[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 11:52:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #21 from Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-12 06:26:17 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-4 Owners: mpg erikos tomeu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-03 12:19:23 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Comment #19 from Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-03 13:00:42 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-03 14:03:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 10:27 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hulahop New Branches: OLPC-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 11:23 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-16 05:20 EST --- Yep it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-16 01:54 EST --- is this built in cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 03:31 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hulahop Short Description: A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla Owners: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 15:09 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-25 00:50 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPMs. + source files match upstream. 10bfea2ab179113f28d849c7d5ae5aea hulahop-0.2-gitf91a1b5b94.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. - dist tag is NOT present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is small so no need of -doc subpackage. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries present. + no .pc files are present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets used. + Provides: _hulahop.so + No desktop files. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 Bug 244368 depends on bug 244374, which changed state. Bug 244374 Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-21 14:14 EST --- I'm going through a lot of packages, having things lined up so that we get cvs and approval in a timely manner is appropriate. This package is relatively simple and passes all of the checklist on my local machine except of course the multiarch one since there is little way I can test that without first being in CVS. The mock build is a SHOULD. In any case the objective is to get clean packages into Fedora and of the 37 odd packages that we have upgraded, branched or created we have been doing that. Plus on this package I left it up to you to review since you were the first to claim it. I simply went through the checklist. I would rather have others do all of our packages but of course there is a need to not block on lack of manpower. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 06:10 EST --- Updated to 0.2, fixed rpmlint complaints. http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/hulahop-0.2-0.1.20070620git6c50d61756.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/hulahop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 14:00 EST --- please add a COPYING license file to upstream and add it to the %doc file list. Is this really GPL? Shouldn't it be MPL/GPL or LGPL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 14:33 EST --- Fixed http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/hulahop-0.2-0.1.20070620gitf91a1b5b94.src.rpm http://dev.laptop.org/~marco/hulahop.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 15:02 EST ---
- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted
in the review.
Ok
- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming
Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The package must be licensed with an open-source compatible
license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of
Packaging Guidelines.
Ok (LGPL)
- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
Ok
- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is
unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora
is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest
(http://www.ioccc.org/).
Ok
- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task.
If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
Ok
- MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one supported architecture.
Ok
- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work
on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to
the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries
during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment
until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the
long explanation with the bug number. (Extras Only) The bug should be marked as
blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues:
FE-ExcludeArch-x86, FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64
Ok
- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines; inclusion
of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
Ok
- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
Ok (no translations)
- MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not
just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig
in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries,
each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls
/sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
Ok (No %{_libdir} libraries)
- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
Ok (package not relocatable)
- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory. The exception to this are directories listed explicitly
in the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard
(http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html), as it is safe to assume that
those directories exist.
Ok
- MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
Ok
- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include
a %defattr(...) line.
Ok
- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
Ok
- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the
macros section of Packaging Guidelines.
Ok
- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is
described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 15:05 EST --- I'll let Parag approve. One note is we should have a comment that states we are upstream in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 15:06 EST --- woops, setting review back to ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-20 23:29 EST --- johnp, Any reason for being so quick without even checking packages properly in review? I don't mind if you want to review this package. Feel free to ask me that. But remember this package depends on Xulrunner and still its not it CVS and it will need some time to complete its review. I prefer to wait till xulrunner is either in CVS or atleast got approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||244374 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 244368] Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hulahop - A pygtk widget for embedding mozilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244368 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-15 06:27 EST --- The plan is to add this package to the olpc-2 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
