[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 08:03 EST --- This is not an official review as I am not sponsored yet. - Summary: - * Fails to build in mock (b/c of below point) * Missing BuildRequires dependency on desktop-file-utils * BuildRequires are redundant * Not sure about the use of X-Fedora in the desktop file and during the installation of the file (--add-category X-Fedora) - Details: - FIX - Mock : Built on F-7 (x86) OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. FIX - Meets Packaging Guidelines. Doesn't build OK - License field in spec matches OK - License is GPL OK - License match packaging policy licenses allowed OK - License file is included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources SHOULD match upstream md5sum: 462542ce70b47d16a019b403b741a411 pida-0.4.4.tar.gz 462542ce70b47d16a019b403b741a411 pida-0.4.4.tar.gz.1 OK - Package has correct buildroot. FIX - BuildRequires are not redundant. python-setuptools requires python-devel, so no need to specify python-devel ? - %build and %install stages are correct and work. didn't build OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - No large doc files not in a -doc package OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories that other packages own. OK - Changelog section is correct. NA - Does not contain any .la libtool archives ? - .desktop file installed correctly Installed correctly, but I am not sure about the use of X-Fedora and adding the X-Fedora category FIX - Should function as described. Does not build in mock because of missing dep OK - Should package latest version --- Rpmlint output: --- * silent on srpm ? main rpm RPM did not build in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-28 15:52 EST --- > * Missing BuildRequires dependency on desktop-file-utils > * BuildRequires are redundant Fixed. SPEC file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=pida-2.spec SRPM file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=pida-0.4.4-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-06-29 14:25 EST --- > This is not an official review as I am not sponsored yet. > * Not sure about the use of X-Fedora in the desktop file and during the > installation of the file (--add-category X-Fedora) Removed it. SPEC file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=pida-3.spec SRPM file: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DebarshiRay?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=pida-0.4.4-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-07 15:44 EST --- Tyler, are you satisfied now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 09:57 EST ---
* I see you fixed all the above issues.
* The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version
information.
On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console.
Appears to be missing requires?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Download]$ pida
09:47:32 failed to import services.pythonbrowser =
pida.services.pythonbrowser:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/pythonbrowser.py", line
34, in
raise Exception('Bike is not installed')
Exception: Bike is not installed
09:47:33 failed to import services.scripts = pida.services.scripts:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/scripts.py", line 24, in
import pida.pidagtk.contentbook as contentbook
ImportError: No module named contentbook
09:47:33 failed to import services.webbrowse = pida.services.webbrowse:Service
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/core/services.py", line 78, in
__load_entrypoint
cls = entrypoint.load()
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1912, in load
entry = __import__(self.module_name, globals(),globals(), ['__name__'])
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowse.py", line 29,
in
import gtkhtml2
ImportError: No module named gtkhtml2
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window.py:243: GtkWarning: quit:
missing action buffermanager+quit_pida
self.__uim.ensure_update()
It appears that you are missing gnome-python2-gtkhtml2 and others. Are these
necessary? Can you disable this support to make the messages go away?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 10:45 EST ---
> * The spec file name should remain as %{name}.spec without the version
information.
It still is. There is no way I could upload 2 files with the same name on the
same server. :-)
> On F7 when I run pida I get a number of errors displayed to the console.
> Appears to be missing requires?
There has been a new upstream release-- 0.5.0. I am going to package it and
upload a new pair of SPEC and SRPM soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 13:49 EST --- Tyler, as now I am sponsoring you, you can formally review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-08 16:13 EST --- I will do the formal review. Please post a note when you have updated the package for the latest upstream version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-07-09 06:48 EST --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247417 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245649 Meanwhile, you may be interested in reviewing the above packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-03 02:37 EST --- I have been fiddling with PIDA 0.5.1 ever since it was released, but somehow I can not get it to run on my Rawhide system. PIDA 0.4.4, which I had originally submitted, did run on Rawhide with a few tweaks here and there to correctly import the meld modules. Without the tweaks it would simply crash with a traceback. However PIDA 0.5.1 does not get give any such obvious error outputs. It simply gets stuck after the startup splash screen and stays there unless forcibly killed. I have tried the PIDA upstream mailing list, but to no avail. So what is the next step? If someone is interested, then I can give you the PIDA 0.5.1 package and you can give a try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-03 02:55 EST --- let me check new release. Can you give new PIDA 0.5.1 SRPM link? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-09 00:32 EST --- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm This is the new pair of Spec & SRPM for PIDA 0.5.1. Rpmlint generates a bunch of errors complaining about empty service.pida files and "wrong end of line encoding" in one of the documentation files. While I am not sure how the empty files are important, I am unable to locate the problem spot which causes the "wrong end of line encoding" error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-09 02:16 EST --- (I only checked your comment) (In reply to comment #12) > I am unable to locate the problem spot which causes the > "wrong end of line encoding" error. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpmlint -I wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding : This file has wrong end-of-line encoding, usually caused by creation or modification on a non-Unix system. It could prevent it from being displayed correctly in some circumstances. -- Try: sed -i -e 's|\r||' docs/html/handbook.html or dos2unix docs/html/handbook.html (for this method BuildRequires: dos2unix is needed) Note: 0.5.1-1 could not be rebuilt. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152935 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-09 13:38 EST --- > dos2unix docs/html/handbook.html (for this method BuildRequires: dos2unix > is needed) Fixed. > Note: > 0.5.1-1 could not be rebuilt. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=152935 Fixed. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-2.fc8.src.rpm If we can not get the thing to run on Fedora, then is there any point in proceeding with verifying the correctness of the package? Or should we revert to 0.4.4 in the worst case, since 0.5.x was a complete rewrite of PIDA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 05:12 EST --- rpmlint on binary rpm gave pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida are those required files or we can remove them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 05:23 EST --- Tested successfully on my rawhide machine. latest SRPM is working fine in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 05:44 EST --- > Tested successfully on my rawhide machine. latest SRPM is working fine in > rawhide. Alright, I will try to install Fedora 8 Test 2 then. Looks like something has got messed up on my Rawhide. I will polish the package a bit and submit it to continue the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 06:00 EST --- Upstream says the empty service.pida files are necessary for PIDA to function properly: http://groups.google.com/group/pida/browse_thread/thread/f18fedeb32017a6/fd516cd340567617?hl=en-GB -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-19 06:59 EST --- we can take then exceptional/special case for this package to ignore rpmlint errors. Good to add comment in SPEC that this package installs empty service.pida files which are required for package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-09-29 16:38 EST --- ping; any status on this? We're getting late into the Fedora cycle... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-01 04:59 EST --- > ping; any status on this? We're getting late into the Fedora cycle... Unfortunately for the past 2-3 weeks my workstation has gone down with a faulty motherboard. I have got a laptop now and preparing a backup system, and am slowly catching up with the backlog. I have got some higher priority things to attend to (eg., updates for bouml) before I can attend to this. So I do not think I will be able to make it in time for Fedora 8. Can we have this as an 'enhancement' update for Fedora 8 and Fedora 7? Thanks for your understanding. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-03 15:59 EST --- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.src.rpm I have added a comment regarding the rpmlint error, and also mentioned emacs and vim-X11 as Requires. These are needed since the first time PIDA is run, it asks the user to select one of these two editors. Although it runs fine with GVim, it does not work well with the Emacs shipping with Fedora. Please advise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-05 15:57 EST --- Not sure if I would like to see pulling in this one package pulling in emacs if I am going to us vim with it. Perhaps shipping a pida-vi and pida-emacs packages would be prudent. I'm not sure if Fedora has policy for handling this dependency situation but we should. However this should not be a blocker for getting pida into Fedora, only for future thought. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-05 16:11 EST --- I just rebuilt this on my F7 machine and ran: rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images/icons/callouts 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/txt 02755 pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html 02755 Looks like pida install is setting the set group guid flag. This is harmless but wrong and should be corrected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-05 16:29 EST --- looking at the upstream tarball, all of their directories are setgid. I suggest doing a chmod on the whole expanded tree in the %install section and notifying upstream about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-06 01:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #23) > Not sure if I would like to see pulling in this one package pulling in emacs > if > I am going to us vim with it. Perhaps shipping a pida-vi and pida-emacs > packages would be prudent. On my Fedora 7 machine, PIDA does not work well with Fedora's Emacs. eg., on exiting Emacs, PIDA still needs a Ctrl-C to exit resulting in an ugly backtrace. >From the upstream PIDA lists, I understand that PIDA needs some features which are still in the Emacs CVS. So would it make sense to patch PIDA to run only with Gvim for the moment and remove Requires: emacs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-06 01:52 EST --- (In reply to comment #24) > I just rebuilt this on my F7 machine and ran: > > rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm > > > pida.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/pida-0.5.1/docs/html/images 02755 Here is my rpmlint NEVRA and output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpm -q rpmlint rpmlint-0.81-1.fc7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ rpmlint pida-0.5.1-3.fc7.i386.rpm pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida [EMAIL PROTECTED] i386]$ I think I am using the most recent rpmlint package for Fedora 7. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-12 15:06 EST --- Tyler, are you still interested in continuing with the review? Any thing that I should fix in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-13 12:46 EST --- I am sorry, but I am not going to be able to finish this review as I have had to be out of town for a family emergency and I am not sure when I will be able to get back to my PCs. I am very sorry about this, can someone else please take this and finish up the review. I am not sure how to put this review back in the queue, so if someone can help me with that I would appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-13 15:26 EST --- I am reassigning this to 'nobody' in view of Tyler's comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-14 00:55 EST --- will officially review it tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-14 23:54 EST --- You should preserve timestamp check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-0239576e441f9ef53d175c4aec8c12868dffb5ab -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-14 23:57 EST --- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. - rpmlint complains follwing messages pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/optionsmanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/project/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/commander/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/grepper/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filemanager/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/statusbar/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/window/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/openwith/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/webbrowser/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/contexts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/rpc/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/help/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/appcontroller/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/bugreport/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/versioncontrol/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/editor/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/shortcuts/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/sessions/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/buffer/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/notify/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/plugins/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/manhole/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/services/filewatcher/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/vim/service.pida pida.i386: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pida/editors/emacs/service.pida But these messages can be ignored here. + source files match upstream. d24bbdc2c07172062cf55dffe58c85f6 PIDA-0.5.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + update-desktop-database and gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets are used. + Desktop file installed correctly. + Package pida-0.5.1-3.fc8 -> Requires: /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python emacs gazpacho hicolor-icon-theme libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libcairo.so.2 libdl.so.2 libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpthread.so.0 libpython2.5.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.5 python-kiwi rtld(GNU_HASH) vim-X11 Provides: moo_stub.so + GUI App. APPROVED. Anyway, I am approving this review with assumption that you will take case of comment #32 while importing package in CVS. I have check this package in rawhide and it worked fine for me on i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedor
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-28 11:01 EST --- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-4.fc7.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=217598 I have removed Emacs support for the time being. Emacs needs to be patched (http://pida.co.uk/trac/ticket/95) and if these are accepted in the Fedora package, I shall re-add Emacs support. I have also modified a number of Requires. However I did not understand which files' timestamps need to be preserved (comment #32)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 13:25 EST --- Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/pida-0.5.1-5.fc8.src.rpm NB: The Fedora 7 package would need to retain the Encoding in Desktop Entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 13:58 EST ---
Found one more problem: the
%{_libdir}/site-packages/pida/services/*/service.pida all have size 0 (checked
on x86_64, but presumably happens on all platforms). You might want to either
remove in %install, or %ghost them in %files.
Here's my Koji scratch build for 0.5.1-5:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=239977
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 13:59 EST --- Oh, and if this is not too late -- should we really call this pida rather than PIDA? Upstream consistently uses the uppercased name. >From the Naming Guidelines: Keep in mind to respect the wishes of the upstream maintainers. If they refer to their application as "ORBit", you should use "ORBit" as the package name, and not "orbit". However, if they do not express any preference of case, you should default to lowercase naming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 21:24 EST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Found one more problem: the
> %{_libdir}/site-packages/pida/services/*/service.pida all have size 0
That is not a problem. Those files are necessary for PIDA to work correctly. See
the comment in the Spec file:
# Installs zero-length service.pida files necessary for proper behaviour.
%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 21:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #37) > Oh, and if this is not too late It is not too late. > -- should we really call this pida rather than > PIDA? Upstream consistently uses the uppercased name. It is not so simple. Debian (http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/pida) and Ubuntu (http://packages.ubuntu.com/gutsy/devel/pida) call their packages 'pida', and use 'PIDA' in the description. Also the primary executable is still named 'pida'. PIDA upstream has been known for strange choice of names which do not tally with the de-facto standards for AUTHORS, ChangeLog, etc.. Although the lead developer (Ali Afshar) is reluctant to change them ( he says, "I like the way I name it, and don't care what distros think/prefer/use")other PIDA folks do like the conventional names. It is a divided house. > From the Naming Guidelines: "When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. In some cases this naming choice is more complicated. If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency. In any case, try to use your best judgement, and other developers will help in the final decision." "In Fedora packaging, the maintainer should use his/her best judgement when considering how to name the package. While case sensitivity is not a mandatory requirement, case should only be used where necessary. Keep in mind to respect the wishes of the upstream maintainers. If they refer to their application as "ORBit", you should use "ORBit" as the package name, and not "orbit". However, if they do not express any preference of case, you should default to lowercase naming." It is basically "consistency with other distributions" versus "upstream choice". Since the guidelines seem to give some weight to the maintainer's judgement, I believe it is important to maintain uniformity between the distributions. # apt-get install pida # yum install PIDA ...can be really confusing and painful for people migrating from one to the other. Also since the main executable is 'pida' and not 'PIDA' users are more likely to expect the first option. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 22:16 EST --- Ah, that makes sense, thanks. I'd say the package is ready for CVS then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-13 22:25 EST --- Yes. New packaging looks ok to me. So you can import this package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-14 07:58 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pida Short Description: A Python IDE written in Python and GTK Owners: rishi Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-14 19:19 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 245826] Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pida - A Python IDE written in Python and GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245826 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
