[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-04-10 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||RAWHIDE




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-10 23:32 EST ---
As build is available now, therefore CLOSING this review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-04-08 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-09 00:06 EST ---
what problem??
Can you specify what problem you found?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-04-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-04-05 11:54 EST ---
There is the same problem in RHEL5:

ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS/aspell-sr-0.02-1.2.1.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-03-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-30 07:16 EST ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
- rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and RPM.
  But following messages are ignorable
  E: aspell-sr no-binary
  E: aspell-sr only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
  E: aspell-sr configure-without-libdir-spec
+ SPEC file contains explanation about above warnings.
+ source files match upstream.
a068ba095e7246fd3bbc92e7d0287998  aspell6-sr-0.02.tar.bz2
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Requires: aspell = 12:0.60
+ Provides: aspell-sr = 50:0.02-3.fc7
+ Not a GUI APP.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |medium

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-28 05:46 EST ---
picking up this for review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-03-28 05:49 EST ---
Can you please change %build and %install section as suggested in other aspell
package review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


fedora-review requested: [Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-02-07 Thread bugzilla
Bug 225284: Merge Review: aspell-sr
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Component: Package Review

Ivana Varekova [EMAIL PROTECTED] has askedfor fedora-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284

--- Additional Comments from Ivana Varekova [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed in aspell-sr-0.02-2.fc7

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 225284] Merge Review: aspell-sr

2007-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Merge Review: aspell-sr


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225284





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-02-05 09:39 EST ---
BLOCKER: spec filename is not %{name}.spec

From the review guidelines:
  MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec

The spec file is actually named -sl, instead of -sr.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review