[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-09-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 17:28 EST ---
cvs done. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 09:21 EST ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name:  Pixie
Short Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant
Owners:kwizart
Branches:  devel FC-6 F-7 EL-4 EL-5
InitialCC: 
Commits by cvsextras: yes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-09-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-09-05 05:40 EST ---
Okay,
All issues has been fixed.

This package can be apporved now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-26 13:44 EST ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Failed at least on ppc64, both rawhide & F-7, perhaps due to
> OOM killer *on koji*.
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104258 (rawhide)
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104314 (F-7)
> 
> IMO codes must be fixed to reduce the burden on compilation
> anyway...

Well, I retried and this time it was okay for all arch...

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129921


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
   Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])|




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-26 08:46 EST ---
Well i don't know if it is normal for 64bit arch to need hours to compile
instead of 10min for 32bit...
Upstream says it takes times because of some expensive optimized macros within
the  source code. I supposed that theses macros needed a lot of swap size
(Mamoru: do you know how much swap have the koji builders?) I expect that it
needs around 5Gio , maybe more (3Gio was used when it fails on x86_64 for me -
swap was full and kswap took lot of cpu time before OOM killer).

There is some changes upstream in the rib.c, maybe I can backport this change
and see if something is better, anyway, i will try to contact upstream about
this subject...



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-26 08:49 EST ---
@Mamoru thx for this test!

I will try to backport changes from cvs...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-26 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO
   Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED])




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-23 09:49 EST ---
ping !

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-15 23:46 EST ---
Failed at least on ppc64, both rawhide & F-7, perhaps due to
OOM killer *on koji*.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104258 (rawhide)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=104314 (F-7)

IMO codes must be fixed to reduce the burden on compilation
anyway...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-08-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-08-15 15:59 EST ---
Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie-2.2.2-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm
Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant

building in mock x86_64 (fc6) might need to test also in devel and maybe ppc 
(ppc64)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-25 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-25 17:43 EST ---
ping ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-16 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-16 15:01 EST ---
Well,
Checked on mock_i386


# About timestamps action

'make INSTALL="install -p" install' doesn't sounds to work well on docs/images
files as we want.
'Cause the Makefile called install-sh script to install all shipped data.
So you will have to sed or patch the Makefile. Or also, if you like improvment,
try this in %install stage 'make install_sh_DATA="$(install_sh) -c -pm 0644"
install'



# Sub-packages

-libs and -devel subpackage don't seem good.
this: %{_libdir}/*.so should be moved to -devel.
this: %{_libdir}/*.so.* should be moved to -lib(s) if other applications require
them for developing work, otherwhise keeping them in main package it's good.


Also, don't forget to upload packaged x86_64 rpm files.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-15 15:44 EST ---
[comment #20]
Sound Good.
Will you also upload the updated packages x86_64 (including -doc and -devel
sub-packages and build.log)
thanks.

[comment #21]
:-)
if this happened with the updated release ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-15 09:01 EST ---
ok i finally experienced this Out of memory: kill process 9504 (g++) score...
(only on x86_64 tought - i386 built fine)
I will give a retry, but i think this is more related to swap size (as kswapd
has taken most of the ressources - top command show it)...
I will give a retry with more swap size (i currently have 2Gio of RAM and 3Gio
of swap size)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-14 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: pixie - 3D  |Review Request: Pixie - 3D
   |renderer Renderman compliant|renderer Renderman compliant




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-14 15:49 EST ---
Ok, so...
- Update to 2.2.1
- Rename to Pixie
- Preserve timestamp at install step
- Improve directory ownership
- Move docs to sub-package
- Add a dyn patch to link to shared ftgl

# Quick answear: The rpm package was already in the same directory for x86_64
(previous version)

Spec URL:
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/Pixie/Pixie-2.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm
Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant

I've tested to rebuild autotools because if sometime solve the rpath issue at
source... But not in this case! so i leave it commented...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-14 00:48 EST ---
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===

 [ FAILED ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
 [ FAILED ] Spec file name must match the base package name.
 [ OK ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
 [ OK ] Package successfully builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
 [ CHECK ] Tested on: Mock i386 [FC-devel]

 [ OK ] Package is not relocatable.
 [ OK ] Buildroot is correct
 [ OK ] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license.
 [ Ok ] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 [ OK ] License type: LGPL
 [ OK ] The source package includes the text of the license(s).
 [ OK ] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
 [ OK ] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
 [ OK ] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
 [ CHECK ] The spec file handles locales properly.
 [ OK ] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
 [ ? ] Package must own all directories that it creates.
 [ OK ] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 [ OK ] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 [ Ok ] Permissions on files are set properly.
 [ OK ] Package has a %clean section.
 [ OK ] Package consistently uses macros.
 [ OK ] Package contains code, or permissable content.
 [ ? ] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
 [ ? ] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 [ SKIP ] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ SKIP ] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ SKIP ] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
 [ Ok ] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 [ Ok ] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
 [ OK ] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
 [ SKIP ] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file.
 [ OK ] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 [ CHECK ] Requires:
libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) libHalf.so.4()(64bit)
libIex.so.4()(64bit) libIlmImf.so.4()(64bit) libImath.so.4()(64bit)
libX11.so.6()(64bit) libXext.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libpixiecommon.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libri.so.0()(64bit) libsdr.so.0()(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libtiff.so.3()(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)



=== ISSUES ===

# Package Name:

The base package name is Pixie (with upper-case letter).
Please move it to Pixie instead of pixie.
That's also imply to move the name of spec file to the right one.



