[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-24 05:45 EST --- Now bug 302221 is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-23 09:39 EST --- I have receive a message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the text below. However, I don't know what to do: nothing changed in the ppl package lately. In particular, the minimal version of GMP required did not change. Can someone please explain to me what the problem is? ppl has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-swiprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On x86_64: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On i386: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-devel - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-yap - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On ppc: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-gprolog - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc requires libgmpxx.so.3 On x86_64: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.x86_64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) On i386: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.i386 requires libgmpxx.so.3 On ppc64: ppl-utils - 0.9-14.fc8.ppc64 requires libgmpxx.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-23 10:53 EST --- Rawhide gmp is upgraded to 4.2.2 and then soversion of libgmpxx.so changed. At least you have to rebuild ppl against newest gmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-23 11:11 EST --- Thanks Mamoru. It turned out to be a bug in gmp.spec: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-23 11:31 EST --- (In reply to comment #76) Thanks Mamoru. It turned out to be a bug in gmp.spec: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302221 No, after bug 302221 is solved, you have to rebuild ppl against newest gmp. As broken deps check says, currently ppl requires libgmpxx.so.3, but current rawhide gmp provides libgmpxx.so.4, not .3. The bug you quoted is saying that libgmpxx.so is linked against libgmpxx.so.3, which does not exist and the link should be targeted against libgmpxx.so.4. So after the bug you quoted is fixed, you have to rebuild against the gmp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-23 11:39 EST --- By the way, if you don't want to wait until bug 302221 is solved, you can * create a temporary directory (say named as foo) * and create a symlink in the directory named libgmpxx.so which links to %_libdir/libgmpxx.so.4 * and add the directory (foo) to LDFLAGS by some way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-12 19:37 EST --- ppl-0.9-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |CLOSED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA Fixed In Version||0.9-12.fc7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 03:02 EST --- Found: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246815 Now, what is the best course of action? Should I wait and hope that bug is fixed soon or work around the problem by, e.g., temporarily disabling the YAP interface? There is a related problem: I had to work around a `pl' packaging problem due to a missing dependency on `readline-devel'. Now this bug has been fixed by the `pl' maintainer (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243084). The question is: should I keep my workaround or should I remove it and make the dependency from `pl' stricter, requiring at least the first version with the fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 03:53 EST --- (In reply to comment #64) Found: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246815 Now, what is the best course of action? Should I wait and hope that bug is fixed soon or work around the problem by, e.g., temporarily disabling the YAP interface? I guess you want to disable YAP support now, and I also want to have this rebuilt once anyway. (If you want to disable YAP support, write a comment in the spec file like: -- # disable YAP support on x86_64 until bug 246815 is fixed -- There is a related problem: I had to work around a `pl' packaging problem due to a missing dependency on `readline-devel'. Now this bug has been fixed by the `pl' maintainer The question is: should I keep my workaround or should I remove it and make the dependency from `pl' stricter, requiring at least the first version with the fix? Yes, pl dependency for readline-devel is fixed now and you can revert the workaround for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 09:11 EST --- I guess you want to disable YAP support now, and I also want to have this rebuilt once anyway. (If you want to disable YAP support, write a comment in the spec file like: -- # disable YAP support on x86_64 until bug 246815 is fixed -- Done. I think bug 246815 will be fixed pretty soon: I will re-enable YAP then. Yes, pl dependency for readline-devel is fixed now and you can revert the workaround for this. Done. I have completed a successful build with the above two changes. I will study Bodhi now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 09:48 EST --- Well, Bodhi is needed for Fedora-7 branch, so first try to rebuild this package also on F-7 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 10:54 EST --- The build on the F-7 branch completed successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 11:07 EST --- Okay. Then you should request to push ppl to Fedora 7 repository by using bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ After that, you can close this bug as CLOSED NEXTRELEASE It may take one or two days before this package is pushed to Fedora 7 formally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 12:04 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 15:13 EST --- ppl-0.9-12.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 22:31 EST --- Next don't forget to again request on bodhi to move ppl from testing to stable. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. If you have some questions, please feel free to ask me, or you can ask them on fedora devel/maintainers mailing lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-04 06:23 EST --- I think I have not understood the role of the InitialCC fiel. Now I am caught by a doubt: should I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-04 07:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #55) should I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] there? You don't have to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-04 14:21 EST --- InitialCC is a list of addresses that will be added to the CC field in bugzilla for any bugs filed against that package. In order for bugzilla to add it and send email, the email address must be associated with a bugzilla account. So, for copies of bugs to be emailed to your list, you will have to create a bugzilla.redhat.com account for that list with that email address. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical
abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-04 16:37 EST ---
I have requested a build and it fails for ppc64. The reason is:
No Package Found for gprolog = 1.2.19
I have checked and, indeed, gprolog.spec containts the line
ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc
If at all possible, I would like to avoid to esclude ppc64 altogether,
since only the GNU Prolog interface is problematic. Is there a way I
could disable the gprolog subpackage for ppc64?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical
abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 00:11 EST ---
Well, you can try it using %ifnarch macro.
