[Bug 541694] Review Request: php-phpunit-File-Iterator - FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541694 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet 2009-11-28 02:55:40 EDT --- > BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1.7.2 This is not correct because we have php-pear-4.3.9 in EL4 Shoud be BuildRequires: php-pear >= 1:1.7.2 or BuildRequires: php-pear(PEAR) >= 1.7.2 + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #35 from Roshan Singh 2009-11-28 01:36:22 EDT --- I have written the spec, I want to know how to determine the default package version of the libraries in the BuildRequire as shipped by fedora, so that I can remove the versions. I dont remember if I have installed/updated any from the update repository. These are the packages wordnet-devel, glib2-devel, gtk2-devel, libnotify-devel, dbus-glib-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-28 00:57:48 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (GPLv3+) OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 9f95a7e002c3c165733e19b70de22c6b xfce4-volumed-0.1.8.tar.bz2 9f95a7e002c3c165733e19b70de22c6b xfce4-volumed-0.1.8.tar.bz2.orig OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. rpmlint says: xfce4-volumed.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce xfce4-volumed.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce xfce4-volumed-debuginfo.i586: W: spelling-error-in-summary en_US xfce xfce4-volumed-debuginfo.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US xfce Doublecheck the spelling in summary and description. xfce4-volumed.i586: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/xdg/autostart/xfce4-volumed.desktop Can be ignored I think. I don't see any blockers, just run the summary and description through a spell checker before you import. ;) This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@tummy.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541154] Review Request: xfce4-volumed - Daemon to add additional functionality to the volume keys of the keyboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541154 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-11-28 00:25:41 EDT --- I'd be happy to review this. Look for a full review in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541992] Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 22:54:41 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 540791] Review Request: rubygem-RubyInline - Write foreign code within your ruby code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540791 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 22:55:24 EDT --- rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-RubyInline-3.8.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542045] New: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542045 Summary: Review Request: php-htmlpurifier - standards-compliant HTML filter library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-htmlpurifier-4.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Standards-compliant HTML filter library written in PHP. HTML Purifier will not only remove all malicious code (better known as XSS) with a thoroughly audited, secure yet permissive whitelist, it will also make sure your documents are standards compliant, something only achievable with a comprehensive knowledge of W3C's specifications. rpmlint output: php-htmlpurifier.src: W: summary-not-capitalized standards-compliant HTML filter library 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-htmlpurifier-4.0.0-1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-htmlpurifier.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized standards-compliant HTML filter library 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The warning being announced by rpmlint appears to be due to the capitilization of HTML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542036] New: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542036 Summary: Review Request: php-fpdf - PHP library to generate PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: FPDF is a PHP class which allows to generate PDF files with pure PHP, that is to say without using the PDFlib library. F from FPDF stands for Free: you may use it for any kind of usage and modify it to suit your needs. rpmlint output: [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-fpdf-1.6-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-fpdf.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 Ryan Rix changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533765] Review Request: fedora-accessibility-guide-en-US - Using Fedora with a visual, hearing, or mobility impairment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533765 --- Comment #2 from Ryan Rix 2009-11-27 20:44:39 EDT --- Since there are no formal package review guidelines outside of SPEC file review, I am approving this package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542028] New: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542028 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer - Package for generating Excel spreadsheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Spreadsheet_Excel_Writer was born as a porting of the Spreadsheet::WriteExcel Perl module to PHP. It allows writing of Excel spreadsheets without the need for COM objects. It supports formulas, images (BMP) and all kinds of formatting for text and cells. It currently supports the BIFF5 format (Excel 5.0), so functionality appeared in the latest Excel versions is not yet available. rpmlint output: [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer-0.9.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-pear-Spreadsheet-Excel-Writer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. (No documentation is bundled with source) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 542027] New: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542027 Summary: Review Request: php-nusoap - SOAP toolkit for PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: da...@gnsa.us QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: NuSOAP is a rewrite of SOAPx4, provided by NuSphere and Dietrich Ayala. It is a set of PHP classes - no PHP extensions required - that allow developers to create and consume web services based on SOAP 1.1, WSDL 1.1 and HTTP 1.0/1.1. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-nusoap.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4...@nalleyx60 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-nusoap-0.7.3-1.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477948] Review Request: simple-ccsm - Simplified plugin and configuration tool - Compiz Fusion Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477948 --- Comment #9 from Julian Aloofi 2009-11-27 19:15:07 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-11-27 18:42:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thomas -- I'm willing to be the maintainer; I'll incorporate changes from > Ralf's package as appropriate. Want to swap reviews? Sure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Uwe Kubosch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #28 from Uwe Kubosch 2009-11-27 18:29:52 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: zfs-fuse New Branches: F-12 EL-5 Owners: donv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:07:44 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.8-2.