[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 02:35:31 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-01 02:43:06 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:03:32 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyvnc2swf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-11 13:19:09 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pyvnc2swf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7983 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 10:16:06 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-07 10:16:11 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-05 12:42:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #14 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-04 19:05:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: pyvnc2swf Short Description: Vnc screen recorder Owners: dtimms Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #13 from Michel Alexandre Salim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 02:29:41 EDT --- Everything looks clear here; approving. Sorry for the delay! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201
--- Comment #12 from David Timms [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-15 23:25:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #11)
Created an attachment (id=314363)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314363) [details]
Updated spec fixing absolute symlinks
Thanks Paul. I wondered if there is a simpler way to implement this so that
rpmlint is happy, and spot gave another suggestion.
In fact, it was what I originally implemented, and caused the lint error that I
thought meant the method should not be used. Changing to cd to the link
destination dir, then ln to the source{target} {although I understand would
make the same link}, means that rpmlint has no qualms with the method, without
the need to use symlinks.
Updated: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec
SRPM:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm
- fix rpmlint W: symlink-should-be-relative
- mod to use file exclude for the recordwin scripts
rpmlint --info /home/davidt/rpmbuild/SRPMS/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.src.rpm
/home/davidt/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9.noarch.rpm
pyvnc2swf.spec
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #11 from Paul Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 20:01:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314363) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314363) Updated spec fixing absolute symlinks The symlinks program is failing to convert your absolute symlink to a relative one because, although your absolute symlink is correctly formed in the package, it's dangling within the buildroot. If you're intending to use the symlinks program, you need to generate your absolute symlink such that the target is also within the buildroot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-15 10:36 EST --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MUST, needs work: • rpmlint: using rm in %preun. See below • license field accurate: from the headers, this should be GPLv2+ not GPLv2 • own all directories: need to Require: hicolor-icon-theme for app icon SHOULD, needs work: • scriplets are sane: using rm in %preun. Does not seem to be necessary, as the files removed are listed in the package manifest (rpm -ql) and thus are removed automatically MUST, OK: • package name • spec file name • package guideline-compliant • license complies with guidelines • license file not deleted • spec in US English • spec legible • source matches upstream: MD5 e871d134420867438cadd1f6320072f0 • builds under = 1 archs, others excluded: noarch, builds • build dependencies complete: yes • no dupes in %files • permission • %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT • macros used consistently • Package contains code • doc not runtime dependent • desktop file uses desktop-file-install • clean buildroot before install • filenames UTF-8 SHOULD, OK: • package build in mock on all architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=717372 • package functioned as described: yes • require package not files -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkh8tc8ACgkQWt0J3fd+7ZAI5QCfRvPiBOLdA+1yRY6yfetRFpJ9 fh4AnjCA5F8CTGVQCyrJBKaGZzyoM+Ki =jkzQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-15 19:14 EST --- Created an attachment (id=311894) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=311894action=view) diff between last .spec and this updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-3.fc9.src.rpm - del preun symbolic link removes - already done by files section - add Requires hicolor-icon-theme, so that icon dir is owned correctly - fix license tag to GPLv2+ since sources say: or later version - fix some comments spelling $ rpmlint SRPMS/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint --info RPMS/noarch/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-3.fc9.noarch.rpm pyvnc2swf.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/vnc2swf /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. pyvnc2swf.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/vnc2swf-edit /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/edit.py Absolute symlinks are problematic eg. when working with chroot environments. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Michel: I did a bit of a search on absolute symlinks, and tried to make such using symlinks -cs: http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/25 , but that didn't resolve the rpm warning. Do you know if this is considered normal to ignore, or can you point to a way to resolve it ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-21 02:01 EST ---
The Bash trick should really be unnecessary: your package is noarch, so even on
64-bit systems the files will be in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/... , never
/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y/... . The invocation you're using actually returns
/usr/lib64 on 64-bit systems, which is not where your files end up installed.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python:
It might be a good idea to generate the wrapper script during the packaging
process, though:
Put this at the top of the specfile:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
(note: not get_python_lib(1) which gives you the arch-specific directory)
%install
...
cat $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/vnc2swf-edit EOF
exec python %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/edit.py $@
EOF
But do you really need to do this? edit.py works just fine if you symlink it.
Likewise with vnc2swf itself. I'd suggest just symlinking them all to /usr/bin.
Could not reproduce the ImportError you're getting -- movie comes from pyvnc2swf
so I'm not sure why you're getting that. Is that from *after* you install the
RPM or before?
Note that the recordwin script has, hardbaked into it, x11vnc and xwininfo.
x11vnc is part of libvncserver, but apparently it's not shipped in the Fedora
package at all. You might want to file a bug asking for it to be included, and
meanwhile, %exclude %{_bindir}/recordwin.sh from the %files section?
edit.py throws some exceptions if called without the right arguments; you might
want to fix the code path so that if any argument is missing, it exits after
displaying the error messages rather than attempting (futilely) to continue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-21 08:40 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
The Bash trick should really be unnecessary: your package is noarch, so even
on
64-bit systems the files will be in /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/... , never
/usr/lib64/pythonX.Y/... . The invocation you're using actually returns
OK, I reread the Packaging/Python info, and see where it's coming from: I
thought that %sitelib would be /usr/lib64 on x86_64, but as you mention this is
noarch.
Put this at the top of the specfile:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib())}
Updated the sitelib assignment.
But do you really need to do this? edit.py works just fine if you symlink it.
