[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2007-04-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-02 08:31 EST ---
done

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2007-04-01 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-01 18:06 EST ---
Please create EPEL branches:

Branches: EL-4, EL-5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2006-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-07-07 17:50 EST ---
Just lack of attention. :) Closing, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2006-06-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-20 15:31 EST ---
http://linux.duke.edu/~icon/misc/fe/yaz.spec
http://blues.mcgill.ca/~icon/fe/yaz-2.1.22-1.src.rpm

* Tue Jun 20 2006 Konstantin Ryabitsev [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2.1.22-1
- Version 2.1.22
- Libtoolize correctly
- BuildRequire libxslt
- BuildRequire tcp_wrappers
- Enable pth in configure
- Add %%check routine

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2006-06-20 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]  |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776  |163779
  nThis||




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-21 00:02 EST ---
Builds fine in mock (x86_64, development) and rpmlint is quiet.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
* source files match upstream:
   2d401ea471a87e7a056ea2df9e2d9d14  yaz-2.1.22.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (x86_64, development).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:

  libyaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   /sbin/ldconfig
   libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
   libexslt.so.0()(64bit)
   libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit)
   libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit)
   libssl.so.6()(64bit)
   libwrap.so.0()(64bit)
   libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
   libxslt.so.1()(64bit)
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   libz.so.1()(64bit)

  libyaz-devel-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   libyaz-devel = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   /bin/sh
   libxml2-devel
   libyaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libyazthread.so.2()(64bit)
   openssl-devel
   readline-devel
   
  yaz-2.1.22-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
   yaz = 2.1.22-1.fc6
  =
   libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
   libexslt.so.0()(64bit)
   libgcrypt.so.11()(64bit)
   libgpg-error.so.0()(64bit)
   libhistory.so.5()(64bit)
   libncurses.so.5()(64bit)
   libreadline.so.5()(64bit)
   libssl.so.6()(64bit)
   libwrap.so.0()(64bit)
   libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
   libxslt.so.1()(64bit)
   libyaz.so.2()(64bit)
   libz.so.1()(64bit)

* shared libraries are present; ldconfig is called and unversioned .so files are
in the -devel package.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   ===
   All 21 tests passed
   ===
* scriptlets present and OK (ldconfig calls)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* headers present in -devel package.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2006-06-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|fedora-extras-  |
   |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
 CC||fedora-package-
   ||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-14 10:19 EST ---
Adding back my comment that was lost in the crash:

--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-10 16:44 EST ---
icon, are you still interested in packaging this?  I have to say, the
description is terribly non-descriptive.  Even the upstream website doesn't
fother to say what Z39.50 is.  Perhaps adding the following (cribbed from
wikipedia) would help a bit:

Z39.50 is a client server protocol for searching and retrieving information from
remote computer databases.

This does, however, properly build in mock (x86_64, development).  If icon is
still interested and updates to the current version (2.1.20), I could go ahead
with a review of this.

BTW, this package has rpath problems on x86_64.  This seems to be fixed by the
usual technique of addingg BR: libtool and then adding LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool
on the make line.  I have no idea if this breaks anything.  There seems to be an
included test suite but no %check section in the spec.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs

2006-06-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-06-14 11:31 EST ---
Yep, I'm still alive. I'll take a look at it briefly.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review