox Short Description: C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra Owners: tomspur Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 --- Comment #16 from Bradley bba...@acm.org 2009-10-19 08:47:22 EDT --- Thanks for doing this - I was considering it before I saw that you were working on it. A couple of comments/bugs, though: * It doesn't work when built for x86_64 - /usr/bin/calibre adds /usr/lib/calibre to the libpath, but that should be lib64. Same for the plugin path. * I had problems building an unpatched calibre from upstream, because it wouldn't compile. You've added calibre-outputdev.patch to work around this, but I'm not sure that that is correct. calibre is documented as requiring poppler-0.12, which isn't in F11, and that function's signature has changed. It compiles, but it looks like it'll just recurse infinitely - rather than call the parent class's method it calls itself. I haven't worked out how to trigger that code, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529375] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529375 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||debarshi@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:56:41 EDT --- *** Bug 529561 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529561] Review Request: emerillon - A map viewer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529561 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||sunda...@redhat.com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 08:56:41 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 529375 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #3 from Mihai Limbășan mi...@limbasan.ro 2009-10-19 08:59:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Package looks sane, but any reason why you want to keep the static library? Not really, no - I just aped the behavior of some other mingw32-* library packages. Can be dropped any time (from the other dependent packages as well.) That's simply not supported. Koji might happen to run on (eg) x86-64 or PPC builder, where Wine either can't be installed or couldn't run even if it could be installed. Don't worry about it. Thanks, I thought I was missing something. I'm still running all tests I can manually - e.g., working on mingw32-xz now, and some edge case tests fail depending on the MINGW32_CFLAGS you pick, which would seem to point to some compiler problems, so properly passing all tests should be a priority. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 --- Comment #2 from Mihai Limbășan mi...@limbasan.ro 2009-10-19 09:07:14 EDT --- Thanks, will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 09:14:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Could we at least submit a bug on the macro. It could be changed more generally I say to perhaps always word wrap at the desired length. Such a bug report already exists: see bug 484616. (It was already submitted by someone else.)(In reply to comment #5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #6 from Dave Ludlow d...@adsllc.com 2009-10-19 09:09:26 EDT --- Upstream packaging bug submitted so that LICENSE (and other things) get included in the tarball: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/3192 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-10-19 09:15:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: globus-gridftp-server-control Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 519282] Review Request: calibre - e-book converter and library manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519282 --- Comment #17 from Bradley bba...@acm.org 2009-10-19 09:17:13 EDT --- Also, it puts the udev rules into /lib64/udev/rules.d but everyone else uses /lib/udev/rules.d, even on 64-bit. It also owns the rules.d directory, but I don't think that it should - udev can presumably be assumed to be present (I'm not a package maintainer, though, but no other package that adds udev rules owns the rules.d directory) /usr/share/calibre/fonts/liberation should presumably be using the system liberation fonts instead of its own copy? What about /usr/share/calibre/fonts/prs500 ? Is /usr/lib64/calibre/calibre/trac needed? The description has a typo - s/It also upports/It also supports/. Plus its not accurate - it supports writing and reading from mostly the same set of formats. And finally, it still has its own copy of python-genshi Thanks a lot for doing this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529548] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - MinGW build of the libogg bitstream library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529548 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 09:34:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) That's simply not supported. Koji might happen to run on (eg) x86-64 or PPC builder, where Wine either can't be installed or couldn't run even if it could be installed. Don't worry about it. I should explain that there are three related issues here which stop us from running Wine. Two are bugs (IMHO) in RPM or Koji. One is a bug (IMHO) in Wine itself. (1) RPM/Koji doesn't understand cross-compilation at all. Our target packages are all noarch which is (sort of) correct within the bounds of RPM[*]. Because the package is noarch, Koji decides that it can be built on any machine, so it can choose a PPC builder for example. On PPC, the cross-compiler works, but Wine could never run. But there is no way to say to Koji that a package is noarch, but should be built anyway on i386. [*] If you prefer you can think of wine as an interpreter, interpreting Win32 PE executables, something like: foo.pl is interpreted by /usr/bin/perl foo.exe is interpreted by /usr/bin/wine (2) Koji won't install Wine on x86-64, because Wine is an i386 package. Koji doesn't understand multilib (probably a good thing, because multilib is crack). (3) Wine after installation doesn't just work. You have to fiddle with a difficult configuration file: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Configure_wine which is difficult to automate. Wine used to have an environment variable (WINE_PATH or something?) but they removed it(!) Thanks, I thought I was missing something. I'm still running all tests I can manually - e.g., working on mingw32-xz now, and some edge case tests fail depending on the MINGW32_CFLAGS you pick, which would seem to point to some compiler problems, so properly passing all tests should be a priority. As long as you're testing it, that's good. It doesn't look like we'll ever get the Koji issues fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Dave Ludlow d...@adsllc.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dave Ludlow d...@adsllc.com 2009-10-19 09:59:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts Short Description: A Latin typeface that is decorative, surreal, and hairy Owners: adsllc Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529387] Review Request: rcrpanel - Create a front panel for an electronics device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529387 --- Comment #14 from John J. McDonough wb8...@arrl.net 2009-10-19 10:11:40 EDT --- OK, I think I got all of the above, also corrected a few places where there were old, obsolete comments. New spec and srpm Spec URL: http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/rcrpanel.spec SRPM URL: http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/rcrpanel-3.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512016] Review Request: zikula-module-Polls - Simple voting system for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512016 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(i...@ianweller.org ||) --- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2009-10-19 10:20:05 EDT --- PING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(tcall...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 10:36:20 EDT --- Copyright only would be the appropriate licensing string to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 523799] Review Request: ascii - nteractive ascii name and synonym chart