i.e. For example
%ifnarch ppc64
# gprolog is not available on ppc64
package gprolog
Summary: The GNU Prolog interface of the Parma Polyhedra Library
.
%endif
.
%build
CPPFLAGS=-I%{_includedir}/glpk
%ifnarch ppc64
CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS -I%{_libdir}/gprolog-`gprolog --version `/include
%endif
CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS -I%{_includedir}/Yap
%configure *** CPPFLAGS=$CPPFLAGS
.
%ifnarch ppc64
%files gprolog
..
%endif
--
NOTE:
- Please write a comment in a spec file briefly why you disable
gprolog support on ppc64 (like I wrote)
- Don't write
---
# gprolog is not available on ppc64 - Don't write comment here!
Here is in the %description of
previous subpackage.
%ifnarch ppc64
%package gprolog
...
%endif
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 00:14 EST --- After rebuild is done, please let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-05 00:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #60) NOTE: - Please write a comment in a spec file briefly why you disable gprolog support on ppc64 (like I wrote) - Don't write --- # gprolog is not available on ppc64 - Don't write comment here! Here is in the %description of previous subpackage. %ifnarch ppc64 %package gprolog ... %endif Oh.. I also made a mistake... The correct way is: %ifnarch ppc64 %package gprolog # gprolog is not available on ppc64 - please write comment here . %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 09:51 EST --- I have written a pre-review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical
abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis||
Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+
|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|com)|
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 11:37 EST ---
* For pre-review:
- Well, it seems you chose one of difficult review requests.
For your pre-review:
* When you want to use check-list style, please also write the
summary which shows what are the issues to be left so that
everyone can read your review easily.
* For ldconfig. where is rkward.so installed? If this is
installed under %{_libdir}/R/library/%{name}, then ldconfig is
not needed because this directory is not standard paths.
Well, okay.
This package (ppl) is APPROVED by me
Please follow the procedure written on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from Get a Fedora Account
When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure
above), please make a note on this bug that you did so.
If you want to push this package also on F-7, you
also have to check:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
after the URL above.
If you have some questions, please let me know.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical
abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 12:17 EST ---
For your pre-review:
* When you want to use check-list style, please also write the
summary which shows what are the issues to be left so that
everyone can read your review easily.
OK.
* For ldconfig. where is rkward.so installed? If this is
installed under %{_libdir}/R/library/%{name}, then ldconfig is
not needed because this directory is not standard paths.
You are right: I updated 244597 consequently.
Well, okay.
This package (ppl) is APPROVED by me
Thanks!
Please follow the procedure written on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join
from Get a Fedora Account
When you requested someone to sponsor you (in the procedure
above), please make a note on this bug that you did so.
Done: I need a sponsor for membership in the cvsextras group
and I need approval for membership in the fedorabugs group.
If you want to push this package also on F-7, you
also have to check:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT
after the URL above.
Will do.
If you have some questions, please let me know.
