[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-21 12:23:51 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-4.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-10-21 12:23:21 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-30 14:10:55 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-4.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-1.27-4.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-09-30 14:11:36 EDT --- perl-Curses-1.27-3.el4 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 4. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Curses-1.27-3.el4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch 2009-09-29 02:40:01 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Curses Owners: stevetraylen New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 I emailed Garrick requesting that this package also be built for EPEL to which he responded: How would you feel about taking it over as the maintainer? HPCC/Linux Systems Admin Garrick I am happy to become the owner of this package and then also create the EL-4, EL-5 branch. I think such a CVS request is also the way to change package ownership. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-09-29 16:26:27 EDT --- cvs done on the EL-5/EL-4 branches. For the rest, Garrick should be able to approve you at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/perl-Curses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-30 18:32 EST --- Properly block FE-ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163779 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189452] Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Curses - Curses bindings for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189452 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-24 10:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) Is 1.13-2 acceptable in its current form, or should I not remove the execute bits? You could leave the exec bits on. The extra dependencies you get as a result of this are: * /usr/bin/perl * perl(Curses) * perl(ExtUtils::testlib) perl(Curses) is provided by the package itself, and the other two are provided by the main perl package, which is already a dependency of this package. So there aren't any new dependencies introduced by leaving the exec bits on. 1) IIRC there are plans to disallowed this in the future (no docs with execution permissions). Even rpmlint already warns about requirements being pulled in by doc files: W: perl-Curses doc-file-dependency ... 2) Right now the only way to avoid the requirements pulled in by perl modules (.pm files) shipped as doc is to filter them out. My point was that although there are logically additional deps from having the executable deps, in practice there are in fact no additional deps *in this case* because the same packages that satisfy the main deps also satisfy the doc deps. Of course that could change if some modules were split out from the main perl package. If at some time in the future rpm doesn't allow executable docs, that's also fine by me, as is this package, with or without the executable docs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
