[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234





--- Comment #8 from matt chan talc...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 03:42:56 EDT ---
Ah. I did not know you could create a devel subpackage by itself.

Here are the new URLs with the changes implemented:

SPEC: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:5/tnt/tnt.spec
SRPM: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:5/tnt/tnt-3.0.11-0.2.beta.fc12.src.rpm

Thanks for the feedback.

Matt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980





--- Comment #4 from matt chan talc...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 03:54:51 EDT ---
Updated package name to jama from jama-devel and included the use of a
subpackage from feedback on the tnt package. Also cleaned up the %install
section. 

SPEC: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:5/jama/jama.spec
SRPM: http://mattchan.homelinux.net:5/jama/jama-1.2.5-2.fc12.src.rpm

Matt

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550597] Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597





--- Comment #1 from Armando Basile hmandevt...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 04:01:03 
EDT ---
SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-avi-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] New: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of Themonospot suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594

   Summary: Themonospot Core Base component - core component of
Themonospot suite
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-base.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-base-0.8.1-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: It install:
- themonospot-base mono assembly in GAC (use from other gui applications)
- themonospot-plugin-interface in GAC (use to write plugins)
- themonospot-plugin-manager (use to load plugins at runtime)
- xml language files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550597] New: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597

   Summary: Themonospot Avi Plugin - manage Avi container
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


It install:
- themonospot-plugin-avi mono assembly (use from themonospot-base)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550598] New: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598

   Summary: Themonospot Mkv Plugin - manage Matroska container
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-plugin-mkv-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: It install:
- themonospot-plugin-mkv mono assembly (use from themonospot-base)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550600] New: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600

   Summary: Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files
using Themonospot
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-gtk-0.2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: themonospot-gui-gtk is a Mono framework application to create a
graphic frontend to use themonospot base component and his plugins.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550599] New: Themonospot Console application - console application to scan multimedia files

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Console application - console application to scan 
multimedia files

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599

   Summary: Themonospot Console application - console application
to scan multimedia files
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-console.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-console-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: themonospot-console is a mono console application to scan
multimedia files using themonospot base component and his plugins.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550601] New: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601

   Summary: Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using
Themonospot
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://www.integrazioneweb.com/themonospot/
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: low
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: hmandevt...@gmail.com
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


SPEC URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SPECS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.integrazioneweb.com/repository/SRPMS/fedora/themonospot-gui-qt-0.1.2-1.fc12.src.rpm

Description: themonospot-gui-qt is a Mono framework application to create a
graphic frontend to use themonospot base component and his plugins.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550519] Themonospot suite - core, plugins, console and gui's applications to parse multimedia files

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550519





--- Comment #2 from Armando Basile hmandevt...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 04:12:58 
EDT ---
submitted seperated review requests:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234


Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: tnt-devel - |Review Request: tnt - C++
   |C++ templates for   |templates for scientific
   |scientific computing|computing




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt-devel - C++ templates for scientific computing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234


Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 05:39:48 
EDT ---
REVIEW:

+ rpmlint is not silent, but this the only warning may be safely ignored:


[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/noarch/tnt-devel-3.0.11-0.2.beta.fc12.noarch.rpm 
tnt-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ 

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
0 Upstream doesn't provide the file file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum tnt_3_0_11.zip*
f0779ef0090df4e5143d4cfcdc2b8c9a9f1abb6befcc97c0969b6e7f134b5dd1 
tnt_3_0_11.zip
f0779ef0090df4e5143d4cfcdc2b8c9a9f1abb6befcc97c0969b6e7f134b5dd1 
tnt_3_0_11.zip.1
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
0 The package doesn't contain %doc files at all.
+ C header files packaged in devel sub-package.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
0 No devel sub-package.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.


APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 520550] Review Request: IVAN - SDL roguelike

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520550





--- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 
05:44:43 EDT ---
Re: comment 8

 ../../FeLib/Include/save.h:39: error: cast from 'FILE*' to 'truth' loses 
 precision

| typedef.h:typedef int truth;
| typedef.h:typedef const int ctruth;
|
| save.h:  FILE* Buffer;
| save.h:  truth IsOpen() { return truth(Buffer); }

An attempt at creating a boolean type and really just ending with a typecast
from pointer to int. Nothing is won by not using an explicit NULL-pointer
comparison in this case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 549980] Review Request: jama - C++ matrix templates

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=549980


Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 05:49:43 
EDT ---
REVIEW:

+ rpmlint is not silent, but his the only warning may be omitted.

[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/jama-devel-1.2.5-2.fc12.noarch.rpm 
jama-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[pe...@sulaco SPECS]$

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the
Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
0 Upstream doesn't provide the file file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The sources used to build the package, match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.

[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum jama125.zip*
7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c  jama125.zip
7432bf51d7101f63d5880421f940f64cea124f1460ff2fcfb6226e6744d1360c  jama125.zip.1
[pe...@sulaco SOURCES]$ 

+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
+ The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files
listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
0 The package doesn't contain %doc files.
+ C header files packaged in devel sub-package.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1).
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
+ At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550234] Review Request: tnt - C++ templates for scientific computing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550234





--- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 05:50:59 
EDT ---
sed s/0 No devel sub-package.//

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 541535] Review Request: raul - Realtime Audio Utility Library

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541535





--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 07:13:00 
EDT ---
Something is wrong with the new -debuginfo package now. It's missing the
sources.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694





--- Comment #18 from Dave M dave.n...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 08:00:23 EDT ---
4.22 has just been released.

Spec URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.22/clamtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://clamtk.sourceforge.net/fedora/4.22/clamtk-4.22-1.fc12.src.rpm

Regarding the licensing issue, I recently noticed that the Debian ports have
always listed it as GPL+ or Artistic anyway. So now the Fedora builds match
that.

And with luck, the Perl module dependency portion is correct now.

Looking forward to feedback. Thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483728] Review Request: kde-plasma-ihatethecashew - Gets rid of the cashew on KDE Workspace

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483728





--- Comment #39 from Dave Ulrick d-ulr...@comcast.net  2009-12-26 09:41:22 
EDT ---
The problem reoccurred after uninstall/reinstall so I opened a new bug report.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Themonospot Core Base   |Review request:
   |component - core component  |themonospot-base - core
   |of Themonospot suite|component of Themonospot
   ||suite




--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-12-26 
09:48:35 EDT ---
First of all, please upload the correct spec files for Fedora
(not for Mandriva) which correspond to the srpms you uploaded.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594





--- Comment #2 from Armando Basile hmandevt...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 10:15:35 
EDT ---
i'm sorry, i uploaded correct spec files

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743





--- Comment #12 from Sandro Mathys s...@sandro-mathys.ch  2009-12-26 11:40:27 
EDT ---
Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/PyPE-2.9-1.fc12.src.rpm

Only small changes to the spec file:
- new version
- msvcp90.dll is now removed in %prep
- pype.py needs CRLF - LF treatment with the new release

Everything else is still the same as in my last version above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-12-26 
12:31:17 EDT ---
For 4.22-1:

* Requires
  - Again please check if writing R: perl-foo explicitly is
really needed.
! For example when you try $ rpm -q --requires clamtk, you'll
  see that perl(Locale::gettext) is automatically detected
  and added to R, so writing R: perl-gettext is not needed.

