[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-05 18:27 EST --- removing the FE_REVIEW blocker too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-10 06:34 EST --- I will close this bug in one week if there is no activity meanwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-12 19:54 EST --- Andreas, anything new ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-16 11:45 EST --- [root]# ip add show 1: lo: mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: peth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: eth1: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:16:76:8a:55:f9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth1 4: sit0: mtu 1480 qdisc noop link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0 5: vif0.0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 6: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether 00:16:76:8a:55:f8 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.50.31/24 brd 192.168.50.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::216:76ff:fe8a:55f8/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 7: vif0.1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 8: veth1: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 9: vif0.2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 10: veth2: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 11: vif0.3: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 12: veth3: mtu 1500 qdisc noop link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 13: xenbr0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 14: vif1.0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 16: vif3.0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 32: vif19.0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 34: vif21.0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::fcff::feff:/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever [root]# cat /etc/redhat-release Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-16 11:41 EST --- Could you send me your "ip addr show" output please? I simply cannot reproduce your problem here. What fedora version are you running that on? fc6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 10:43 EST --- The very first time I tried to start the server after editing etc/sysconfig/mystun. I've performed the manual tests because using the init.d script was not successfull: [root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/mystun ### mystun NAT traversal server ### ### For correct operation, the mystun-server has to bind to two different ### ip addressed. Please configure your server accordingly and specify ### these two addresses here. ### # First Interface int1="192.168.1.1" # Second Interface int2="192.168.50.31" # extra options extra_opts="" [root]# service mystun start Starting mystun server: using intefaces:0 and 1 pid file contains old pid, replacing pid [ OK ] [root]# service mystun status mystun dead but subsys locked [root]# /usr/sbin/mystun-server -i 192.168.50.31,192.168.1.1 using intefaces:0 and 1 strange family 0 skipping... strange family 29797 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... strange family 29797 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... Located interfaces [127.0.0.1] ip->127.0.0.1 Before daemonize pid is [28817] parent [28757] Sending FROM: 127.0.0.1:3478 NOTICE:udp init succeded 3 Sending FROM: 127.0.0.1:3479 NOTICE:udp init succeded 4 init_ss: BUG: unknown address family 0 ERROR: udp_init: could not init sockaddr_union ERROR:udp init failed Unable to udp_init alternate_address Initialazing failed ... code -1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-15 10:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) > Starting it manually gives: > # /usr/sbin/mystun-server -i eth0 > I have the very same errors with "-i eth0,eth1" as arg... That is the problem. The program does not want eth0,eth1 but either 1,2 or (makes more sense (IMHO) 192.168.1.l,192.168.1.2 as parameters for -i. The config file /etc/sysconfig/mystun contains example entries and is consulted by the initscript. Could you try that way please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 11:50 EST --- Indeed, the two problems are fixed and the program builds successfully in mock / fedora 6 / x86_64 However, I can't make it start: # service mystun start Starting mystun server: using intefaces:0 and 1 pid file contains old pid, replacing pid [ OK ] # service mystun status mystun dead but subsys locked (this is after 3-4 unsucessfull attempts) The machine has two ethernet interfaces, both are up. I have the same problem on another machine which has one interface only. Starting it manually gives: # /usr/sbin/mystun-server -i eth0 using intefaces:52 and 55 strange family 0 skipping... strange family 29797 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... strange family 29797 skipping... strange family 0 skipping... Located interfaces [127.0.0.1] ip->127.0.0.1 Before daemonize pid is [27527] parent [27296] init_ss: BUG: unknown address family 0 ERROR: udp_init: could not init sockaddr_union ERROR:udp init failed Unable to udp_init bind_address Initialazing failed ... code -1 I have the very same errors with "-i eth0,eth1" as arg... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-13 07:49 EST --- http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun-1.0-2.src.rpm has been updated and should fix all outstanding issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs)
server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis||
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-12 22:37 EST ---
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
on source
W: mystun strange-permission mystun.init 0755
->can be ignored, it's a startup script
E: mystun no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
-> I was almost ready to say it's an rpmlint error, but then I noticed that rm
-rf ${buildroot} and rm -rf %{buildroot} are not really the same :)
on generated binary:
W: mystun wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mystun-1.0/README
W: mystun wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/mystun-1.0/COPYING
Running dos2unix will make rpmlint happy here. Not a blocker, anyway.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL)is OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream, sha1sum is
35685456e7cbf31f831d106b19185ccea7c3952f /tmp/mystun-1.0-source.zip
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- no static files, no libtool, no pkconfig
- scriptlets are sane, correctly Requires chkconfig and service
SHOULD
- compiles and builds happily in mock/devel/x86_64, but ignores the fedora
specific compilation flags
MUSTFIX:
- fixing the typo in %clean ($-->%)
- the Makefile overrides CFLAGS, therefore $rpm_opt_flags is not used. Please
patch it; I did not test but I think that a simple sed similar to
"s/-DOPENSSL_NO_KRBS/-DOPENSSL_NO_KRBS (CFLAGS)/" should be enough
Andreas, please address the above. After that I'll do a test run (I am not going
to test the version which does not take the compiler flags into account since it
might be way different to the final one) and assuming no issues appear, we are
good to go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-10 17:20 EST --- Woah. Upstream did a 1.0 release. The package is at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun-1.0-1.src.rpm and the .spec at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/mystun/mystun.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 10:04 EST --- I forgot to say its nice to add a bash script that does a checkout and tarballs it up but that is not vital as long as we know how you created your tarball so that we can reproduce to verify source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 10:02 EST --- andreas please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines namely the section on snapshot packages. it explains clearly how you should name and do the versioning on your package. otherwise after a quick glance it looks ok. you state how to get the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-10 08:27 EST --- >From a quick look at the srpm name, it doesn't seems to be named according to the naming guidelines (although this case is a bit unusuall). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 10:52 EST --- The Source Tag cannot be an URL as it's a CVS checkout. Tough luck there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189949] Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mystun - STUN (Simple Traversal of UDP through NATs) server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189949 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-01 09:34 EST --- SOURCE tag is not URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
