[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-18 12:17 EST --- Well, as this bug blocks speech-dispatcher (bug 432259) I want to approve this package soon, however it seems not a few issues needs fixing. For general packaging guidelines you can refer to the following pages. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines For this package it seems to be a package for libraries so it would be good for you that you install rpmdevtools rpm and try: $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib dotconf to get a skeleton spec file for dotconf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-19 13:40 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) > Well, as this bug blocks speech-dispatcher (bug 432259) I want > to approve this package soon, however it seems not a few issues > needs fixing. > > For general packaging guidelines you can refer to the following pages. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > For this package it seems to be a package for libraries so it would > be good for you that you install rpmdevtools rpm and try: > $ rpmdev-newspec -t lib dotconf > to get a skeleton spec file for dotconf. Spec URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-1.0.13- 1.fc7.src.rpm I have replaced both the SPEC and SRPM file on the server by the one made using skeleton spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 01:55 EST ---
Well, would you again try to follow lib skeleton spec file again?
- The ELF shared library (usually lib.so.X.X) and its ldconfig
symlink (usually libX.so.X) must not be in -devel subpackage.
Only the symlink used for linkage (lib.so) should be in
-devel subpackage.
- pkgconfig .pc file should not be deleted and should be included
in -devel subpackage. Then -devel subpackage should
have "Requires: pkgconfig" (please check
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)
Also:
- Please make Summary a bit more verbose. the summary "dot.conf"
is not useful.
- I recommend to use %{name} and %{version} in Source0 URL.
In this way you don't have to modify Source0 when the version
of the tarball is upgraded.
- I recommend to use
-
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
-
to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually
works for recent autotool-based Makefiles.
- The file "INSTALL" is usually for people who want to compile
and install the package by themselves and is not needed for people
who use rpm.
- For directory ownership issue of %{_datadir}/aclocal and for
usability, I recommend to add "Requires: automake" to -devel
subpackage (not BuildRequires).
- For %{_bindir}/dotconf-config (in the source tarball it was
dotconf-config.in), @libdir@ is expanded as /usr/lib on 32bits
machine but /usr/lib64 on 64bits machine on Fedora.
This means that /usr/bin/dotconf-config differs between
on 32 bits machine and on 64 bits machine. Currently Fedora
does not allow this type of multilib conflicts for -devel
subpackage.
You can use "rpmlint" (in rpmlint rpm) to detect some generic
issues on your rpms. For example of a library rpm,
you can check:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/*checkout*/devel/oniguruma/oniguruma.spec
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 02:35 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=295402)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295402&action=view)
Patch to remove ASL 1.1 part for GPLv2+ compatibility
By the way:
- speech-dispatcher (bug 432259), which depends on this bug, is
licensed under GPLv2+.
So to make use of speech-dispatcher the license of dotconf must
be GPLv2+ compatible.
- However currently this package (dotconf) is licensed under
LGPLv2 and ASL 1.1 as build log shows:
--
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386
-mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13/libpool
-Wall -g -o libdotconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 10:4:10 -release
1.0-export-dynamic dotconf.lo readdir.lo
---
and src/readdir.c is ASL 1.1
Note that ASL 1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible, so this situation is not
allowed.
Fortunately for Linux as far as I checked the source code
we can built this package without src/readdir.{c,h}. The attached
file makes this package surely LGPLv2.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 04:23 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created an attachment (id=295402)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295402&action=view) [edit]
> Patch to remove ASL 1.1 part for GPLv2+ compatibility
>
> By the way:
>
> - speech-dispatcher (bug 432259), which depends on this bug, is
> licensed under GPLv2+.
> So to make use of speech-dispatcher the license of dotconf must
> be GPLv2+ compatible.
>
> - However currently this package (dotconf) is licensed under
> LGPLv2 and ASL 1.1 as build log shows:
> --
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386
> -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13/libpool
> -Wall -g -o libdotconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 10:4:10 -release
> 1.0-export-dynamic dotconf.lo readdir.lo
> ---
>and src/readdir.c is ASL 1.1
>Note that ASL 1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible, so this situation is not
>allowed.