  By the way with rawhide rpm (4.8.0), when you try
  rpm -qv --requires clamtk, you can check what Requires are
  manually written in the spec file and what are automatically
  added by rpmbuild like:
---
$ rpm -qv --requires clamtk
post: /bin/sh  
postun: /bin/sh  
auto: /usr/bin/perl  
manual: clamav = 0.90
manual: clamav-data  
manual: clamav-update  
manual: cronie  
manual: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)  
auto: perl(Carp)  
auto: perl(ClamTk::App)  
.
---

! License
  - Not a blocker, however it is better that you update lib/GUI.pm
and the corresponding gettext po files.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 545405] Review Request: goldendict - A feature-rich dictionary lookup program

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545405





--- Comment #9 from Liberty libe...@live.com  2009-12-26 12:32:16 EDT ---
Updated package, include latest fixes of punctuation indexing and sound
problems.

SPEC:
http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict.spec?attredirects=0d=1

SRPM
http://sites.google.com/site/libertysopenworld/Home/goldendict-0.9.0-3.20091226git7a03248.fc12.src.rpm?attredirects=0d=1

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 536694] Review Request: clamtk - GUI frontend for ClamAV

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536694





--- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2009-12-26 
12:37:40 EDT ---
By the way:

-
NOTE: Before being sponsored:

This package will be accepted with another few work. 
But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) 
must sponsor you.

Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other 
submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. 
For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) 
are required to show that you have an understanding 
of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described
on :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Usually there are two ways to show this.
A. submit other review requests with enough quality.
B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request
   (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do
   a formal review)

When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other 
person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report 
so that I can check your comments or review request.

Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to
review can be checked on:
http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html
(NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review)


Review guidelines are described mainly on:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets


As you're the upstream of this package it may be that you
are interested in maintaining this package only on Fedora,
however still I want to see at least one pre-review by you
(if you don't want to submit another review request)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550599




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550599] Review Request: themonospot-console - console application to scan multimedia files

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550599


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550594
Summary|Themonospot Console |Review Request:
   |application - console   |themonospot-console -
   |application to scan |console application to scan
   |multimedia files|multimedia files




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550664] New: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the 
MySQL GUI Suites

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664

   Summary: Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data
shared among the MySQL GUI Suites
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-gui-common/mysql-gui-common-static.spec
SRPM URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-gui-common/mysql-gui-common-static-5.0r17-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
Static libs for mysql-gui-common. Primarly for developers to build
mysql-querybrowser and mysql-administrator.


Important additional notes:
1) It was initially just mysql-gui-tools, without -static suffix, but current
RPM does not allow build arch-dependant packages as subpackage noarch one
(comment about it also placed in spec). So, may be it is not obvious but it
finally does same result in reverse way.
2) It is shared package to build mysql-querybrowser and mysql-administrator. In
separate package to do not double it in mentioned.
3) This package obsolete mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of it and
we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to again
split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to co-maintain
it.
4) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you,
please, just do not start review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550598




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550600] Review Request: themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550600


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550594
Summary|Themonospot Gtk - Gtk gui   |Review Request:
   |to scan multimedia files|themonospot-gui-gtk - Gtk
   |using Themonospot   |gui to scan multimedia
   ||files using Themonospot




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550667] Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667


Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550664




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550664] Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664


Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550667




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550598] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-mkv - manage Matroska container

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550598


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550594
Summary|Themonospot Mkv Plugin -|Review Request:
   |manage Matroska container   |themonospot-plugin-mkv -
   ||manage Matroska container




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550600




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550667] New: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool for handling 
MySQL queries, construct and analize it

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550667

   Summary: Review Request: mysql-querybrowser - A graphical tool
for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-querybrowser/mysql-querybrowser.spec
SRPM URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-querybrowser/mysql-querybrowser-5.0r17-3.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
The MySQL Query Browser is a graphical tool provided by MySQL AB for creating,
executing, and optimizing queries in a graphical environment. Where the MySQL
Administrator is designed to administer a MySQL server, the MySQL Query
Browser is designed to help you query and analyze data stored within your MySQL
database.

