[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 07:42:51 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: squirrel New Branches: EL-5 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-11-25 11:52:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-03 03:34 EST --- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-03 03:33 EST --- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE Fixed In Version||2.2.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-01 05:40 EST --- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-01 05:39 EST --- squirrel-2.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-31 04:59 EST --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming
language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-31 09:15 EST ---
Full review done:
SHOULD FIX
--
* Use standard (and actually working, unlike the current) sf.net download url
of:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/squirrel/squirrel_%{version}.stable.tar.gz
* You currently give README HISTORY and COPYRIGHT the timestamp of the COMPILE
for
for HISTORY this is different from the original timestamp of HISTORY and in
future upstream releases chances are good the timestamps differ even more.
Instead you should make backups while sed-ing using sed -i.orig and then
use the .orig files as source for restoring the timestamps.
No blockers, approved!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-31 09:50 EST --- Thanks for the review. ad 1 - my mistake - the releases are squirrel_X.Y.stable.tar.gz and squirrel_X.Y.Z_stable.tar.gz (and the spec in fact originated in version 2.1.1) ad 2 - thanks for the hint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-31 09:52 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: squirrel Short Description: High level imperative/OO programming language Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-31 19:18 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-28 01:58 EST --- Looks like my webhosting changed their setup, I will fix it later today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-27 15:16 EST --- Hmm, spec SRPM url's don't seem to be valid. Do you still wish for this to be submitted to Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-28 03:48 EST --- Updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/squirrel-2.2-2.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Apr 27 2008 Dan Horak dan[at]danny.cz 2.2-2 - enable parallel make - add missing %%defattr for subpackages - preserve timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 442280] Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming language
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: squirrel - high level imperative/OO programming
language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442280
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-04-27 08:38 EST ---
There are a couple of small changes that you should make to the spec:
* your build section does not make use of the SMP flags (see
Packaging/Guidelines#parallelmake); fixable by adding %{?_smp_mflags} to the
make line in %build
* preserving timestamps; partially fixable by adding INSTALL=install -p to
the %make install line in %install; this will the timestamps for files
included in squirrel-devel and squirrel-debuginfo. A nice touch would be to use
touch -r in order to also preserve preserve the timestamps of the 3 files
modified via sed (in %prep)
* Each %files section should have a %defattr line
(wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
