[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-29 04:21 EST --- * new docs (NEWS, COPYING) added to the package, removed INSTALL * corrected permissions on /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm to 0644 * gnutls-devel is added to BuildRequires, MockBuild works now again * when using parallel make, package building fails. thats the reason why I avoid using parallel make with this package. * no other issues found new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-4.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-29 11:51 EST --- ( Some comments mentioned on bug 209215 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-30 00:02 EST --- Well, now this package meets http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines This package (libprelude) is APPROVED by me. Please step forward according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-30 00:08 EST --- Umm... It seems that Paul Johnson has already sponsored you (I don't know why, however, it is okay..) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-28 13:57 EST --- Well, I will check -3 package today (in Japan: EST+14h)... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-29 00:52 EST ---
Well,
A. Genenal packaging issues
* Please add the following documentation(s)
NEWS
COPYING
* Please remove the following documentation(s)
INSTALL - only need by manual installation and
not needed by rpm installation
B. For debuginfo rpm issue
! It seems that some of the source files are
borrowed from libgpg-error.
(borrowed means copied with some modifications for the
usage of libprelude)
---
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-from-errno.c
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-from-errno.h
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-to-errno.c
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/code-to-errno.h
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/err-codes.h
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/err-sources.h
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/strerror.c
/usr/src/debug/libprelude-0.9.12/src/libprelude-error/strsource.c
---
Usually local copies of other libraries are
forbidden, however, as long as I checked how
these source codes are used, these codes can be
allowed because it seems that the part of codes
borrowed from libgpg-error seems very trivial.
However, would you check if this is proper?
(IMO this is not a blocker for this package).
Then:
C: Related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines
* Use rpmlint
E: libprelude-perl script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm
permission should be 0644 for this file.
* BuildRequires
- Mockbuild fails.
BuildRequires: gnutls should be BuildRequires: gnutls-devel
* Parallel make
- Does this package fail on parallel make?
If not, please use make %{?_smp_mflags}
D. Related to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines :
= This is okay, except for the issues on A-C.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-27 10:13 EST --- ok, rpath and permission problems are fixed now. timestamp issue is fixed as well. new package is available here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-3.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 05:03 EST ---
Well,
Compared to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines :
* Requires
- Check the requirement for -devel package.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ ./libprelude-config --libs
-L/usr/lib -lprelude -lgnutls -lgcrypt -lgpg-error -lrt -ldl
--
This usually means that -devel package should require
gnutls-devel.
* Beware of Rpath
- This package fails on rpath checking.
---
+ /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/BUILD/libprelude-0.9.12
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/bin/prelude-adduser
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/libprelude.so.2.9.0
extracting debug info from
/var/tmp/libprelude-0.9.12-2-root-tasaka1/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_prelude.so
10681 blocks
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
***
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild'
* to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS'
* environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values
* below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x.
*
*0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
* issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
* providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
* environments.
*0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
* nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
* SECURITY risk
*0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
* RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
* and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
* the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
* $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
* $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=top-dir /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*
* 'check-rpaths' is part of 'rpmdevtools'.
*
***
ERROR 0010: file
'/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so'
contains an empty rpath in []
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71892 (%install)
---
Prelude.so contains empty rpath and this should be removed.
* Timestamps
- Please consider to keep timestamps on installed files,
especially on text files because
* timestamps can show when the files are created and
if vendor (like you) have modified the files.
This package contain many HTML documents and header files,
so keeping timestamps on those files are preferable.