Important additional notes:
1) mysql-querybrowser was part of mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of
it and we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to
again split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to
co-maintain it.
2) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you,
please, just do not start review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550668] Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668


Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550664




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550664] Review Request: mysql-gui-common-static - Common data shared among the MySQL GUI Suites

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550664


Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550668




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550668] New: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool for handling 
MySQL queries, construct and analize it

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550668

   Summary: Review Request: mysql-administrator - A graphical tool
for handling MySQL queries, construct and analize it
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: pa...@hubbitus.info
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-administrator/mysql-administrator.spec
SRPM URL:
http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora11/mysql-administrator/mysql-administrator-5.0r17-3.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
MySQL Administrator enables developers and DBAs to easily perform
all the command line operations visually including configuring servers,
administering users, and dynamically monitoring database health. Other
common administrative tasks such as monitoring replication status,
backup and restore, and viewing logs can also be performed through the
MySQL Administrator graphical console.

Additional notes:
1) mysql-querybrowser was part of mysql-gui-tools. I currently co-maintainer of
it and we discuss with Dennis Gilmore (primary maintainer) and make decision to
again split this to separate packages. Dennis, if you want - feel free to
co-maintain it.
2) Spec-file indented by tabs with 5-space width. If it is the problem to you,
please, just do not start review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550601




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550601] Review Request: themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui to scan multimedia files using Themonospot

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550601


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550594
Summary|Themonospot Qt - Qt gui to  |Review Request:
   |scan multimedia files using |themonospot-gui-qt - Qt gui
   |Themonospot |to scan multimedia files
   ||using Themonospot




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550594] Review request: themonospot-base - core component of Themonospot suite

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550594


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||550597




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550597] Review Request: themonospot-plugin-avi - manage Avi container

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550597


Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||550594
Summary|Themonospot Avi Plugin -|Review Request:
   |manage Avi container|themonospot-plugin-avi -
   ||manage Avi container




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190





--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 14:39:03 EDT ---
unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190


Robert Scheck redhat-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 538190] Review Request: unicornscan - Scalable, accurate, flexible and efficient network probing

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538190


Bug 538190 depends on bug 537805, which changed state.

Bug 537805 Summary: Please build libdnet for EPEL 4 and 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537805

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution||ERRATA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 14:38:39 EDT ---
unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unicornscan-0.4.7-2.el4

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 457210] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457210


Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on|201449(FE-DEADREVIEW)   |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983


Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA




--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 14:53:54 EDT ---
osutil-1.3.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update osutil'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-13718

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 521983] New package for Dogtag PKI: osutil

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521983





--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 14:54:29 EDT ---
osutil-1.3.1-1.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update osutil'.  You can provide
feedback for this update here:
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2009-13729

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550690] New: Review Request: libsurl - A library for generating shortened URLs

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: libsurl - A  library for generating shortened URLs

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550690

   Summary: Review Request: libsurl - A  library for generating
shortened URLs
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libsurl-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm

Project URL: http://libsurl.sourceforge.net/

Description:
libsurl is a library for generating short urls (using various online
services like tinyurl.com and bit.ly) suited to use where space is
limited, such as in status messages. surl is the command-line interface
to libsurl, providing most of the functionality in libsurl as well as
additional functionality likely to be of use to command-line users. 

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1891806

rpmlint output:
[...@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint libsurl-0.5.0-1.fc12.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[...@localhost i686]$ rpmlint libsurl*
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550692] New: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring 
program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692

   Summary: Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and
monitoring program
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fab...@bernewireless.net
 QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcpreen.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/tcpreen-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm

Project URL: http://www.remlab.net/tcpreen/

Description:
TCPreen is a simple tool to monitor and analyze data transmitted between
clients and servers through connection-oriented streams data such as a TCP
sessions; it supports TCP over either IPv4 or IPv6. This tool focuses on
the data stream (software/socket layer), not on the lower level transmission
protocol as packet sniffers do. 

Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1892028

rpmlint output:
[...@localhost i686]$ rpmlint tcpreen*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[...@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint tcpreen-1.4.4-1.fc12.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 547832] Review Request: procServ - A process server with telnet console and log access

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547832





--- Comment #4 from Ralph Lange ralph.la...@bessy.de  2009-12-26 16:51:05 EDT 
---
Fixed.

New URLs are

Spec URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ.spec
SRPM URL: http://pubweb.bnl.gov/~rlange/procserv/procServ-2.5.0-3.fc12.src.rpm

- I was confusing the package build from release tar with the build from
repository (which needs the autotools), so I followed your suggestions. I kept
the BuildRoot prep in %install, though, as many of my customers are still
running older RHEL/SL and Fedora releases and will package locally using that
spec.

- I also added the parallel make flags,

- nice blank lines in the changelog,

- and removed the %attr, which indeed was not needed.

Thanks again!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100





--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 16:59:08 EDT ---
python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550100] Review Request: python-olpcgames - Utilities for developing games on the OLPC platform

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550100





--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org  
2009-12-26 16:59:03 EDT ---
python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-olpcgames-1.6-3.fc12

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 548795] Review Request: belier - Generates scripts allowing you to chain many ssh connections

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548795





--- Comment #3 from Florent Le Coz louizat...@fedoraproject.org  2009-12-26 
18:16:38 EDT ---
meanwhile, here is the new version with all your comments applied :

Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.fedoraproject.org/~louizatakk/rpm/belier-1.2-2.fc12.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743





--- Comment #13 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org  2009-12-26 
21:18:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
 You can choose, between
 - adding a comment above the License: field
 - refer to a file upstream, where anything is explained
 - breack down in the %files section.
 
 
 See [1] for further information.
 
 [1]
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
   

This is a MUST. ;)
If you have multiple licenses, you have to e.g. refer to in this case
readme.txt or say in a comment, which files have which license.

wxWidgets is GPL compatible (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ), so
anything under wxWidgets can be relicensed under GPL. BUT in fact, Josiah has
already done that:
from readme.txt:
'''
The portions of STCStyleEditor.py included in StyleSetter.py, which is used to

support styles, was released under the wxWindows license [...]
'''

But the whole file itself is GPL - no wxWidgets everywhere.


What is copyrighted under LGPL?
There is a lgpl.txt, but that's it. Or am I wrong?

So, it stays for me: GPLv2.

@ Josiah: Correct me, if I'm wrong ;)




Some other issues:
- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} is created, but empty (rest of old icon
path) - not needed anymore.
- sed -i -e s;PYTHONPATH;%{python_sitelib};g %{SOURCE1}
  has no effect. There is no pythonpath in the .desktop ( yet? ;) )
- Don't copy *.pyc and *pyw.
  They are created later in the /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile part
anyway.
  See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries
  MUST: don't install them, and Josiah please don't include them (same for
*.dll);)
- changelog format:
  There is '* new version' - '- new version'

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 517743] Review Request: PyPE - Lightweight but powerful graphical editor for developers

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517743





--- Comment #14 from Josiah Carlson josiah.carl...@gmail.com  2009-12-26 
23:26:56 EDT ---
The portion that is lgpl licensed is parts of plugins/exparse.py , which
describes which parts of itself are lgpl v2 licensed, and includes a link to
the original version of the files w/the original license.  :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 550582] Review Request: dpkg - Package maintenance system for Debian Linux

2009-12-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550582


Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org




--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org  2009-12-26 
23:49:07 EDT ---
Just a few comments:
-
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define
- Could you reduce the %files a bit?
  e.g.: %{_bindir}/dpkg-*
%{_mandir}/*/man*/dpkg-*
  and so on.
  It will be easier to follow, and maybe the compression format of the man
pages
  changes and you need to rename all *.gz to something else.
- There is a new version upstream.
  How do you create the patch?
  (Maybe sed would be enought. Most of the changes are only in the *.po file,
which will change quite often...)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review