[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 04:32 EST --- (In reply to comment #44) Ouch. Though I haven't seen any xemacs-beta package for Debian yet Sorry for being unclear, by xemacs-beta I meant the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 08:26 EST --- Also emacsen-common is going to re-byte-compile apel if flim is updated or installed, in above case, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 17:02 EST --- I have moved the namespace discussion to the FE list. However, I don't feel I understand the build in %post proposal well enough to properly convey it to the list - Akira, if you have the time and energy, I think it's worth bringing that up on FE list as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 21:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) Less than for various Emacsen? I fail to see why. Well, in the release cycle POV. newer release of emacs isn't seen a long time. I suppose there may be strong request to use the latest emacs but may wants to keep the stable version together. but yes, there may be more or less such requirements on others as well. Yes, but that kind of defeats the idea of getting stuff byte compiled for whatever Emacsen are installed on that particular box. On a side note, there have been lots of reports over time on xemacs-beta about Debian's setup being broken and resulting in for example XEmacs somehow getting *.elc bytecompiled by GNU Emacs in its load path. That will obviously wreak havoc. OTOH my gut feeling is that the reports are less frequent nowadays so it's possible that the Debian folks have got it fixed. Ouch. Though I haven't seen any xemacs-beta package for Debian yet - at least in the official tree - it may be because it just doesn't follow the emacsen-common-way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 181404] Review Request: emacs-muse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: emacs-muse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181404 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-25 21:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) My feeling is that, while what Akira is suggesting has merit, what it's ultimately an attempt to do is to bend rpm to deal with installation from source (.el) rather than binary.. it's not so dissimilar to gentoos ebuilds etc. It really seems like trying to get rpm to do things it wasn't designed to do. I'm in favour of keeping things simple, working with binary packages, and not aiming for the canonical solution. it's sensible. discussing something without the real implementation is little messy. so I'll try to do it when I have a time, and let's continue to discuss against it then. Sorry to interrupt your package contribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