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.2-1.fc11 |0.2-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:06:59 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531988] Review Request: lekhonee-gnome - The gnome frontend for lekhonee wordpress client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531988 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:08:41 EDT --- lekhonee-gnome-0.8-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 17:01:56 EDT --- sparcy-0.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539428] Review Request: sparcy - Command line utility for Sparc Systems GPS loggers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539428 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.1-1.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.50-62.6.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|3.0.3-1.fc12|3.0.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526564] Review Request: unittest - C++ unit testing framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526564 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:58:42 EDT --- unittest-0.50-62.6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:58:28 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||2.2.3-6.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.4.1-6.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|4.1.4-3.fc12|4.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524107] Review Request: qbrew - A Brewing Recipe Calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524107 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:50:14 EDT --- qbrew-0.4.1-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532315] Review Request: nanoxml - Small XML parser for Java
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532315 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:53:01 EDT --- nanoxml-2.2.3-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:52 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-AsObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12242 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||4.1.4-3.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:51:35 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539442] Review Request: rubygem-ZenTest - Automated test scaffolding for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539442 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:40 EDT --- rubygem-ZenTest-4.1.4-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:48:35 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update janino'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.6.1-2.fc12 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-11-27 16:44:27 EDT --- Well, I assume you are not interested in getting a review from me since you explicitly removed me. I am not sure you get to arbitrarily pick a reviewer however. Whatever works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531987] Review Request: wtop - top for webserver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531987 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:43:55 EDT --- wtop-0.6.1-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.2-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc11 |0.4-2.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:42:52 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539230] Review Request: perl-Authen-Simple - Simple Authentication
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539230 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:43:31 EDT --- perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541533] Review Request: hunspell-si - Sinhala hunspell dictionaries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541533 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:41:10 EDT --- hunspell-si-0.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530986] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530986 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:40:02 EDT --- janino-2.5.15-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update janino'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-12215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:40:55 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:15 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:37:16 EDT --- rubygem-sexp_processor-3.0.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:42 EDT --- python-pip-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.3.3-1.fc11|0.3.3-1.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539231] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-SuperForm - Create sticky forms with HTML::SuperForm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539231 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.4-2.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520352] Review Request: python-pip - Pip installs packages. Python packages. An easy_install replacement
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520352 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||0.4-1.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541185] Review Request: rubygem-sexp_processor - A branch of ParseTree providing generic sexp processing tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541185 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||3.0.3-1.fc12 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:38:54 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 539486] Review Request: perl-Data-AsObject - Easy OO access to complex perl data structures
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539486 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:35:52 EDT --- perl-Data-AsObject-0.05-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-AsObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-12200 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||0.3.3-1.fc11 Resolution||ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541004] Review Request: pkcs11-dump - Small utility for querying PKCS#11 modules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541004 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 16:36:26 EDT --- pkcs11-dump-0.3.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Andreas Osowski changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|sunda...@redhat.com |cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 --- Comment #10 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-11-27 16:22:57 EDT --- Thomas -- I'm willing to be the maintainer; I'll incorporate changes from Ralf's package as appropriate. Want to swap reviews? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Fitzsimmons 2009-11-27
16:18:41 EDT ---
I also packaged this independently. I compared our three versions. Here are
my suggestions for a combined package.
I like gle as a name, but since that's already taken, libgle is fine.
The license field is complicated. The closest representation I came up with
is:
License: GPLv2+ or (Artistic clarified and MIT)
where MIT is an approximation of:
gle-3.1.0/src/COPYING.src
which, as far as I can tell, is an IBM MIT-like license that's not present in
Fedora's list:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
URL and Source0 should point to gle's new home:
URL:http://linas.org/gle/
Source0:http://linas.org/gle/pub/gle-%{version}.tar.gz
Ralf got the minimal set of BuildRequires but since this is a Fedora package, I
prefer to reference the actual dependencies directly, rather than use virtual
provides:
BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel
BuildRequires: freeglut-devel
BuildRequires: libXmu-devel
BuildRequires: libXi-devel
The guidelines don't mention anything about not referencing virtual provides,
so this is a personal preference (the choice between compatibility with other
distros and future-proofing wrt to Fedora).
