[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-07 04:45 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |s.sourceforge.net) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-07 06:33 EST --- Sorry for the delay... I was away from an internet connection for a long time... Anyway, I must admit that I resign : the package is too complex for me and it needs an integral rewrite of the buildchain. I think that's not to a package maintainer to do such things but main developers should switch to a more robust system. Moreover, Fedora isn't my main distribution anymore because I put Gentoo on my new laptop and I won't use my desktop PC as intensively as before. Sorry. Please put the according status to the bug as I am a bit lost with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 |201449 nThis|| Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-07 09:54 EST --- Thank you for reply. Please feel free to open a new review request when you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||s.sourceforge.net) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-24 09:29 EST --- Anyway would you update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |s.sourceforge.net) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-07 15:22 EST --- Hi, sorry for the late reply but I must say that I haven't any experience with soversions and upstream doesn't seem to want to add them to the makefiles... So without any help saying me how to add them (I don't really know how libtool does) I think I will have to give up this package (in addition, it seems to be really beta). Sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-06 12:24 EST --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response from the reporter is received within ONE WEEK, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-10 13:33 EST --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||s.sourceforge.net) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-03 14:18 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |s.sourceforge.net) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 11:32 EST --- Sorry, I haven't enough time for now (exams time) and I don't really know how to make these changes as it needs a complete redo of the buildchain as they don't use autoconf/automake. I thought about renaming all files but that would be useless as executables are linked against .so without soversion If you have any idea... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for
UNIX operating systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-11 07:36 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Won't fix :
The guidelines say
- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.
libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel
package.
As this package doesn't contain any library file with a suffix
I won't put so
files in the -devel package
Well, so again why does the library %{_libdir}/*.so has no
soname while this package tries to ship -devel package?
Shipping -devel package means that the libraries %{_libdir}/*.so
is allowed to be linked from other packages. So some binaries in
other package may link to the libraries in this package.
Then ABI of the libraries in this package may change in the future.
At this time, as these libraries have no sover, rpm has no clue of
whether ABI of these libraries changed, so rpm allows the upgrading
of this package. However, this upgrade surely stop the other binaries
linking to these libraries from working any more.
So IMO when the package want to provide -devel package, no-sover
libraries are generally bad. What do you think?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for
UNIX operating systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:08 EST ---
New version :
SPEC File : http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi.spec
SRPM :
http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.2.20070527cvs.fc6.src.rpm
Changes:
Now package owns %{_includedir}/libelfsh/
Won't fix :
The guidelines say
- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1),
then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package.
As this package doesn't contain any library file with a suffix I won't put so
files in the -devel package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-10 18:10 EST --- OOps I installed F7 during both builds SRPM : http://www.amsn-project.net/~lephilousophe/fedora/eresi-0.77-0.2.20070527cvs.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for
UNIX operating systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-06 13:59 EST ---
Some notes:
* While you want to ship -devel package, why does the shared library
%{_libdir}/*.so have no soversion? This will cause problems
when ABI of the libraries change?
* The directory %{_includedir}/libelfsh/ does not seem to be
owned by any package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 241550] Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ERESI - A unified reverse engineering framework for UNIX operating systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
