[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-14 20:12 EST --- Successfully built. Should be availe in FC4/5 soon. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-11 14:24 EST --- One step ahead of me. It is now built cleanly. I'm going to wait and make sure everything looks good in devel before I build it for FC-X. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-11 11:24 EST ---
Mike,
Adding the lines below to the %install section should fix it
%ifarch ppc ppc64
%{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_sensors
%endif
jpo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-08 07:55 EST --- Created an attachment (id=130733) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=130733&action=view) Do not create the sensors plugin in ppc builds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-08 07:50 EST ---
Mike,
Instead of just excluding the ppc arch could you try to use conditional blocks
like the one below:
...
%ifnarch ppc ppc64
%files sensors
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_sensors
%endif
...
I will attach a possible patch (not tested as I don't have access to ppc
systems).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-08 00:02 EST --- The build is done with these changes, I'm going to make sure it's fine in devel before I release it in FC4/5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-07 18:35 EST --- Mike, We have to exclude the subpackage nagios-plugins-sensors from being created for ppc as lm_sensors is not built for it (and also exclude it from the nagios-pluggins-all requirement list). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-05 17:48 EST --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-03 18:12 EST --- Mike, As in this review there are several people envolved, we should fall back to a voting decision (as in old Fedora.us days). At least two or three other reviewers should express their opinion by placing a comment like PUBLISH++ or PUBLISH--. But if no one expresses his opinion, lets say in the next 48 hours, I will approve this package changing the blocking ticket from FE-REVIEW to FE-ACCEPT. (I still would love to see a comment from someone with a 64bit system.) My vote is for approval. PUBLISH++ MD5SUMS: 6387568f71b4c7fd6afe62afdb5e1972 nagios-plugins-1.4.3-5.src.rpm 2c40fc69d51cc979e85150870a1daa93 nagios-plugins-1.4.3.tar.gz 6af2d874922483154a5e8adf87e066b3 nagios-plugins.spec jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-03 17:11 EST --- These updates have been made: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-5.src.rpm Jose Pedro Oliveira: you have assigned this to yourself and voted for approval, are you approving it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-02 12:40 EST ---
You have to
-Requires: nagios-plugins = %{version}-${release}
+Requires: nagios-plugins = %{version}-%{release}
in two places
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 17:57 EST --- MD5SUMS: 766f257aa209759b94f68a8a37119cf5 nagios-plugins-1.4.3-4.src.rpm 2c40fc69d51cc979e85150870a1daa93 nagios-plugins-1.4.3.tar.gz f4e1bb47d20816d128f9704be7bd6b04 nagios-plugins.spec PUBLISH++ This is my vote for approval. Notes: * The following itens should be corrected (maybe after importing the package to the CVS repo) - The last changelog entry needs to be corrected (release bump) - The empty export statement before the configure macro should be removed * Could someone (re)build this package in a 64bit system and express his vote? * I have assigned this ticket to me. If someone wants it, please feel free to reassign it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 22:08 EST --- SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-4.src.rpm Changelog: - Now using configure macro instead of ./configure - Added BuildRequest: perl(Net::SNMP) - For reference, this was bugzilla.redhat.com ticket# 176374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 11:16 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129746) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129746&action=view) Inherit distro CFLAGS Mike, This patch does the following: * [Blocker] Makes the package use the distro CFLAGS Most of the plugins weren't being compiled with the distro CFLAGS. Using the %configure macro takes care of that. * Adds perl(Net::SNMP) to the build requirements One less warning message from the configure. Suggestion: Could you also add the bugzilla ticket to one of the changelog entries? Hopefully these will be the last corrections. jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 11:00 EST --- Changing FE-NEW to FE-REVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 01:02 EST ---
SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec
SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-3.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Added check_ide_smart
- Added some dependencies
- Added support for check_if* (perl-Net-SNMP now in extras)
- nagios-plugins now owns dir %{_libdir}/nagios
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-18 18:16 EST --- Next time you're in the Chicagoland area lemme know, I owe you a beer. I'm chomping through some of these changes and testing. I'll post what I've got by tomorow night. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-18 17:59 EST --- Mike, perl-Net-SNMP has been built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel. The devel RPMs have already been pushed into the mirrors. The FC-4 and FC-5 will take a little a bit longer (next push). jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 18:59 EST --- Missing requirements in perl plugins The perl module - utils.pm - as the following lines modified by the configure script (utils.sh also has similar lines). ## updated by autoconf $PATH_TO_RPCINFO = "/usr/sbin/rpcinfo" ; $PATH_TO_NTPDATE = "/usr/sbin/ntpdate" ; $PATH_TO_NTPDC = "/usr/sbin/ntpdc" ; $PATH_TO_NTPQ= "/usr/sbin/ntpq" ; $PATH_TO_LMSTAT = "" ; $PATH_TO_SMBCLIENT = "/usr/bin/smbclient" ; $PATH_TO_MAILQ = "/usr/bin/mailq"; $PATH_TO_QMAIL_QSTAT = ""; and these variables are used by some of the perl plugins. For example, the check_ntp should require the ntp package Code used by in the check_ntp plugin - my $ntpdate = $utils::PATH_TO_NTPDATE; my $ntpq= $utils::PATH_TO_NTPQ; ... open (NTPDATE, $ntpdate . " -q $host 2>&1 |") ... open(NTPQ, $ntpq . " -np $host 2>&1 |") Plugins with missing requirements: * nagios-plugins-mailq should require the /usr/bin/mailq file (or sendmail (?)) * nagios-plugins-ntp should require the ntp package (or the above ntp utilities) * nagios-plugins-disk_smb should require the samba-client package or the /usr/bin/smbclient binary Directory ownership the nagios-plugins base rpm should also own the /usr/lib/nagios/plugins/ directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 18:33 EST --- This just documents several configure warnings. A future comment will deal with problems in perl and bash plugins. Configure warnings [1] checking for rc_read_config in -lradiusclient... no configure: WARNING: Skipping radius plugin configure: WARNING: install radius libs to compile this plugin (see REQUIREMENTS). [2] checking for lmstat... no configure: WARNING: Get lmstat from Globetrotter Software to monitor flexlm licenses [3] configure: WARNING: Tried /usr/bin/perl - install Net::SNMP perl module if you want to use the perl snmp plugins [4] checking for quakestat... no checking for qstat... no configure: WARNING: Get qstat from http://www.activesw.com/people/steve/qstat.html in order to make check_game plugin [5] checking for qmail-qstat... no configure: WARNING: Could not find qmail-qstat or eqivalent [1] disables the check_radius binary plugin (not built) [2] comercial product the perl plugin - check_flexlm - will not work as expected [3] two perl plugins being removed perl-Net-SNMP review ticket #191628 [4] disables the check_game binary plugin (not built) http://www.qstat.org/ [5] no binary distribution of qmail the check_mailq perl plugin won't be able to check qmail queues Note: Another plugin that appears to be disabled is the check_ide_smart (.c) At least [1], [3], and [4] should be added to a TODO list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 20:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #27) > Comment #26: Yes the only reason I'm not packaging the check_if's is because > Net::SNMP isn't in there, I was going to package it after nagios-plugins got > approved but if you want to package it have at it :-D perl-Net-SNMP review ticket: #191628 ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 19:53 EST --- Comment #26: Yes the only reason I'm not packaging the check_if's is because Net::SNMP isn't in there, I was going to package it after nagios-plugins got approved but if you want to package it have at it :-D As far as the individual plugin requires... it was a pain in the butt but I think I got all the requires that rpm doesn't pick up: SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios.spec SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 15:23 EST ---
Mike,
Missing requirements
Every external binary needed by a plugin needs to be on the requirement
list of that plugin.
An example, the check_fping plugin requires the /usr/sbin/fping file (or the
fping package). Right now you are only requiring it during the building process.
$ strace -f -e trace=execve ./check_fping 127.0.0.1
execve("./check_fping", ["./check_fping", "127.0.0.1"], [/* 23 vars */]) = 0
Process 9277 attached
[pid 9277] execve("/usr/sbin/fping", ["/usr/sbin/fping", "-b", "56", "-c", "1",
"127.0.0.1"], [/* 1 var */]) = 0
Process 9277 detached
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
Other plugins will needed to be checked. Will try to check a couple more
during in the next days.
Net::SNMP
-
Are you removing the following two plugins because
http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SNMP/ isn't available in Extras?
# check_ifoperstatus and check_ifstatus require Net::SNMP
%{__rm} %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_ifoperstatus
%{__rm} %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/nagios/plugins/check_ifstatus
I will see if I can package it ASAP.
/jpo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-08 09:24 EST --- I've been sponsored but this package has not yet been approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 23:44 EST --- cool. then you should put the package in FE and close this bug. I'm happy to see nagios-plugins got in FE now. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 20:50 EST --- Sorry, I'm removing FE-NEEDSPONSOR, I've been sponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 20:48 EST --- Sorry about that, the Nagios people have been really busy lately :-D. All updated: SRPM: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins-1.4.3-1.src.rpm SPEC: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/nagios-plugins.spec Its also been requested that I build some i386 bin's for people to use. i386: http://mmcgrath.net/~mmcgrath/nagios/i386/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 17:39 EST --- Mike, Could you update nagios-plugins to version 1.4.3 (released last month). TIA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-07 17:26 EST ---
I've just built this package and some of the plugins wouldn't install due to a
dependency on /usr/local/bin/perl. Turns out configure has found a symlink to
/usr/bin/perl I put there to make some random perl scripts run.
It would seem sensible for the package to enforce the correct perl by adding
this to the configure line:
--with-perl=%{_bindir}/perl
There's a few other --with parameters which could be similarly helpful.
On the other hand, seems to be working well on fc5 x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
