[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-12 14:27:02 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-12 14:21:11 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-03 11:09:39 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Lucian Langa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-03 11:03:02 EDT --- xpsk31-1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-03 00:07:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:29 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:02 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: xpsk31 Short Description: GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 for Ham Radio Owners: lucilanga,bjensen Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 06:01 EST --- > The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version > 1.2 > that builds with the same spec and patches Verified building with 1.2, I will initial import the newer version and contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 05:33 EST --- The source tarball is a 404, again, and it seems upstream has a new version 1.2 that builds with the same spec and patches RPM Lint: OK, silent Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK, GPLv2+ Actual License: OK, no license file but code says GPLv2+ %doc License: No, license is in the code Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: Upstream tarball disappears when new version is released. Newer version 1.2 builds with the same spec and the same patches, so no problem. Might wanna contact upstream to make them have the tarballs around a little longer though. Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: OK - rawhide: OK - EL-5: OK Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK package approved in principle, but you might want to bump the version and contact upstream about the disappearing tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |g) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 04:31 EST --- Hello, I'm taking over this review request because bob has some problems I've corrected spec file and bumped version new files: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xpsk31.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/xpsk31-0.8-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||g) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 07:23 EST --- Changing status to NEEDINFO from Reporter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-02 10:03 EST --- Fails on missing po/Makefile.in.in: == configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating src/Makefile config.status: error: cannot find input file: po/Makefile.in.in error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91780 (%build) == -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-02 10:02 EST --- Koji build on dist-f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=484167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-01 06:07 EST --- I tried to update this package and ran in to problems. I will try again and collect the build log if someone does not beat me to is. Spec URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SPECS/xpsk31.spec SRPM URL: http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/hams/SRPMS/xpsk31-0.8-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-29 17:48 EST --- I am going to stall this review for a couple days, Upstream has other related packages I would like to also get in to the review process, they all will need similar fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-29 01:45 EST --- Some pre-review pointers:- - Use of make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" is recommended as it keeps the timestamps on installed files. This is useful for recent autotools based make file. - INSTALL file is not required in %doc section as it is used to install from the source. RPM installation does not require INSTALL file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |g) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-28 18:34 EST --- Upstream apparently deletes old source, the new source will require a version bump http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/psk31/xpsk31/xpsk31-0.8.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435227] Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xpsk31 - GTK+ graphical version of lpsk31 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435227 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||fedora-review?, ||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] ||g) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-28 18:29 EST --- Source0 is a 404: http://5b4az.chronos.org.uk/pkg/psk31/xpsk31/xpsk31-0.7.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
