[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-18 12:42 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-18 11:52 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: nickle New Branches: EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-13 01:25 EST --- Rawhide build done. Thanks for reviewing! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-12 17:06 EST --- * source files match upstream: ffc7b03a830e64ec054330ae00b8 nickle-2.54.tar.gz * package meets naming and packaging guidelines * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently * dist tag is present * build root is correct * license field matches the actual license * license is open source-compatible, license text included in package * latest version is being packaged * BuildRequires are proper * compiler flags are appropriate * %clean is present * package builds in mock (FC-6, i386) * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent (no doc for -devel package, which is ok) * final provides and requires are sane * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths * owns the directories it creates * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't * no duplicates in %files * file permissions are appropriate * no scriptlets present * code, not content * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package * header files in -devel package * no pkgconfig files * no libtool .la droppings APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nickle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-04 11:35 EST ---
http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle-2.54-2.src.rpm
http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle.spec
Fixed, thanks. Note that the two left-over COPYING files in %{_docdir}/examples
are there because they cite different authors than the main COPYING file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-04 07:18 EST --- I think it is enough to have rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT instead of [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT The examples directory appears twice, once in the docdir and once in /usr/share/nickle. I prefer the docdir. The examples directory contains Makefile* files which are not functional. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 21:15 EST --- pong. http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle-2.54-1.src.rpm http://hircus.org/fedora/nickle/nickle.spec Sorry for the late response! Changed the %ghost to %exclude and avoided using %dir and then listing everything under it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 184011] Review Request: nickle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nickle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184011 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 16:58 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
