[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|RAWHIDE | Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-08 21:17 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gwenhywfar New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-08 23:59 EST --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-19 15:32 EST --- This is built now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-22 11:16 EST --- Just waiting for the round tuits. Will get to it this week-ish. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-22 00:09 EST --- Ping any problem for importing this package to CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-12 10:04 EST --- Just looking over: (In reply to comment #7) + no gwenhywfar.pc files present. It certainly has them in my builds... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-11 17:54 EST --- 2.3.0-6 uploaded; cert bundle marked as config, rpaths fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-12 01:52 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPMS. E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. But its ok as it looks mis-error by rpmlint. + source files match upstream. 0f7cf7d0efa6719f85c00d6d8ccec2b3 gwenhywfar-2.3.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. + %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required. + %doc does not affect runtime. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code Not contents. + no static libraries present. + no gwenhywfar.pc files present. + -devel subpackage exists + included %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig + no .la files. + translations are available + Dose owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + no scriptlets used. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 09:35 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt It's not really a configuration file, it's a data file. It's a CA certificate bundle, much like /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt. However, that is also marked %config, so I'll change this. (Ideally it just uses the openssl CA bundle.) E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. This is a mis-error from rpmlint. It's a architecture-specific include, so it can't be in /usr/include, and needs to be in an architecture specific directory. See glib2, dbus, gcc, qt for other examples of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 10:28 EST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt It's not really a configuration file, it's a data file. It's a CA certificate bundle, much like /etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt. However, that is also marked %config, so I'll change this. Perhaps it should live in /etc/pki/tls/certs too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 12:03 EST --- It's not easily modifiable without patching, and if I'm going to do that, I'd rather just patch it to *use* the openssl one. Currently discussing that w/upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 12:12 EST --- FWIW, curl uses the openssl one rather than the one shipped in the curl tarball... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 221947] Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gwenhywfar - utility library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221947 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-10 02:47 EST --- rpmlint is not silent rpmlint on main RPM reported W: gwenhywfar non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gwen-public-ca.crt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rpmlint on -devel rpm reported I: gwenhywfar-devel checking E: gwenhywfar-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Otherwise mock build is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
