[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-05-10 10:15 EST --- Yes. Back from vacation. FlightGear has been successfully build for FC-6 and devel. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-27 02:31 EST --- AFAIK Fabrice is on vacation, I'm sure he will handle this when he is back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-26 18:09 EST --- Fabrice, Please finish up the steps listed at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewProcess#head-df921556b35438a4c78b4b6a790151ea568e8f9e Namely, import, build, and close the review ticket. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-18 04:33 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: FlightGear Short Description: The FlightGear Flight Simulator Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: FC-6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-17 19:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #8) 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a desktop file without icon ? It's VERY preferable to have the icon in place. Please take a look at this: http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-September/039106.html http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/icons/index.html Contact the author of this artwork and see if he will release it under a license that allows you to use it (and include that license as well). Nice find. I contacted him, and he kindly provides the icons under the GPL license, and updated his web page accordingly. I added the icon to the desktop file, and included all available sizes. You also need to add this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef done. and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda done. New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-6.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-17 20:56 EST --- *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 06:33 EST ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n))
[x] Rpmlint output: None
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meet other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type:
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is written in American English.
[x] Spec file for the package is legible.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: f4b89c9cafc18d56beab77a04f1ebdce
MD5SUM upstream package: f4b89c9cafc18d56beab77a04f1ebdce
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
Why:
[?] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: FC-6 / i386
[-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on:
[x] Package functions as described.
[-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[-] File based requires are sane.
[x] Latest version is packaged.
=== Issues ===
1. Possible missing BR, from build.log:
checking for library containing hid_init... no
checking for X... no
2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is
still a valid download link.
3. Please clean up %doc entries that are related to building, installation, or
other operating systems.
4. Please change %patch0 -p1 to %patch0 -p1 -b .no-automake-in-configure
5. What is the reason to add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS? If this is truly needed,
it must be documented.
6. Please change %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) to %defattr(-, root, root, -)
and if needed, fix install section to set correct permissions.
7. Must include a .desktop file (please see
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop)
=== Final Notes ===
1.
Minor cleanups, then we'll call it good.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 11:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) Thanks for the review Bernard, === Issues === 1. Possible missing BR, from build.log: checking for library containing hid_init... no hid_init() from libusbhid is specific to freebsd (from configure.ac): dnl add joystick support libraries dnl search for FreeBSD library AC_SEARCH_LIBS(hid_init, usbhid) joystick_LIBS=$LIBS LIBS= so IMO, it's safe to ignore this unsatisfied check (joystick interface should be handled by plib IIRC) checking for X... no Checking for X (in fact looking for XIntrisic.h from libXt-devel) comes from the AC_PATH_XTRA macro, that defines X_DISPLAY_MISSING in src/Include/config.h. This macro is used nowhere in the source code and in the included headers. My conclusion is that adding libXt-devel to the buildroot has no consequence on the build result. 2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is still a valid download link. yes, I confirm that ftp.flightgear.org is currently unreachable. This is probably a transcient problem, as it appears on http://www.flightgear.org/mirrors.html#ftp at the first row and its dns name indicates that its probably the primary/master mirror. 3. Please clean up %doc entries that are related to building, installation, or other operating systems. done. 4. Please change %patch0 -p1 to %patch0 -p1 -b .no-automake-in-configure done. 5. What is the reason to add -fPIC to $RPM_OPT_FLAGS? If this is truly needed, it must be documented. This option is not needed, it's a mistake. I removed it from the spec file. 6. Please change %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) to %defattr(-, root, root, -) and if needed, fix install section to set correct permissions. done 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a desktop file without icon ? New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-5.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 16:20 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) 2. Host listed in Source0 URL appears to be down. Please verify if this is still a valid download link. ftp.flightgear.org is back online, and the link is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) 7. Must include a .desktop file (please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) Done. I added a .desktop file, but I didn't find a suitable icon, neither in the source tarball, nor in the fgfs-base package. Is it acceptable to ship a desktop file without icon ? It's VERY preferable to have the icon in place. Please take a look at this: http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-September/039106.html http://jrbabcock.home.comcast.net/flightgear/icons/index.html Contact the author of this artwork and see if he will release it under a license that allows you to use it (and include that license as well). You also need to add this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-de6770dd9867fcd085a73a4700f6bcd0d10294ef and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets?highlight=%28scriptlets%29#head-7103f6c38d1b5735e8477bdd569ad73ea2c49bda -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-08 08:08 EST ---
By the way, there's a typo in the %build section : it's not %{?smp_mflags},
it's %{?_smp_mflags}.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-08 09:46 EST --- Thanks for the typo Aurelien. I tried a parallel build, but the compilation failed. So until parallel build is fixed upstream, it is probably better IMO to disable it in the spec file. New SPEC: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM: http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-4.fc6.src.rpm I also fixed some duplicate BuildRequires in this new build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-08 13:33 EST --- Removing needsponsor blocker as Fabrice has been sponsored now. Bernard / Aurelien, feel free to review this (hint hint). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 Bug 234826 depends on bug 234831, which changed state. Bug 234831 Summary: Review Request: fgfs-base - FlightGear base scenery and data files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234831 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BugsThisDependsOn||234831
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-07 12:34 EST ---
What is:
Requires: fgfs-base = %{version}
Sed is preferred:
dos2unix docs-mini/AptNavFAQ.FlightGear.html
From build.log:
Automake version: ./configure: line 13604: automake: command not found
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-07 12:36 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
What is:
Requires: fgfs-base = %{version}
Ignore that comment, I found it and set a dependency bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-07 16:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Sed is preferred: dos2unix docs-mini/AptNavFAQ.FlightGear.html ok. fixed (and also in the fgfs-base package) From build.log: Automake version: ./configure: line 13604: automake: command not found This one is an upstream problem. automake is called at the end of the configure script, and is just used to display summary information (automake version). configure should not use automake. I added a patch to fix this, and will report upstream if you agree. Should I also patch configure.ac, even if this is not required for a clean build ? If yes, some care must be taken with files modification date, as the Makefile expects configure to be newer than configure.ac to start compiling. New SPEC : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear.spec New SRPM : http://fr2.rpmfind.net/pub/bellet/review/FlightGear-0.9.10-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 234826] Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: FlightGear - Flight Simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