>
>Fortunately for Linux as far as I checked the source code
>we can built this package without src/readdir.{c,h}. The attached
>file makes this package surely LGPLv2.
I have again updated the file at the server. Have included the patch file on
the server also link:http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-
1.0.13.patch. I have done all the edits as said except for the last one
- For %{_bindir}/dotconf-config (in the source tarball it was
dotconf-config.in), @libdir@ is expanded as /usr/lib on 32bits
machine but /usr/lib64 on 64bits machine on Fedora.
This means that /usr/bin/dotconf-config differs between
on 32 bits machine and on 64 bits machine. Currently Fedora
does not allow this type of multilib conflicts for -devel
subpackage.
I am a complete newbie to package building so can you please provide me some
pointer regarding this issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-22 12:35 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=295663)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295663&action=view)
Patch to resolve multilib issue
* As we don't ship libpool.a, the part related to libpool.a
can be removed from dotconf-config.in.
* -L%{_libdir} is always unneeded.
The attached patch should resolve multilib issue.
When you modify your spec file, please change the release number
to avoid confusion.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-23 00:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=295663)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295663&action=view) [edit]
> Patch to resolve multilib issue
>
> * As we don't ship libpool.a, the part related to libpool.a
> can be removed from dotconf-config.in.
> * -L%{_libdir} is always unneeded.
>
> The attached patch should resolve multilib issue.
> When you modify your spec file, please change the release number
> to avoid confusion.
SRPM URL:
http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7.src.rpm
SPEC File: http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf.spec
Thanks for the providing the patches. I have uploaded both the patches on the
server (http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/) and all the SRPMs
also. Have removed all the rpmlint errors and incremented the version.
I hope to get this resolved soon..
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-24 09:07 EST --- For 1.0.13-4: * Source tarball - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what is written as %Source: -- -rw--- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 197993 2006-01-27 23:03 dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 200442 2008-02-23 12:58 dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz -- * rpmlint Please check your rpms by rpmlint again? -- dotconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf dotconf.src: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. dotconf.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dotconf-1.0.13/AUTHORS dotconf.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf dotconf.i386: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. dotconf.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0,13.4 1.0.13-4.fc9 -- Summary: - Summary must begin with capital letter. Also, please change the Summary "dot.conf". This Summary description is not useful. - description-line-too-long: -- $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long description-line-too-long : Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding this number, cut it to fit in two lines. -- - AUTHORS file is not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the encoding to UTF-8. - The EVR (epoch-version-release) in %changelog is not right. -- * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0.13-4 - Applied patch macro * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0.13-3 -- Also please insert one line between each %changelog entry. This is useful for Fedora's CVS system. Then, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone NOTE: FE-NEW blockers are now not complete. Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-29 03:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #8) > For 1.0.13-4: > > * Source tarball > - The tarball in your srpm does not coincide with what > is written as %Source: > -- > -rw--- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 197993 2006-01-27 23:03 dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 200442 2008-02-23 12:58 > dotconf-1.0.13-4.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13.tar.gz > -- I manually changed the encoding of AUTHORS and doc/dotconf-features.txt. This was causing teh problem. I have requested to dotconf developer to make in correct in there source file. I have also changed the encoding using iconv. > * rpmlint > Please check your rpms by rpmlint again? > -- > dotconf.src: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf > dotconf.src: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file > parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. > dotconf.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dotconf-1.0.13/AUTHORS > dotconf.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized dot.conf > dotconf.i386: E: description-line-too-long dotconf is a configuration file > parser. These libraries are used by many applications to handle configuration files. > dotconf.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0,13.4 1.0.13-4.fc9 > -- > Summary: > - Summary must begin with capital letter. > Also, please change the Summary "dot.conf". This Summary description > is not useful. > > - description-line-too-long: > -- > $ rpmlint -I description-line-too-long > description-line-too-long : > Your description lines must not exceed 79 characters. If a line is exceeding > this number, cut it to fit in two lines. > -- > >- AUTHORS file is not encoded with UTF-8. Please change the > encoding to UTF-8. > >- The EVR (epoch-version-release) in %changelog is not right. > -- > * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0.13-4 > - Applied patch macro > > * Sat Feb 23 2008 Assim Deodia<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.0.13-3 > -- > Also please insert one line between each %changelog entry. > This is useful for Fedora's CVS system. > > Then, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket: Done All. > - > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. > > Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other > submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. > For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) > are