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523799 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de 2009-10-19 11:24:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) [X] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - I'm not sure if ascii is a valid package name because generic terms should be avoided This name was choosen by upstream, so I think it's ok. If you not agree with me, please open a dispute on FESCo. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527996] Review Request: jempbox - Java library for working with XMP metadata
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527996 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2009-10-19 11:27:59 EDT --- Checked in and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2009-10-19 11:32:57 EDT --- Probably true. Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pdfbox-0.8.0-2.fc12.src.rpm * Mon Oct 19 2009 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com - 0.8.0-2 - Add Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 --- Comment #3 from Robin Sonefors ozam...@flukkost.nu 2009-10-19 11:30:26 EDT --- 1. don't really know if it's better to hang this on George Douros (gdouros-) or Unicode Fonts for Ancient Scripts (ufas-). Probably a good idea to ask upstream what they prefer. Please sync the wiki page name with the choice you make in the rpm Upstream prefers gdouros. 2. You have a typo in the description (Aegea) Fixed. 3. It'd be a good idea to convince the author to put his licensing info in the zip (as a detached txt file). If his web site ever disappears the Fonts in this site are offered free for any use; they may be opened, edited, modified, regenerated, posted, packaged and redistributed. statement will be lost (it's in the License font metadata field but sadly our font viewers seem not to display it right now so users will miss it Upstream said he'd try to do that, but has not done so yet. I'm assuming he'll do that once he makes a new release. 4. Since this is a non-standard licensing statement, please confirm with spot that Freely redistributable without restriction is the right licensing string to use Changed according to spot's comment. Spec URL (still): http://flukkost.nu/gdouros-aegean-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://flukkost.nu/gdouros-aegean-fonts-3.01-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Eric Christensen e...@christensenplace.us 2009-10-19 11:46:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: zikula-module-advanced_polls Short Description: Advanced voting system for Zikula Owners: sparks ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529466] Review Request: linbox - C++ Library for High-Performance Linear Algebra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529466 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 11:56:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529494] Review Request: drehatlas-warender-bibliothek-fonts - A decorative, hairy font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529494 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 11:54:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 11:57:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528096] Review Request: kmagnet - KDE puzzle game with built in editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528096 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 11:57:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529016] Review Request: yaml-cpp - A YAML parser and emitter for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529016 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:01:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527308] Review Request: xmltooling - XML signing and encrytion library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527308 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:15:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512021] Review Request: zikula-module-advanced_polls - Advanced voting system for Zikula
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512021 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:17:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:19:14 EDT --- Did you mean mingw-maint as a CC here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527336] Review Request: opensaml - Security Assertion Markup Language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527336 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:16:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:20:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529269] Review Request: cmospwd - BIOS password cracker utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529269 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:20:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502843] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:23:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 502596] Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:22:33 EDT --- I'd have to say that short description isn't very short. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516519] Review Request: globus-gram-client - Globus Toolkit - GRAM Client Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516519 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:25:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516516] Review Request: globus-gridftp-server-control - Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516516 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:24:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526351] Review Request: tito - A tool for managing rpm based git projects
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526351 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:28:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525005] Review Request: libmxp - MUD eXtension protocol library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525005 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:26:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526633] Review Request: gargi-fonts - A Devanagari font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526633 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:27:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516533] Review Request: globus-gatekeeper - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516533 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-10-19 12:26:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514311] Review Request: ovirt-node-recipe - oVirt Node image recipe and tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514311 David Huff dh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from David Huff dh...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 12:29:19 EDT --- ovirt-node-recipe will now be subpackage of ovirt-node rpm closing this bug as duplicate of 514221 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 514221 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 514221] Review Request: ovirt-node - The oVirt Node daemons/scripts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514221 --- Comment #12 from David Huff dh...