I like Ralf's use of --disable-static rather than deleting the .a file after
the build.
To be explicit I added:
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
but the guidelines don't mention that:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
so omitting them is fine.
I think Ralf's package is the closest to complete. It only needs the License,
URL and Source0 (and possibly BuildRequires) changes.
Who wants to be the libgle maintainer for Fedora? I'd prefer not to be; I only
packaged GLE because it is a dependency of NanoEngineer-1:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765
which I do want to maintain.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 526426] Review Request: OpenGL-gle - A Tubing and Extrusion Library for OpenGL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526426 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||541765 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541764] Review Request: gle - Tubing and extrusion library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541764 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|541765 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541765] Review Request: NanoEngineer-1 - Nano-composite modeling and simulation program
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541765 Thomas Fitzsimmons changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|541764 |526426 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541992] New: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541992 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Create - Create PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: co...@gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/perl-PDF-Create.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/perl-PDF-Create-1.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to create PDF documents using a large number of primitives, and emit the result as a PDF file or stream. PDF stands for Portable Document Format. Documents can have several pages, a table of content, an information section and many other PDF elements. More functionalities will be added as needs arise. Documents are constructed on the fly so the memory footprint is not tied to the size of the pages but only to their number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225726] Merge Review: emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225726 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chitl...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-11-27 15:22:06 EDT --- I assume you guys have directly communication with emacs's upstream. Could you guys please ask upstream to update their * vhdl-mode * verilog-mode I would be nice that to see these be fixed upstream so that I can obsolete emacs-verilog-mode on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: i3lock Short Description: Slightly improved version of slock Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:31 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: i3status Short Description: Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529254] Review Request: i3 - Improved tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529254 Simon Wesp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:55:20 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request === Package Name: i3 Short Description: improved tiling window manager Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530617] Review Request: libixp - Stand-alone client/server 9P library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530617 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-11-27 14:26:45 EDT --- http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libixp/libixp-0.5-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541902] Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Rahul Sundaram changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sunda...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sunda...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541978] New: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541978 Summary: Review Request: pulseaudio-equalizer - PulseAudio Equalizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hicham.haou...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/pulseaudio-equalizer-2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PulseAudio Equalizer rpmlint output : none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 12:04:23 EDT --- mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546
--- Comment #3 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-11-27 11:54:25 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> - MUST(4): The License field in spec match the actual license
Ok, used LGPLv2+ instead of LGPLv2
> - MUST(6): The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
> source, as provided in the spec URL
Must be some kind of alumnit temporary shutdown, I downloaded new version of
wvdial (1.61) from there ~2 weeks ago...
> Comments:
>
> 1) Checking RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / is not necessary
>
> per Packaging Guidelines (
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean ):
> > In the past, some packages checked that %{buildroot} was not / before
> > deleting it. This is not necessary in Fedora,
>
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is enough
Ok, changed...
> 2) %attr in %files section is used too much
>
> %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
> %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/*
> %attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5/*
>
> these are default permissions, thus not required to explicitly add there
Ok, removed...
> 3) too much wildcards under %files section
>
> If upstream makes some changes in tarball and add/remove some files, this is
> not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files
> under %{_bindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one.
files under %{_bindir} and man pages listed more specifically.
> 4) License
>
> There is no license info in the package except COPYING - LGPL. This means
> License tag should be set to LGPLv2+
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing :
>
> """A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version
> that
> it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is
> technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the
> version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not
> LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL."""
Ok, changed LGPLv2 to LGPLv2+
> 5) Versioned requires (
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires )
>
> > First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a
> > version older than that installed on any target distribution release,
> > there's no need to include the version in the dependency at all. In that
> > case we know the available software is new enough. For example, the version
> > in gtk+-devel 1.2 dependency above is unnecessary for all Red Hat Linux
> > distributions since (at least) release 6.2. As a rule of thumb, if the
> > version is not required, don't add it just for fun.
>
> all 'ppp' versions (even in old RHELs) are newer than version specified,
> please
> remove it
Removed versioned requires...
> 6)Url and Source0 links does not work
>
> wget http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz
> --2009-11-27 16:16:56-- http://alumnit.ca/download/wvdial-1.61.tar.gz
> Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118
> Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused.
>
>
> wget 'http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial'
> --2009-11-27 16:17:30-- http://alumnit.ca/wiki/?WvDial
> Resolving alumnit.ca... 69.196.152.118
> Connecting to alumnit.ca|69.196.152.118|:80... failed: Connection refused.
I guess it is temporary issue... we'll see on Monday...