required to "show that you have an understanding > of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described > on : > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored > > Usually there are two ways to show this. > A. submit other review requests with enough quality. > B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request >(at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do >a formal review) Pre-reviewed bug number 435227. I will review more bugs shortly. > Fedora Extras package review requests which are waiting for someone to > review can be checked on: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mtasaka-review-noone This url is not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-29 10:29 EST --- Created an attachment (id=296366) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=296366&action=view) patch for dotconf.m4 to remove warning Almost okay, please fix below. * doc/Makefile* are not needed for %doc * For now when I call autotools, warnings are printed out like: /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_DOTCONF /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal - The attached patch should remove these warnings. * Please change the permission of the tarball in srpm to 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 11:58 EST --- dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 12:08 EST --- I am sorry for the delay. I am having some problem accessing the Internet. > Would you submit a updates request for F-9 on > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ so that speech-dispatcher can be > rebuilt > on F-9? You mean F-8? I have done it requested it. dotconf is already tagged for F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 12:52 EST --- Yes, I meant F-8, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-09 17:48 EST --- dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||1.0.13-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-08 11:07 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-09 06:02 EST --- Created an attachment (id=297351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=297351&action=view) dotconf-1.0.13-m4-underquote.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-09 06:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #11) > ping? Sorry for the late reply. My school exams are going on so I would resume the work on this after the exams. By now i have extended the patch file you have made to remove other underquote errors also but i am not able to make correct this one --- /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_DOTCONF /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/ automake.html#Extending-aclocal --- I am not able to find solution for this. I have attached the extented patch file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-11 12:15 EST --- (In reply to comment #13) > By now i have extended the patch file you have > made to remove other underquote errors also but i am not able to make correct > this one > --- > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of > AM_PATH_DOTCONF > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: or see http://sources.redhat.com/automake/ > automake.html#Extending-aclocal > --- Umm... Actually this _is_ fixed :) Well, - This package itself is okay - Your pre-review seems okay for initial comments -- This package (dotconf) is APPROVED by me -- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 02:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > By now i have extended the patch file you have > > made to remove other underquote errors also but i am not able to make correct > > this one > > --- > > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: warning: underquoted definition of > > AM_PATH_DOTCONF > > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal' > > /usr/share/aclocal/dotconf.m4:5: or see http://sources.redhat.com/ automake/ > > automake.html#Extending-aclocal > > --- > > Umm... Actually this _is_ fixed :) > Well, > - This package itself is okay > - Your pre-review seems okay for initial comments > > -- >This package (dotconf) is APPROVED by me > -- > > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Get a Fedora Account". > At a point a mail should be sent to sponsor members which notifies > that you need a sponsor. At the stage, please also write on > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and > your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. > > If you want to import this package into Fedora 7/8, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). > > If you have questions, please ask me. > > I think they have changed the procedure from what has given on wiki page. There was no option to mail CLA. All I have to do is register there and upload a singed CLA. I have created the account with name "assim", signed the CLA and got my client-side certificate. Is there anyting more I need to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-13 03:31 EST --- FAS sysadmins are now actually changing FAS to new one, which may be related to this. For now new Account System doesn't seem to be working for sponsoring process. So please wait until the problem is solved by FAS sysadmins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-14 02:18 EST --- Perhaps now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "wiki" page again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 00:42 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) > Perhaps now I am sponsoring you. > Please follow "wiki" page again. What I meant is that please follow "Join" wiki page again. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 08:29 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Perhaps now I am sponsoring you. > > Please follow "wiki" page again. > > What I meant is that please follow "Join" wiki page again. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join I didnt get you. In my account it is showing that I have been approved by you for cvsextra and by Jonathan Stanley for fedora bugs. Do you mean to create another account? I tried but couldnt cannot register another account with same EmailID. And links on that page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 08:33 EST --- Sorry the last post got submitted accidentally. Links on that page are still not working. Did you mean to submit package for CVS. I have planned to do that once my school exam gets over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-23 01:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Perhaps now I am sponsoring you. > > Please follow "wiki" page again. > > What I meant is that please follow "Join" wiki page again. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Hi, Sorry for the delay I just got free from my exams. Can you please point me to the next step to get this package approved? do I need to install Build-System Client Tools and proceed further from that point? did I missed something till now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-23 04:36 EST --- (In reply to comment #21) > do I need to install Build-System > Client Tools and proceed further from that point? Yes, exactly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-25 06:17 EST --- If you see some trouble about CVS importint procedure, please let me know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||.com) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 03:17 EST --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |.com) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 07:56 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: Dotconf Short Description: Dotconf is a library used to handle configuration files. Owners: assim Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 11:01 EST --- I am getting this error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .ssh]$ cvs co Dotconf cvs server: cannot find module `Dotconf' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules Tried with 'd' in small caps also. [EMAIL PROTECTED] .ssh]$ cvs co dotconf cvs server: cannot find module `dotconf' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules my keys are same as on the server. Is it that repository is not created on the server?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 11:16 EST --- (In reply to comment #26) > Is it that repository is not created on the server?? Not yet. Please wait until someone changes fedora-cvs flag to plus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 11:31 EST --- CVS is processed manually by CVS admins. ;) Before I process your request: - Shouldn't the package name be 'dotconf' and not 'Dotconf' ? - Shouldn't the description be: "A library used to handle configuration files" Since it's already the description for dotconf, adding the package name there is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 12:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #28) New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dotconf Short Description: A library used to handle configuration files. Owners: assim Branches: OLPC-2 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-04 13:02 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-05 03:05 EST --- Thanks. Have made the builds(OLPC2 and devel). Closed the ticcket as NEXTRELEASE. Is there anything else to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-05 09:38 EST --- No, all you should do is done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-25 09:19 EST --- I received this mail. dotconf has broken dependencies in the development tree: On ppc: dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc9.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig On x86_64: dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc9.x86_64 requires /sbin/ldconfig On i386: dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc9.i386 requires /sbin/ldconfig On ppc64: dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc9.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig On ppc: dotconf-devel-1.0.13-6.fc9.ppc64 requires /bin/sh On x86_64: dotconf-devel-1.0.13-6.fc9.x86_64 requires /bin/sh On i386: dotconf-devel-1.0.13-6.fc9.i386 requires /bin/sh On ppc64: dotconf-devel-1.0.13-6.fc9.ppc64 requires /bin/sh Please resolve this as soon as possible. I havn't build dotconf for these platforms. Do i need to re-build it for all these platforms also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-25 12:59 EST --- (In reply to comment #33) > I received this mail. > > dotconf has broken dependencies in the development tree: > On ppc: >dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc9.ppc64 requires /sbin/ldconfig > Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > I havn't build dotconf for these platforms. Do i need to re-build it for all > these platforms also? Just ignore those. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-May/msg01257.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-28 05:34 EST --- Package Change Request == Package Name: dotconf New Branches: OLPC-3 F-8 F-9 This package is required by speech-dispatcher (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432259) OLPC-3 F-8 and F-9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 00:19 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 07:59 EST --- I am getting this error while performing import of dotconf repository [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ ssh-add --help Enter passphrase for /home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa: Identity added: /home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/Assim/.ssh/id_rsa) Identity added: /home/Assim/.ssh/id_dsa (/home/Assim/.ssh/id_dsa) [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ fedora-cvs dotconf Checking out dotconf from fedora cvs: Error: Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) i have used same keys before also and it has worked. I later found that in FAS account i have uploaded id-dsa key instead of id-rsa. I have replaced it still i am getting same error. have i missed something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 08:13 EST --- Well, first would you try to re-download fedora-upload-ca.cert available from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 and re-run fedora-packager-setup ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-29 11:26 EST --- the error message indicates ssh auth failure. make sure the key you are using is the same as the key you have uploaded to FAS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 01:06 EST --- I downloaded fedora-upload-ca.cert and ran fedora-package-setup. Still I am getting same error. i recently changed the uploaded key. Does system take some time to get it updated? I am using the same id_rsa.pub key which i have uploaded in FAS. I am able to use koji and have build all the packages on it successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 12:34 EST --- (In reply to comment #40) > I am able to use koji and have build all the packages on it successfully. Well, does it mean that you can rebuild dotconf now? (Would you try F-8 branch?