[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |fc5 Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-26 23:57 EST --- Needs some work. * Use dist tag instead of coding release. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DistTag * Should install into /usr/bin, not /usr/bin/local - Does the Makefile have an install target? - need to substitute out paths with macros * URL tag missing, does it have a web page? * Source tag is not a URL * Should change Requieres to BuildRequires on the devel packges. For example ImageMagick-devel * Doesn't build, probably missing BuildRequires gtk2-devel * Need to handle the .desktop file correctly. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * %description should have "contains" not "contain" (Yes English is strange) And it is somewhat brief. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-27 05:39 EST ---
John,
Please check SPEC file again at
http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec. I am getting error
error: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/Webcam.desktop: No such file or
directory
what changes should i do in SPEC file??
Also for using dist tag i saw onse statement on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7
that NOTE: Fedora Core packages cannot use the %{?dist} tag as the current build
system cannot handle it.
So how to use dist in SPEC file? I tried but no value is substituted there
and got blank space in src rpm name.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-27 06:36 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> John,
> Please check SPEC file again at
> http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec. I am getting error
> error: Bad file: /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES/Webcam.desktop: No such file or
> directory
The file Webcam.desktop was missing from the RPM SOURCES directory. This
shouldn't happen if you're building from the SRPM, which contains this file.
> what changes should i do in SPEC file??
I'd suggest reading the packaging guidelines here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
It doesn't cover everything here though. In particular, RPM packages should not
install anything under /usr/local - you need to change the install step to put
files under /usr instead.
> Also for using dist tag i saw onse statement on
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-beca3bf84972f19a384cc2e5091ed47c2b3cebc7
> that NOTE: Fedora Core packages cannot use the %{?dist} tag as the current
> build
> system cannot handle it.
This is a Fedora Extras package submission, not a Fedora Core one. The Fedora
Extras build system (which will soon be used for Fedora Core anyway) handles the
dist tag just fine.
> So how to use dist in SPEC file?
Exactly as it says on the wiki.
I tried but no value is substituted there
> and got blank space in src rpm name.
The macros will defined automatically in the Fedora Extras build system, and you
can try this for yourself by building your package in mock. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock
You could alternatively define the macros manually when you build the package:
$ rpmbuild --define "fedora 5" --define "dist .fc5" ...
I see there is another project called qcwebcam:
http://www.fhttpd.org/pub/qcwebcam/README.html
This could cause confusion...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-28 06:07 EST --- I hope i have completed all work except package name change. Will think on that and change it accordingly. Current working SPEC file Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec Current working Source file Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.1.tar.bz2 SRPM Url: http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Can you check all above things are working fine or not?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-28 13:32 EST --- I attempted to rebuild your src rpm on my X86_64 box and received a dependency error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ sudo rpmbuild --rebuild Desktop/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm Installing Desktop/qcwebcam-1.1-3.fc5.src.rpm warning: user parag does not exist - using root warning: group parag does not exist - using root warning: user parag does not exist - using root warning: group parag does not exist - using root error: Failed build dependencies: streamer >= 1.1 is needed by qcwebcam-1.1-3.x86_64 I'm not sure what package provides 'streamer' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-28 22:58 EST --- Yes, its dependent on streamer package that provides command line tool streamer to record video. i have already uploaded it at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||193224 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NOTABUG Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution|NOTABUG | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-21 01:03 EST --- New version is out. Added Audio recording support as a separate feature. Access package at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.2.1-1.fc5.src.rpm and SPEC file at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-21 02:24 EST --- I changed SPEC file and made it clean as per FE package guidelines and now new package is at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.2.1-2.fc5.src.rpm and its SPEC file is at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-22 05:30 EST --- Bugfix in Contorls window and new version is at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam-1.2.2-1.fc5.src.rpm And its SPEC file is at http://people.redhat.com/pnemade/Qcwebcam/qcwebcam.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163776 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 13:01 EST --- Sorry, but I don't intend to do a full review now. Reassigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-30 21:56 EST --- Ok will wait for somebody to do that work. I am also too busy since 2 weeks and didn't got time to have any new updates here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 Bug 193216 depends on bug 193224, which changed state. Bug 193224 Summary: Review Request: streamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193224 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 |201449 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 193216] Review Request: qcwebcam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qcwebcam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193216 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|193224 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