Likewise with vnc2swf itself. I'd suggest just symlinking them all to
/usr/bin.
OK. Without the need to determine the final arch specific location of the *.py,
yes, I can simply use a symlink, done for the 3x command line tools.
Could not reproduce the ImportError you're getting -- movie comes from
pyvnc2swf
so I'm not sure why you're getting that. Is that from *after* you install the
RPM or before?
Here is a test case:
1. vncserver :1
2. vnc2swf
3. options|server|localhost:1
4. start
5. stop
6. save as test.swf
7. exit
8. vnc2swf-play test.swf
result:
vnc2swf-play ~/dev/pytest.swf
Using pygame 1.7.1release
Input movie: version=5, size=1024x768, framerate=12fps, frames=187,
duration=15.6s.
Output movie size: 1024x768
Scanning source swf file: /home/davidt/dev/pytest.swf...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/vnc2swf-play, line 267, in module
play(args, info, debug=debug)
File /usr/bin/vnc2swf-play, line 234, in play
PygameMoviePlayer(movie, debug=debug).play()
File /usr/bin/vnc2swf-play, line 165, in play
self.builder.start()
File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/output.py, line 942, in
start
self.stream.open()
File /usr/bin/vnc2swf-play, line 79, in open
import pymedia
ImportError: No module named pymedia
===
Since fedora now has a flash player, I removed the play.py script and symlink.
Note that the recordwin script has, hardbaked into it, x11vnc and xwininfo.
x11vnc is part of libvncserver, but apparently it's not shipped in the Fedora
package at all. You might want to file a bug asking for it to be included, and
meanwhile, %exclude %{_bindir}/recordwin.sh from the %files section?
Yes, disabled recordwin for now. It looks to me like x11vnc is a separate part
of the libvncserver project:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=32584
edit.py throws some exceptions if called without the right arguments; you
might
want to fix the code path so that if any argument is missing, it exits after
displaying the error messages rather than attempting (futilely) to continue.
Created a patch that changes the return into a sys.exit. This seems to work well
to show the usage and exit at that point.
updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec
src.rpm:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-2.fc9.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-13 07:19 EST --- (In reply to comment #5) Which method is considered most appropriate for making these tools easily usable ?: - bash script - exec python the tool path I asked on fedora-list, and received a tip that I can use a bash script to invoke python to get the site-lib directory, and then exec the required .py within that path. Updated: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-1.fc9.src.rpm That hopefully covers all the reviewer notes so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 22:54 EST --- Created an attachment (id=308584) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=308584action=view) attempt at wrapper script (In reply to comment #4) Requires: on python unnecessary (automatically picked up by RPM, in a stricter form: python(abi) = 2.5 Thanks, done. Missing Requires: on pygame (used in image.py and play.py, listed on website) Done. The optional pymedia would seem to use mpeg libraries, and hence isn't in fedora, and can't be required. The debug lines are harmless. debuginfo packages are only automatically generated for C/C++ applications. OK. In %changelog, you mean to say using desktop-file-install to install desktop file, not to install an icon, right? Yes, I see what you mean and updated that changelog line. Looks like your other questions have been answered on fedora-devel, but do ask if you have any other question. For my purposes, the .desktop pointing to the site-packages path starts the gui app fine. None of the 3x tool work from the command line: * vnc2swf.py - Recorder * edit.py - Movie editor (This is NOT a general SWF file editor. It only supports movies generated by vnc2swf.) * play.py - Simple movie viewer Which method is considered most appropriate for making these tools easily usable ?: - bash script - exec python the tool path - python script - to retrieve the correct 32/64 bit path, and invoke. - adding *.pth to the site-packages directory - moving these three .py scripts to /usr/bin/ I have attached my attempt, but this is unsuccessful; since the pymedia is not found the wrapper bombs out with: ./vnc2swf libpath=/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf Traceback (most recent call last): File ./vnc2swf, line 35, in module execfile(get_python_lib() + /pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py) File /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyvnc2swf/vnc2swf.py, line 32, in module from movie import SWFInfo ImportError: No module named movie Any ideas on how to ignore the import - and why when vnc2swf.py is called directly, that it works, even without pymedia installed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-05 16:51 EST --- Requires: on python unnecessary (automatically picked up by RPM, in a stricter form: python(abi) = 2.5 Missing Requires: on pygame (used in image.py and play.py, listed on website) The debug lines are harmless. debuginfo packages are only automatically generated for C/C++ applications. In %changelog, you mean to say using desktop-file-install to install desktop file, not to install an icon, right? Looks like your other questions have been answered on fedora-devel, but do ask if you have any other question. Awaiting updated SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-24 07:22 EST --- 1. I'm not sure about, during rpmbuild: + desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /var/tmp/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-0.1.fc9-root-davidt/usr/share/applications /home/davidt/src/redhat/SOURCES/pyvnc2swf.desktop + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh /home/davidt/src/redhat/BUILD/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3 find: debug: No such file or directory + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot is that a problem, that I can do something about ? 2. The packages includes 2 other command line tools, but I haven't wrapped them or anything else, and hence they aren't easily acceptable. I asked a while ago: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-May/msg00351.html and saw: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2006-December/msg00356.html but wondered if there is a clear guideline on the best way to handle the app not being on he normal path ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-24 22:43 EST --- Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf.spec SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/pyvnc2swf/pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-0.2.fc9.src.rpm Updated package to fix missing BR: desktop-file-utils scratch build now succeeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-24 22:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) or anything else, and hence they aren't easily acceptable. I asked a while ago: accessible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