# Timestamps action:

This package have many text/documentations files and png/icons files
so keeping timestamps is desirable.
Does this package accept 'make INSTALL="install -p" install' ?



# Some concerns about Large documentation:

The final package is mostly documentation.I don't think it's mandatory that it
be split into a -doc subpackage. But, it'll be not a bad idea to do so.
Also, any reason to mkdir'ed __doc (with double underscore) ?



# Ownership:

Currently your %file section (main package) sound good.
however, i've some comment about ownership (which can be improved).
--
%dir %{_libdir}/Pixie
%{_libdir}/Pixie/displays/
%{_libdir}/Pixie/modules/
--
The use of %{_libdir}/Pixie is enough and owned by the package (including
sub-folders)

--
%dir %{_datadir}/Pixie
%dir %{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders
%{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders/*.sdr
%{_datadir}/Pixie/shaders/*.sl
--
You don't need to own sub-folders if you already own parent directory.
And, As above, this can be improved by %{_datadir}/Pixie (which's enough to be
owned)



# Quick request:

Nicolas, will you upload somewhere the packaged x86_64 binaries please ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-07-07 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-07 23:30 EST ---
Ok,

Starting review...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-27 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-27 15:39 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=158048)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158048&action=view)
fedora-7-x86_64 build.log

This take around one hour to build on my amd64 x2 4200+ with 2GO dual
channel...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-21 17:23 EST ---
I will submit build for x86_64 next week-end...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-21 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Product|Fedora Extras   |Fedora




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-21 09:38 EST ---
ping

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-15 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-15 20:03 EST ---
Well,

Same things with my main machine :(
it seem that we need a powerfull config to make this package build on x86_64.
Rebuilt on i386 and after few hour successfully done.

Nicolas, could you upload the build log from x86_64 ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-09 22:03 EST ---
Okay. Please go again. Actually rebuilding this package
is too heavy for my machine...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-09 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-09 20:58 EST ---
Hi Mamoru,

i'll check this out and launch the test on my main machine which has 2go of
memory (dual channel) 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-07 02:58 EST ---
Perhaps you can see the message in /var/log/messages like this:

Jun  7 15:46:50 localhost kernel: printk: 6 messages suppressed.
Jun  7 15:46:50 localhost kernel: xterm invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x201d2,
order=0, oomkilladj=0
Jun  7 15:46:51 localhost kernel:  [] out_of_memory+0x69/0x185

Jun  7 15:47:07 localhost kernel: Out of memory: kill process 9504 (g++) score
129440 or a child
Jun  7 15:47:07 localhost kernel: Killed process 9505 (cc1plus)
---


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-07 02:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> ^^ nope, i don't send kill signal to g++.
> 
> i will re-launch the build to check

Perhaps killed by OOM (Out Of Memory) killer...

On my machine (with 768M RAM + about 780M swaps), g++
on execute.cpp ate all memory + swap and finally was killed
by OOM killer...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-06 23:55 EST ---
it seem still failed to build on my virtual machines with same error above.
i will try on physical one by tomorrow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-06 17:13 EST ---
mock's on its way

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-03 17:24 EST ---
Well also about URL for sourceforge... All others URL format are failing,
This is the only format that can retrieve sources...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-03 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-03 17:23 EST ---
OK i get wrong it takes around two hours to compile on x86_64 for Fedora 7 with
my AMD64 X2 (it take less time on x86)... I have 2go of dual channel memory...
The system is instable during this indeed... 

My ISP website is offline...
Here is a mirror:
Spec URL:
http://kwizartchitecture.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/Pixie/pixie.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://kwizartchitecture.free.fr/fedora/7/testing/Pixie/pixie-2.1.1-1.kwizart.fc7.src.rpm
Description: 3D renderer Renderman compliant


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-02 19:40 EST ---
^^ nope, i don't send kill signal to g++.

i will re-launch the build to check

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-02 14:38 EST ---
g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)
You should say it if you killed the compiler!

As state in a doc file, compilation take a lot of time because of 
optimization...
It takes about 20min on my dual core

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-06-02 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-02 13:08 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=155990)
 --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155990&action=view)
pixie-2.1.1-build.log

Mock failed on FC-6 and F-7 (i386) and seem freeze on x86_64.
see build log for details.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-05-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-30 22:08 EST ---
[in reply to comment #1]

+1

--

Avoid to use as more possible a mirror url from sourceforge website.
So, the use of "source0: download.sourceforge.net/pixie/Pixie-2.1.1.tgz" is more
appropriate. ;)


-

Starting review


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 241549] Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant

2007-05-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pixie - 3D renderer Renderman compliant


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241549


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||rge.net




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-05-28 09:57 EST ---
RPMLint output is empty
Compiles under mock fc6-i386

URL of the package is bad : cf
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#head-e27982f18a3bfd26b5b6ecbee113d2d8f3f006f2

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review