For this package, this can be done by
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL=%{__install} -c -p
cp -p AUTHORS ChangeLog README INSTALL LICENSE.README HACKING.README \
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-25 07:41 EST --- More comments: Please check the permissions of files: - E: libprelude-perl non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so 0555 - Also, check if 0444 permission of /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-22 05:47 EST --- ok, here we go: * config is _now_ in /etc/prelude * perl-modules are now in vendor_perl instead of site_perl * unnecessary files were deleted * package does not own /usr/share/aclocal anymore * automake is a new Requirement for libprelude-devel * language bindings are in separated packages now sponsors? new package is here: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-2.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-21 19:16 EST --- * now used %buildroot all over the spec file * removed smp-flags/-j flag because the package won't build with it * added doc files * moved config to /etc/prelude instead of /etc/prelude/prelude * removed duplicate BuildReqs * upgraded to new upstream verson 0.9.12 no more output from rpmlint on the SRPM. any sponsor available? new package is online: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.12-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-22 01:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #15) * moved config to /etc/prelude instead of /etc/prelude/prelude Well, did you? # rpm -qlp libprelude-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep /etc/prelude /etc/prelude /etc/prelude/prelude /etc/prelude/prelude/default /etc/prelude/prelude/default/client.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/global.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/idmef-client.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/default/tls.conf /etc/prelude/prelude/profile Further issues: - The perl modules are being installed into site_perl # rpm -qlp libprelude-devel-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep perl5 /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/perllocal.pod /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Prelude.pm /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/.packlist /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.bs /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/auto/Prelude/Prelude.so Fedora supplied perl-modules MUST go into vendor_perl (or outside of the perl5/ hierarchy). Installing into site_perl is a no-no. - The perl-module contains files supposed not to be shipped (.packlist, etc.) You might want to check how perl modules are suppose to be packaged in FE. - Package must not own /usr/share/aclocal # rpm -qlp libprelude-devel-0.9.12-1.i386.rpm | grep aclocal /usr/share/aclocal /usr/share/aclocal/libprelude.m4 The FPC has not decided upon yet, but so far the recommendation is to requires packages providing aclocal macros to Requires: automake - I don't understand why the perl-module is part of *-devel. Perl modules normally all are run-time packages. - I'd split the language bindings into separate packages (esp. move the perl module into a separate perl-Prelude package). This would avoid pulling in unnecessary deps in cases users are only interested into one of the language bindings. I am not sufficiently familiar with python, but I presume similar consideration as to the perl bindings also apply to it (Toshio, Ville, f13?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 05:33 EST --- ok, it must have something to do with the perl-bindings. installing the SRPM in mock works without any problems, but I guess you have perl-devel installed which forces the configure script to do perl-bindings. I disabled them in a new packeg which is available here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144049action=view could you please check of this one works without the binding problem? Thanks, Thorsten -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 05:34 EST --- sorry, correct link for the SRPM is: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-3.src.rpmv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #144049|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 13:21 EST --- Created an attachment (id=144124) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=144124action=view) Libprelude without perl and python bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 13:26 EST --- I didn't have perl-devel installed, but nevermind, now it fails on the python bindings. --disable-perl doesn't work, it's --enable-perl=no. I disabled perl and python and now it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-20 16:35 EST --- info from upstream was to remove the smp compiler flag which often leads to problem with perl- and python bindings. could you please test the new release, if this one builds without problems (in my mock buildsystem it actually builds). new link is: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-19 17:39 EST --- Hi Thorsten, I tried building the srpm on FC-6, but it failed on the perl and python bindings. Building the tarball worked though, so I'm not sure what's wrong. Buildlog is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-01 10:58 EST --- ping?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-24 09:49 EST --- updated package: http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.11-1.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-19 01:09 EST --- Ping? Thorsten, shouldn't you show up again before Nov 3rd (One month after submission), I'll close this request, then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||209217, 209219, 209220 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 05:14 EST ---
Thorsten, would please make yourself familiar with the Fedora Packaging
Guidelines and modify your spec to its conventions.
Just to point out a some issues:
* Source: should be an absolute URL
* Remove Prefix:
* Adopt FPC's conventions on Release: and BuildRoot:
* Use %configure instead of ./configure
* %{_libdir}/*.so's belong into *-devel
* Shipping static libs
* *devel contains files which should go to *-debuginfo-* only.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||209224 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||209215 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||209222 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-04 04:15 EST --- http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude-0.9.10.2-1.fc592.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/tscherf/fedora-extra/libprelude.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209214] Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libprelude - Prelude library collection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