> 7) Missing info for patches
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment
>
> Every patch in spec file should contain a comment describing:
> * why is that patch used - bug number is enough
> * upstream information - was it sent upstream (and when)? taken from upstream?
> was it accepted/rejected? is this patch "fedora specific" ?
I added the informations why the patch is used with bug numbers/short comments.
Some patches - like remotename and 9nums are Fedora specific. Compuserve patch
is just change to use more new Compuserve style (which increases the chance of
succesful connection). That one wvdial.conf manpage patch - I don't know, I'll
try to submit it once the website will be up. Anyway the package is not really
"alive" - current update was just to fix issues with new gcc/glibc.
Fixed in rawhide ... wvdial-1.61-2.fc13
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515230] Review Request: python-dmidecode - python extension module to access DMI data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515230 David Sommerseth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from David Sommerseth 2009-11-27 11:15:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: python-dmidecode Short Description: Python module to access DMI data Owners: dsommers Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #41 from Peter Galbraith 2009-11-27 11:06:58 EDT --- I don't know whether there is a place for this in the SPEC file, but another URL for emacs-goodies-el sources is: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-goodies-el/ The CVS repo is hosted there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533594] Review Request: Pootle - Localization and translation management web application
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533594 --- Comment #1 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-11-27 11:01:02 EDT --- Updated to a newer release candidate: Spec URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.spec SRPM URL: http://dwayne.fedorapeople.org/pootle-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226546] Merge Review: wvdial
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226546
--- Comment #2 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-11-27 10:37:59
EDT ---
0) MUST:
* MUST: rpmlint :
$ rpmlint wvdial.spec wvdial-*.src.rpm x86_64/wvdial-*
wvdial.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/wvdial.conf
wvdial.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/wvdial 0600
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
looks ok
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
+ MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
+ MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec
+ MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
+ MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
- MUST(4): The License field in spec match the actual license
+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file must be included in %doc
+ MUST: The spec file written in American English
+ MUST: The spec file for the package is legible
- MUST(6): The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL
+ MUST: The package successfully compile
+ MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
+ MUST: The spec file handle locales properly
0 MUST: Every package which stores shared library files in any of the dynamic
linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun
+ MUST: Packages does not bundle copies of system libraries
+ MUST: Package own all directories that it creates
+ MUST: Package does not list a file more than once in the spec file
+ MUST(2): Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must
include a %defattr(...) line
+ MUST(1): Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
+ MUST: Package use macros consistently
+ MUST: Package contains code, or permissable content
+ MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage
+ MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application
0 MUST: Header files in a -devel package
0 MUST: Static libraries in a -static package
0 MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'
0 MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package
0 MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
+ MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built
0 MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
+ MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages
+ MUST(1): At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
+ MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [27]
Comments:
1) Checking RPM_BUILD_ROOT != / is not necessary
per Packaging Guidelines (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25clean ):
> In the past, some packages checked that %{buildroot} was not / before
> deleting it. This is not necessary in Fedora,
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is enough
2) %attr in %files section is used too much
%attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/*
%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man1/*
%attr(0644,root,root) %{_mandir}/man5/*
these are default permissions, thus not required to explicitly add there
3) too much wildcards under %files section
If upstream makes some changes in tarball and add/remove some files, this is
not going to catch anything. It's good practice to list at least all files
under %{_bindir}. This will let you know if there is any new/missing one.
4) License
There is no license info in the package except COPYING - LGPL. This means
License tag should be set to LGPLv2+
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing :
"""A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that
it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is
technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the
version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not
LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL."""
5) Versioned requires (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requires )
> First, if the lowest possible requirement is so old that nobody has a version
> older than that installed on any target distribution release, there's no need
> to include the version in the dependency at all. In that case we know the
> available software is new enough. For example, the version in gtk+-devel 1.2
> dependency above is unnecessary for all Red Hat Linux distributions since (at
[Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-11-27 10:26:04 EDT --- poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poco-1.3.5-8.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225916] Merge Review: isdn4k-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225916
--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-27 09:48:10
EDT ---
- rpmlint: NOT OK!!!
isdn4k-utils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for configuring an ISDN
subsystem.
isdn4k-utils.src: W: no-url-tag
isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdn.init 0775
isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission capi.init 0775
isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdnhangup 0775
isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdndial 0775
isdn4k-utils.src: W: strange-permission isdnstatus 0775
isdn4k-utils.src:70: E: prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig
isdn4k-utils.src:71: E: prereq-use /sbin/ldconfig
isdn4k-utils.src:72: E: prereq-use /bin/ln
isdn4k-utils.src:73: E: prereq-use sh-utils
isdn4k-utils.src:220: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libfreecdb.a
isdn4k-utils.src:221: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libfreecdbmake.a
isdn4k-utils.src:255: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/X11
isdn4k-utils.src:858: W: macro-in-%changelog %config
isdn4k-utils.src:860: W: macro-in-%changelog %post
isdn4k-utils.src:870: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc
isdn4k-utils.src:948: W: macro-in-%changelog %preun
isdn4k-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 177, tab: line
130)
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for configuring an
ISDN subsystem.