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-30 14:39 EST --- > Well, does it mean that you can rebuild dotconf now? (Would you try F-8 > branch?) Yes I just now tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ koji build --scratch dist-f8 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm Uploading srpm: /home/Assim/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm [] 100% 00:03:53 199.38 Kb 873.48 B/sec Created task: 687799 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=687799 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687802 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687800 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687803 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687801 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 687801 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, x86_64): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 1 done 0 failed 687802 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 2 done 0 failed 687803 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc1.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 3 done 0 failed 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 4 done 0 failed 687800 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 687799 build (dist-f8, dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 06:05 EST --- Okay, then would you try to build F-8 and devel branch (not by scratch)? Also, for F-9/F-8 branches, please visit https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and submit a push request to repositories. Then you can close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 08:07 EST --- I tried building without scratch and this is the error i got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ koji build dist-f8 ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc7.src.rpm Usage: koji build [options] target URL (Specify the --help global option for a list of other help options) koji: error: Destination tag dist-f8 is locked I generated new keys and tried everything again. Still no change.. Seems like there is some problem in my sshd. When i try to run it in debug mode it fails to run and gives this error : Bind to port 22 on :: failed: Address already in use. Is it cause of this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-01 09:18 EST --- No, as you did on F-9 branch, follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/UpdatingPackageHowTo or from "Import Your Package" of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-02 10:37 EST --- While building I got two errors 1) for devel branch i got this error(I am pasting complete log): --- Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 692161 build (dist-f10, devel:dotconf-1_0_13-6_fc10): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 692162 buildSRPMFromSCM (noarch): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 692162 buildSRPMFromSCM (noarch): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 692165 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, i386): free 692163 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): free 692166 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free 692164 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 692165 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, i386): free -> open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 692163 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): free -> open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) 692166 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): free -> open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) 692164 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, x86_64): open (x86-2.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 4 open 2 done 0 failed 692165 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, i386): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 3 open 3 done 0 failed 692163 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc): open (ppc4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 2 open 4 done 0 failed 692166 buildArch (dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc10.src.rpm, ppc64): open (ppc3.fedora.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: error building package (arch ppc64), mock exited with status 1 0 free 1 open 4 done 1 failed 692161 build (dist-f10, devel:dotconf-1_0_13-6_fc10): open (xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildrootError: error building package (arch ppc64), mock exited with status 1 0 free 0 open 4 done 2 failed 692161 build (dist-f10, devel:dotconf-1_0_13-6_fc10) failed make: *** [koji] Error 1 --- I am not able to find any thing related to this error. 2) While building for F-8 it gave me error that this has already been build. F-8 and OLPC-3 has been build successfully. I forgot to paste the changelog in some of the branches. Is it possible to rectify it? Do I need to update this package to Bodhi also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-02 11:30 EST --- Thanks. I hope speech-dispatcher can be build safely on these branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-02 11:49 EST --- (In reply to comment #46) > While building I got two errors > > 1) for devel branch i got this error(I am pasting complete log): > I am not able to find any thing related to this error. As you saw it, I've fixed this error. If you are using 2) While building for F-8 it gave me error that this has already been build. Perhaps you meant for F-9. > I forgot to paste the changelog in some of the branches. Is it possible to > rectify it? Please fix it in next update. > Do I need to update this package to Bodhi also? For F-8, you have to submit a request to push to stable on bodhi. (In reply to comment #47) > Thanks. You are welcome :) > I hope speech-dispatcher can be build safely on these branches For F-8, speech-dispatcher cannot be built unless dotconf is pushed to stable repository. If Hemant want to build speech-dispatcher on F-8 in a hurry, please ask rel-eng team (rel-eng_AT_fedoraproject.org) to tag dotconf-1.0.13-6.fc8 as dist-f8-override. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords||Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-07 02:48 EST --- Would you submit a updates request for F-9 on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ so that speech-dispatcher can be rebuilt on F-9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 433253] Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