Thanks a lot.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 14:43 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ppl Short Description: The Parma Polyhedra Library: a library of numerical abstractions Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 21:40 EST --- The InitialCC: address doesn't seem to have a bugzilla account... can you create one for it and resubmit once thats done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-04 01:27 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ppl Short Description: The Parma Polyhedra Library: a library of numerical abstractions Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: F-7 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 08:50 EST --- (In reply to comment #41) Okay, * For this package, the last remaining is (I just found): --- /usr/share/doc/ppl/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/ppl/TODO: ISO-8859 English text --- Please change to UTF-8 (by iconv for example). Done. I have simply changed http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-docfiles.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 09:43 EST --- Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new package review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 10:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #45) Well, please create a new spec/srpm and upload anyway. New SPEC: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl.spec New SRPM: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-9.src.rpm And please do a pre-review of other person's review request or submit a new package review request. I am trying to select a project for which I have a minimum of qualification, but I am having problems: all such projects seem to have requests that are either stuck (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227933, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227570) or by people that is unlikely to need my reviewe (e.g., https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208679). I am confused about how to proceed: any hints? Meanwhile I am reading again the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 12:11 EST --- Well, would you choose from newer review requests of others, not choosing older ones? (Currently the newest review requests is bug 246460) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-02 13:04 EST --- OK: I will try to write a review for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-22 07:45 EST --- I am sorry for the delay. I am currently traveling and busy preparing and giving talks. I will be back on July 1st: from that date I will start again working on this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 10:21 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-13 12:52 EST --- Okay, * For this package, the last remaining is (I just found): --- /usr/share/doc/ppl/NEWS: ISO-8859 English text /usr/share/doc/ppl/TODO: ISO-8859 English text --- Please change to UTF-8 (by iconv for example). * For pre-review/other review submit: - If you want to do a pre-review of other person's review request, even if you reviewed a package but you did not find any problems with the package, it is okay if you pre-reviewed it with care. Actually I want to approve this package as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-12 14:27 EST --- For concrete, --- %configure sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool --- I suppose this will work for this package (the section Removing rpath in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines). After doing this, ppl-0.9-makefiles.patch should be needed. It works! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-12 14:37 EST --- Great to hear! Then would you upload new spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-12 15:40 EST --- Well, for 0.9-7: * %check - This package contains test/ directory and some check programs seem to be executed. If make check makes sense, please add: -- %check make check -- (Well, this is very very long...) I guess it is way too long (from a few hours to a full day, depending on the machine): it does a very thorough test of all the library functionalities. I would leave it out for the moment. For PPL 0.10 we may considering having a light `make check' and anchor the current regression-testing facilities to another make target. * Documentation - It seems that README.configure is for people who want to rebuild ppl by themselves (i.e. who want to call configure by themselves) and so IMO this document should be removed for rpm user. This file provides useful documentation for the user. It is needed, for instance, to interpret the output of `ppl-config --configure-options'. Some users may realize that they need to rebuild the PPL by themselves: I estimate the RPM package can cover 95% of the uses, not all of them. - IMO TODO should be added to documents. Added. * %description - Please refrect static archive split. For example, -devel package says: --- %description devel The header files, documentation and static libraries for developing --- Fixed. * rpath issue - As said above, please let me know if rpath issue is resolved by hacking libtool. The rpath issue is resolved. All other things are okay. Great! Thanks a lot. Here are the revised files: http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-8.src.rpm http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl.spec http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/ppl-0.9.tar.gz http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-docfiles.patch http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-configure.patch http://www.cs.unipr.it/ppl/Download/ftp/releases/0.9/RedHat/FC6/ppl-0.9-makefiles.patch [I have read comment #37: I will double-check I have understood it properly and come back to you.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: ppl-0.9 - A |Review Request: ppl - A |modern C++ library providing|modern C++ library providing |numerical abstractions |numerical abstractions --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-09 11:33 EST --- Okay, undefined non-weak symbols disappeared. I will recheck again. Please let me know if rpath issue disappears by comment 34. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-09 13:25 EST --- Well, for 0.9-7: * %check - This package contains test/ directory and some check programs seem to be executed. If make check makes sense, please add: -- %check make check -- (Well, this is very very long...) * Documentation - It seems that README.configure is for people who want to rebuild ppl by themselves (i.e. who want to call configure by themselves) and so IMO this document should be removed for rpm user. - IMO TODO should be added to documents. * %description - Please refrect static archive split. For example, -devel package says: --- %description devel The header files, documentation and static libraries for developing --- * rpath issue - As said above, please let me know if rpath issue is resolved by hacking libtool. All other things are okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 227669] Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ppl - A modern C++ library providing numerical abstractions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227669 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-09 13:27 EST --- Well, as this is sponsor needed ticket: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a pre-review of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose Merge Review) Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