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: no-url-tag
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: shared-lib-without-dependency-information
/usr/lib64/pppd/2.4.4/userpass.so
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/isdn
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/ipfwadm.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/ipfwadm.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/capi
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/vboxd 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/vboxd 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppcosts.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: zero-length /etc/ppp/ioptions
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/ppp/peers/isdn/avm-ml 0600
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/CVS/Repository
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/vbox_sound.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/vbox_sound.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/Mini-FAQ/CVS/Entries
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/vbox.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/pcbitctl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/pcbitctl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/masquerade.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/CVS/Root
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxd.conf 0640
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/avmcapictrl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/avmcapictrl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/vbox/vboxgetty.conf 0640
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/CVS/Root
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_example/config.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/ipppd 0700
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/ipppd 0700
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppbind.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/pppbind.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-readable /sbin/hisaxctrl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/hisaxctrl 0750
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: E: version-control-internal-file
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/CVS/Entries
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/www-vbox.tar.gz
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/xp-howto.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8
/usr/share/doc/isdn4k-utils-3.2/_howto/xp-howto.txt
isdn4k-utils.x86_6
[Bug 529255] Review Request: i3lock - A slightly improved version of slock
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529255
Andreas Osowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||th0...@mkdir.name
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|th0...@mkdir.name
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-27 09:37:46
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on:
[x] F12/i686
[x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
-
Binary RPM(s):
-
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: MIT
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 8fcca5adea7b0c6e3ae3e4e1032c548dd96bbee9
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: F12/i686
[?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[x] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[x] File based requires are sane.
Remaining issues:
One spare space in the Conflicts: line again, but that's just for aestheticism
:D
*
* APPROVED **
*
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-11-27 09:37:02 EDT --- O kruwa, dziekuje. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xstream Short Description: Java XML serialization library Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 529256] Review Request: i3status - Generates a status line for dzen2 or wmii
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529256
Andreas Osowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||th0...@mkdir.name
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|th0...@mkdir.name
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Osowski 2009-11-27 09:27:56
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on:
[x] F12/i686
[x] Rpmlint output:
Source RPM:
-
Binary RPM(s):
-
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: MIT
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of package: 0c6e737d5af661feaa6c4d9c09d2a34abe1f8571
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: F12/i786
[?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: -
[x] Package functions as described.
[x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
Remaining issues:
For aestheticism, remove the spare space in the Conflict: line ;)
Other than that
* APPROVED *
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 541902] New: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541902 Summary: Review Request: almanah - Application for keeping an encrypted diary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th0...@mkdir.name QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/almanah-0.6.1/almanah.spec SRPM URL: http://th0br0.fedorapeople.org/almanah-0.6.1/almanah-0.6.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Almanah Diary is a small application to ease the management of an encrypted personal diary. It's got good editing abilities, including text formatting and printing. Evolution tasks and appointments will be listed to ease the creation of diary entries related to them. At the same time, you can create diary entries using multiple events. This package was already reviewed and pushed but given that it's orphaned and the last update was more than 3 months ago, I had to create a new review request according to the guidelines. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447751 I removed the smp flags from the make command as they gave me problems when building. Rpmlint remains silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536684] Review Request: eclipse-mdt-ocl - Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536684 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mat Booth 2009-11-27 09:05:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Looks well now. > > APPROVED Nice one, thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: eclipse-mdt-ocl Short Description: Implementation of the OCL OMG metamodel for Eclipse Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537451] Review Request: eclipse-emf-query - Specify and execute queries against EMF models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537451 Mat Booth changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-11-27 09:06:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thank you! > > APPROVED Thanks. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: eclipse-emf-query Short Description: Specify and execute queries against EMF models Owners: mbooth Branches: F-12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226192] Merge Review: net-snmp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226192
Jan Safranek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo? |
--- Comment #6 from Jan Safranek 2009-11-27 08:58:53 EDT
---
Huh, the review is still open... I should have noticed it earlier. It has been
quite long time since the review has started and now the net-snmp package looks
differently and hopefuly simpler.