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 12:29:20 EDT --- *** Bug 514311 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529016] Review Request: yaml-cpp - A YAML parser and emitter for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529016 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:03:06 EDT --- yaml-cpp-0.2.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yaml-cpp-0.2.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529016] Review Request: yaml-cpp - A YAML parser and emitter for C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529016 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:03:12 EDT --- yaml-cpp-0.2.2-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yaml-cpp-0.2.2-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528892] Review Request: mingw32-freeglut - Fedora MinGW alternative to the OpenGL Utility Toolkit (GLUT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528892 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-10-19 13:05:50 EDT --- Kevin, we usually add mingw-maint as a role account so that the mailing list gets CC'd on Bugzillas. But I can set this up manually so don't worry about it. Thanks for doing CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:16:02 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527488] Review Request: drbd - drbd tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #51 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-19 13:14:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) http://people.linbit.com/~florian/drbd-8.3.4-10.src.rpm - This is 404. (In reply to comment #48) * BuildRequires - BR: gcc is redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 I realize that; however I still prefer to list the full build dependencies. The packaging guidelines state that the packages are considered the minimum build environment, but if a clueless user happens to run rpmbuild without gcc installed, then I consider it proper to fail with an unsatisfied build dependency, rather than with a relatively obscure error from configure, midway during %prep. - In your sense not only gcc is affected (glibc-headers, make, tar, redhat-rpm-config and so on is also needed) and we don't want to write such redundant things. We regard gcc and so on are surely installed, and actually we recommend to use mock for clean build, which installs gcc automatically. Note that not a few users forget to install redhat-rpm-config more likely than gcc. * About -rgmanager subpackage - Is -rgmanager part really needed? From the description in the spec file currently this subpackage can be rebuilt only for F-10, which is about to be EOL and on F-11/12/13 this cannot be supported. Addressed by Fabio -- see comment #49. - It is preferable to write such explanation in the spec file and file a bug on RH bugzilla so that we can keep track of it. * Duplicate files - You don't have to include COPYING file as %doc other than -utils subpackage because all other packages depends on -utils subpackage. Now I have two conflicting reviewer comments. Fabio (in comment #17) tells me that all subpackages should contain the COPYING file. Mamoru (in comment #48) tells me they shouldn't. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text is inconclusive and doesn't mention sub-packages specifically. What should I do? - You don't have to include a document file which is included in a rpm which is required by the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:17:04 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529465] Review Request: thunar-vcs-plugin - SVN integration for the Thunar filemanager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529465 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:17:10 EDT --- thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunar-vcs-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529323] Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - Font for ancient scripts in the Aegean vicinity
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529323 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |ozam...@flukkost.nu Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-10-19 13:26:38 EDT --- This one is golden ♬♬♬ APPROVED ♬♬♬ You can now continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a I hope the process was pleasant, and that it will inspire you to package a other fonts for Fedora. Please do not hesitate to suggest improvements to our organisation or documentation on the fonts mailing list. Thank you for another contribution to our font package pool. ⇒ REASSIGNING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-19 13:33:46 EDT --- Well, * Redundant (Build)Requires - BuildRequires: python is redundant because python-devel requires python. - Requires python = 2.4 is redundant because python is required by pygtk2 and so on, and on supported Fedora branch python is at least 2.5.2. - Requires: pycairo, pygobject2 is redundant because these are required by pygtk2 - And = 2.10 in Requires: pygtk2 is redundant because on currently supported Fedora pygtk2 is 2.13.0. ! Note: - It seems that hgtk is a GUI application. Usually when packaging GUI application a corresponding desktop file should be installed altogether: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files However is seems that hgtk requires at least one argument invoking hgtk command only does not make sense. So for now I don't request to install a desktop file for hgtk. Then: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check No one is reviewing) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:13 EDT --- globus-mp-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-mp-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:39 EDT --- globus-authz-0.7-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-authz-0.7-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:16 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:26 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:20 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:02 EDT --- globus-mp-2.1-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-mp-2.1-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516521] Review Request: globus-mp - Globus Toolkit - Message Passing Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516521 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:07 EDT --- globus-mp-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-mp-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:34 EDT --- globus-authz-0.7-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-authz-0.7-1.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516514] Review Request: globus-authz - Globus Toolkit - Globus authz library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516514 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:29 EDT --- globus-authz-0.7-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-authz-0.7-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516520] Review Request: globus-data-conversion - Globus Toolkit - Data Conversion
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516520 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-19 13:37:22 EDT --- globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-data-conversion-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529605] Review Request: ohai - Profiles your system and emits JSON
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529605 Bug 529605 depends on bug 525988, which changed state. Bug 525988 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 525988] Review Request: rubygem-systemu - Multi-platform command execution and capture
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=525988 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-10-19 13:45:51 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
