[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-11 10:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) *These: Requires(pre): %crontabdir Requires(postun): %crontabdir ... are required resp. the best current way to express: * the directory must exist before the package places files into it. Else, when the directory is a symlink (e.g. compare /etc/init.d) in the owning package, you will create oddities. * the package must be removed before the directory. Else, the directory can not be removed because it still contains files from 'kismet' and becomes orphaned. Therefore, a strict '%crontabdir - kismet' order on installation, and 'kismet - %crontabdir' order on uninstallation is required. A plain 'Requires:' does not *guarantees* such an order. I just hit a problem in a package of mine being reviewed where I have exactly this problem (package owning dir being removed before the packages which requires the dir is). So I tried fixing it, unfortunatly this doesn't seem to help, rpm bug? See: Bug #190878 . Any help much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-29 13:57 EST --- Thanks for the review and the patches. My first patchset is in upstream svn and I reported your changes some minutes ago. I did not fixed the -debuginfo bug; IMO it is a minor issue and I am not sure about the impact in the build. Package built for devel branch (after adding a freetype-devel BR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 01:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128237) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128237action=view) Patch fixing 2 warnings (and real problems) on x84_64 With these 2 patches the package is ok. IOW approved! under the conditition that you agree with adding both patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
