[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|lkund...@redhat.com |lkund...@v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-11 04:40 EST --- #176582#c6 says that FESCo voted against allowing ipsvd to link statically against dietlibc in Fedora. I don't see how the outcome could be different for this package, but if you want it to also be voted upon, please say so. Same for this package. Packages depending on this were revoked, so I am refusing also this one. If you feel that it was an incorrect decision, please reopen and let me know. Also, if you would use the same reasoning as in #176582#c2, please do not bother to reopen. Arguments like are implemented correctly are not only just not good enough FESCo, but for everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||201449 nThis|| Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Bug 176581 depends on bug 176579, which changed state. Bug 176579 Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 Bug 176581 depends on bug 176582, which changed state. Bug 176582 Summary: Review Request: freedt -- Reimplementation of Dan Bernstein's daemontools under the GNU GPL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176582 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 08:34 EST --- Some additional comments and complete review: * rpmlint: E: fnord non-standard-gid /srv/www/fnord fnord E: fnord non-standard-dir-perm /srv/www/fnord 0750 The ownership and path are both fine. But could you please pick some more standard path than /srv? Would /var/www be a good choice? E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-httpd E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-idx E: fnord statically-linked-binary /usr/sbin/fnord-cgi I asked about linking against dietlibc in the comment above. * The package is named according to guidelines * Spec file name is fine * Package meets the guidelines * Package is licensed under GPL * The license text is included in documentation * To the extend I understand, the spec file is in American English * The spec file is clear, legible and easily understandable * The source matches upstream fnord-1.10.tar.bz2 = MD5(4c7d9f0e2b2f071d4687688f3018ba91) What is the Source1: http://www.fefe.de/fnord/%name-%version.tar.bz2.sig good for? * Tried compiling and running on i386 and x86_64 successfully * Dependency list seems to be complete * Package makes no use of locales * Does not provide dynamically loaded libraries * Not relocatable * Package owns the directory it creates (though correctness of the path is questionable, see comment at the top of this comment) * Contains no duplicate entries in %files * %files sections are fine and contain %defattr * Contains proper %clean section * Consistently uses macros * Contains permissable content (code) * No large quantities of documentation * %doc files are not required for correct function * No header files * No static libraries * No pkgconfig files * No library files * No devel subpackage * No libtool archives * No GUI * No confilcts about files with anny other package * %install begins with removal of PRM_BUILD_ROOT as it should * All filenames are 7bit ASCII, so also valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|173459 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 176581] Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fnord -- A very fast HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176581 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||173459 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