I have just fixed the errors noted above and prepared net-snmp-5.5-3.fc13 in
rawhide, which should be review-able again.
X build root is not correct.
Fixed
? license field matches the actual license.
Fixed (BSD and MIT)
? %check is not present but there seems to be a test suite.
I've added the %check. I am not sure it will work when the package is compiled
on system with net-snmp already installed. It works in mock and in koji though.
The whole %check is not executed when %{netsnmp_check} == 0 to speed up my
local builds.
X file permissions are appropriate.
rpmlint still complains about executable flag on agent/helpers/table_row.c,
I have fixed it upstream, see
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=rev&revision=17839 . I
hope it's enough - I don't want to add another .spec voodoo just because of
this one file.
X scriptlets present without proper dependencies.
Fixed
X rpmlint has many valid complaints.
Fixed most of them, following remain:
net-snmp.i686: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv
net-snmp.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv
There is one mv, which moves net-snmp data from /var/net-snmp to
/var/lib/net-snmp, IMHO it's valid usage.
net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmp-config 0755
net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmpd.init 0755
net-snmp.src: W: strange-permission net-snmptrapd.init 0755
These files are stored in CVS with executable bit set, AFAIK there is no easy
way how to remove it. And IMHO it's pretty harmless.
net-snmp.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch1: net-snmp-5.4.1-pie.patch
IA64 has some problems with -pie, I'll look into it. Maybe it's not needed
anymore - is IA64 secondary architecture?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530806] Review Request: Pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530806
Thomas Spura changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-27
08:49:28 EDT ---
Just a few comments, because I'm no sponsor anyway:
- Some tests are currently failing ( to long to copy&paste here )
- Missing Requires: scapy ( one test fails because of this... )
- The license (as you noted in setup.py) should be GPLv3+
- tests should be part of doc and not installed in /usr/share, except you need
them on runtime.
Please delete all install* lines from %install and include the tests in the
%files section as:
%doc test/*
This will copy all files from test to /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/
- You don't own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ just the subfiles.
If this package will be deleted on any system out there, the folder
%{_datadir}/%{name}/ will stay there...
When you install the tests with %doc, this won't be needed anymore.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225916] Merge Review: isdn4k-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225916 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225719] Merge Review: efax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225719 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-11-27 08:35:39 EDT --- - rpmlint: NOT OK!!! efax.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A program for faxing using a Class 1, 2 or 2.0 fax modem. efax.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/fax - spec file name: OK - package name: OK - package version: release should start with 0., alpha tag should go to release instead version according to Package Guidelines but as this package can be considered as successor to 0.9 (not pre 0.9) this is OK - license: OK - group: OK - url: OK - sources URL: FAILED to download tarball * correct URL http://www.cce.com/efax/download/efax-0.9a-001114.tar.gz - md5sum: OK (compared to upstream tarball above) - exclude arch: no rules for s390, OK - buildroot: OK - requires: make and probably netpbm-progs (?) should be BuildRequires, not Requires, NOT OK!!! - description: OK - build flags: missing smp_mflags, custom build flags?, NOT OK!!! - macros used consistently: OK - clean section: OK - file attributes: OK - docs: OK - package owns directories: OK - no duplicate files: OK - package builds on: F-12/x86_64 OK Than, please fix/comment issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530806] Review Request: Pyrit - A GPGPU-driven WPA-PSK key cracker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530806 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura 2009-11-27 08:35:53 EDT --- *** Bug 491428 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 540708] Review Request: gant - Groovy-based build system that uses Ant tasks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540708 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mma...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mma...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532709] Review Request: xmlbeans - XML-Java binding tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532709 Marek Mahut changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mma...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mma...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 534135] Review Request: xstream - Java XML serialization library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534135 Michal Ingeli changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Michal Ingeli 2009-11-27 07:59:58 EDT --- - builds in koji - license ok * rpmlint not silent: - xstream.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/xstream-1.2.2/LICENSE.txt I also think, that it's not good to touch license, so this is OK. - xstream.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0:1.2.2-3 ['1.2.2-3', '1.2.2-3'] Remove epoch also from changelog Dropping that AOT seems OK, according to [1] it will be no longer required in F13. APPROVED [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2009-November/msg00025.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225719] Merge Review: efax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225719 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jrez...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jrez...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
