[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #18 from Konstantinos ultimatekonstanti...@gmail.com 2009-07-07 08:32:34 EDT --- Hi, This is my first package. I checked the package and the spec and I updated them using the comments of Comment 14 and playing with rpmlint. Here is the spec and srpm. SPEC URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid.spec SRPM URL:http://tartufo.dyndns.org/temp/python-urwid-0.9.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Dimitris Glezos dimit...@glezos.com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||dimit...@glezos.com Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #19 from Dimitris Glezos dimit...@glezos.com 2009-07-07 08:36:31 EDT --- Reopening, as we've got a new spec/srpm from Konstantinos who hasn't got bugzilla edit permissions. Hope this is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #20 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2009-07-07 09:41:09 EDT --- Firstly, thanks for stepping up to work on the package. However, the original and current submitter need to decide who is wanting to become the package maintainer. If it is not the original submitter of the review request, I think the new packager should begin a new review request bug, referencing this (closed) bug. This makes for clearer reading of the work performed by the potential packager, for sponsors deciding to approve and sponsor the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-07-07 11:44:05 EDT --- Yes, please open a new review request for the new package and close this one as a duplicate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Dimitris Glezos dimit...@glezos.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #22 from Dimitris Glezos dimit...@glezos.com 2009-07-07 12:53:49 EDT --- Done. #510097 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510097 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |om) | --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-28 13:29:52 EDT --- I guess not. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||om) --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-17 13:54:31 EDT --- OK, it's been a month since I posted comment 14 and there's been no response. I will close this ticket soon if nothing further happens. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-27 12:52:19 EDT --- Any response to the above commentary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706
Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-17 01:12:23
EDT ---
I'm looking at some of the older tickets and thought I'd take care of this one.
I'm sorry you've had to wait so long. Are you still interested in getting
this package into Fedora? If so, I'll review it, but I need to note a couple
of things. First off, rpmlint does spew a couple of complaints:
python-urwid.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/str_util.so 0775
This one is some weird bug somewhere that has nothing to do with your package;
occasionally the permissions on .so files built by python come out wrong. I
have no idea what causes it, but we're just ignoring it as the packages
generated by the buildsystem seem to come out OK.
python-urwid.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.8.2-2
0.9.8.2-1.fc10
You have an entry for 0.9.8.2-2 (i.e release 2) but the spec has Release: 1.
Also, it seems that 0.9.8.3 is out; would you like to update the package?
It seems reasonable to package up the examples (those .py files in the top
level which aren't setup.py) as documentation. Generally I'd recommend that
you make them not executable but that's not necessary as long as they don't
drag in additional dependencies.
There is an actual test suite included as test_urwid.py which, surprisingly,
seems to run standalone. You should call it in a %check section:
%check
%{__python} test_urwid.py
We always want to run test suites when possible, since we want as many sanity
checks as possible.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Alias||python-urwid -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 09:45 EST ---
Niall: I am not a sponsor, but will help out of I can.
1. It is expected that when you have made requested changes to your package that
you post the actual clickable URLs of the spec and .src.rpm.
- Additionally, it can make a reviewers job easier to be able to see the
earlier .spec and .src.rpm's so that it is easier to follow the improvements
that get made. This is easy enough to do by renaming the earlier .spec {and
leaving it publically accessible} to include the version that it was eg
python-urwid-1.2-5.spec
2. Even in package review it is required to show your knowledge of how to handle
package changelogs within the .spec {and hence rpms} by describing your changes
to the .spec in the spec, and always incrementing the Release field:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
- preferably add changelogs for each updates that have been made already.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 09:48 EST ---
Also, please state the output of rpmlint {or quiet} for both the .src.rpm and
the .rpms build from it. Consider it good practice to always use this tool for
picking up things before the reviewer has to...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 15:24 EST --- My apologies. rpmlint output: 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. srpm: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/python-urwid-0.9.8.2-1.fc9.src.rpm spec: http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/python-urwid.spec I managed to lose the earlier spec and srpm by scping over them. I've fixed up the changelog to reflect reality better. Thanks for your feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-06 08:43 EST --- Hi I think I've made all the recommended changes. The spec and src.rpm are at http://www.evil.ie/fedora/rpms/python-urwid/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-20 08:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for python python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL Fixed. Niall: Did you get a chance to update your spec with the review points already mentioned ? If so, please provide the location of your .spec and .src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-27 08:48 EST --- 1. it's not noarch: gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -D_G NU_SOURCE -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC -I/u sr/include/python2.5 -c source/str_util.c -o build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/source/str_util.o 2. ncurses does not seem to be needed at all, the package builds fine locally in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-26 18:53 EST ---
Doing my own review of this as part of my sponsorship campaign...
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
Note: Shouldn't this be a BuildArch: noarch package? - it doesn't seem to
compile anything and the python should be cross-platform...
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Suggestion: change Summary Console user interface for python to Console user
interface library for python for clarity
[x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: FC8/i386
[!] Rpmlint output:
source RPM: empty
binary RPM:
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/canvas.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/graphics.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/old_str_util.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/font.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/raw_display.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/web_display.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/html_fragment.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/listbox.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/widget.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/escape.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/util.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/__init__.py 0644
python-urwid.i386: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/curses_display.py 0644
This is basically because the Python modules contain a #!/usr/bin/python
shebang.
[x] Package is not relocatable.
[x] Buildroot is correct
(%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) )
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
SHA1SUM of tar.gz: 0a0b6e716ff6794900475463a0aaf8a9b4458ca0
[x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch
[!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Are you sure this should be BuildRequires ncurses, not BuildRequires
ncurses-devel? I can't even get rpmbuild to run without ncurses (even Python
seems to require it). But building without ncurses-devel seems to run fine, so
not sure anything is needed here...
[-] The spec file handles locales properly.
[-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[?] Permissions on files are set properly.
See the above issue with shebangs from rpmlint
[x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x] Package consistently uses macros.
[x] Package contains code, or permissible content.
[-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] All filenames present are
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-20 08:19 EST --- You have to add python-setuptools-devel to the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-20 08:53 EST --- python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for python python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL Fixed. Also tmpl_tutorial.html should have gone to doc i guess I kept this file out, as it's only used during the build by docgen_tutorial.py to generate tutorial.html. As such I didn't think it warranted an inclusion in doc. You have to add python-setuptools-devel to the BuildRequires. Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-20 15:52 EST --- Hi Niall, Since this is your first package, you will need a sponsor. You might want to do some reviews on your own, and post the bugzilla id's over here, so potential sponsors can see what you're capable of. There's more information about that on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 05:19 EST --- Hi, I cannot sponsor your package, I can just review it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpmlint python-urwid-0.9.8.1-1.fc8.src.rpm python-urwid.src: W: summary-not-capitalized console user interface for python python-urwid.src: W: invalid-license LGPL See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Also tmpl_tutorial.html should have gone to doc i guess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 05:35 EST --- Also this package does not build for me, using rpmbuild: running build_ext error: invalid Python installation: unable to open /usr/lib/python2.5/config/Makefile (No such file or directory) error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56412 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-09 05:51 EST --- I guess this means you add python-devel as BuildRoot if i am not wrong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
